Is this considered circumventing limits?

[LetItRide]

If a company has multiple books all using the same lines (like sportsbook.com does with wallstreet.com, etc...), would it be considered "circumventing limits" to start an account on each of those sites and max out on a certain bet you like?

I mean, after all, if the book is willing to go under different names (which I don't have a problem with), shouldn't that mean the $ limit placed on a certain bet be only for *that* book?

 

[IDENTITY]

letitride - while there is nothing wrong with it in theory. you cannot win if you take that approach. ya see, the book will wait to see how the bet does. if you win, they will call you a shot taker and close your accounts and not pay you. if you lose, they will obviously keep the money.

best thing to do is to call them and ask. and then get in writing that it is okay to do, if they say u can do it.

gl....

 

[Omni]

ya see, the book will wait to see how the bet does. if you win, they will call you a shot taker and close your accounts and not pay you. if you lose, they will obviously keep the money.

best thing to do is to call them and ask. and then get in writing that it is okay to do, if they say u can do it.

EXACTLY. And I think we've seen this scenario on the forums before where the book has done this, though the specifics escape me.

 

[raiders72001]

Email the book. This way if they say it's fine to do that you have written proof.

 

[IDENTITY]

raiders is right. email the book. then save their response.

 

[Joe]

If you have to ask the question...

 

[Santo]

It's sportingbet. They have in their T&C that betting at multiple skins is circumventing limits.