Failed amendment? He wanted to change the rules so he could bet women's soccer, you changed the rules to allow it. He wanted to change the rules so he could bet college baseball, you changed the rules to allow it. Dell wanted to change the rules only for one month so he could bet tennis, you wouldn't do it. You talk about extending an olive branch to Dell by offering him a spot in the Challenge, and that was a nice gesture on your part, but Dell offered the same branch to Winky by offering to donate his winnings to the charity of Winky's choice, a surprising, but equally nice gesture, I said I'd add $150 to the pot meaning the charity donation would have been $1,150, all you had to do was change the rules only for one month and allow him to bet tennis, but you refused. For RailNazi you permanently changed the rules by allowing two additional sports, for Dell you wouldn't temporarily change the rules for one month to help a charity. You're the boss and I respect that, but don't tell me RailNazi doesn't have his own set of rules