Re: Kobe aint no Lebron
I like Butler a lot and he does it on both ends of the floor
IMO Arenas and Jamison are paper tigers - you can throw their stats up all day long but at the end of the day their teams don't produce - I would never want players like this on my team.
I also would like to point out that certain players fit and and have a better role with certain teams - Gasol is great for that triangle as a secondary role - and the cavs lineup is perefectly complimentary to LBJ - does this mean they are not talented? No. It means there abilities are utilized to the fullest with a player like LBJ. If you were to say they Cavs roster is playing at a level they couldn't reach without LBJ in the lineup then OK, you're right - doubt many people would argue that. But to say they are not a talented roster is silly.
I think of an analogy to a DE playing in a 3-4 and then switching teams to a 4-3. Same player but his skill set fits one scheme as opposed to the other. I think that is Mo in a nutshell.
The cavs dont have anyone, other than james, that is better than butler, jamison, or arenas from the wiz. they cant win with all of them.
I like Butler a lot and he does it on both ends of the floor
IMO Arenas and Jamison are paper tigers - you can throw their stats up all day long but at the end of the day their teams don't produce - I would never want players like this on my team.
I also would like to point out that certain players fit and and have a better role with certain teams - Gasol is great for that triangle as a secondary role - and the cavs lineup is perefectly complimentary to LBJ - does this mean they are not talented? No. It means there abilities are utilized to the fullest with a player like LBJ. If you were to say they Cavs roster is playing at a level they couldn't reach without LBJ in the lineup then OK, you're right - doubt many people would argue that. But to say they are not a talented roster is silly.
I think of an analogy to a DE playing in a 3-4 and then switching teams to a 4-3. Same player but his skill set fits one scheme as opposed to the other. I think that is Mo in a nutshell.