to adopt a child?
great question...I would have to say NO!
just isn't fair to the child IMO.
Why do you think it is not fair?
Just my opinion, I would not want to gay parents...think of how the kid will be teased....it's not a natural situation, of course being gay has nothing to do with beinga quality person or not but this is different this is raising a child, which is hard enough in a normal setting.
Again, no.
so what you are saying is that in my post you'd rather stay in the orphanage and rot there until you are 18 - then be taken into someone's home and shown love for the very first time?
ok - you say this now - but once again if you are 5-7 and someone comes to get you i'd be STUNNED if you turn them down. if you did there would be countless kids right behind you dying to take your place and make sure you knew what a JACKASS you were for "winning the lottery" but throwing away the ticket
Oh, good grief. I mean really.
Should tomorrow's question be whether kids should be able to sacrifice goats in the bathroom to provide goatskin suicide bomber belts to their Tuesday Hitler Yourh Meertings?
I mean really. How overwhelmingly stupid can these threads finally become?
Dirty and General apparently support them.
Oh, good grief. I mean really.
Should tomorrow's question be whether kids should be able to sacrifice goats in the bathroom to provide goatskin suicide bomber belts to their Tuesday Hitler Yourh Meertings?
I mean really. How overwhelmingly stupid can these threads finally become?
Dirty and General apparently support them.
Oh, good grief. I mean really.
Should tomorrow's question be whether kids should be able to sacrifice goats in the bathroom to provide goatskin suicide bomber belts to their Tuesday Hitler Yourh Meertings?
I mean really. How overwhelmingly stupid can these threads finally become?
Dirty and General apparently support them.
You drop stuff in my lap.
So winky, if people don't agree with you or have an opinion different than yours they are somehow wrong? The question was asked, people answered.
I hate this argument. Apparently it is a popular one because I've heard it before. Since when are gay couples some kind of fucking saints that never argue or endure the types of problems regular straight couples do? Come on. We both know, or should know, that if gay marriage was accepted in this country divorce lawyers would be jumping up and down in joy.ok - so those who say "NO" - what you are saying is it is OK for a "normal" couple to adopt a kid - but then fight like married couples do and get a divorce soon after they.....
I hate this argument. Apparently it is a popular one because I've heard it before. Since when are gay couples some kind of fucking saints that never argue or endure the types of problems regular straight couples do? Come on. We both know, or should know, that if gay marriage was accepted in this country divorce lawyers would be jumping up and down in joy.
You people with your sexual hangups and antiquated ideas of "morality" are on the short side of history. In 50 years (maybe less), a person's sexual preference will be a non-issue, and the archaic sexual inhibitions revealed by the 18th-century yearners here will seem to be nothing more than a curiosity to be studied--much like we now study the ancient practice of bloodletting or chastity-belts. Good riddance; you may as well start your spinning now, as much good as it will do you. . . .
You people with your sexual hangups and antiquated ideas of "morality" are on the short side of history. In 50 years (maybe less), a person's sexual preference will be a non-issue, and the archaic sexual inhibitions revealed by the 18th-century yearners here will seem to be nothing more than a curiosity to be studied--much like we now study the ancient practice of bloodletting or chastity-belts. Good riddance; you may as well start your spinning now, as much good as it will do you. . . .
Pioneer I think this is my last post to you, as ignore is the best option for someone who clearly does not fit in with this forum. Time to hump the misfit. Same drill as your priest used to do, bend over and spread em.
Your not worth reading, why are you here?
Ignore time...OF :+excited-
So what is your opinion Jeff?
You people with your sexual hangups and antiquated ideas of "morality" are on the short side of history. In 50 years (maybe less), a person's sexual preference will be a non-issue, and the archaic sexual inhibitions revealed by the 18th-century yearners here will seem to be nothing more than a curiosity to be studied--much like we now study the ancient practice of bloodletting or chastity-belts. Good riddance; you may as well start your spinning now, as much good as it will do you. . . .