Re: Why didn't NE let the giants score with 2 mins remaining????
God you're really fucking dumb.
Even if Brady had a 5% ("very little" to your simple mind) chance of scoring, it's still optimal to kick the FG.
Your issue is that you're acting like if it was the right move, then NE should have won which is not the case at all. It's about making the decision that improves your chances of winning, but certainly being up 2 with your opponent in the red zone with 2 minutes left - there is no way play call to guarantee winning.
AT BEST, New England could have given themselves maybe a 75-80% chance if they let NYG score right away from the 25 yard line. So regardless of what happened, the Giants were still a massive favorite once they marched down the field.
Just because some math nerds say "percentage wise" the right thing to do is run out the clock and kick the (NEVER MISS) extra point FG does not even begin to make it the right decision.
The decision is this ......
You TAKE the LEAD by 4 GUARANTEED!!!!!!!!
OR
You fall down on the 1 and don't mind trying a FG where if you MISS you lose the Super Bowl.
I will take the 4 point lead every time!!!!!!!!
Those odds are 100%
First choice is you are winning the Super Bowl by 4 and it would take a miracle for the other team to go 80 yards in 1 minute to beat you!
The other choice is to take your chance on a FG where YOU ran out the clock so if you miss you just GAVE the Super Bowl AWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Again not 1 player wants to lose a game like that especially a Super Bowl game.
That is a MISTAKE that would never go away.
No I will take my chances on stopping ANY QB from going 80 yards with 1 minute left.
That's how football is played