I’m curious to see how Woodruff looks tonight. On the surface, he’s back. 2 starts, 10 innings 16 k’s. But a look at the velocity, he’s a solid 3 mph below pre injury levels.
Bellinger's performance tonight is why I don't pay too much attention to lifetime batter stats versus starting pitcher.
Bellinger was 1 for 16 vs. Scherzer with 10 strikeouts.
Tonight 3 for 3, two doubles and a homerun.
Bellinger's performance tonight is why I don't pay too much attention to lifetime batter stats versus starting pitcher.
Bellinger was 1 for 16 vs. Scherzer with 10 strikeouts.
Tonight 3 for 3, two doubles and a homerun.
i agree with you batter vs pitcher at bats are probably random??. Then we watch a game and the manager mentions a batter is 4 hits off the pitcher in 9 at bats when asked why he chose the pinch hitter
I don't get it
i remember when bobby cox said this about barry bonds who had a horrible post season average....
well he is still barry bonds......the best hitter in the game..............
i say talent hits the ball ...not clutch................clutch is monday morning QB
I agree, you can't look at a hitters career numbers against Scherzer as any indication of what he'll do against him right now, clearly this isn't the Max Scherzer of old, what Bellinger or anyone else has done against him in the past has little bearing on what he'll do against him this year, same goes for Verlander, throw out what hitters did against him in the past, just like Scherzer, Verlander not the same pitcher he wasIt's not random.
The example Heim cited was a pitcher who was a multiple Cy Young winner years ago. Scherzer will be 41 in the next week and clearly is nowhere near the pitcher he was at this peak.
Not random Topper, assuming it's a big enough sample size. For example, if a guy is 4-8 against a pitcher, maybe 2 of those hits were broken bat bloopers. On the other hand a guy might be 0-8 lifetime against a certain pitcher, but maybe he hit 2 line drive outs and was robbed of a home run at the wall. If a hitter is something like 13-30, that means somethingi agree with you batter vs pitcher at bats are probably random??.
Not random Topper, assuming it's a big enough sample size. For example, if a guy is 4-8 against a pitcher, maybe 2 of those hits were broken bat bloopers. On the other hand a guy might be 0-8 lifetime against a certain pitcher, but maybe he hit 2 line drive outs and was robbed of a home run at the wall. If a hitter is something like 13-30, that means something
White Sox 4-0 first 4 games out of the ASB. 35 runs scored in 4 games.
Considering they're playing much better they might get well into the 60's for wins.The White Sox are 37-66, but they're 8-23 in one run games, their EXWL is 43-60, their still bad, but not the shit show they were last year, they have some decent young arms
I'll be happy with 53Considering they're playing much better they might get well into the 60's for wins.
[9511747] TOTAL o1½-125 (MANNY MACHADO HITS + RUNS + RBIS vrs MANNY MACHADO HITS + RUNS + RBIS) ( ACTION )
Pending
Jul 24 2025 07:45
Manny Machado Hits + Runs + RBIs - Must Start for Action
[9511747] MANNY MACHADO HITS + RUNS + RBIS
[9511748] MANNY MACHADO HITS + RUNS + RBIS
Here's a hitter/pitcher example for tonight.
Manny Machado vs Sonny Gray. Decent sample size at 32 at bats, 11 hits, 2 doubles 2 home runs and only 5 k's. That pencils out to a .344 BA, .595 SP and a .955 OPS.
Guess who homered tonight?
merchado doesn't whiff ......he is a good bet to play totals with. Has some power too. Is there records what the batters do all year with totals?
Not that I'm aware of. But that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Or you can just figure it out going thru all their results.
Nice addition, but they still need another bat IMONaylor might have been the missing piece Mariners needed to win the division.
Where getting nothing from Raley.
Raleigh will get a few more good looks with Naylor batting clean up.
They are staring at 74-78 wins, their win total O/U was 63.He has no chance to win it due to the voters being idiots, but if the Marlins finish the season .500 Clayton McCullough should win the MOY award, and the voting shouldn't be close. Assuming the Dodgers win the West, they'll give it to the winner of the Central, but no team has overachieved as much as the Marlins, the job McCullough has done has been amazing, doing it with a bunch of rookies, castoffs, and no names
They're 4 games under .500, at the start of June they were 16 games under, the job McCollough has done can't be understated, but I know how the voters think, he won't win the award but probably shouldThey are staring at 74-78 wins, their win total O/U was 63.
How much is he paid? makes no sense unless the guy is heading out of the league.
He's one of the best closers in the gameHow much is he paid? makes no sense unless the guy is heading out of the league.
The pitches alone wouldn't attract that much scrutiny so there must be a lot of money wagered on the b/s outcome. only got one dude to swing in above video ...