Doc Mercer
EOG Master
Re: Famous Americans questioning 911 and calling it a scam
<big><big>/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Describes Having Seen Global Hawk *PIC*</big></big>
<center><center><script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-1310173801262266"; google_ad_width = 728; google_ad_height = 90; google_ad_format = "728x90_as"; google_ad_type = "text_image"; google_ad_channel =""; google_color_border = "CCCCCC"; google_color_link = "0000FF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_text = "000000"; google_color_url = "008000"; //--></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script><iframe name="google_ads_frame" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-1310173801262266&dt=1175389445718&lmt=1175389445&format=728x90_as&output=html&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rumormillnews.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fforum.cgi%3Fnoframes%3Bread%3D90745&color_bg=FFFFFF&color_text=000000&color_link=0000FF&color_url=008000&color_border=CCCCCC&ad_type=text_image&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dbogus%2Bpentagon%2B9-11%2Beyewitnesses%26btnG%3DSearch&cc=18&u_h=768&u_w=1024&u_ah=740&u_aw=1024&u_cd=16&u_tz=-300&u_his=34&u_java=true&u_nplug=25&u_nmime=104" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="90" scrolling="no" width="728"></iframe> </center>[SIZE=-2]
Got some ideas you'd like to ad[/SIZE]
</center>
<big><big>/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Describes Having Seen Global Hawk *PIC*</big></big>
Posted By: <big>ChristopherBollyn</big>
Date: Monday, 17 July 2006, 6:58 p.m.
Date: Monday, 17 July 2006, 6:58 p.m.
PENTAGON EYEWITNESS DEBUNKS OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY
Civilian Pilot Saw Global Hawk and Control Plane
Christopher Bollyn
An eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forward with an astonishing account that debunks the official 9/11 story and corroborates the hypothesis that an unmanned – and weaponized – Global Hawk drone was involved in the attack.
Nearly 5 years after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, an eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forth with testimony, which, if accurate, completely debunks the official version that a hijacked Boeing 757 flew into the 5-sided military fortress housing the U.S. Department of Defense.
Samuel D. Danner, a civilian pilot and electrical engineer from Hagerstown, Maryland, says he was trying to get out of Washington on the morning of 9/11 after hearing of the attacks on the World Trade Center. Having made a wrong turn, Danner wound up heading south on Washington Blvd. (Virginia Highway 27), the highway that passes alongside the western side of the Pentagon. It was from the shoulder of Highway 27, across from the Pentagon, that Danner says he observed the approaching aircraft involved in the attack.
Danner's eyewitness account corroborates the theory that an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), known as Global Hawk, was flown by remote control into the newly renovated section of the Pentagon, the fortress of the Department of War that was built on a low lying area formerly known as Hell's Bottom. Although Danner's testimony is unique in its detail and description of the aircraft, it is supported by an abundance of photographic evidence and numerous statements made by other eyewitnesses.
Now a multi-billion dollar defense project involving contractors like L3 Communications Titan Group, Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., and Raytheon, the Global Hawk is a 44-foot long jet-powered surveillance UAV with a 116 foot wing span that can fly 12,000 miles at an altitude of 65,000 feet at 400 miles per hour. At the time of the attack, however, the U.S. Air Force had only 6 Global Hawks in service. Two of the original Global Hawks reportedly crashed, one at China Lake, California, another "somewhere overseas," according to a spokesman at Edwards Air Force Base where the aircraft is tested.
"Two Global Hawk crashes occurred in the Central Command Area of Operation, which is Southwest Asia," a spokesman for the U.S.A.F. later told AFP. "Both these crashes occurred during support for Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, which started after September 11th," he added.
The evidence supporting the theory that a Global Hawk was flown into the Pentagon by remote control has been investigated by this writer in American Free Press. While Danner's testimony corroborates this hypothesis, which is supported by evidence, there is not a single piece of evidence, physical or photographic in the public domain to support the government version that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon.
Danner, who was diagnosed with a form of lymphoma in September 2004, contacted 9/11 researcher Eric Hufschmid, author of Painful Questions, on June 29. Hufschmid, who works closely with this author, provided Danner's contact information.
Danner's initial wide-ranging two-hour conversation with Hufschmid is available online at www.erichufschmid.net.
Asked why he finally decided to come forth with his ground-breaking testimony, Danner told AFP, "It's been bugging me."
Danner said his son had shown him the 9/11 video called Loose Change by Dylan Avery on the Internet. "It made so much sense to me," Danner said. "It got me upset, in a good sense, in a patriotic sense. I asked myself why I didn't come out with this earlier?"
Danner told AFP that being a 53-year old lymphoma patient going through chemotherapy had motivated him to come forward with his testimony. Since coming forward with his account, Danner has been the guest on several of Michael C. Piper's radio programs on Republic Broadcasting Network, which are archived at http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper06.html
Piper's first show with Sam Danner set a record for the number of listeners at RBN.
"A BIG BOGUS LIE"
The government version that a Boeing 757 hijacked by Arabs hit the Pentagon is "a big bogus lie," Danner says. About the five video frames released by the government and the official explanation, Danner says: "That's a lie if I ever saw one. The American people need to know."
"It was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon," Danner told AFP, "No way." In fact, Danner's description of the aircraft that struck the Pentagon fits precisely with that of a Global Hawk, a relatively unknown UAV which was still being tested in 2001.
Danner, a certified pilot who no longer flies due to his illness, has had a lifelong interest in aircraft, both military and civilian, and has attended military air shows at Andrews AFB outside Washington. "I like airplanes," Danner says, and his ability to identify aircraft quickly and accurately is central to the credibility of his testimony. He was, however, not familiar with the Global Hawk at the time.
As he drove south on the west side of the Pentagon shortly after 9:30 a.m. on 9/11, Danner noticed a strange object in the air. He noticed that other drivers were also distracted by the object, which he described as an unidentified flying object (UFO). Danner pulled over on the right hand shoulder, stopped his car, and got out to observe the approaching aircraft. From this position, with the Pentagon on his left, he recalled his observations of the aircraft he says struck the Pentagon.
Danner described the UFO as a white aircraft, without any cockpit or fuselage windows, which came at him very fast. It was "bigger than a Gulfstream 300," he said, and had only one engine located on the rear section between a V tail, which reminded him of a Beechcraft Bonanza. The aircraft had a "funny looking front" with the shape of "a humpback whale," he said.
He saw the aircraft finish a tight descending turn to the right as it approached the Pentagon. As it leveled off just off the ground he said he heard "a high pitched whine" as the single engine aircraft "spooled up."
"It was real low," he said as it turned and dove toward the Pentagon over the highway cloverleaf southwest of the Pentagon. Danner said the aircraft had approached from the north and had made a 270 degree turn done while descending.
"It looked like it was under perfect control," Danner said, adding that he did not see any windows on the cockpit or the fuselage. Danner estimated that the aircraft was traveling about 200 mph as it made the tight turn and then accelerated as it leveled out and aimed itself at the Pentagon.
The engine configuration reminded Danner of an older Boeing 727, which has a turbine jet engine located on the back of the plane above the fuselage. "That was the only engine I saw," Danner said, "there was none affixed to any fore or aft wings.
"It had a V tail," Danner told AFP, "it had a Bonanza V tail."
Danner, who estimates that he was less than 500 feet from the path of this aircraft, noted that it was very quiet: "There wasn't the roar noise that you get with a jet at full throttle. This thing knew how to fly quietly – I mean I could hear the whine and I knew it was jet powered." Danner's description of the aircraft's small size is confirmed by early eyewitness reports. One witness, Steve Riskus, has previously confirmed to AFP that the plane was very quiet.
SECOND PLANE
"There was a four-engine jet above us," Danner said, which looked to him like a Boeing 707 or a DC-8 at about 15,000 feet.
He said this plane may have been controlling the windowless drone by "flying it by camera." Danner noticed that people at the Pentagon were aware of this plane overhead.
Danner said he had contacted some of the people he met on the lawn of the Pentagon to encourage them to come forward with their testimony.
BRILLIANT WHITE FLASH
Danner says the aircraft flew with remarkable precision as it leveled off and went right into the southwestern facade of the Pentagon. The impact created a "brilliant white flash" that he described as "a phosphorous kind of flash." This suggests the UAV carried high energy explosives or a depleted uranium (DU) missile. If a DU missile was used, this could explain the source of Danner's lymphoma. If he was contaminated by DU at the Pentagon crash site, the other people in the proximity would also have been affected.
Wearing his emergency medical technician (EMT) shirt that he carried in his car, Danner went directly to the crash site expecting to find wreckage, debris, wounded and dead. "I didn't find anything," Danner says. "I was there to rescue, but there were no bodies and no substantial pieces of wreckage."
Rather than finding wreckage of a Boeing 757, passengers and luggage, Danner found "a bunch of sheet metal" and a bent and damaged 3-foot engine that was missing its turbine blades.
Danner said he stood two feet away from the 3-foot engine that this writer investigated in a series of articles in 2003. The engine was found about 25 feet from the exterior wall and appears to have bounced off the two-foot thick limestone-clad wall.
See: The Truth Seeker - 911 Pentagon Photo Show Mystery Engine Part
At the scene of the crash Danner recalls smelling gun powder or cordite. The white flash he saw suggests that the aircraft was weaponized with a missile. A DU missile launched as the aircraft approached the building would explain the brilliant white flash, the hole pierced through three rings of the Pentagon, and the huge explosion.
Later, Danner participated in the retrieval of small pieces of the aircraft from the lawn with Pentagon personnel. He said he found small pieces of shredded aluminum and bits of carbon fiber and polymer resins. The Global Hawk has an aluminum fuselage and carbon fiber wings. "We were told to pick up every piece of debris," Danner said, which they put into trash bags.
Danner said the scene felt more like a crime scene than a crash scene and he was mystified by the way the evidence was being removed rather than flagged and documented.
Finis
Photo: The Global Hawk - Was this the "humpback whale" shaped windowless UFO that Sam Danner saw pulling a tight turn and flying into the Pentagon - with a depleted uranium tipped missle in the payload?
Civilian Pilot Saw Global Hawk and Control Plane
Christopher Bollyn
An eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forward with an astonishing account that debunks the official 9/11 story and corroborates the hypothesis that an unmanned – and weaponized – Global Hawk drone was involved in the attack.
Nearly 5 years after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, an eyewitness from the Pentagon has come forth with testimony, which, if accurate, completely debunks the official version that a hijacked Boeing 757 flew into the 5-sided military fortress housing the U.S. Department of Defense.
Samuel D. Danner, a civilian pilot and electrical engineer from Hagerstown, Maryland, says he was trying to get out of Washington on the morning of 9/11 after hearing of the attacks on the World Trade Center. Having made a wrong turn, Danner wound up heading south on Washington Blvd. (Virginia Highway 27), the highway that passes alongside the western side of the Pentagon. It was from the shoulder of Highway 27, across from the Pentagon, that Danner says he observed the approaching aircraft involved in the attack.
Danner's eyewitness account corroborates the theory that an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), known as Global Hawk, was flown by remote control into the newly renovated section of the Pentagon, the fortress of the Department of War that was built on a low lying area formerly known as Hell's Bottom. Although Danner's testimony is unique in its detail and description of the aircraft, it is supported by an abundance of photographic evidence and numerous statements made by other eyewitnesses.
Now a multi-billion dollar defense project involving contractors like L3 Communications Titan Group, Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., and Raytheon, the Global Hawk is a 44-foot long jet-powered surveillance UAV with a 116 foot wing span that can fly 12,000 miles at an altitude of 65,000 feet at 400 miles per hour. At the time of the attack, however, the U.S. Air Force had only 6 Global Hawks in service. Two of the original Global Hawks reportedly crashed, one at China Lake, California, another "somewhere overseas," according to a spokesman at Edwards Air Force Base where the aircraft is tested.
"Two Global Hawk crashes occurred in the Central Command Area of Operation, which is Southwest Asia," a spokesman for the U.S.A.F. later told AFP. "Both these crashes occurred during support for Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom, which started after September 11th," he added.
The evidence supporting the theory that a Global Hawk was flown into the Pentagon by remote control has been investigated by this writer in American Free Press. While Danner's testimony corroborates this hypothesis, which is supported by evidence, there is not a single piece of evidence, physical or photographic in the public domain to support the government version that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon.
Danner, who was diagnosed with a form of lymphoma in September 2004, contacted 9/11 researcher Eric Hufschmid, author of Painful Questions, on June 29. Hufschmid, who works closely with this author, provided Danner's contact information.
Danner's initial wide-ranging two-hour conversation with Hufschmid is available online at www.erichufschmid.net.
Asked why he finally decided to come forth with his ground-breaking testimony, Danner told AFP, "It's been bugging me."
Danner said his son had shown him the 9/11 video called Loose Change by Dylan Avery on the Internet. "It made so much sense to me," Danner said. "It got me upset, in a good sense, in a patriotic sense. I asked myself why I didn't come out with this earlier?"
Danner told AFP that being a 53-year old lymphoma patient going through chemotherapy had motivated him to come forward with his testimony. Since coming forward with his account, Danner has been the guest on several of Michael C. Piper's radio programs on Republic Broadcasting Network, which are archived at http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper06.html
Piper's first show with Sam Danner set a record for the number of listeners at RBN.
"A BIG BOGUS LIE"
The government version that a Boeing 757 hijacked by Arabs hit the Pentagon is "a big bogus lie," Danner says. About the five video frames released by the government and the official explanation, Danner says: "That's a lie if I ever saw one. The American people need to know."
"It was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon," Danner told AFP, "No way." In fact, Danner's description of the aircraft that struck the Pentagon fits precisely with that of a Global Hawk, a relatively unknown UAV which was still being tested in 2001.
Danner, a certified pilot who no longer flies due to his illness, has had a lifelong interest in aircraft, both military and civilian, and has attended military air shows at Andrews AFB outside Washington. "I like airplanes," Danner says, and his ability to identify aircraft quickly and accurately is central to the credibility of his testimony. He was, however, not familiar with the Global Hawk at the time.
As he drove south on the west side of the Pentagon shortly after 9:30 a.m. on 9/11, Danner noticed a strange object in the air. He noticed that other drivers were also distracted by the object, which he described as an unidentified flying object (UFO). Danner pulled over on the right hand shoulder, stopped his car, and got out to observe the approaching aircraft. From this position, with the Pentagon on his left, he recalled his observations of the aircraft he says struck the Pentagon.
Danner described the UFO as a white aircraft, without any cockpit or fuselage windows, which came at him very fast. It was "bigger than a Gulfstream 300," he said, and had only one engine located on the rear section between a V tail, which reminded him of a Beechcraft Bonanza. The aircraft had a "funny looking front" with the shape of "a humpback whale," he said.
He saw the aircraft finish a tight descending turn to the right as it approached the Pentagon. As it leveled off just off the ground he said he heard "a high pitched whine" as the single engine aircraft "spooled up."
"It was real low," he said as it turned and dove toward the Pentagon over the highway cloverleaf southwest of the Pentagon. Danner said the aircraft had approached from the north and had made a 270 degree turn done while descending.
"It looked like it was under perfect control," Danner said, adding that he did not see any windows on the cockpit or the fuselage. Danner estimated that the aircraft was traveling about 200 mph as it made the tight turn and then accelerated as it leveled out and aimed itself at the Pentagon.
The engine configuration reminded Danner of an older Boeing 727, which has a turbine jet engine located on the back of the plane above the fuselage. "That was the only engine I saw," Danner said, "there was none affixed to any fore or aft wings.
"It had a V tail," Danner told AFP, "it had a Bonanza V tail."
Danner, who estimates that he was less than 500 feet from the path of this aircraft, noted that it was very quiet: "There wasn't the roar noise that you get with a jet at full throttle. This thing knew how to fly quietly – I mean I could hear the whine and I knew it was jet powered." Danner's description of the aircraft's small size is confirmed by early eyewitness reports. One witness, Steve Riskus, has previously confirmed to AFP that the plane was very quiet.
SECOND PLANE
"There was a four-engine jet above us," Danner said, which looked to him like a Boeing 707 or a DC-8 at about 15,000 feet.
He said this plane may have been controlling the windowless drone by "flying it by camera." Danner noticed that people at the Pentagon were aware of this plane overhead.
Danner said he had contacted some of the people he met on the lawn of the Pentagon to encourage them to come forward with their testimony.
BRILLIANT WHITE FLASH
Danner says the aircraft flew with remarkable precision as it leveled off and went right into the southwestern facade of the Pentagon. The impact created a "brilliant white flash" that he described as "a phosphorous kind of flash." This suggests the UAV carried high energy explosives or a depleted uranium (DU) missile. If a DU missile was used, this could explain the source of Danner's lymphoma. If he was contaminated by DU at the Pentagon crash site, the other people in the proximity would also have been affected.
Wearing his emergency medical technician (EMT) shirt that he carried in his car, Danner went directly to the crash site expecting to find wreckage, debris, wounded and dead. "I didn't find anything," Danner says. "I was there to rescue, but there were no bodies and no substantial pieces of wreckage."
Rather than finding wreckage of a Boeing 757, passengers and luggage, Danner found "a bunch of sheet metal" and a bent and damaged 3-foot engine that was missing its turbine blades.
Danner said he stood two feet away from the 3-foot engine that this writer investigated in a series of articles in 2003. The engine was found about 25 feet from the exterior wall and appears to have bounced off the two-foot thick limestone-clad wall.
See: The Truth Seeker - 911 Pentagon Photo Show Mystery Engine Part
At the scene of the crash Danner recalls smelling gun powder or cordite. The white flash he saw suggests that the aircraft was weaponized with a missile. A DU missile launched as the aircraft approached the building would explain the brilliant white flash, the hole pierced through three rings of the Pentagon, and the huge explosion.
Later, Danner participated in the retrieval of small pieces of the aircraft from the lawn with Pentagon personnel. He said he found small pieces of shredded aluminum and bits of carbon fiber and polymer resins. The Global Hawk has an aluminum fuselage and carbon fiber wings. "We were told to pick up every piece of debris," Danner said, which they put into trash bags.
Danner said the scene felt more like a crime scene than a crash scene and he was mystified by the way the evidence was being removed rather than flagged and documented.
Finis
Photo: The Global Hawk - Was this the "humpback whale" shaped windowless UFO that Sam Danner saw pulling a tight turn and flying into the Pentagon - with a depleted uranium tipped missle in the payload?
<center><center><script type="text/javascript"><!-- google_ad_client = "pub-1310173801262266"; google_ad_width = 728; google_ad_height = 90; google_ad_format = "728x90_as"; google_ad_type = "text_image"; google_ad_channel =""; google_color_border = "CCCCCC"; google_color_link = "0000FF"; google_color_bg = "FFFFFF"; google_color_text = "000000"; google_color_url = "008000"; //--></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script><iframe name="google_ads_frame" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-1310173801262266&dt=1175389445718&lmt=1175389445&format=728x90_as&output=html&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rumormillnews.com%2Fcgi-bin%2Fforum.cgi%3Fnoframes%3Bread%3D90745&color_bg=FFFFFF&color_text=000000&color_link=0000FF&color_url=008000&color_border=CCCCCC&ad_type=text_image&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fhl%3Den%26q%3Dbogus%2Bpentagon%2B9-11%2Beyewitnesses%26btnG%3DSearch&cc=18&u_h=768&u_w=1024&u_ah=740&u_aw=1024&u_cd=16&u_tz=-300&u_his=34&u_java=true&u_nplug=25&u_nmime=104" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="90" scrolling="no" width="728"></iframe> </center>[SIZE=-2]
Got some ideas you'd like to ad[/SIZE]
</center>
</td> <td> The two photographs in question 2 show the building just after the attack. We may observe that the aircraft only hit the ground floor. The four upper floors collapsed towards 10.10 am. The building is 26 yards high.
</td> <td>
</td> <td>
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> 
</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right" height="25"> 
</td> </tr> <tr> <td style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 79%;" align="right" height="242" width="236"> <table style="border-collapse: collapse;" align="right" border="0" bordercolor="#111111" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="207"> <tbody><tr> <td style="font-size: 79%; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;" align="right"> 
>
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]
exit hole approximately twelve feet across. Can you imagine something in an aluminum aircraft that could remain intact through six walls, multiple pillars and leave an exit wound so small. It can't be one of the engines because there is only one hole and the exit hole is consistent with the trajectory of the fuselage, not an outboard turbine. Besides, this is too near the opening and an engine would not have burned up in a fire in the open courtyard. The nose cone of the 757 is made of a very hard carbon compound that could not be expected to survive crashing through all that structure
and still have enough momentum to blast a twelve foot hole in the heavy wall in the Pentagon. It's starting to seem as though Secretary Rumsfeld might be right!
Which part of a 757 did this wing section come from? It seems to have a remarkably similar profile to that of Global Hawk. Wing debris in the Pentagon matches the profile of a Global Hawk. Other debris photographed at the Pentagon seem to match Global Hawk parts and materials. 
The lawn on the west side of the Pentagon was not damaged by the crash or the blast. See the lawn at the Pentagon after a 100-ton Boeing 757 plows into the Pentagon. Not a scrape, not even a singe. Several witnesses observed that the aircraft had hit the ground and then crashed into the Pentagon. Perhaps this grass is GMO 
crews and the workers at the Pentagon. To stabilize the situation, sand would provide a barrier that would keep the radioactive dust in place. A clue that will begin to show up almost immediately would be health problems of the firemen and their families. First responders were not wearing decontamination clothing and masks until later. Absent any warnings about the dust on their clothing and boots, they probably carried a lot home with them to settle into the carpet and furnishings. Over time, the dust will begin to produce symptoms similar to Gulf War Syndrome. Or perhaps they were just bringing in very heavy equipment for the excavation of the mess. I am looking for an updated photo of the lawn on the west side of the Pentagon. Is it paved or grass?
