Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters

Re: Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters

It's so much easier to attack the messenger than attack the argument; is'nt it? Rather than deal with the criminal mismanagement of our country for the last eight years, let's discuss Dawg's alleged "anger problem." PRICELESS. . . .On the other hand, the absolute inability of the party that now calls itself Republican to deal with anything of consequence is the main reason it will be shellacked in November. . . .

as someone said before...why dont you place a big bet on the democrats if it is such guaranteed money?
 
Re: Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters

New Iraq report: 15 of 18 benchmarks satisfactory

WASHINGTON (AP) - No matter who is elected president in November, his foreign policy team will have to deal with one of the most frustrating realities in Iraq: the slow pace with which the government in Baghdad operates. Iraq's political and military success is considered vital to U.S. interests, whether troops stay or go. And while the Iraqi government has made measurable progress in recent months, the pace at which it's done so has been achingly slow.
The White House sees the progress in a particularly positive light, declaring in a new assessment to Congress that Iraq's efforts on 15 of 18 benchmarks are "satisfactory"?almost twice of what it determined to be the case a year ago. The May 2008 report card, obtained by the Associated Press, determines that only two of the benchmarks?enacting and implementing laws to disarm militias and distribute oil revenues?are unsatisfactory.
In the past 12 months, since the White House released its first formal assessment of Iraq's military and political progress, Baghdad politicians have reached several new agreements seen as critical to easing sectarian tensions.
They have passed, for example, legislation that grants amnesty for some prisoners and allows former members of Saddam Hussein's political party to recover lost jobs or pensions. They also determined that provincial elections would be held by Oct. 1.
But for every small step forward, Iraq has several more giant steps to take before victory can be declared on any one issue.
Amnesty requests are backlogged, and in question is whether the new law will speed the release of those in U.S. custody. It also remains unclear just how many former Baath members will be able to return to their jobs. And while Oct. 1 had been identified as an election day, Baghdad hasn't been able to agree on the rules, possibly delaying the event by several weeks.
Likewise, militias and sectarian interests among Iraq's leaders still play a central role in the conflict. And U.S. military officials say they are unsure violence levels will stay down as troop levels return to 142,000 after a major buildup last year.
In the May progress report, one benchmark was deemed to have brought mixed results. The Iraqi army has made satisfactory progress on the goal of fairly enforcing the law, while the nation's police force remains plagued by sectarianism, according to the administration assessment.
Overall, militia control has declined and Baghdad's security forces have "demonstrated its willingness and effectiveness to use these authorities to pursue extremists in all provinces, regardless of population or extremist demographics," as illustrated by recent operations, the White House concludes.
Rep. Mike McIntyre, D-N.C., who requested the administration's updated assessment, scoffed at the May report, which he says uses the false standard of determining whether progress on a goal is "satisfactory" versus whether the benchmark has been met. He estimates that only a few of the 18 benchmarks have been fully achieved.
Democrats also say more solid progress could have been made had the administration starting pulling troops out sooner.
"We've tried repeatedly to get the administration to shift responsibility to the Iraqi leaders for their own future, since there is broad consensus that there is no military solution and only a political settlement among the Iraqis can end the conflict," said Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
"The administration, however, has repeatedly missed opportunities to shift this burden to the Iraqis and appears willing to do so again," Levin said.
But whether the next president will be much more successful in forcing the Iraqi government to reach a lasting political settlement remains to be seen.
Whether the new administration starts pulling troops out of Iraq right away, as Democratic presidential hopeful Barak Obama has promised, or refuses to set a timetable, per Republican John McCain's suggestion, most agree that a functional democracy in Iraq could still be years away because of the complexities of the issues involved and the deeply rooted distrust among the nation's sectarian groups.
"Iraq has the potential to develop into a stable, secure multiethnic, multi-sectarian democracy under the rule of law," Ryan Crocker, U.S. ambassador to Iraq said in April when he last testified before Congress. "Whether it realizes that potential is ultimately up to the Iraqi people."
why would anyone even read this stupid post? .. you told us all we needed to know in your moronic title, "Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters..." Exactly how big of a douche bag are you dude? Your title states that all people against Bush (meaning Bush's policies, Bush's decisions, beliefs.... ANYTHING related to Bush) are Anti-American. This is tunnel vision at its most pathetic. I hate to jump on the bandwagon, but enjoy your sheepdom.
 
Re: Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters

I'm fulfilling the oath I swore to do. Pointing out what the BUSH ADMINISTRATION has lied about, in no way makes me a hypocrite. I will use my voice as I see fit and the more I irritate you, the more I revel in it.
after reading this, you might as well give up and let their ignorance flow. you are just honoring your work, as we all must work to survive. you are still entitled to your own opinions, rather than allowing Sean Hannity to form them for you. I know it must be hard for you to have patience for a guy that tells you that you need anger management, in the same sentence he calls you "boy."
 
Re: Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters

irritate? are you kidding? other than youngbuck you are the weakest of the bunch. because you cant take even the tiniest morsel of criticism.


Is that why you follow me around these forums like a love-struck stalker...?
 

DimeDR

Banned
Re: Very bad news for the Anti-American Bush Haters

It's so much easier to attack the messenger than attack the argument; is'nt it? Rather than deal with the criminal mismanagement of our country for the last eight years, let's discuss Dawg's alleged "anger problem." PRICELESS. . . .On the other hand, the absolute inability of the party that now calls itself Republican to deal with anything of consequence is the main reason it will be shellacked in November. . . . 4625


my man, show me anywhere these dolts debate anything, their MO is to avoid all facts and attack the person ... they cut and paste at times, which is fine, but never speak to direct questions in their own words and stay on topic ... cut and paste, we all do it to share info, but i will debate anyone anytime on 9/11 yet these moles just go undercover and have no basis of knowledge to discuss anything; all the sudden its always "you wacky conspiracy theorists," like the official story isnt the worst conspiracy lie of all time ...

i think i talk in my own words as much or more than anyone, even doc would, but the braindead repeat this mantra to hide their ignorance: ALL YOU DO IS CUT AND PASTE AND POST VIDEOS...

so not true, just like the neocons lies over last decade and beyond

have a nice weekend
dimeDr
 
Top