http://www.eog.com/news/index.aspx?id=660 Thoughts?
red26 EOG Enthusiast Sep 16, 2005 #2 I agree with the premise, but would have liked to see more results then just two weeks from early last year. Sample is way too small. Recognizing which teams are overvalued and undervalued is a good tool though.
I agree with the premise, but would have liked to see more results then just two weeks from early last year. Sample is way too small. Recognizing which teams are overvalued and undervalued is a good tool though.
