The Rangers should be sued. They have a waist high railing protecting the first row of fans from a 25 foot plunge or thereabouts. Seriously? They couldn't install a cheap mesh net along the top of that cavernous space to prevent someone from falling that far? It is entirely reasonable to think that fans in the first row will reach over and/or lean over the fence to catch a ball. I'm not one to advocate suing people unless there is merit, and this has merit written all over it.MLB and the Rangers will be sued for not adequately protecting their fans. Bet it!
It's a shame what happened to the guy, but he and he alone is responsible. Not jumping over railings from high places is one of the hazards that people must face alone. The team, the govt, can't protect you, nor should they. Think of it this way, someday some kid(or adult) is going to be killed by a line drive ,should we put nets around the whole stadium to stop it(or perhaps force people to wear helmets)? Of course not, when it happens we 'll move on.The Rangers should be sued. They have a waist high railing protecting the first row of fans from a 25 foot plunge or thereabouts. Seriously? They couldn't install a cheap mesh net along the top of that cavernous space to prevent someone from falling that far? It is entirely reasonable to think that fans in the first row will reach over and/or lean over the fence to catch a ball. I'm not one to advocate suing people unless there is merit, and this has merit written all over it.
Talk about a substandard duty of care.
The Rangers should be sued. They have a waist high railing protecting the first row of fans from a 25 foot plunge or thereabouts. Seriously? They couldn't install a cheap mesh net along the top of that cavernous space to prevent someone from falling that far? It is entirely reasonable to think that fans in the first row will reach over and/or lean over the fence to catch a ball. I'm not one to advocate suing people unless there is merit, and this has merit written all over it.
Talk about a substandard duty of care.
Evey stadium has upper decks all around the field, fans could and have fallen over onto the stands(and fans) below. You cant and shouldnt put nets everywhere.If a line drive hits someone in the head and kills them, I don't see how the stadium is responsible. There is a certain assumption of risk one takes in attending a game. Getting hit by a ball is one of those risks. But that tiny railing without any netting on the opposite side is not a risk anyone should take.
Here is what will happen: the guy's family will hire a lawyer and he'll find out 29 MLB stadiums have netting or some other structure so that no fan can fall that far and injure themselves. The only stadium I can think of that may have such a drop is the San Diego Chargers stadium. Those seats in the first row of the endzone are very high, but not as high as the Rangers' stadium, I don't believe. Even the announcers in that clip said there should be something stopping the fall.
If a line drive hits someone in the head and kills them, I don't see how the stadium is responsible. There is a certain assumption of risk one takes in attending a game. Getting hit by a ball is one of those risks. But that tiny railing without any netting on the opposite side is not a risk anyone should take.
Here is what will happen: the guy's family will hire a lawyer and he'll find out 29 MLB stadiums have netting or some other structure so that no fan can fall that far and injure themselves. The only stadium I can think of that may have such a drop is the San Diego Chargers stadium. Those seats in the first row of the endzone are very high, but not as high as the Rangers' stadium, I don't believe. Even the announcers in that clip said there should be something stopping the fall.
Bet these announcers wish they werent laughing about it.
That guy was thinking of his son, completely different scenario.