Looks like Clinton thought these guys would just go away too...

Bettor days

EOG Dedicated
<CENTER>The Culpability of William Jefferson Clinton




<CENTER>lest we forget</CENTER>


After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
Perhaps if Clinton had kept his promises, over 3,000 people would be alive today.






</B>
Everything was more important than fighting terrorism. Political correctness, civil liberties concerns, fear of offending the administration's supporters, Janet Reno's objections, considerations of cost, worries about racial profiling and, in the second term, surviving impeachment, all came before fighting terrorism. - Dick Morris, New York Post, Jan. 2, 2002
______________________________________________________________________


Got this off some right wing blog.
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Lets not forget about Reagan ...

and lets not forget Rice was not even familiar with Al Queda the day she
took office
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Perhaps if Clinton had kept his promises, over 3,000 people would be alive today

PERHAPS IF THE BUSH FAMILY WAS NOT IN BED WITH BIN LADEN AND CHENEY WAS NOT RUNNING NORAD ON THE MORNING OF 9-11 3000 AMERICANS WOULD STILL BE ALIVE

BUSH WAS WARNED AND TOOK A MONTHS VACATION .... TO BLAME CLINTON IS SOMETHING THE RIGHT LOVES TO DO
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
ALL TERRORIST ATTACKS UNDER REAGAN/BUSH ... AND NO MILITARY ACTION TAKEN ON ANY OF THESE ATTACKS!! .... IN FACT, REAGAN WAS A "CUT AND RUNNER" WHEN IT CAME
TO LEBANON ...



<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#a14d4d" valign="center">April 18, 1983</td><td bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center">Bombing of U.S. Embassy in Beirut</td></tr> <tr><td>
</td><td colspan="2"> A suicide bomber in a pickup truck loaded with explosives rammed into the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon. Sixty-three people were killed, including 17 Americans, eight of whom were employees of the Central Intelligence Agency, including chief Middle East analyst Robert C. Ames and station chief Kenneth Haas.


Reagan administration officials said that the attack was carried out by Hezbollah operatives, a Lebanese militant Islamic group whose anti-U.S. sentiments were sparked in part by the revolution in Iran. The Hezbollah operatives who carried out the attack on the embassy reportedly were receiving financial and logistical support from both Iran and Syria.


The U.S. government took no military action in response to the embassy bombing


<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#a14d4d" valign="middle">
</td><td bgcolor="#a14d4d" valign="center">Oct. 23, 1983</td><td bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center">Bombing of Marine barracks in Beirut</td></tr> <tr><td>
</td><td colspan="2"> A suicide bomber detonated a truck full of explosives at a U.S. Marine barracks located at Beirut International Airport; 241 U.S. Marines were killed and more than 100 others wounded. They were part of a contingent of 1,800 Marines that had been sent to Lebanon as part of a multinational force to help separate the warring Lebanese factions.
.
Four months after the Marine barracks bombing, U.S. Marines were ordered to start pulling out of Lebanon .... I BELIEVE BETTER KNOWN AS REAGAN BEING A "CUT AND RUNNER"



<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#a14d4d" valign="center">Dec. 12, 1983</td><td bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center">Bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait</td></tr> <tr><td>
</td><td colspan="2"> The American embassy in Kuwait was bombed in a series of attacks whose targets also included the French embassy, the control tower at the airport, the country's main oil refinery, and a residential area for employees of the American corporation Raytheon. Six people were killed, including a suicide truck bomber, and more than 80 others were injured. The suspects were thought to be members of Al Dawa, or "The Call," an Iranian-backed group and one of the principal Shiite groups operating against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.


The U.S. military took no action in retaliation


<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#a14d4d" valign="center">Sept. 20, 1984</td><td bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center">Bombing of U.S. Embassy annex northeast of Beirut</td></tr> <tr><td>
</td><td colspan="2"> In Aukar, northeast of Beirut, a truck bomb exploded outside the U.S. Embassy annex killing 24 people, two of whom were U.S. military personnel. According to the U.S. State Department's 1999 report on terrorist organizations, elements of Hezbollah are "known or suspected to have been involved" in the bombing.


The U.S. mounted no military response to the embassy annex bombing



</td></tr></tbody></table>
</td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table>
 

Bettor days

EOG Dedicated
Why did't he take Bin Laden when he had the chance? Talk about leaving a big pile of dogshit in the next presidents house.
 

ynot

EOG Dedicated
Because Clintons orders were to to build Bin Laden. Just like the Repubs before him.

Bettor get with the program or you will be considered the enemy.
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
why not ask Bush the same question ...

If the CIA had wanted to arrest Osama bin Laden prior to September 11, they could have done it then in Dubai. But they would not have had a the war on terrorism pretext for waging a major military operation in the Middle East and Central Asia.


"Dubai... was the backdrop of a secret meeting between Osama bin Laden and the local CIA agent in July [2001]. A partner of the administration of the American Hospital in Dubai claims that "public enemy number one" stayed at this hospital between the 4th and 14th of July. While he was hospitalized, bin Laden received visits from many members of his family as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. During the hospital stay, the local CIA agent, known to many in Dubai, was seen taking the main elevator of the hospital to go [up] to bin Laden's hospital room. A few days later, the CIA man bragged to a few friends about having visited bin Laden. Authorized sources say that on July 15th, the day after bin Laden returned to Quetta [Pakistan], the CIA agent was called back to headquarters. In the pursuit of its investigations, the FBI discovered "financing agreements" that the CIA had been developing with its "Arab friends" for years. The Dubai meeting is, so it would seem, within the logic of 'a certain American policy.'" (CRG -- The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital last July in Dubai )
 

Bettor days

EOG Dedicated
So that makes 2 prsidents so far that ignored terrorists, how bout Carter as the worst of them all, Reagan apparently didn't do much although he was fighting the Commies, Bush 1? How did he handle the terrorists? So pretty much every president since Carter ignored the threat these loonies posed. Isn't that nice... Good to know it wasn't only Bush. Plenty of blame to go around.
 

Lawrence

EOG Dedicated
Bigplay, was the ding ding in response to my question? I do not know much about it, but would that mean that Bush 1 intentionally lost to Bill, to pave the way for it?
 

ynot

EOG Dedicated
Planning for this crap started before WW2 even got off the ground. I know this is hard to comprehend.

[hint, the releasing of British Control.. to American control of certain parts of the world, and an interweaving that is meant to decieve]

If one looks at the whole picture. it's not all that hard.
 

ynot

EOG Dedicated
Lawrence said:
Bigplay, was the ding ding in response to my question? I do not know much about it, but would that mean that Bush 1 intentionally lost to Bill, to pave the way for it?

In June of 1992 Rush and the dittoheads were having hayday.

The big joke was the DNC having their convention in Manhattan , just blocks from Rush's headquarters.
(when they had NO chance of winning)

Flash forward Oct. 15th 1992 > Clinton in the lead and money flowing in from very suspect sources.
>>>>>The Press making a joke out of Bush 1.......

"No new taxes" rammed down the throats of even the rightest of the right
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Bettor:

facts are whoever we arm we go to war with ....

American Politics breeds corruption with the current system in place and
with ONE SINGLE PARTY IN PLACE - REGARDLESS IF LEFT OR RIGHT - it
is the "Inmates running the Big House"
 
Top