When Narratives Go Viral
The best explanation may lie in the emerging field of narrative economics, to borrow a term from the Yale University economist Robert Shiller. He argues that markets and prices are often driven by stories and narratives that can take on the characteristics of epidemiology, suddenly spreading and “going viral.” Markets can spark contagion (as in the rise in the gold price), which in turn moves other markets still further.
This applies even to gold, which Shiller describes as a “relatively useless metal, mentioned something like 300 times in the Bible.” And this: “You can have both long-term and short-term contagions; the contagious idea that gold has value has been going around for thousands of decades
WTF, he was just telling people to put 15% of portfolio in gold. Maybe the above clip is old.
This isn't a trade. Long run, its still well intact. The momentum traders jumped on in September and now the momentum has (temporarily stopped) they are jumping off. A correction had been expected.
Silver crashing, I'll pick some up when it gets under $10.
I've noticed that recently, a number of these commodity guys, while still bullish on gold & silver, they are starting to look at the oil market. It's been beat up and hated, but there does seem to be some unofficial consensus that prices will rise in 2026.
Nice dress.Squeeze the #Silver View attachment 7473803
I picked up some ORCL late in the day yesterday. The stock rocketed up around 30% back on Sept 10. Gapped up but has really been selling off since; much of the gains have been given back as it works to fill the gap from Sept 10.
It's hard to say, several of them did express skepticism but then backtracked with different comments suggesting they were more open to it. Roberts did appear to be a clear no on the tariffs - which isn't surprising since he's a rino traitor.
- The US Supreme Court appeared skeptical of President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, with key justices suggesting he had overstepped his authority.
- A decision against Trump could force refunds, remove a major burden on US importers, and blunt a tool the president has used against trading partners.
- The court’s justices, including conservative justices, questioned Trump’s use of an emergency-powers law to collect tariffs, with some indicating alarm at the reach of the Trump administration’s contention that Congress had delegated its constitutional authority over tariffs to the president.
a ruling should come at the end of the year
It's hard to say, several of them did express skepticism but then backtracked with different comments suggesting they were more open to it. Roberts did appear to be a clear no on the tariffs - which isn't surprising since he's a rino traitor.
It's hard to say, several of them did express skepticism but then backtracked with different comments suggesting they were more open to it. Roberts did appear to be a clear no on the tariffs - which isn't surprising since he's a rino traitor.
So, the entire world, less USA, can tarriff all they want. It's just over stepping here. Got it!
So, you really, really think the Chinese are the only ones with RE's. Pls.