Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

[choslamshe]

First set total games - 9.5: OVER +125 UNDER -175

I don't get this line.

First off, does an under to this total not imply a player's serve will be broken twice in one set?

Second, plus money for the over at this line?

Maybe i'm missing something obvious here, but the liklihood of it going to a tie break is just as good if not better than a 6-3 1st set win?!!??

 

[KingRevolver]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

You can have your serve broken only once, and the score could be 6-3.

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

yea, youre right.

nonetheless...does this, at plus money, not seem like a decent wager?

 

[KingRevolver]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

There's a lot of tricky props in these big matches. TryTryTry and I were just talking about this last month in a PM. Here are a couple of other tricky prop bets...

<table id="tblTennisPropsGame" class="lines" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width=""><tbody><tr class="linesRow" valign="bottom"><td>Sun 7/3</td><td> </td><td>171 R.Nadal wins first point</td><td>
</td><td><input id="editx" name="M1_26" size="4" maxlength="5"> +150 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr class="linesRowBot" valign="top"><td>9:00AM </td><td> </td><td>172 N.Djokovic wins first point</td><td> </td><td><input id="editx" name="M2_26" size="4" maxlength="5"> -190 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr class="linesRow" valign="bottom"><td>Sun 7/3</td><td> </td><td>175 R.Nadal wins first game</td><td>
</td><td><input id="editx" name="M1_27" size="4" maxlength="5"> +190 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr class="linesRowBot" valign="top"><td>9:00AM </td><td> </td><td>176 N.Djokovic wins first game</td><td> </td><td><input id="editx" name="M2_27" size="4" maxlength="5"> -260 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr class="linesRow" valign="bottom"><td>Sun 7/3</td><td> </td><td>177 R.Nadal wins 3 games first</td><td>
</td><td><input id="editx" name="M1_28" size="4" maxlength="5"> -105 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr class="linesRowBot" valign="top"><td>9:00AM </td><td> </td><td>178 N.Djokovic wins 3 games first</td><td> </td><td><input id="editx" name="M2_28" size="4" maxlength="5"> -135 </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table>

 

[KingRevolver]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

yea, youre right.

nonetheless...does this, at plus money, not seem like a decent wager?

Tough one, Cho. It very well might go to a tiebreak, but 6-3 is a very common 1st set score. I thought for sure the 1st set in the Fish-Nadal match would go to a tiebreak. It ended up being 6-3 Nadal.

I know what you're saying, though.

 

[ttwarrior1]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

1st set would go at least 6 -4 in imo if not a tiebreaker

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

for plus money, this may have been the easiest wager i have ever won

 

[trytrytry]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

hmm late break of serve there for 6-4 djok..interesting..

 

[trytrytry]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

for plus money, this may have been the easiest wager i have ever won

nice logic and find there chos enjoy the rest of the match..

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

match is ovah!!! nadal failed to bring it today

 

[trytrytry]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

match is ovah!!! nadal failed to bring it today

ur nutz if you think this is over

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

t3, you think Nadal will win the 3rd set? Djok returns everything raffi throws at him. nadal can't break djok's serve...

i hope you're right for entertainment but raffi looks really outmatched in this one

 

[trytrytry]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

t3, you think Nadal will win the 3rd set? Djok returns everything raffi throws at him. nadal can't break djok's serve...

i hope you're right for entertainment but raffi looks really outmatched in this one

hes fine but behind for now..Djok looks amazing...

 

[trytrytry]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

maybe its me that was nutz..joker perfect tennis in the 2nd set..WOW pleasure to watch this....

 

[KingRevolver]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

Match is far from over, though. All it takes is a couple of big mistakes from Djokovic in this set, and we go to a fourth set. I've seen it happen plenty of times. But, obviously, Djokovic is in a good position right now.

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

GAME ON!!!!

 

[KingRevolver]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

Bam! Nadal now up 3-0.

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

a match of breaks. total game over players will be uber pissed as it looks like 4 sets won't be enough to get 40+ games.

 

[choslamshe]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

unfortunate for viewers..yet another super lame finale. djok is wicked tho...

 

[trytrytry]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

unfortunate for viewers..yet another super lame finale. djok is wicked tho...

i did not think that was lame..not a classic but only 2% of matches should be considered a classic...and I dont have to burn 4 + hrs either!

 

[railbird]

Re: Tennis prop - am i missing something???!???!!!??

Railbird Sports nailed both finals