Dell Dude Press Conference

STOP THE STEAL!

We know the reason JK is not posting. Here is the reason Computer Bob is not posting:

He's waiting until it becomes calendar mathematically impossible to reach 18. He posts now what he has my record and why, time to recover. Waits until we are at the business end of August, nothing I can do. Same dirty tricks Democrats pull with rigged elections. Wait until everybody is done counting so they know howid many ballots they need. This is beyond dirty. This is criminal. JK and Bobby are 2 crooks! I expect it from JK a proud Dem but Bobby pretends to be MAGA. Just another RINO in Reno.
 
I expect it from JK a proud Dem

JK isn't a Dem, he's on the right, not the far right, he's seems more moderate, but he's definitely not a Dem
 
That's you two, kane.
As I posted before, I quit the challenge thread when you turned it political, when I stopped checking it there were three plays that were questionable, the Bears play, the Cubs RL, and the tennis match. Here's my honest response, I would allow the tennis play to count, I mean you willingly took a 2/1 dog, if fact, I don't know why tennis isn't allowed, as long as you're not laying more than -110 it should be fine, as for the Cubs RL, it says "sides and totals only", to me a RL isn't considered a side, but as long as you're not laying more than -110, there should be no problem with it. The only play that absolutely shouldn't count is the Bears play, maybe I'm wrong, but I can't imagine any book paying out on that game, unless they're pulling a stunt to create good will like when they void a player prop if someone gets hurt early in the game, NFL games have to go I think 55 minutes to be an official game. So, if I was running the show here, AFAIK the only play that shouldn't count is the Bears, the tennis and RL's should stand. As I said, I stopped following the thread long ago, so I don't know if there are any additional controversial plays or not, but that's my opinion on the three I know of
 
Bears ended up being a loss.
Why a loss? It should go as a no play and you should be able to replace it, and another thing, golf matchups should also be allowed, as long as the bum you bet isn't laying more than -110 it should be fine
 
Posters probably blame me but try to defend JK and Computer Bob abandoning the thread. They didn't have to give me August. Why give it to me then set me up to be DQ'd?
 
I will play along. Is that a real picture of JD?
Yes, and there's another one just like it I posted in the other section, and while I can't say for 100% that it's real, I do know the Vance campaign has yet to say it's fake, common sense would dictate that if it was fake they would have announced it immediately, instead they've said "no comment", to me that means it's real, I'm quite sure the alt right will have no problem with their VP pick dressing in drag, maybe he's been hanging out with George Santos and Rudy

1723503777123.png

1723503826014.png
 
J.D. Vance evidently did some cross-dressing back in law school.

On Sunday, a photo of the Ohio senator and Republican vice presidential nominee allegedly wearing a blonde wig and dressed as a woman was posted on X.

When The Daily Beast reached out to Vance to see if the photo was real, the campaign did not deny its authenticity and also refused to comment further.

The source of the photo is from one of Vance’s classmates at Yale Law School, Travis Whitfield, who said the picture was taken by a different classmate in 2012, when they were all students. Whitfield sent the photo to podcast host Matt Bernstein, who then uploaded it to X.
 
Now, personally I have no problem with the guy cross dressing, if that's who he is, that's fine with me, be yourself, but it is a bit hypocritical of him to disparage trans people and cross dressers when he himself does it. Again, no problem with him doing it, just that he's being very hypocritical
 
Believe me, Incel knows who that is.

He is just thankful that nobody has a picture of him in cross-dressing apparel.
 
Back
Top