NFL Playoff Thread 2026

raiders72001 said:
There’s a difference between no line and stale lines that you use. Nothing wrong with saying I’m on the Steelers.
Click to expand...
If the Steelers lose by 3, you can come in the next day and claim you took 3.5 and won your bet when you really had them plus 3. If you can't see the issue with posting plays without lines, then I can't help you
 
ZzyzxRoad said:
I have to ask, even though though I know I'm not going to get an intelligent answer.

What are you hoping to accomplish with this conversation?
Kane to admit that he's wrong?
Someone as stupid as Jammer to read it and agree with you?
A small hit of dopamine from insulting someone in the internet?
Click to expand...
You’re an idiot. A couple days ago you begged me not to mention your name.
 
It would be like me posting I have the Eagles. The line opened 3.5 and is now 6. What If I posted a play on the Eagles without the line I got, would it be okay for them to win by 4 and me post the next day I laid 3.5 and won my bet? Think how ridiculous that would look. Think how I would get called out for doing that, and rightfully so, but Raiders sees nothing wrong with posting plays with no lines, I don't get it
 
raiders72001 said:
One correction. Since I post so many plays, some may have no line. Kane posts stale lines. Either no line or current line is how it should be posted.
Click to expand...
Correct. If you post a line make it available at time of posting.

Either way Raiders occasionally not posting a line is not justification for using nonexistent lines.

Just my 2 cents.
 
kane said:
It would be like me posting I have the Eagles. The line opened 3.5 and is now 6. What If I posted a play on the Eagles without the line I got, would it be okay for them to win by 4 and me post the next day I laid 3.5 and won my bet? Think how ridiculous that would look. Think how I would get called out for doing that, and rightfully so, but Raiders sees nothing wrong with posting plays with no lines, I don't get it
Click to expand...
I guess if it’s not a contest play you don’t have to post a line now?
 
Rams jiust not fully buttoned up. They had a 4th & 3 late in first half. Stafford rolled out. He could’ve easily run for it, but forced a throw that was incomplete. It could’ve been 20-7 if they kick a FG. Carolina rides the momentum for a quick score, and like that, its 17-14.

This team isn’t better than Seattle, no matter what the modelers say.
 
ATL exposed the Rams. Rams didn't lay down either fighting for seeding.

Only difference is ATL put more pressure on Stafford.
 
Valuist said:
Rams jiust not fully buttoned up. They had a 4th & 3 late in first half. Stafford rolled out. He could’ve easily run for it, but forced a throw that was incomplete. It could’ve been 20-7 if they kick a FG. Carolina rides the momentum for a quick score, and like that, its 17-14.

This team isn’t better than Seattle, no matter what the modelers say.
Click to expand...
Cannot figure out how you don't kick a FG in that situation. You have to coach differently in the playoffs....do not pass up points.
 
railbird said:
amazing the low iq of some players of dbs catching interception on 4th down 30 yds down field
Click to expand...
That proves that most are most care more about their personal stats.. you can't tell me they are that stupid that they don't know to just knock it down.
 
Turmover reliant defenses can win some regular season games because there’s plenty of weak QBs. Can’t expect to win that way in playoffs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top