I hope someone puts some angry pit bulls at his house to greet him :devil:
TTINCO....$500 beyatch!
i'm sure the whole steelers team are a buncha saints..
move on!
Do you not agree with the punishment that the government decided was fair and just in Michael's case?
I've never gotten the two wrongs make it right philosophy. :+clueless
Whether the punishement was right or not, people, especially kids, look up to athletes and I think they should take a stand about allowing convicted felons into these organizations. People such as Vick, Leonard Little, etc., should be on a lifetime ban, imo.
So you are saying that you think the government made a mistake and his jail sentence, financial punishments and other stuff wasn't sufficient?
Also, the kids looking up to Vick is not a vick problem, that's a you problem. Right?
I didn't say that at all. And it's not "me" problem, it's an NFL, MLB, NBA, ect., problem. If they can have drug rules, conduct rules, etc., for member players, then they can have a rule banning convicted felons from playing in their leagues.
I didn't say that at all. And it's not "me" problem, it's an NFL, MLB, NBA, ect., problem. If they can have drug rules, conduct rules, etc., for member players, then they can have a rule banning convicted felons from playing in their leagues.
But he's served his time. His punishment is supposed to put him back in good standing with society.
Also, the NFL is a football league not a morals league. Their job is to get the best football players on the planet to ply their trade in their company. Live and let live. If you committed a crime and served your time, you would ask society to leave you alone that you paid your debt and you should be allowed to live as normal a life as the next guy.
If they have a rule against felons, I don't t hink it is being enforced. This book is about 10 years old, but look at the description:
http://www.amazon.com/Pros-Cons-Criminals-Who-Play/dp/0446607479
Amazon.com Review
Startling in its breadth, Benedict and Yaeger's investigation into the off-the-field violence and criminal behavior that pervades the culture of professional football is as eye opening as it is disturbing. That these guys get into trouble is nothing new, but when their offenses are collected in one place--with mug shots, court records, police reports, and interviews with arresting officers--the effect is as surreal as the statistics: 21 percent of the NFL's players have been charged with a serious crime.
How serious? The docket begins with assault, rape, and domestic violence and keeps spiraling out of control. These are not just blind allegations; the authors name names and match felonies to players. Some of the better-known examples: Cornelius Bennett--rape and sexual assault; Cortez Kennedy--domestic violence; Michael Irvin--cocaine and marijuana possession; Nate Newton--sexual assault; Warren Moon--domestic violence; Jake Plummer--sexual abuse; Andre Rison--aggravated assault; Bruce Smith--driving under the influence; and Deion Sanders--aggravated assault, disorderly convict, trespassing, and battery.
Yet, as disturbing as the names and numbers are, Benedict and Yaeger's contention, backed by exhaustive research, is even worse: the league pretty much looks away, tacitly condoning the havoc caused by these overpaid, coddled men-children, whose very propensity for unchecked mayhem fills stadiums on Sunday. But, then, in the NFL's view of things, football is the law. Make no mistake about Pros and Cons though; as sensational as much of it is, this is a serious work with serious footnotes compiled by serious journalists, who, in the end, do something the game's establishment has avoided: they offer a detailed "Game Plan" for addressing the issues they raise. It begins with respecting law and imposing order. --Jeff Silverman
what was the bet?
We shall then agree to disagree. 12io4j2w90
That he would play in the NFL again. So far TT is still winning the bet. But the clock is ticking. I heard Jerry Jones sent a limo over to get him to the half-way house.
True, TF - but it doesn't make it right.
True, TF - but it doesn't make it right.
It's funny how a lot of people get so much more charged up about Vick, than they do about all the other crap that goes on in the world.
You'd think Vick invented animal abuse and dog fighting.
Does it excuse his behavior? People like Vick are cowards. People who abuse children, the elderly, or animals imo are cowards because they do harm to those who can't defend themselves.
No argument here about Vick being a coward. He was however, convicted and punished for his crimes, more severely, I think, than anyone else who has ever been involved in dog fighting or other like crimes.
I hope someone puts some angry pit bulls at his house to greet him :devil:
Yeah, well, I will agree that if a no name was caught the sentence probably wouldn't have been as severe. Of course, Vick had such an elaborate setup and was crossing state lines that made it a federal case.
Excited to see this guy back on the field. Could definitely use him on the Jets if they aren't going to move up and draft either Stafford or Sanchez.
What's with the hate for Vick people?
He did his time and should be allowed back into the league, it's that simple.
I look forward to seeing him back on the field and electrifying the game again.
GM's know this guy WILL fill seats, so he WILL be playing in the NFL again very shortly.
So you are saying that you think the government made a mistake and his jail sentence, financial punishments and other stuff wasn't sufficient?
Also, the kids looking up to Vick is not a vick problem, that's a you problem. Right?