Obama racks up list of broken promises

[brucefan]

<HR noShade SIZE=1><!-- standing head -->
<!-- end standing head --><!-- head -->[FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+2]Obama racks up list of broken promises[/SIZE][/FONT]
<!-- end head --><!-- deck -->[FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+1]Just 2 months into term, president abandons numerous commitments[/SIZE][/FONT]
<!-- end deck -->


<HR SIZE=1>[SIZE=-1]Posted: March 12, 2009[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]11:30 pm Eastern[/SIZE]



[FONT=Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif]By Chelsea Schilling[/FONT]
<!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------>[SIZE=-1]<!-- copyright -->? 2009 WorldNetDaily <!-- end copyright -->[/SIZE]
<!-- begin bodytext -->After only two months in office, President Obama may have fallen short on a number of his campaign promises.
As a candidate, he promised to allow public comment before signing bills, eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses provide tax credits to ]businesses for hiring new employees, allow Americans to withdraw funds from 401(k) and retirement accounts without penalties, ban lobbyists from serving in his administration, reform earmarks, bring all combat troops home from Iraq in 16 months, sign the "Freedom of Choice Act," give Americans $4,000 in credits for college and run a "transparent" administration.
However, after giving his word to the American people on so many issues, Obama has yet to fulfill many commitments.
WND has compiled the following extensive list of those abandoned promises:
Broken promise No. 1: 'Sunlight Before Signing'
When Obama campaigned for the Democratic presidential nomination in Manchester, N.H., on June 22, 2007, he announced his "Sunlight Before Signing" promise.
"When there is a bill that ends up on my desk as the president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out what's in it before I sign it," he said.



<OBJECT codeBase=http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0 height=344 width=425 classid=clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000>
























</p>&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&ampnbsp</p>&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
&ampnbsp
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o5t8GdxFYBU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" width="425" height="344" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></OBJECT>
He repeated that promise on his campaign website:
"Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days."
However, Obama signed his first bill, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act, on Jan. 20 ? only two days after its passage.
He signed a second bill expanding the State Children's Health Insurance Program just three hours after Congress passed it.
Again, on Feb. 17, Obama signed his 1,000-page $787 billion stimulus aimed at jolting the declining U.S. economy. He did so only one business after it passed through Congress ? without allowing for five days of public comment.
Broken promise No. 2: Capital gains tax elimination
<TABLE style="HEIGHT: 201px" width=213 align=left border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=200>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
According to his comprehensive tax plan released during his campaign, Obama promised to "eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses."
Just weeks prior to the election, Obama advisers Austan Goolsbee and Jason Furman told the Wall Street Journal that Obama planned tax cuts that included "the elimination of capital gains taxes for small businesses and start-ups."
People who invest in small businesses have only been allowed to exclude 50 percent of that gain from capital gains taxes. While Obama's $787 billion economic-stimulus package reduces that tax liability ? raising the exclusion to 75 percent ? it does not eliminate it.
Broken promise No. 3: New American jobs tax credit
During his transition, Obama's promised to provide a $3,000 refundable tax credit to existing businesses for every additional full-time U.S. employee hired in 2009 and 2010.
"If a company that currently has 10 U.S. employees increases its domestic full time employment to 20 employees, this company would get a $30,000 tax credit ? enough to offset the entire added payroll tax costs to the company for the first $50,000 of income for the new employees," the transition website stated. "The tax credit will benefit all companies creating net new jobs, even those struggling to make a profit."
Obama's promise was never included in the stimulus package.
Broken promise No. 4: Hiatus on 401(k) penalties
Many unemployed and financially strapped Americans have considered early withdrawals on 401(k) and retirement accounts to survive the current recession. However, the IRS imposes strict penalties of up to 10 percent plus federal, state and local income taxes on such advances.
Workers who have taken $10,000 in early withdrawals from retirement plans have lost as much as 40 percent to taxes and penalties, depending upon tax brackets.
In October 2008, Obama released his "Rescue Plan for the Middle-Class" in which he promised to allow financially distressed Americans to withdraw up to $10,000 from their 401(k) accounts and retirement savings without having to pay penalties. They would only pay income taxes on the amount.
"Since so many Americans will be struggling to pay the bills over the next year, I propose that we allow every family to withdraw up to 15% from their IRA or 401(k) ? up to a maximum of $10,000 ? without any fine or penalty throughout 2009," Obama said. "This will help families get through this crisis without being forced to make painful choices like selling their homes or not sending their kids to college."
However, Obama's promise was never included in his recent stimulus package.
(Story continues below)
<TABLE><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top><SCRIPT type=text/javascript> GA_googleFillSlot("WND_NWS_C0200");</SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?correlator=1236989602543&output=json_html&callback=_GA_googleAdEngine.setAdContentsBySlotForSync&impl=s&a2ids=%2CsStA%2Cqn1A%2CiNPA%2Cot1g%2CiLeg%2C&cids=%2CJ2Xseo%2CJv8i_g%2CJWsMyA%2CJpTMXY%2CJWsK2Q%2C&client=ca-pub-9952085791529017&slotname=WND_NWS_C0200&page_slots=WND_NWS__FLOAT%2CWND_NWS__SKY_%2CWND_NWS_L0100%2CWND_NWS_L0201%2CWND_NWS_L0200%2CWND_NWS_L0300%2CWND_NWS_C0100%2CWND_NWS_C0200&cust_params=&cookie=ID%3D2ab94478f9c86eb4%3AT%3D1236808432%3AS%3DALNI_Mao_f8967j0GFXPwi3fWX9-Y6P0Mg&ga_vid=494800158.1236808428&ga_sid=1236989586&ga_hid=1204286381&ga_fc=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldnetdaily.com%2Findex.php%3Ffa%3DPAGE.view%26pageId%3D91286&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldnetdaily.com%2F&lmt=1236989604&dt=1236989604946&cc=385&oe=utf-8&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=770&u_aw=1280&u_cd=32&u_tz=-240&u_his=7&u_java=true&u_nplug=0&u_nmime=0&flash=10.0.12.36"></SCRIPT><!-- BEGIN STANDARD TAG - 300x250 - WorldNetDaily ROS --><SCRIPT language=javascript>var rnd = Math.round(Math.random()*10000000);document.write('<IFR' + 'AME FRAMEBORDER=0 MARGINWIDTH=0 MARGINHEIGHT=0 SCROLLING=NO WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=250 SRC=http://demr.opt.fimserve.com/adopt/?r=h&l=de92b74e-8691-49af-8c18-94082aec6def&sz=300x250&rnd=' + rnd + '></IFR' + 'AME>');</SCRIPT><IFRAME marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 src="http://demr.opt.fimserve.com/adopt/?r=h&l=de92b74e-8691-49af-8c18-94082aec6def&sz=300x250&rnd=7546015" frameBorder=0 width=300 scrolling=no height=250></IFRAME><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><!-- END TAG -->


</TD><TD width=10></TD><TD vAlign=top><SCRIPT type=text/javascript> GA_googleFillSlot("WND_NWS_C0201");</SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?correlator=1236989602543&output=json_html&callback=_GA_googleAdEngine.setAdContentsBySlotForSync&impl=s&a2ids=%2CsStA%2Cqn1A%2CiNPA%2Cot1g%2CiLeg%2C%2Ce6TA&cids=%2CJ2Xseo%2CJv8i_g%2CJWsMyA%2CJpTMXY%2CJWsK2Q%2C%2CJNS9po&client=ca-pub-9952085791529017&slotname=WND_NWS_C0201&page_slots=WND_NWS__FLOAT%2CWND_NWS__SKY_%2CWND_NWS_L0100%2CWND_NWS_L0201%2CWND_NWS_L0200%2CWND_NWS_L0300%2CWND_NWS_C0100%2CWND_NWS_C0200%2CWND_NWS_C0201&cust_params=&cookie=ID%3D2ab94478f9c86eb4%3AT%3D1236808432%3AS%3DALNI_Mao_f8967j0GFXPwi3fWX9-Y6P0Mg&ga_vid=494800158.1236808428&ga_sid=1236989586&ga_hid=1204286381&ga_fc=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldnetdaily.com%2Findex.php%3Ffa%3DPAGE.view%26pageId%3D91286&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldnetdaily.com%2F&lmt=1236989605&dt=1236989605757&cc=385&oe=utf-8&u_h=800&u_w=1280&u_ah=770&u_aw=1280&u_cd=32&u_tz=-240&u_his=7&u_java=true&u_nplug=0&u_nmime=0&flash=10.0.12.36"></SCRIPT><!-- ValueClick Media 300x250 Medium Rectangle CODE for worldnetdaily.com --><SCRIPT language=javascript src="http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?sid=46722&m=6&tp=8&d=j&t=n"></SCRIPT><NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT><!-- ValueClick Media 300x250 Medium Rectangle CODE for worldnetdaily.com -->


</TD><TD width=10></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Broken promise No. 5: 'No jobs for lobbyists'
<TABLE style="HEIGHT: 186px" width=135 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=160>
William J. Lynn III


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Obama promised America he would loosen the grip of lobbyists on Washington.
In his Nov. 10, 2007, speech in Des Moines, Iowa, Obama declared:

I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists that their days of setting the agenda in Washington are over. I have done more than any other candidate in this race to take on lobbyists ? and won. They have not funded my campaign, they will not run my White House, and they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I am president.
​

During his campaign, Obama also said, "I have done more to take on lobbyists than any other candidate in this race. I don't take a dime of their money, and when I am president, they won't find a job in my White House."
However, USA Today reported Obama's campaign fundraising team included 38 members of law firms that were paid $138 million in 2007 to lobby the federal government.
<TABLE style="HEIGHT: 190px" width=127 align=left border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=159>
William Corr

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
"Those lawyers, including 10 former federal lobbyists, have pledged to raise at least $3.5 million" for Obama's campaign, the report states. "Employees of their firms have given Obama's campaign $2.26 million."
It wasn't long before he allowed at least two dozen exceptions and broke his promise.
Obama's own ethic rules barred officials of his administration from lobbying their former colleagues "for as long as I am president." He also said former lobbyists would be prohibited from working for agencies they had lobbied within the past two years. President Obama later waived his rules for at least two of his nominees ? William J. Lynn III, undersecretary at the Department of Defense and recent lobbyist for Raytheon, and William Corr, deputy secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services and anti-tobacco lobbyist for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
Broken promise No. 6: Earmark reform
As WND reports, at the first presidential debate in Oxford, Miss., Obama declared, "[W]e need earmark reform. And when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely."
However, in February, Obama passed his $787 billion stimulus aimed at jolting the declining U.S. economy. Before a joint session of Congress, Obama declared: "Now, I'm proud that we passed a recovery plan free of earmarks."
Some chuckled in amusement when he claimed the bill contained no pork.
"There was just a roar of laughter ? because there were earmarks," Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., told CNN.
U.S. News & World Report found at least eight earmarks in his stimulus bill.
Obama also signed a $410 billion omnibus bill for 2009. More than 9,000 earmarks in the spending bill total an estimated $7.7 billion.
Even though the Democrat-controlled Congress crafted the bill after Obama's election, the administration claims the added pork is just "unfinished businessfrom last year.
The White House website states, "Obama and Biden will slash earmarks to no greater than 1994 levels and ensure all spending decisions are open to the public." However, watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense reports that the omnibus pork alone already totals $7.7 billion ? just less than the total of $7.8 billion in earmarks in 1994 ? and the figure does not include $6.6 billion in earmarks contained in three previous spending bills Congress passed amid the bailout crisis last year.
During his three years in the Senate, Obama requested more than $860 million in earmarks, according to the group. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has 16 earmarks ? worth approximately $8.5 million ? in the bill.
Broken promise No. 7: Bring troops home in 16 months
<TABLE style="HEIGHT: 323px" width=211 align=left border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=200>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
On his campaign website, Obama promised he would "remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months."
His commitment to bring combat troops home by May 20, 2010, and end the war gave him an edge among Democrats over candidate Hillary Clinton.
However, on Feb. 27, Obama declared, "Let me say this as plainly as I can: By Aug. 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end."
If Obama adheres to his plan, combat troops will return home months later than originally promised. The New York Times reports, Obama will withdraw only two of the 14 brigades before December.
As part of a "new era of American []leadership he also said he would leave behind a residual force of 35,000 to 50,000 troops and remove all U.S. soldiers from Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011 ? the same deadline the Bush administration negotiated with the Iraqi government last year in its Status of Forces Agreement.
Additionally, some combat units would remain in Iraq beyond Obama's declared August 2010 withdrawal. Rather than returning home, they would simply face reassignment as "advisory training brigades."
Even as combat troops are brought home, Pentagon officials have said fresh units will continue deploying to Iraq.
Broken promise No. 8: Sign 'Freedom of Choice Act'

On July 17, 2007, Obama told the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, "The first thing I'd do as president is, is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do."
Obama expressed his support for the sweeping plan that would repeal all national and state regulations of abortion passed over the last 35 years.
His agenda regarding "reproductive choice" is posted on the White House website. It states, Obama "has been a consistent champion of reproductive choice and will make preserving women's rights under Roe v. Wade a priority in his Administration."
Obama chose radical pro-abortion Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to serve as the Health secretary, moved to void job protections for health workers who oppose abortion and repealed a ban on U.S. taxpayer funding of foreign abortions. While many pro-life advocates consider it a blessing that Obama has no fulfilled his promise to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, he has made no mention of the legislation since he took office.
Broken promise No. 9: $4,000 college credit
Obama pledged to make college "affordable for all Americans" when he announced his American Opportunity Tax Credit.
<TABLE style="HEIGHT: 160px" width=161 align=left border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=200>


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
His campaign promise read: "This universal and fully refundable credit will ensure that the first $4,000 of a college is completely free for most Americans, and will cover two-thirds the cost of tuition at the average public college or university and make community college tuition completely free for most students. Recipients of the credit will be required to conduct 100 hours of community service."
While the American Opportunity Tax Credit was included in the recent stimulus bill, it offers a credit of only $2,500 for up to two years and requires no commitment to community service.
Broken promise No. 10: Transparency
On the White House website, the Obama administration claims it will be "the most open and transparent in history.
The administration released a memo on Jan. 21, stating:

My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government. Government should be transparent. Transparency promotes accountability and provides information for citizens about what their Government is doing. ?
​

However, Congress and the administration hurried the $787 billion, 1,027-page American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to a vote after allowing lawmakers just a few hours to read the bill. It was also available online in a form that could not be keyword searched.
While former administrations immediately posted transcripts of presidential speeches ? including some remarks before delivery ? the White House website often waits until days or even weeks after an event to release transcripts.
Also, some say recent reports of tax evasion by Obama nominees is evidence that the administration is not as transparent as promised.
<TABLE align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=155>
Timothy Geithner


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Just before Obama named Timothy Geithner to be his treasury secretary, the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank quietly paid $26,000 in back taxes and interest due since 2001 and 2002.
Obama characterized the eight-year tax evasion as "an innocent mistake."
But as many as five of his picks defaulted on taxes, including former nominee for health and human services secretary, Tom Daschle; former nominee for chief performance officer, Nancy Killefer; U.S. trade representative nominee Ron Kirk and Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis.
Furthermore, while the president posted his own weekly "fireside chats" on YouTube during the campaign, many journalists report that he has a history of being less than welcoming to the Fourth Estate.
Columbia Journalism Review noted Obama's treatment of the press: "During the campaign, reporters' access to Obama was severely limited. On-the-record conversations with the candidate were even more so. Indeed, Obama's overall treatment of the press ? not just in his general rejection of the day-to-day news cycle, but also in his tendency to shun his national traveling press corps ... created the impression that its members were, to him, a buzzing nuisance. Instead of the voice of the people."
WND's correspondent at the White House, Les Kinsolving, raised the issue in February that most of the reporters recognized for questions in the briefing room were among the same handful over and over again. Some of them had been given four or even five opportunities for questions while other reporters were not recognized at all.
Kinsolving, a senior journalist in the White House press corps, was not allowed to voice his questions on issues on which millions of WND readers have expressed an interest. There were also complaints about the time of the November election that not only did Obama rely on a few key reporters for questions, those reporters were chosen ahead of time.
And, finally, WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
<TABLE align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=200>
Obama's alleged Certification of Live Birth is not his original 1961 birth certificate


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
However, Obama has refused repeated calls to publicly release his Hawaiian birth certificate, which would include the actual hospital that performed the delivery. His campaign posted an alleged "Certification of Live Birth" online, but it is not the same as a Hawaii birth certificate. COLBs have been issued by Hawaii to parents whose children are not born in the state.
Instead of providing the documentation to end the lawsuits, a series of law firms have been hired on Obama's behalf around the nation to prevent any public access to his birth certificate, passport records, college records and other documents. ? even after more than 320,000 people signed a petition demanding that he live up to his promise of transparency by releasing the certificate to the public.
Nonetheless, during his campaign and after he took office, Obama maintained that his administration would have an unyielding commitment to transparency.
"The American people want to trust in our government again ? we just need a government that will trust in us," he said in a campaign speech. "And making government accountable to the people isn't just a cause of this campaign ? it's been a cause of my life for two decades."
The White House declined to respond to WND's request for comment on Obama's promises

 

[Doc Mercer]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

World Net Daily? :+textinb3:+textinb3:+textinb3:+textinb3:+textinb3

No "updates" from Beck??


:+textinb3:+textinb3:+textinb3:+textinb3:+textinb3

 

[Doc Mercer]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

Bush's Broken Promises
Miscellaneous Lies
Americorps
Aids Funding
Conservation Trust Fund
Deficits
National Debt
Energy Assistance
Education
Student Loans
All The President's Lies

Miscellaneous Obfuscations

WHITE HOUSE CLAIM: Leading the Fight Against HIV/AIDS: In his State of the Union Address in 2003, President Bush announced the Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief an historic 5-year, $15 billion effort to turn the tide of the AIDS pandemic. Only 4 months later, Congress passed legislation authorizing the Emergency Plan based on the President's proposal.

FACT: President Bush's budget introduced four days after his State of the Union only sought $2 billion for the year" for AIDS - 33% less than the $3 billion needed to keep his $15-billion-over-5-year pledge. When the Senate voted to increase the President's budget, the White House "repeated its strong opposition to any funding beyond $2 billion." (here)

WHITE HOUSE CLAIM: "The U.S. Congress passed the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act which authorizes $3.47 billion for Afghanistan over fiscal years 2003-2006."

FACT: While President Bush declared a "Marshall Plan for Afghanistan" in April 2002, the nation has "received only a fraction of the $10.2 billion" that the World Bank said was necessary over the first five years. (pdf here)

Bush Guts AmeriCorps

Breaking the promises he made to encourage volunteerism in America, President Bush made huge cuts to the AmeriCorps program. AmeriCorps, created by President Bill Clinton, organizes thousands of volunteers across the country to work in education, public safety, health, and the environment.

AmeriCorps is cutting the largest group of volunteers, those from the "state competitive programs," from 16,000 to 3,000. AmeriCorps director Rosie Mauk described the cuts as "devastating to our program."

The cuts stand in stark contrast to President Bush's repeated promises to expand programs that help Americans volunteer his time. He proposed expanding AmeriCorps from 50,000 to 75,000 volunteers, and then gutted the program.

In his 2002 State of the Union address, Bush said, "My call tonight is for every American to commit at least two years -- 4,000 hours over the rest of your lifetime -- to the service of your neighbors and your nation. Many are already serving, and I thank you."

And in his 2003 State of the Union, Bush reiterated his promise: "Tonight I ask Congress and the American people to focus the spirit of service and the resources of government on the needs of some of our most vulnerable citizens -- boys and girls trying to grow up without guidance and attention, and children who have to go through a prison gate to be hugged by their mom or dad."

But in spite of those promises, Bush's top fiscal priority has been massive, irresponsible tax cuts that have created record budget deficits. Those deficits have forced cuts like those to AmeriCorps and other vital programs working families rely upon. [Washington Post, 6/17/03; Boston Globe editorial, 6/14/03; Bush State of the Union addresses, 1/28/03, 1/29/02] (here) Dave Eggers' excellent article here)
Bush Guts Aids Funding

The House approved a measure July 24 that would bring spending on global AIDS to $2 billion in 2004, rejecting complaints by Democrats who noted that the amount was $1 billion short of what was promised in a bill President Bush signed in May.

Democrats were not permitted to introduce an emergency measure that would have increased AIDS spending by $1 billion. Instead, they offered two amendments that would have increased financing to combat the epidemic by a total of $375 million. Both were defeated. (here)


Bush Promises Full Funding, Then Allows Funding Cut in Half for Conservation Trust Fund

Environmental Carnage NY Times

Three years ago, in a rare moment of harmony, a coalition of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans in Congress approved what it hoped would be a guaranteed stream of revenue for a range of environmental purposes. The Conservation Trust Fund, as it was called, would increase spending in increments over six years, from $1.6 billion in 2001 to $2.4 billion in 2006, and would be used, among other things, to buy open space, protect endangered species and restore damaged coastlines and estuaries. No new taxes would be needed ? the program would rely on the same offshore oil royalties that had long underwritten federal land acquisition.

President Bill Clinton eagerly signed on to what was hailed as the most important conservation bill in years.

That was then. Earlier this month, the House of Representatives cut the program almost in half, to $1.2 billion from the $2.1 billion originally authorized for the 2004 fiscal year. The major land acquisition programs suffered most of the damage, in particular the venerable Land and Water Conservation Fund, which President Bush had grandly promised during his 2000 campaign to "fully fund" at $900 million. The House, in full nose-thumbing mode, cut that figure to a measly $198 million.

This massacre was largely the handiwork of a House subcommittee led by Charles Taylor of North Carolina and dominated by people who share his belief that far too much of the country is already in public hands. Democrats labored in vain to honor Congress's original promises and to defend the environment. They tried to block the administration from gutting a Clinton-era rule protecting 58 million acres of national forest from development. They tried to prevent state roads across pristine federal land. They tried to ban snowmobile use in Yellowstone, which the administration supports. In all these efforts they were no more successful than they were in their fight to replenish the trust fund.

One would at least have expected some annoyance from Mr. Bush at the contempt with which Mr. Taylor and the Republicans treated his campaign pledge on open space. So far, however, there has not been a murmur from the White House. (here)

Deficits
Promise
During a speech at Western Michigan University advocating tax cuts, Bush promised that his plan would not lead to deficits. "Tax relief is central to my plan to encourage economic growth, and we can proceed with tax relief without fear of budget deficits, even if the economy softens," Bush promised. [Bush Remarks at Western Michigan University, 3/27/01 (here)]
Broken
In February 2002, Bush released his budget for fiscal year 2003, which included the first federal deficit since 1997. Bush's proposed budget would result in a $106 billion in deficit in FY 2002 and $80 billion in FY 2003. According to Bush administration estimates, the budget will not return to balance until FY 2005. Worse, an analysis of the Bush budget by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicted the deficits between FY 2002 and 2005 would be $62 billion larger than White House figures. Current projections put the deficit at 500 billion.
[Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2003, Table S-1; Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2003, Historical Tables, Table 1.1; CBO, An Analysis of the President's Budgetary Proposals for 2003, Table 1, 3/6/02 and (here)]
National Debt
Promise
In March 2001, Bush said, "And after we fund important priorities in the ongoing operations of our Government, I believe we ought to pay down national debt. And so my budget pays down a record $2 trillion in debt over the next 10 years." [Bush Remarks to the American College of Cardiology, 3/21/01 here]
Broken (Debt clock here--scary!)
In December 2001, the Bush administration announced that it would be forced to ask Congress to increase the $5.95 trillion federal debt ceiling in order to avoid a breach. The Bush administration asked Congress to raise the debt limit by $750 billion. The debt ceiling has now been raised 984 billion to over 9 trillion. [Associated Press, 3/12/02; Washington Post, 12/4/01] (here)
Energy Assistance
Promise
During the presidential debates Bush outlined his energy strategy for the United States and made a commitment to fund Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which helps low-income Americans with their heating and cooling needs. "First and foremost, we got to make sure we fully fund LIHEAP, which is a way to help low-income folks, particularly here in the East, to pay for their high fuel bills," Bush said. [Presidential Debate in Boston, MA, 10/3/00 (here)]
Broken
In Bush's FY 2003 budget proposal, LIHEAP funding was reduced by $300 million, from $1.7 billion in FY 2002 to $1.4 billion, a decrease of 18 percent. According to the Bush administration, LIHEAP provides heating and cooling services to 4.3 million households each year, one-third of which include seniors and one-half of which include children under age 18. [HHS, FY2003 Budget in Brief; LIHEAP here]
The National Energy Assistance Directors Association (NEADA) said the Bush LIHEAP cut comes at a time of increased need due to the recession. "The Administration proposal comes at precisely the wrong time," NEADA Executive Director Mark Wolfe said. "We should help poor people keep the heat on ? especially during periods of high unemployment." [National Energy Assistance Directors' Association press release, 2/20/02 (here)]
Education

Promise
At the bill signing ceremony for the bipartisan "No Child Left Behind" education law, Bush pledged to increase funding for education. "And so the new role of the Federal Government is to set high standards, provide resources, hold people accountable, and liberate school districts to meet the standards. ... We're going to spend more on our schools, and we're going to spend it more wisely," Bush said. [Remarks on Signing the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 1/8/02 here]
Broken
Bush Budget Cut $90 Million From "No Child Left Behind" Education Reform Law. According to an analysis of the Bush education budget by the House Education and the Workforce Committee, "Just one month ago, Congress and the President enacted the most important education reform legislation in 30 years. This bipartisan law is based on the principle that, with adequate resources, real reform is possible. But rather than building on this progress, the President's budget cuts initiatives in The No Child Left Behind Act by a net total of $90 million." [House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Democratic staff, The Bush Budget: Shortchanging School Reform, 2/12/02 here]
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), who worked closely with Bush crafting the education reform law, criticized Bush's education budget. "This budget is a severe blow to our nation's schools. Just four weeks after the President signed the education bill into law, the Administration's budget cuts funding for it," Kennedy said. [Kennedy Press Release, 2/12/02 here: under "archive" and "press releases"--2/12/02]
Bush Education Budget Provided Smallest Funding Increase In Seven Years. President Bush proposed a 2.8 percent increase, roughly $1.4 billion, in education funding, the smallest increase in seven years. [House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Democratic staff, The Bush Budget: Shortchanging School Reform, 2/12/02 (here)
Student Loans
Promise
During the campaign, Bush said, "Every year, U.S. colleges attract the best and the brightest students from all over the world. I want to make sure that higher education is affordable and accessible to every American. And therein lie our greatest weaknesses: college tuition and the burden of student indebtedness. I am committed to helping families prepare for the cost of higher education." [Matrix: The Magazine for Leaders in Higher Education, 10/1/00 (here)]
Broken
The Bush administration proposed a plan to help ease the $100 billion federal budget shortfall by tapping $1.3 billion from a federal student loan program. OMB Director Mitch Daniels and GOP budget negotiators proposed preventing college students and graduates from consolidating their education loans at federally subsidized, fixed interest rates. The GOP plan would allow the consolidated loans to be offered only at variable rates, making the loans less appealing. [New York Times, 4/28/02 (here)]
Bush's Budget Proposed Eliminating State Scholarship Program ? Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnerships. President Bush's 2002 budget proposed freezing funding for the Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnerships (LEAP). His 2003 budget proposed eliminating the $67 million LEAP program, potentially affecting 1.2 million recipients. By leveraging state dollars, LEAP provided $171 million to low-income students last year. [Associated Press, 2/11/02; House Democratic Staff of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, 2/5/02 here ]

All the President's Lies (here)

The Education President

"Every single child in America must be educated, I mean every child. ... There's nothing more prejudiced than not educating a child." -- George W. Bush, presidential debate versus Vice President Al Gore, Oct. 11, 2000

Bush got his "No Child Left Behind" bill passed, a bill that combined greater accountability and testing with increased funding. Then, in what has become a trademark, he pulled the plug on the funding.
In his 2003 budget, Bush proposed funding levels far below what the legislation called for, requesting only $22.1 billion of the $29.2 billion that Congress authorized. For the largest program, Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which provides support to students in impoverished school districts, Bush asked for $11 billion out of the $18.5 billion authorized. His 2004 budget was more than $6 billion short of what Congress authorized. Furious, Ted Kennedy called Bush's proposal a "tin cup budget" that "may provide the resources to test our children, but not enough to teach them."

The result: States already strapped by record deficits are being held responsible for the extra testing and administration mandated by law -- but aren't getting any enough money to pay for it. So the number of public schools likely to be labeled "failing" by the law is estimated to be as high as 85 percent. Failing triggers sanctions, from technical assistance to requiring public-school choice to "reconstitution" -- that is, firing the entire school's staff and hiring a new one. And Bush isn't doing much to help. The New Hampshire School Administrators Association calculated that Bush's plan imposed at least $575 per student in new obligations. His budget, however, provides just $77 per student. It's a revolution in education policy, all right, but No Child Left Behind was simply a lie.

Healthy Skepticism

"Our goal is a system in which all Americans have got a good insurance policy, in which all Americans can choose their own doctor, in which seniors and low-income citizens receive the help they need. ... Our Medicare system is a binding commitment of a caring society. We must renew that commitment by providing the seniors of today and tomorrow with preventive care and the new medicines that are transforming health care in our country." -- George W. Bush, Medicare address, March 4, 2003

His program does none of this. What it does, simply, is to make dramatic cuts in the benefits for both the poor and the elderly.

Under the current Medicaid program, the federal government matches, on a sliding scale, the money that states put up. The state is required to cover some beneficiaries and services, although others are "optional." But "optional" services include many essential and life-saving treatments. And "optional" beneficiaries are rarely able to pay for private insurance. Bush's plan would turn Medicaid into a block grant, capping the federal contribution. Because states are already hard-pressed to keep up with Medicaid costs, services to the poor will simply disappear. As Leighton Ku, a health-policy analyst at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, notes, if under the current plan "you wanted to save that much money, you would have to specify which cuts to make, how to make the cuts. But it's much easier to cut the block grant because it's invisible; someone else has to make the decisions."

Bush claims to bring flexibility to Medicaid, and, in a sense, he's right. Under his plan states would have, as Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson put it, "carte blanche" in dealing with optional benefits and optional recipients. In other words, a mother making more than $9,000 a year would be fair game, as would an 8-year-old child who lives in a family with an income just above the poverty line, or a senior citizen or disabled person living on $7,200 a year.

And there's a whiff of coercion to the way in which the states are offered the option of switching to the Medicaid block grant. The states, which have already started cutting Medicaid on their own, are literally begging for federal fiscal assistance, and none is forthcoming. But if they consent to Bush's Medicaid plan, they'll get not only $3 billion in new federal money next year (a loan they would have to repay) but the ability to save money by trimming their Medicaid rolls. In other words, the president is making them an offer they can't refuse.

Bush relentlessly invokes a rhetoric of choice on Medicare. But the Republican proposal pushes seniors toward heavily managed private plans that offer partial drug benefits but limit choice of treatment and doctor. If you stayed with traditional Medicare (which does offer free choice of doctor and hospital), you'd only get minimal prescription-drug benefits. The plan would spend some $400 billion over 10 years, a sum that provides coverage worth 40 percent less than that enjoyed by members of Congress under the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program, which Bush repeatedly invokes as a model.

And while the plan allows House Republicans to avoid making politically unpopular cuts to Medicare, it requires Congress to cut $169 billion over 10 years from programs they oversee. So in the end, Medicare cuts may end up paying for prescription-drug benefits.

Despite rhetoric promising to increase other health spending, a close reading of the House Republican budget proposal shows $2.4 billion in cuts for programs -- such as the National Institutes of Health, Community Health Centers and the Ryan White AIDS program -- that Bush has pledged to support. Even though Bush vowed in his State of the Union address to spend $15 billion over the next five years to provide AIDS relief to Africa, much of that money won't be available until at least 2006. [See Garance Franke-Ruta, "The Fakeout," TAP, April 2003.]

A Paler Shade of Green

"Clear Skies legislation, when passed by Congress, will significantly reduce smog and mercury emissions, as well as stop acid rain. It will put more money directly into programs to reduce pollution, so as to meet firm national air-quality goals. ..." -- George W. Bush, Earth Day speech, April 22, 2002

Actually, the Clear Skies law doesn't do any of this. The act, in fact, delays required emission cuts by as much as 10 years, usurps the states' power to address interstate pollution problems and allows outdated industrial facilities to skirt costly pollution-control upgrades. The Environmental Protection Agency ensured that few people would notice this last regulation by announcing the change on the Friday before Thanksgiving and publishing it in the Federal Register on New Year's Eve. Still, nine northeastern states immediately filed suit against the administration; their case is pending.

Meanwhile, Bush's commitment to clean water is just as murky. Despite saying last October that he wanted to "renew our commitment" to building on the Clean Water Act, he's instead decided to "update" it by removing protections for "isolated" waters and weakening sewage-overflow rules, which could significantly increase the potential for waterborne illnesses.

It's hardly surprising to learn that big business is behind a lot of these changes. The Washington Post recounted a meeting between Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) Administrator John Graham and industry lobbyists during which the latter were encouraged to identify particularly onerous rules -- and ultimately created a regulatory "hit list." "There is a stealth campaign that's going on behind closed doors to twist the anti-regulatory process into a pretzel so that the public will be unaware that they are bottling up these protections," says Wesley Warren, the National Resources Defense Council's senior fellow for environmental economics. A good chunk of the 57-item list fell under the EPA's jurisdiction. One by one these rules have been submitted to OIRA under the Paperwork Reduction Act for cost-benefit analysis, a regulatory accounting technique that often ends up justifying watered-down rules.

Even as former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman announced that global warming is a "real phenomenon," Bush refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions. His decision weakened the treaty's effectiveness because the United States produces 25 percent of all greenhouse-gas emissions.

The former Texas oilman, who made one environmental promise after another on the campaign trail, has slashed the EPA's budget by half a billion dollars over two years, cut 100 employees and rolled back regulations on a near-weekly basis. "There has never been anything to compare this to," says Greg Wetstone, director of advocacy at the National Resources Defense Council. "Even in the days of Reagan, there was never an administration so willfully and almost obsessively concerned with finding ways to really undermine the environmental infrastructure."

Although she said the administration was working to put in place a standard to "dramatically reduce" levels of arsenic in drinking water, Whitman later tried to lower the existing regulation, saying that even the 10-part-per-billion federal benchmark was too tough. The EPA rolled back the standard until a report warning of health risks (and public outcry) forced the agency to reinstate the old limit.

Here's another classic Bush whopper. In his State of the Union address, the president proposed $1.2 billion in research funding to develop hydrogen-powered cars, in part to make the United States less reliant on foreign oil. What he didn't say is that the technology and infrastructure needed to mass produce such cars won't be available until at least 2020. If Bush truly cared about immediate relief, he might start by acknowledging existing hybrid vehicles or supporting more stringent Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for light trucks and SUVs. Neither is likely to be part of a Republican energy package this year.

"There is an absolute hostility toward any positive strengthening of environmental law," says Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. "It is a wholesale turning over to corporate America the governing of this country." (here)

Bush Pushes Plan to Curb Medicare Appeals
New York Times (here)

The Bush administration says it is planning major changes in the Medicare program that would make it more difficult for beneficiaries to appeal the denial of benefits like home health care and skilled nursing home care.

In thousands of recent cases, federal judges have ruled that frail elderly people with severe illnesses were improperly denied coverage for such services.

In the last year, Medicare beneficiaries and the providers who treated them won more than half the cases ? 39,796 of the 77,388 Medicare cases decided by administrative law judges. In the last five years, claimants prevailed in 186,300 cases, for a success rate of 53 percent.

Under federal law, the judges are independent, impartial adjudicators who hold hearings and make decisions based on the facts. They must follow the Medicare law and rules, but are insulated from political pressures and sudden shifts in policy made by presidential appointees.

President Bush is proposing both legislation and rules that would limit the judges' independence and could replace them in many cases.

The administration's draft legislation says, "The secretary of health and human services may use alternate mechanisms in lieu of administrative law judge review" to resolve disputes over Medicare coverage.

 

[BrickShitHouse]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

:maniac:Almost even between them, but Obama has only been in office 2 months

 

[TomKing]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

You forgot these from his web site at the time:

• Enact a Windfall Profits Tax to Provide a $1,000 Emergency Energy Rebate to American Families:Barack Obama and Joe Biden will enact a windfall profits tax on excessive oil company profits to give American families an immediate $1,000 emergency energy rebate to help families pay rising bills. This relief would be a down payment on the Obama-Biden long-term plan to provide middle-class families with at least $1,000 per year in permanent tax relief. <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o>
  
  • Simplify Tax Filings for Middle Class Americans: Obama and Biden will dramatically simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes. Obama and Biden will ensure that the IRS uses the information it already gets from banks and employers to give taxpayers the option of pre-filled tax forms to verify, sign and return. Experts estimate that the Obama-Biden proposal will save Americans up to 200 million total hours of work and aggravation and up to $2 billion in tax preparer fees. <o>
    
    • Fight for Fair Trade: Obama and Biden will fight for a trade policy that opens up foreign markets to support good American jobs. They will use trade agreements to spread good labor and environmental standards around the world and stand firm against agreements like the Central American Free Trade Agreement that fail to live up to those important benchmarks. Obama and Biden will also pressure the World Trade Organization to enforce trade agreements and stop countries from continuing unfair government subsidies to foreign exporters and nontariff barriers on U.S. exports. <o></o>
    • Amend the North American Free Trade Agreement: Obama and Biden believe that NAFTA and its potential were oversold to the American people. They will work with the leaders of Canada and Mexico to fix NAFTA so that it works for American workers. <o></o>
    • Improve Transition Assistance: To help all workers adapt to a rapidly changing economy, Obama and Biden will update the existing system of Trade Adjustment Assistance by extending it to service industries, creating flexible education accounts to help workers retrain, and providing retraining assistance for workers in sectors of the economy vulnerable to dislocation before they lose their jobs. <o></o>
    • End Tax Breaks for Companies that Send Jobs Overseas: Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe that companies should not get billions of dollars in tax deductions for moving their operations overseas. Obama and Biden will also fight to ensure that public contracts are awarded to companies that are committed to American workers. <o></o>
    • Reward Companies that Support American Workers: Barack Obama introduced the Patriot Employer Act of 2007 with Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL) and Sherrod Brown (D-OH) to reward companies that create good jobs with good benefits for American workers. The legislation would provide a tax credit to companies that maintain or increase the number of full-time workers in America relative to those outside the US; maintain their corporate headquarters in America if it has ever been in America; pay decent wages; prepare workers for retirement; provide health insurance; and support employees who serve in the milita
  
  

I would go through the rest of the file, but who gives a shit
HOPE & CHANGE just fucked you up the shitter

• • </o>

• </o>

 

[Doc Mercer]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

LOL .....

the "concerns" are touching .... the support for the biggest lying bastard and
flip/flopper who destroyed our country is sitting in Dallas and should be sitting
at the Hague awaiting execution for war crimes

 

[gopherbob]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

why are the same people that said george w. bush's presidency can't be fairly or objectively rated for at least 20-25 years now able to fairly and objectively rate obama's presidency with less than 2 months in office ?

 

[Joe Contrarian]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

 

[Doc Mercer]

Re: Obama racks up list of broken promises

...