Attention Conservatives:
Do you have a loony lib family member or friend you can't seem to corner and pummel in a debate? Especially this latest pesky issue on torture?
Wouldn't you just love to waterboard them into confessing how intellectually dishonest, dangerous and imbecelic their values really are?
Well, now you can! :thumbsup
You're about to read several top-secret techniques I use to defeat the avg lib in almost any debate dealing with any subject -- even when I know I'm OBJECTIVELY WRONG.
:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
Here's why:
First, libs are feeling-centric creatures who don't think beyond Stage One.
Despite their claims to the contrary, at the center of every liberal mind is a John Lennon absolutist -- a utopian dreamer ("peace, love dope") with absolutely no footing in the real world whatsoever.
There are NO exceptions. If you find a liberal who thinks beyond Stage One, they're not a lib -- or won't be for very long.
Oh, I know they try and razzle us with their highly edumacated prose, phony ivy league vocab, fancy hairdoos and Starbucks lattes can make them seem intimidating -- as if these brainwashed posers know what they speak of...
Trust me, they don't. At least, not if you can dislodge them from their theoretical textbooks and drag their elitist asses into the not-so-friendly jungle of reality.
Second, the liberal mind is wedded to theory -- soundbites and incantations which originate in the heart, which makes them masters of Orwellian doublespeak.
I've been decapitating their stupidity for years -- and for a while was getting paid a handsome sum to do it, but alas those days are over...at least for now. *sigh*
Anyhoo...
The first thing you'll notice when you entangle yourself with one of these fecal monkey throwers is they love to personalize the debate.
You may have noticed this reading my posts:
"Joe Canuk"
"Joe Canada"
"Mark L"
"bipolar meds"
"Hey! You're from Toronto! STFU you Mountee from the frozen tundra..."
*Kahzam* :+textinb3
And on and on...
(As if non-American DNA had anything to do with it...) :flatten
Why do they do this?
They do this because a) they know they can't win the debate and b) liberals are all about "style" and "personality" and the ancillary minutia, rather than the big picture/bottom line.
If this sounds like the description of a girl, it is: PMS overdrive.
Newsflash: When it comes to debating, liberals act like girls, which is why they take these issues so personally.
I've lost track how many times I've had to stop debating a lib in person because they told me "they're getting too upset" and "need to change the subject." :+textinb3
In cyberspace, it's a different ballgame -- they're just get really, REALLY pissed and personal. :+textinb3:+textinb3
This brings me to my third point.
Once you see them flustered and you can see the debate is becoming personalized and nasty, this is your subliminal cue to blitzkrieg the touchy-feely malcontent ignoramuses with Stage Two Interrogation.
If you're a novice and not sure how to proceed, always use a "what happens next" guide as your compass.
Like this:
On Gorebull Warming: Forget debating their religious faith ("The science is in: Gorebull Warming is HAPPENING and will fry the planet!!! We're all doooomed!!!) it's a waste of time. Instead, go straight to Stage Two: how much is the economy going to suffer to "save the planet"? Will China, Russia and India follow our green lead? Or will they simply take advantage of this lunacy and gobble up the planet's resources at our economic expense? How much are YOU willing to pony up when your electricity skyrockets? Do YOU want to drive a Smart Car? How much are you willing to pay for gas? What if the King who you assure us knows what's best for everyone decides YOU should have a GPS in your car to tax you for mileage and a "smart meter" in your home so he can monitor your energy consumption? You okay with all that, Captain Planet?
(At this point, you'll prob get a look of disbelief or get accused of being a "fearmongerer" or -- even better -- a shill for Big Oil, but that's okay. You've got them on the ropes.) :thumbsup
On socialized medicine: Again, screw their laughable moral compass of "equality": how much innovation, rationing, economic performance and quality of care are YOU willing to sacrifice to have "free health care"?
See, the problem with liberals is they don't even look at the pros and cons of any given issue and work through it rationally. Liberals aren't high-driven executives or engineers, they tenured professors, "journalists", govt employees or "community activists" of some sort, which means you're dealing with irrational narcissists who believe unicorns can crap Skittles. So don't be surprised or get discouraged when they try and deflect and duck all the missiles you're lobbing at them.
Just keep carper bombing until you HIT the target. :thumbsup
On Darwinsim: You mean to tell me that we went from swamp goo to Mozart? Explain exactly how that works (without falling back on your religious dogma you learned in science class)? :blink:
Fourth, Libs feel their way through issues in the abstract, rather than navigate their way through reality -- something you can use to your full advantage by doing what they do: personalizing the debate.
For example...take the issue of torture: if YOUR daughter was kidnapped and YOU managed to snag one of their kidnappers, how far would YOU go to recover her safely? What if they wouldn't talk? Then what?
Yeah, yeah...I know King Hussein assures us his holier-than-though truth serum is more "effective" than waterboarding -- he just won't tell you the magic ingredients of his Chamberlainian witches brew. :+textinb3
Nor is this blind idealogue willing to release ALL THE INFO on waterboarding -- specifcially, how effective it was -- so the the public can make up it's own mind.
It turns out these self-proclaimed "sophisticated nuanced thinkers" are very closed-minded and ridged on the issue of waterboarding -- dangerously so.
(Who knew?) :+textinb3
It's not about "the enemy" they groan, it's about "US" -- OUR VALUES.
Listening to King Hussein, you'd swear the Bush administration broke a long standing American tradition of "fighting above the fray" and no president in US history couldn't ever be charged as a "war criminal." As if war crimes aren't committed in EVERY war. And as if the ruthless savages we're fighting give a rat's ass about "our values" and will adjust their strategy according to King Hussein's delusional "moral high ground."
Boy, what I wouldn't give to see an ignoramus like King Hussein face off against an old cerebral patriotic warhawk like Dick Cheney. :houra
Attn all libs: war isn't football where zebras tag along on the battlefield and throw bean bags for every 'violation' -- unless of course you also happen to believe the UN can be an effective policeman. :doh1
Once you go to war, you play to win! Period, end of issue.
Anyway, this idiotic utopian narrow idealism is always your best friend in a debate: your secret weapon to KO a lib.
Like so:
Lib: Going through a red traffic light is illegal and wrong -- ALWAYS.
Joe: Always?
Lib: Always.
Joe: Okay, how bout firefighters, police and paramedics? They're allowed to run reds, aren't they?
Lib: Well uhh...
Joe: How come they get to run red lights and the rest of us don't? Not very "fair" is it? They're breaking the law, damn it!
Lib: Yes, well it's not illegal for them to do it, is it? Haha...common sense Joe Canadian.
Joe: But you said running red lights is wrong under any/all circumstances?
Lib: Well...you know what I mean, Joe Canada. Now go freeze to death in your igloo!
(Okay, enough toying...I'm going for the kill!) :thumbsup
Joe: I know what you mean? Not really -- except that you're getting creamed. Okay, what about if your mom has a heart attack and you're rushing her to the hospital? Okay to run a red? I mean technically it's against the law, wrong and dangerous right?
Lib: Uhhhh....well.....you see.....whew...it's gettin' hot in here!...
Warning! Warning! Temper tantrum alert! :suit:
Game. Set. Match.
See how easy it is?
Tip: never let them bog you down with their stupid ancillary issues. For example, you're debating torture and somehow you get sideswiped and suddenly find yourself debating WW I. This is intentional. They have to keep shifting the target because they know you're trying to lock in.
So there have it: how to waterboard your fav liberal.
Finally, remember, always wear protective gear and gloves when debating a lib because they hiss, growl, bark, spit, claw and lash out when cornered.
Debating a lib is not for the faint of heart, but it's ohhhhh so fun!
:+excited-:+excited-:+excited-:+excited-:+excited-
Do you have a loony lib family member or friend you can't seem to corner and pummel in a debate? Especially this latest pesky issue on torture?
Wouldn't you just love to waterboard them into confessing how intellectually dishonest, dangerous and imbecelic their values really are?
Well, now you can! :thumbsup
You're about to read several top-secret techniques I use to defeat the avg lib in almost any debate dealing with any subject -- even when I know I'm OBJECTIVELY WRONG.
:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
Here's why:
First, libs are feeling-centric creatures who don't think beyond Stage One.
Despite their claims to the contrary, at the center of every liberal mind is a John Lennon absolutist -- a utopian dreamer ("peace, love dope") with absolutely no footing in the real world whatsoever.
There are NO exceptions. If you find a liberal who thinks beyond Stage One, they're not a lib -- or won't be for very long.
Oh, I know they try and razzle us with their highly edumacated prose, phony ivy league vocab, fancy hairdoos and Starbucks lattes can make them seem intimidating -- as if these brainwashed posers know what they speak of...
Trust me, they don't. At least, not if you can dislodge them from their theoretical textbooks and drag their elitist asses into the not-so-friendly jungle of reality.
Second, the liberal mind is wedded to theory -- soundbites and incantations which originate in the heart, which makes them masters of Orwellian doublespeak.
I've been decapitating their stupidity for years -- and for a while was getting paid a handsome sum to do it, but alas those days are over...at least for now. *sigh*
Anyhoo...
The first thing you'll notice when you entangle yourself with one of these fecal monkey throwers is they love to personalize the debate.
You may have noticed this reading my posts:
"Joe Canuk"
"Joe Canada"
"Mark L"
"bipolar meds"
"Hey! You're from Toronto! STFU you Mountee from the frozen tundra..."
*Kahzam* :+textinb3
And on and on...
(As if non-American DNA had anything to do with it...) :flatten
Why do they do this?
They do this because a) they know they can't win the debate and b) liberals are all about "style" and "personality" and the ancillary minutia, rather than the big picture/bottom line.
If this sounds like the description of a girl, it is: PMS overdrive.
Newsflash: When it comes to debating, liberals act like girls, which is why they take these issues so personally.
I've lost track how many times I've had to stop debating a lib in person because they told me "they're getting too upset" and "need to change the subject." :+textinb3
In cyberspace, it's a different ballgame -- they're just get really, REALLY pissed and personal. :+textinb3:+textinb3
This brings me to my third point.
Once you see them flustered and you can see the debate is becoming personalized and nasty, this is your subliminal cue to blitzkrieg the touchy-feely malcontent ignoramuses with Stage Two Interrogation.
If you're a novice and not sure how to proceed, always use a "what happens next" guide as your compass.
Like this:
On Gorebull Warming: Forget debating their religious faith ("The science is in: Gorebull Warming is HAPPENING and will fry the planet!!! We're all doooomed!!!) it's a waste of time. Instead, go straight to Stage Two: how much is the economy going to suffer to "save the planet"? Will China, Russia and India follow our green lead? Or will they simply take advantage of this lunacy and gobble up the planet's resources at our economic expense? How much are YOU willing to pony up when your electricity skyrockets? Do YOU want to drive a Smart Car? How much are you willing to pay for gas? What if the King who you assure us knows what's best for everyone decides YOU should have a GPS in your car to tax you for mileage and a "smart meter" in your home so he can monitor your energy consumption? You okay with all that, Captain Planet?
(At this point, you'll prob get a look of disbelief or get accused of being a "fearmongerer" or -- even better -- a shill for Big Oil, but that's okay. You've got them on the ropes.) :thumbsup
On socialized medicine: Again, screw their laughable moral compass of "equality": how much innovation, rationing, economic performance and quality of care are YOU willing to sacrifice to have "free health care"?
See, the problem with liberals is they don't even look at the pros and cons of any given issue and work through it rationally. Liberals aren't high-driven executives or engineers, they tenured professors, "journalists", govt employees or "community activists" of some sort, which means you're dealing with irrational narcissists who believe unicorns can crap Skittles. So don't be surprised or get discouraged when they try and deflect and duck all the missiles you're lobbing at them.
Just keep carper bombing until you HIT the target. :thumbsup
On Darwinsim: You mean to tell me that we went from swamp goo to Mozart? Explain exactly how that works (without falling back on your religious dogma you learned in science class)? :blink:
Fourth, Libs feel their way through issues in the abstract, rather than navigate their way through reality -- something you can use to your full advantage by doing what they do: personalizing the debate.
For example...take the issue of torture: if YOUR daughter was kidnapped and YOU managed to snag one of their kidnappers, how far would YOU go to recover her safely? What if they wouldn't talk? Then what?
Yeah, yeah...I know King Hussein assures us his holier-than-though truth serum is more "effective" than waterboarding -- he just won't tell you the magic ingredients of his Chamberlainian witches brew. :+textinb3
Nor is this blind idealogue willing to release ALL THE INFO on waterboarding -- specifcially, how effective it was -- so the the public can make up it's own mind.
It turns out these self-proclaimed "sophisticated nuanced thinkers" are very closed-minded and ridged on the issue of waterboarding -- dangerously so.
(Who knew?) :+textinb3
It's not about "the enemy" they groan, it's about "US" -- OUR VALUES.
Listening to King Hussein, you'd swear the Bush administration broke a long standing American tradition of "fighting above the fray" and no president in US history couldn't ever be charged as a "war criminal." As if war crimes aren't committed in EVERY war. And as if the ruthless savages we're fighting give a rat's ass about "our values" and will adjust their strategy according to King Hussein's delusional "moral high ground."
Boy, what I wouldn't give to see an ignoramus like King Hussein face off against an old cerebral patriotic warhawk like Dick Cheney. :houra
Attn all libs: war isn't football where zebras tag along on the battlefield and throw bean bags for every 'violation' -- unless of course you also happen to believe the UN can be an effective policeman. :doh1
Once you go to war, you play to win! Period, end of issue.
Anyway, this idiotic utopian narrow idealism is always your best friend in a debate: your secret weapon to KO a lib.
Like so:
Lib: Going through a red traffic light is illegal and wrong -- ALWAYS.
Joe: Always?
Lib: Always.
Joe: Okay, how bout firefighters, police and paramedics? They're allowed to run reds, aren't they?
Lib: Well uhh...
Joe: How come they get to run red lights and the rest of us don't? Not very "fair" is it? They're breaking the law, damn it!
Lib: Yes, well it's not illegal for them to do it, is it? Haha...common sense Joe Canadian.
Joe: But you said running red lights is wrong under any/all circumstances?
Lib: Well...you know what I mean, Joe Canada. Now go freeze to death in your igloo!
(Okay, enough toying...I'm going for the kill!) :thumbsup
Joe: I know what you mean? Not really -- except that you're getting creamed. Okay, what about if your mom has a heart attack and you're rushing her to the hospital? Okay to run a red? I mean technically it's against the law, wrong and dangerous right?
Lib: Uhhhh....well.....you see.....whew...it's gettin' hot in here!...
Warning! Warning! Temper tantrum alert! :suit:
Game. Set. Match.
See how easy it is?
Tip: never let them bog you down with their stupid ancillary issues. For example, you're debating torture and somehow you get sideswiped and suddenly find yourself debating WW I. This is intentional. They have to keep shifting the target because they know you're trying to lock in.
So there have it: how to waterboard your fav liberal.
Finally, remember, always wear protective gear and gloves when debating a lib because they hiss, growl, bark, spit, claw and lash out when cornered.
Debating a lib is not for the faint of heart, but it's ohhhhh so fun!
:+excited-:+excited-:+excited-:+excited-:+excited-
