Man landed on the moon 50 years ago today

trytrytry

All I do is trytrytry
At 4:17 p.m. EDT on July 20, 1969, NASA's "Eagle" lunar lander touched down on the surface of the moon. ( I think about 5 hours to go before first step, )

 

blueline

EOG Master
No Plan B to get off the moon.

If that engine didn't fire, it was over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe the biggest hoax ever on humanity.

Pence said we would 'be back' on the moon within 5 years. So I suspect they have hired Spielberg and a few others to start filming the 1969 'landing site' footage now to make sure it can pass the modern day digital break downs.

But more than likely they will use the same excuse as to why we didnt 'go back' as they have for the past 40 years...we dont have any money. LMAO we spend trillions of dollars and billions of dollars on illegals (and every Dem pres candidate wants to give them free healthcare now) yet we cant slap an Iphone (which currently has about 100K times computing power as all the computers in mission control in 69) onto a few million pounds of fuel and a jiffy popcorn container (which is basically what they were in) and be there in a couple days?

Some of the richest men in the world have spent how much money just to get rockets into orbit? And when they do its like some big achievement. Tech and 'science' that has been around how long now? NASA has awarded these guys billions of dollars but no 'data' on the moon trips? Yet we have an 'international space station' for how long now? And how many trips and men on the moon 50 years ago? yet with all the money and light years better tech and computing power some of the guys with the most money able to hire the smartest guys in the world jump for joy when they do what any grade school boy did in the 60s and 70s...launched a rocket from a pad which inevitably crashed somewhere. But ironically Space X (founded in 2002) took 8 years just to get something into space and back again. Then after 2012 and a 'delivery to the space station' they have seen many and much faster 'successes'. Coincidentally this all happened after they started receiving billions from NASA. Basically they became part of it all once they started taking money.

Now I know we have the ability to get satellites into space. Thats pretty easy guys figured out gravity 400 years ago. But even so Skylab crashed to earth about 40 years ago so who knows if they have it fully figured out yet. But small TV and radio satellites sure. But theyre all also in a very low earth orbit compared to shit that has been claimed.

But really for the US government when has MONEY ever been a reason to NOT do something?
 

SlipperyPete

EOG Dedicated
I am always a firm believer in the moon landing, till I see videos where they explain the nuts and bolts of it.

I am always like, 'that is all you had???' 'how the fuck did you succeed??'

LOL
 

mr merlin

EOG Master
Idiotic, the fool say's we succeeeded on the first attempt, the whole appolo program was based on testing various components and processes about the moon trip. Apollo 10 was a dress rehearsal leaving out only the moon landing, Apollo 8 also sent astronauts to circle the moon.

Then he's hung up on computing power, they didn't need computing power because they had almost no computers. As far as the shadow goes, we dont know that he had the sun directly behind him. Fake news from lunatics.
 
Idiotic, the fool say's we succeeeded on the first attempt, the whole appolo program was based on testing various components and processes about the moon trip. Apollo 10 was a dress rehearsal leaving out only the moon landing, Apollo 8 also sent astronauts to circle the moon.

Then he's hung up on computing power, they didn't need computing power because they had almost no computers. As far as the shadow goes, we dont know that he had the sun directly behind him. Fake news from lunatics.

Your explanation for the shadows reveals your low intelligence level
 

ComptrBob

EOG Master
LOL-doesn't matter what angle the camera would be facing-if there's only one light source (in this case the sun) shadows are only able to go one direction

But there are multiple light sources. Obviously the sun, but also earth shine and moonscape reflections.
 

mr merlin

EOG Master
LOL-doesn't matter what angle the camera would be facing-if there's only one light source (in this case the sun) shadows are only able to go one direction
Haven't they seen the shit we left on the moon with probes and even telescopes? Or are they all fake too?
 
Haven't they seen the shit we left on the moon with probes and even telescopes? Or are they all fake too?

actually they havent. At least no INDEPENDENT 'photos'. Just like there are no actual 'pictures' of the earth from space (thus the theory its flat). Every image of the earth from space has a disclaimer that its 'enhanced' or whatever. There are no full globe views of the planet....

As for the stuff we left on the moon and the 'photos'...There are more than a few but they dont really seem to be to scale. There are 5 or 6 alleged manned landing sites and they cover an area almost the size of the US. Theyre also definitely not 'google earth' quality. Grainy black and white stuff that shows some tracks and alleged stuff we left.

Russia/USSR also had 8 or 10 unmanned landings ironically none of them anywhere near where we supposedly put men. For a country who claimed they wanted to prove we lied they surely didnt look like they were trying too hard. Even the China landing a few years ago, that basically landed in Chicago and the closest US manned landing spot (allegedly) would have been equivalent of probably Miami.

In the end it doesnt matter. Govt lies to us everyday about a lot more important things than us landing on the moon. But its always a dream and when things suck really bad here they dangle space in front of people thats why Mars is the big deal now, thats how bad it sucks again. When it was halfway decent no one gave a shit about space. Now that the earth is going to hell (some real some fake) its all about going to space again.
 

mr merlin

EOG Master
actually they havent. At least no INDEPENDENT 'photos'. Just like there are no actual 'pictures' of the earth from space (thus the theory its flat). Every image of the earth from space has a disclaimer that its 'enhanced' or whatever. There are no full globe views of the planet....

As for the stuff we left on the moon and the 'photos'...There are more than a few but they dont really seem to be to scale. There are 5 or 6 alleged manned landing sites and they cover an area almost the size of the US. Theyre also definitely not 'google earth' quality. Grainy black and white stuff that shows some tracks and alleged stuff we left.

Russia/USSR also had 8 or 10 unmanned landings ironically none of them anywhere near where we supposedly put men. For a country who claimed they wanted to prove we lied they surely didnt look like they were trying too hard. Even the China landing a few years ago, that basically landed in Chicago and the closest US manned landing spot (allegedly) would have been equivalent of probably Miami.

In the end it doesnt matter. Govt lies to us everyday about a lot more important things than us landing on the moon. But its always a dream and when things suck really bad here they dangle space in front of people thats why Mars is the big deal now, thats how bad it sucks again. When it was halfway decent no one gave a shit about space. Now that the earth is going to hell (some real some fake) its all about going to space again.
Wow, let me ask you, are there people in space now, on the space station?
 
If we wanted to, they could easily seize a portion of the remittances mexicans send home, and they should.

News Flash: They’re not paying for the wall and they never were. Your belief in that promise is much more silly than alternative views of the moon landing.
 

mr merlin

EOG Master
News Flash: They’re not paying for the wall and they never were. Your belief in that promise is much more silly than alternative views of the moon landing.
I never said i believe they would, only that we should make them, we should also require the Iranians to pay for our aid to Israel.
 
Top