Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

It's a good thing I'm not sending this stuff to my fellow birthers...
You needed their help a long time ago.Posting shit from WND and ORYR that I debunk rather easily is no challenge anymore.You need new material and you should try thinking for yourself and get some logic in your brain because listening to those crank sites is just making you dumber.Pathetic
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Well by all means prove this wrong!!
BTW thanks for proving that all you have is ''Google'':LMAO:LMAO
PROVE that their is a difference in subpoena's!!Please do!!:lol
First PROVE there is another umm, normal source making this beyond asinine comparison, and I promise I will school you the same way I did with this:

Originally Posted by tank

IT WAS A HEARING FOR THE HUNDREDTH TIME AND WAS NOT A COURT ORDERED SUBPOENA!
Break is over.

Your 12 year old says he wants you back for more English tutoring.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

First PROVE there is another umm, normal source making this beyond asinine comparison, and I promise I will school you the same way I did with this:



Break is over.

Your 12 year old says he wants you back for more English tutoring.
How about from the state of Georgia??Like a typical birfer you will still say it is not true!
http://www.osah.ga.gov/documents/procedures/administrative-rules-osah.pdf

S
chool me????:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
I have made you look stupid for over 67 pages now and it will not change!!I own your dumbass.
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Georgia Ballot Appeal In Progress: Attorney Hatfield To Take It All The Way To SCOTUS

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/georgia-ballot-challenge-appeal-in.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2012-02-11T19:31:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">7:31 PM
</abbr>



The case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama and the other Georgia ballot challenge cases are different from all of the previous cases in that the judge DENIED Obama’s Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, this case cannot be compared to any of the previous cases because the merits of the case were presented in open court before Judge Michael Malihi. Subsequently, the FACTS with regard to Barack Obama’s “natural-born Citizen” status and non-compliance with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution as required for the Office of the President of the United States were entered into the court record. However, Obama ignored the subpoena requiring his attendance to the judicial proceeding where neither he nor his attorney even showed up and then his attorney sent an email directly to the Georgia Secretary of State asking him to just cancel the hearing, a move which is completely against the established “rules” of the court.

In an incomprehensible turn of events, Judge Malihi ultimately rewarded Obama’s astounding display of contempt for the court and his attempt to subvert the U.S. Constitution and “Rule of Law” by finding Obama eligible for the ballot even though he entered nothing into the record to prove his eligibility.

Pursuant to Georgia election law O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a):

(a) Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.

Malihi relied upon a non-binding advisory opinion from an Indiana State case over a U.S. Supreme Court case which has held binding precedent since 1875 to “consider” Obama’s eligibility. In effect his recommendation would signify that the U.S. Constitution as he “considers” it would allow the child of a terrorist with dual allegiance to be President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

With great foresight and deliberate resolve, the Founders explicitly crafted the requirement of “natural-born Citizen” as a safeguard to guarantee protection for the nation against foreign influence.

The extant implications are so far-reaching they belie all reason and can’t be ignored. The foundations of our government made up of three equal branches have been totally undermined such that the Judiciary either can’t or won’t enforce the U.S. Constitution which is the “Law of the Land.”

The dangers posed to the Republic are profoundly grave. At best the Judiciary is of no effect upon an unchecked Executive branch, and at worst the Judiciary is complicit in the total destruction of the Constitution leaving tyranny in its wake.

This is not a theoretical exposition. While these United States are supposed to comprise a representative Republic, the fact remains Malevolent Forces have stolen the sanctity of the ballot to illegitimately usurp the highest seat of power with impunity while officials in positions of trust have turned a blind eye and abrogated their responsibility to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC.

These enemies of freedom have plotted a course for the nation that will impact, if not control every aspect of your life against your will including your immutable God given rights.

We must challenge these Malevolent Forces girded by TRUTH and the armour of righteousness.

Represented by J. Mark Hatfield of Hatfield & Hatfield P.C., Waycross, GA; this Georgia Ballot Challenge case now advances in the appeals process all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. Your financial support is greatly needed at this time. No amount is too small or too large.
Donations can be made here:




https://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fundhttps://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fund

Updates on the case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama can be found here:
http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.htmlhttp://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

"I know not the day nor hour our victory will be at hand…
But know ye this, our cause is just therefore I take this stand."

Godspeed,
Kevin Richard Powell
February 11th, 2012
http://pixelpatriot.blogspot.com/http://PixelPatriot.blogspot.com

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

BTW why did the Judge not issue a contempt of court order for Obama??:LMAO:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Georgia Ballot Appeal In Progress: Attorney Hatfield To Take It All The Way To SCOTUS

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/georgia-ballot-challenge-appeal-in.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2012-02-11T19:31:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">7:31 PM
</abbr>




The case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama and the other Georgia ballot challenge cases are different from all of the previous cases in that the judge DENIED Obama’s Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, this case cannot be compared to any of the previous cases because the merits of the case were presented in open court before Judge Michael Malihi. Subsequently, the FACTS with regard to Barack Obama’s “natural-born Citizen” status and non-compliance with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution as required for the Office of the President of the United States were entered into the court record. However, Obama ignored the subpoena requiring his attendance to the judicial proceeding where neither he nor his attorney even showed up and then his attorney sent an email directly to the Georgia Secretary of State asking him to just cancel the hearing, a move which is completely against the established “rules” of the court.

In an incomprehensible turn of events, Judge Malihi ultimately rewarded Obama’s astounding display of contempt for the court and his attempt to subvert the U.S. Constitution and “Rule of Law” by finding Obama eligible for the ballot even though he entered nothing into the record to prove his eligibility.

Pursuant to Georgia election law O.C.G.A. 21-2-5(a):
(a) Every candidate for federal and state office who is certified by the state executive committee of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.

Malihi relied upon a non-binding advisory opinion from an Indiana State case over a U.S. Supreme Court case which has held binding precedent since 1875 to “consider” Obama’s eligibility. In effect his recommendation would signify that the U.S. Constitution as he “considers” it would allow the child of a terrorist with dual allegiance to be President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

With great foresight and deliberate resolve, the Founders explicitly crafted the requirement of “natural-born Citizen” as a safeguard to guarantee protection for the nation against foreign influence.

The extant implications are so far-reaching they belie all reason and can’t be ignored. The foundations of our government made up of three equal branches have been totally undermined such that the Judiciary either can’t or won’t enforce the U.S. Constitution which is the “Law of the Land.”

The dangers posed to the Republic are profoundly grave. At best the Judiciary is of no effect upon an unchecked Executive branch, and at worst the Judiciary is complicit in the total destruction of the Constitution leaving tyranny in its wake.

This is not a theoretical exposition. While these United States are supposed to comprise a representative Republic, the fact remains Malevolent Forces have stolen the sanctity of the ballot to illegitimately usurp the highest seat of power with impunity while officials in positions of trust have turned a blind eye and abrogated their responsibility to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC.

These enemies of freedom have plotted a course for the nation that will impact, if not control every aspect of your life against your will including your immutable God given rights.

We must challenge these Malevolent Forces girded by TRUTH and the armour of righteousness.

Represented by J. Mark Hatfield of Hatfield & Hatfield P.C., Waycross, GA; this Georgia Ballot Challenge case now advances in the appeals process all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. Your financial support is greatly needed at this time. No amount is too small or too large.
Donations can be made here:





https://secure.piryx.com/donate/Owri7yAp/Article-II-Legal-Defense-Fund

Updates on the case Kevin Richard Powell v. Barack Obama can be found here:
http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

"I know not the day nor hour our victory will be at hand…
But know ye this, our cause is just therefore I take this stand."

Godspeed,
Kevin Richard Powell
February 11th, 2012
http://PixelPatriot.blogspot.com

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Ho Hum!
[h=2]Mark Hatfield’s error[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-11T10:16:17-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 11, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES
Mark Hatfield, the attorney for plaintiffs Powell and Swensson in the Georgia Ballot Challenge, wrote the Georgia Secretary of State asserting that Judge Malihi made an error. Hatfield argues that no evidence was presented in his case upon which one might conclude that Barack Obama was born in the United States or that his mother was a US citizen, important factors in determining his eligibility as President of the United States. While both Taitz and Irion submitted copies of the President’s birth certificate in their cases, Hatfield did not, and Hatfield says that what the other attorneys submitted cannot be used to decide his case. Hatfield wrote:
Simply put, a review of the record in my clients’ above-captioned reveals no evidence of Defendant’s place of birth and no evidence of Defendant’s mother’s citizenship at the time of Defendant’s birth.
[h=2]Exhibit 6[/h]So let’s go back to the hearing transcript in Hatfield’s case. Exhibit 6 was introduced into evidence on page 17 of the transcript. Mr. Kenneth Allen testified that Exhibit 6 was “the disk I received from the Citizenship and Immigration Services with 181 pages of documents and an introductory letter from – you know, from the department.” It is described as a true copy of the FOIA response Mr. Allen received in response to a 2011 request.
Looking at Exhibit 6, on document page 34, we find the phrase “USC [United States citizen] spouse to go to Wash State University next semester” dated 8/31/1961 (the month of Barack Obama’s birth). And following that: “They have one child born Honolulu on 8/4/1961.” So it appears that Mr. Hatfield did submit some evidence both that Obama’s mother was a US Citizen at the time of his birth and that her son was born in Honolulu.

On page 39 we have additional testimony of the mother’s citizenship status in a Memo for File:
Mrs. McCabe, University of Hawaii, Foreign Student Advisor, called on 4/10/61 and reported that BARACK H. OBAMA, a student at the University since 1959 was married on February 2, 1961 to Stanley Ann Dunham, a United States citizen from Seattle, Washington …

We have, thereby, documentation that Stanley Ann Obama was a US citizen both shortly before and after the birth of the President. Mr. Hatfield is mistaken as to what he submitted.
So here we have a document that says Obama was born in Honolulu and that he was still living there just 27 days after his birth. Maybe this isn’t the best evidence, but certainly evidence that would lead any reasonable person to assume that he was born in Hawaii. Mr. Hatfield, having not even suggested that there was any emergency international travel to have Barack Obama delivered in Kenya, cannot expect the Judge to imagine on his own the fantastic birther “flight to Africa” scenarios and fraudulent birth registration schemes.
Just as Jablonski failed to show up to argue against the cases presented against the President, Hatfield failed to argue against the evidence that he himself presented that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii to a US Citizen mother and is at least 35 years of age.
OOPS!

:LMAO:LMAO
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Mark Hatfield’s error

by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-11T10:16:17-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 11, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES
More unsourced, baseless cow dung from the CON who can shovel it like no other:



:cocksuck: :cocksuck:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Boy that is scary!!:3dgros11:
Don't worry, the Fraud-in-Chief will be forced to step down way before the civil trials get to the SCOTUS once he's indicted by a grand jury. :thumbsup
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

More unsourced, baseless cow dung from the CON who can shovel it like no other:



:cocksuck: :cocksuck:
In other words you cannot refute anything he say's!That is already obvious to everyone but keep acting like you can!!That is what is so funny!He makes you look stupid and all you can do is try and smear him.No rebuttal just smears!:houra
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Don't worry, the Fraud-in-Chief will be forced to step down way before the civil trials get to the SCOTUS once he's indicted by a grand jury. :thumbsup
Yes we have heard this for over 3 years now and after 99 losses in court we know...''we got him now'':LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

More unsourced, baseless cow dung from the CON who can shovel it like no other:



:cocksuck: :cocksuck:
What is untrue about what Doc posted??Those are the actual things from the hearing so show what is not true.
:pop::pop::pOP:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

What is untrue about what Doc posted??Those are the actual things from the hearing so show what is not true.
:pop::pop::pOP:
Start with exhibit 6!!:pOP:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

In other words you cannot refute anything he say's!That is already obvious to everyone but keep acting like you can!!That is what is so funny!He makes you look stupid and all you can do is try and smear him.No rebuttal just smears!:houra
Wrong as always, moron.

What your loser no-traffic underwear bloggers opine doesn't makes fuck-all of a difference in the eventual outcome.

Do you understand fantasy vs reality, idiot?

I'm not interested in DR CON's putrid constipated 'opinions', I'm interested in FACTS, and that means the statements/actions from both sides, i.e., Hatfield vs. Jablonski.

Apples vs apples -- not apples vs a pile of cow dung (Obot underwear bloggers).

I post a statement by the Plaintiff and your first impulse is to go crawling into the Alinsky sewer for an Obot underwear blogger response, as always.

If you posted a statement or press conference of one of the Kenyan's lawyers, I would say that's a useful thing -- BOTH sides DO deserve to be heard.

But Obot Underwear bloggers are a complete waste of EOG bandwidth. 2938u4ji23
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

In other words you cannot refute anything he say's!That is already obvious to everyone but keep acting like you can!!That is what is so funny!He makes you look stupid and all you can do is try and smear him.No rebuttal just smears!:houra
It's already been proven you are too fucking stupid to discern Obot underwear blogger fantasy from reality, so carry on what you do best:

tank: "Ahhhhh, he's never let me down!"



:cocksuck::cocksuck: :cocksuck: :cocksuck:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

It's already been proven you are too fucking stupid to discern Obot underwear blogger fantasy from reality, so carry on what you do best:

tank: "Ahhhhh, he's never let me down!"



:cocksuck::cocksuck: :cocksuck: :cocksuck:
Start with exhibit 6!!:pOP:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Wrong as always, moron.
Still cannot refute anything he says.We know and it is obvious.

What your loser no-traffic underwear bloggers opine doesn't makes fuck-all of a difference in the eventual outcome.
The one you cannot refute.You are his bitch so get use to it.

Do you understand fantasy vs reality, idiot?
Yep!Facts are reality wich we supply while all you have is fantasy tales and never prove shit.It is obvious for all to see.

I'm not interested in DR CON's putrid constipated 'opinions', I'm interested in FACTS, and that means the statements/actions from both sides, i.e., Hatfield vs. Jablonski.
You cannot refute anything he says so this is all you got?Sad!He is using actual transcripts from the hearing so what is a lie or a opinion here?

Apples vs apples -- not apples vs a pile of cow dung (Obot underwear bloggers).

I post a statement by the Plaintiff and your first impulse is to go crawling into the Alinsky sewer for an Obot underwear blogger response, as always.
Because I already posted were he screwed up 2 pages back but your dumbass never realized it like usual.

If you posted a statement or press conference of one of the Kenyan's lawyers, I would say that's a useful thing -- BOTH sides DO deserve to be heard.
Oh no!!Only shit from WND or ORYR is fact in your idiotic mind.When Doc exposes your lies all you have is to try and smear him.Classic@

But Obot Underwear bloggers are a complete waste of EOG bandwidth. 2938u4ji23
Especially when they make you look stupid and you cannot refute anything they say because they use facts and make your smears look stupid.
Now start with exhibit 6 idiot.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

You mean the turd you just pulled out of Dr CON's ass while fingering him? That exhibit 6?

You disgusting Obot traitors make me sick to my stomach!

:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAOLike usual you cannot do it!!:LMAO:LMAOBrilliant answer though.:shoot:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

It's already been proven you are too fucking stupid to discern Obot underwear blogger fantasy from reality, so carry on what you do best:

tank: "Ahhhhh, he's never let me down!"



:cocksuck::cocksuck: :cocksuck: :cocksuck:
And you have never refuted anything he has said or proven he is lying!!Telling indeed!!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

What is untrue about what Doc posted??Those are the actual things from the hearing so show what is not true.
:pop::pop::pOP:
:pop::pop:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Post facts and reputable sources, not underwear blogger fantasy crap.

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!:pop:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!:pop:
Dr CON's underwear blogger response nobody reads:

 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Dr CON's underwear blogger response nobody reads:

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Dr CON's underwear blogger response nobody reads:

This is your answer????:LMAO:LMAOYet another strawman attempt to deflect but keep showing everyone how you cannot do it!!We are waiting!!:pop:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!
Hey numbnuts, what part of UNDERWEAR BLOGGER OPINIONS don't you understand?

 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Hey numbnuts, what part of UNDERWEAR BLOGGER OPINIONS don't you understand?

What part of actual transcripts from the hearing do you not get??Prove him wrong!!:pop:Show where he is lying.:pop:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Yipee!!Spambot Joe has got his thread of lies and bullshit up to 67 pages!Still has not proven shit or refuted anything Doc has said but fantasy world on the net is fun.Still looking stupid Joe so keep on going spam monkey.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!:pop:
:pop:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Originally Posted by tank

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!


It would be so much easier if you just admitted you cannot refute anything he say and cannot prove he is wrong!!:pop:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Originally Posted by tank

Hey stupid what part of ACTUAL TRANSCRIPTS from the hearing do you not get?Now show where he is lying or PROVE what he said is not true!


It would be so much easier if you just admitted you cannot refute anything he say and cannot prove he is wrong!!:pop:
But have it your way.Still waiting for you to prove him wrong and show where he is lying.:pop:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Dr CON and his homo lover tank after a hard day's work of "debunking birthers":

 
Top