Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

tank

EOG Dedicated
Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

And I'm saying it bluntly, that this administration is the greatest wet blanket to business, and progress and job creation in my lifetime. And I can prove it and I could spend the next 3 hours giving you examples of all of us in this market place that are frightened to death about all the new regulations, our healthcare costs escalate, regulations coming from left and right. A President that seems, that keeps using that word redistribution. Well, my customers and the companies that provide the vitality for the hospitality and restaurant industry, in the United States of America, they are frightened of this administration.And it makes you slow down and not invest your money. Everybody complains about how much money is on the side in America.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

You bet and until we change the tempo and the conversation from Washington, it's not going to change. And those of us who have business opportunities and the capital to do it are going to sit in fear of the President. And a lot of people don't want to say that. They'll say, God, don't be attacking Obama. Well, this is Obama's deal and it's Obama that's responsible for this fear in America.
The guy keeps making speeches about redistribution and maybe we ought to do something to businesses that don't invest, their holding too much money. We haven't heard that kind of talk except from pure socialists. Everybody's afraid of the government and there's no need soft peddling it, it's the truth. It is the truth. And that's true of Democratic businessman and Republican businessman, and I am a Democratic businessman and I support Harry Reid. I support Democrats and Republicans. And I'm telling you that the business community in this company is frightened to death of the weird political philosophy of the President of the United States. And until he's gone, everybody's going to be sitting on their thumbs.
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Uh, Steve...

You call yourself a "Democratic businessman". The Democrats are Socialists. Pure and simple. :doh1

brucefan, take a bow. The Kenyan has turned out as radical as we warned he would be in 2008. Even his biggest supporters are beginning to turn on him, Wynn being the latest.
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

"And I'm telling you that the business community is frightened to death of the weird political philosophy of the President of the United States. And until he's gone, everybody's going to be sitting on their thumbs."

Classic. :whip:

The "weird political philosophy" is called Marxism, Steve.
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

The question now is will other CEOs have the balls to stand up with him?

Its about time these CEO's s defended themselves ,call out the marxist bastard, and not just let Glenn Beck take all the heat!


( Ill hold my breath waiting for Immelt :doh1)
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call



Wynn's Rant: One Among Many - Investors.com

"In such a climate, it's no surprise that executive outbursts are erupting like lava from scorched earth. Wynn's remarks echo those on a lengthening list of CEOs including:

? 3M's George Buckley, who blasted Obama last February as anti-business. "We know what his instincts are," Buckley said. "We've got a real choice between manufacturing in Canada or Mexico ? which tends to be more pro-business ? and America," he told the Financial Times.

? Boeing's Jim McNerney, who in the Wall Street Journal last May called Obama's handpicked National Labor Relations Board's suit against his company a "fundamental assault on the capitalist principles that have sustained America's competitiveness since it became the world's largest economy nearly 140 years ago."

? Intel's Paul Otellini, who told CNET last August that the U.S. legal environment has become so hostile to business that there is likely to be "an inevitable erosion and shift of wealth, much like we're seeing today in Europe ? this is the bitter truth."
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Home Depot Co-Founder: Obama Is Choking Recovery

By JOHN MERLINE, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY Posted 07/20/2011 06:35 PM ET

Bernie Marcus co-founded Home Depot (HD) in 1978 and brought it public in 1981 as the U.S. was suffering from the worst recession and unemployment in 40 years. The company thrived, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs and redefining home improvement retailing.

But Marcus says Home Depot "would never have succeeded" if it launched today due to onerous regulation. He recently helped launch the Job Creators Alliance, a Dallas-based nonprofit of CEOs and entrepreneurs dedicated to preserving the free enterprise system. IBD recently spoke to him about jobs and the economy.

IBD: What's the single biggest impediment to job growth today?

Bernie Marcus: Red over rules. View Enlarged Image

Marcus: The U.S. government. Having built a small business into a big one, I can tell you that today the impediments that the government imposes are impossible to deal with. Home Depot would never have succeeded if we'd tried to start it today. Every day you see rules and regulations from a group of Washington bureaucrats who know nothing about running a business. And I mean every day. It's become stifling.

If you're a small businessman, the only way to deal with it is to work harder, put in more hours, and let people go. When you consider that something like 70% of the American people work for small businesses, you are talking about a big economic impact.

IBD: President Obama has promised to streamline and eliminate regulations. What's your take?

Marcus: His speeches are wonderful. His output is absolutely, incredibly bad. As he speaks about cutting out regulations, they are now producing thousands of pages of new ones. With just ObamaCare by itself, you have a 2,000 page bill that's probably going end up being 150,000 pages of regulations.

IBD: Washington has been consumed with debt talks. Is this the right focus now?

Marcus: They are all tied together. If we don't lower spending and if we don't deal with paying down the debt, we are going to have to raise taxes. Even brain-dead economists understand that when you raise taxes, you cost jobs.

IBD: If you could sit down with Obama and talk to him about job creation, what would you say?

Marcus: I'm not sure Obama would understand anything that I'd say, because he's never really worked a day outside the political or legal area. He doesn't know how to make a payroll, he doesn't understand the problems businesses face. I would try to explain that the plight of the busi nessman is very reactive to Washington. As Washington piles on regulations and mandates, the impact is tremendous. I don't think he's a bad guy. I just think he has no knowledge of this.
 

eberetta1

EOG Addicted
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Obama is just another Jimmy Carter, great intentions bad execution due to others making sure that he does not succeed. Jimmy Carter was blamed for 17% interest rates back when he was president, but I appreciated his Habitat For Humanity. I do not know what legacy Obama is leaving, but knowing he tried to get individuals healthcare is good enough for me.

The problem is as long as this is a democracy, big business is going to nail government to pay godawfull prices for healthcare for the poor. The profit motive for insurance and healthcare needs removed. Get rid of marketing and the price of insurance and medical care goes down.

Bill Clinton tried to get his wife to get a healthcare bill passed. It got shot down. He also ran a budget surplus, more than any Republican admin can ever brag about. They got rid of the 30 year tresury bills, because the us debt was being paid off so fast. It was not until reagan dropped taxes 20 percent on the rich, and Bush dropped taxes another 20 percent on the rich, that we ran into budget problems. Bush never raised taxes to pay for the war he got us into. Just put it on my grandkids shoulders. Historically, the nation has had the rich pay 50 to 70 percent of income over $1,000,000, now it is under 30 percent. Do that for 10 years and we have the problem we are in now. How many million does a person need to live, and what the rich still pay people 10 bucks an hour to buy a house.
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Obama is just another Jimmy Carter, great intentions bad execution due to others making sure that he does not succeed. Jimmy Carter was blamed for 17% interest rates back when he was president, but I appreciated his Habitat For Humanity. I do not know what legacy Obama is leaving, but knowing he tried to get individuals healthcare is good enough for me.

The problem is as long as this is a democracy, big business is going to nail government to pay godawfull prices for healthcare for the poor. The profit motive for insurance and healthcare needs removed. Get rid of marketing and the price of insurance and medical care goes down.

Bill Clinton tried to get his wife to get a healthcare bill passed. It got shot down. He also ran a budget surplus, more than any Republican admin can ever brag about. They got rid of the 30 year tresury bills, because the us debt was being paid off so fast. It was not until reagan dropped taxes 20 percent on the rich, and Bush dropped taxes another 20 percent on the rich, that we ran into budget problems. Bush never raised taxes to pay for the war he got us into. Just put it on my grandkids shoulders. Historically, the nation has had the rich pay 50 to 70 percent of income over $1,000,000, now it is under 30 percent. Do that for 10 years and we have the problem we are in now. How many million does a person need to live, and what the rich still pay people 10 bucks an hour to buy a house.

No nation has ever tax and spent their way to prosperity.

The decline of America started under FDR with Social Security and went on steroids under LBJ with Medicare and Medicaid, supplemented by George W. Bush with his expansion of Medicare to include Prescription Drugs (one of the main reasons Big Government Republicans lost BIG in 2006), and culminated with Obamacare which, if not fully repealed, will be the final straw.

The welfare state is the cause of America's decline, just as it was for the Roman Empire and now the EU.

For my money, Calvin Coolidge is the most underrated president. Between he and Harding, they lowered the highest income tax rate from 70% to 29%. Coolidge cut government spending by 50%. The result: the Roaring Twenties.
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

The problem is as long as this is a democracy, big business is going to nail government to pay godawfull prices for healthcare for the poor. The profit motive for insurance and healthcare needs removed. Get rid of marketing and the price of insurance and medical care goes down.

Is that so?

Ever since the government started messing with healthcare, costs have skyrocketed.



The best way to get healthcare costs down is to get the government out of it.
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

I?m just quitting?: A scene right out of ?Atlas Shrugged? in Birmingham

by David McElroy


If it had been a scene in ?Atlas Shrugged,? the guy would have disappeared into the secrecy of Colorado with a shadowy figure who we would later learn to be John Galt. In real life, the story will probably be more complex. But I wonder how long it?s going to be before businesspeople really do start walking away and deciding it?s not worth doing business in America today. Or it it already happening and we just don?t know it?

The man you see in the picture at the right is named Ronnie Bryant. He operates coal mines in Alabama. I?d never heard of him until this morning, but after what I saw and heard from him, I?d say he?s a bit like a southern version of Ellis Wyatt from Ayn Rand?s novel. What I saw made an impression on me.

I was at a public hearing in an inner-city Birmingham neighborhood for various government officials to get public input on some local environmental issues. There are several hot topics, but one of the highest-profile disputes is over a proposal for a coal mine near a river that serves as a source of drinking water for parts of the Birmingham metro area. Mine operators and state environmental officials say the mine can be operated without threatening the water supply. Environmentalists claim it will be a threat.

I?m not going to take sides on that environmental issue, because I don?t know enough to stake out an informed opinion. (With most of the people I listened to today, facts didn?t seem to matter as much as emotional implications.) But Ronnie Bryant wasn?t there to talk about that particular mine. As a mine operator in a nearby area, he was attending the meeting to listen to what residents and government officials were saying. He listened to close to two hours of people trashing companies of all types and blaming pollution for random cases of cancer in their families. Several speakers clearly believe that all of the cancer and other deaths they see in their families and communities must be caused by pollution. Why? Who knows? Maybe just because it makes for an emotional story to blame big bad business. It?s hard to say.

After Bryant listened to all of the business-bashing, he finally stood to speak. He sounded a little bit shellshocked, a little bit angry ? and a lot frustrated.
My name?s Ronnie Bryant, and I?m a mine operator?. I?ve been issued a [state] permit in the recent past for [waste water] discharge, and after standing in this room today listening to the comments being made by the people?. [pause] Nearly every day without fail ? I have a different perspective ? men stream to these [mining] operations looking for work in Walker County. They can?t pay their mortgage. They can?t pay their car note. They can?t feed their families. They don?t have health insurance. And as I stand here today, I just ? you know ? what?s the use? I got a permit to open up an underground coal mine that would employ probably 125 people. They?d be paid wages from $50,000 to $150,000 a year. We would consume probably $50 million to $60 million in consumables a year, putting more men to work. And my only idea today is to go home. What?s the use? I don?t know. I mean, I see these guys ? I see them with tears in their eyes ? looking for work. And if there?s so much opposition to these guys making a living, I feel like there?s no need in me putting out the effort to provide work for them. So as I stood against the wall here today, basically what I?ve decided is not to open the mine. I?m just quitting. Thank you.
I have no idea what Bryant will actually do. He might have made a quick emotional decision based on anger at feeling blamed for things that are frequently just normal health issues of life. He might reconsider and go ahead with his project.

The only thing I?m sure of is that what I saw today is a broken process and a sham. We all want a decent environment in which to live, but when various people at a public meeting ? including federal officials and community members ? talk about ?environmental justice? and make it clear that their intent is to make it harder for businesses to operate, well, I can see why a businessman would decide to quit. I consider myself an environmentalist ? because I want to live in a safe, secure, clean world ? but what I saw isn?t reasonable concern for the environment as much as it?s an ideological agenda.

We need reasonable people to talk about how to balance various people?s property rights. (You have the right to use your property as you please, but I have a right not to be injured by it.) Even though we need a discussion, the modern equivalent of a kangaroo court that I observed today isn?t the way to go about it. It was more like a prelude to a lynching of business. If I were a businessperson or investor, I wouldn?t put the money or effort into opening new industry in this country today.

I?d take my investment and jobs to somewhere they were wanted.
As Ronnie Bryant asked, ?What?s the use?? Maybe Atlas really is starting to shrug.

Editor?s note: Since several people have asked about the source of the quote, I?ll point out again that I was at the meeting. Here?s the audio clip of Ronnie Bryant speaking. The audio quality is poor since it was recorded on my iPad without any intention of broadcast or public sharing.
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Small Business Owner Says The Food Stamp President Should Apologize For Economy

Amilya Antonetti says that businesses cannot rely on the Obama administration and that he should apologize for not leading the country to success. She goes on to say that the administration has not prepared a plan.

<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/X1l4_nFe0tY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Fed Up: A Texas Bank Is Calling It Quits

By ROBIN SIDEL

Main Street Bank lends most of its money to small businesses and is earning decent profits. But the Kingwood, Texas, bank is about to get out of the banking business.

In an extreme example of the frustration felt by many bankers as regulators toughen their oversight of the nation's financial institutions, Main Street's chairman, Thomas Depping, is expected to announce Wednesday that the 27-year-old bank will surrender its banking charter and sell its four branches to a nearby bank.


<cite>Michael Stravato for The Wall Street Journal</cite>

Texas turnaround: Thomas Depping, chairman of Main Street Bank, plans to give up the bank's charter.

Mr. Depping plans to set up a new lender that will operate beyond the reach of banking regulators—and the deposit-insurance safety net.

Backed by the private investment firm of Microsoft Corp. co-founder Paul Allen, the company won't be able to call itself a bank, but it will be able to do business the way Mr. Depping wants.

"The regulatory environment makes it very difficult to do what we do," says Mr. Depping, who last summer saw his bank hit with an enforcement order from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

A spokesman for the FDIC declined to comment on Main Street, a unit of closely held MS Financial Inc. Dan Frasier, director of corporate activities for the Texas Department of Banking, confirmed that Main Street is "working on the process of moving out of the state banking system," but declined to provide details.

Bankers have long complained about their overseers, but it is rare for a bank to basically close its doors aside from an acquisition or failure. Mr.

Depping blames the move on a tightening regulatory noose.

Regulators came under fire in the financial crisis for lax oversight that allowed financial institutions to dole out too much credit to unworthy borrowers. Some bank executives now complain that federal and state agencies have swung to the other extreme, poring over minute details of virtually every loan, including those to small businesses.

"The No. 1 complaint that we hear from community bankers is that they feel that regulators have gone one step too far and are choking off lending," says Paul Merski, chief economist at the Independent Community Bankers of America, a trade group that represents small banks.




Regulators defend their efforts, saying that intensive oversight is needed to prevent banks from taking too much risk and repeating the behavior that got the industry in trouble.

Mr. Depping has been on a collision course with regulators since 2009, when FDIC examiners began questioning the bank's large concentration of small-business loans. Nearly all of Main Street's $175 million loan portfolio has gone to customers like dentists, owners of fast-food franchises and delivery-truck drivers, who use the loans to purchase equipment. The bank's average loan size is $100,000 to customers who have less than $1 million in annual revenue, Mr. Depping says.

Mr. Depping says that Main Street's focus on small-business lending has sheltered the bank from much of the devastation that has swept the industry, including 385 bank failures since the start of 2008.

Main Street had profits of $1 million in the second quarter and wrote off 1.25% of its loans as uncollectible. That is below the industry's charge-off rate of 1.82% in the FDIC's data for the first quarter, the latest available. The bank has earned nearly $11 million in the past year.

In July 2010, the FDIC slapped Main Street with a 25-page order to boost its capital, strengthen its controls and bring in a new top executive.

Regulators also said the bank was putting too many eggs in one basket.

Mr. Depping says regulators wanted the bank to shrink its small-business lending to about 25% of the total loan portfolio, down from about 90%.

Mr. Depping says he explained to regulators that Main Street has focused on small-business lending since he bought the bank in 2004 with a group of investors. He says the bank makes credit decisions based on a combination of the borrower's personal-credit and business-credit histories, among other factors.

"We felt that servicing small business is something the country needs and that we're really good at it. I thought the model was working just fine," Mr. Depping says.

Main Street also was required to increase its capital cushion and prohibited from substantially expanding its balance sheet.

FDIC officials told the bank to file financial reports that "accurately reflect the financial condition of the Bank as of the reporting date," particularly regarding the money it set aside to cover loan losses.

The FDIC also ordered Main Street to shore up its lending guidelines so that loans are "supported by current credit information and collateral documentation, including lien searches and the perfection of security interests; have a defined and stated purpose; and have a predetermined and realistic repayment source and schedule," according to the order.

Main Street bolstered its capital levels by getting smaller. It sold a business and shrank its loan portfolio, actions that boosted its Tier 1 leverage ratio—a measure of capital as a proportion of assets—to 17.3% at June 30 from 9.5% a year earlier. It also brought in a new president.

Even so, soon after last July's order, Mr. Depping began exploring a transaction that would include the unusual step of surrendering his banking charter.

Mr. Depping's new company, called Ascentium Capital, will be backed by Vulcan and a group of investors led by an investment arm of Luther King Capital Management, based in Fort Worth, Texas.

The new entity won't be regulated and won't be able to offer federal deposit insurance—but doesn't want to attract deposits, Mr. Depping says. The new firm is being capitalized with $75 million of equity and a $250 million financing facility led by UBS. Mr. Depping says he wants to ultimately increase the loan portfolio to $500 million.

The deal also calls for Green Bank, a unit of Houston-based Green Bancorp Inc., to acquire Main Street's four branches. Ascentium will acquire $150 million of Main Street's loans, with the rest going to Green.

Mr. Depping hopes the deal will close by October after receiving regulatory approvals and completing Main Street Bank's unwinding.

"It's a lot easier to become a bank than to get rid of your bank charter," he says.

Write to Robin Sidel at robin.sidel@wsj.com
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

The banks should be able to take risk's with their money,but at the same time if they lose it then do not go crying to the Government for a bailout.
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

The banks should be able to take risk's with their money,but at the same time if they lose it then do not go crying to the Government for a bailout.


Amen to that
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Gallup: Small business confidence collapses

byConn Carroll

Follow on Twitter:@conncarroll



A new Wells Fargo-Gallup poll shows that the percentage of small business owners expecting to hire more employees fell to 12 percent in July, down from 23 percent in January. A matching 12 percent of small businesses also say they expect a decrease in the number of jobs at their companies over the next 12 months. These hiring-and-firing numbers are at their lowest point in a year. The poll was taken before this week's stock market collapse.

The number of small businesses who told Gallup they are anticipating an increase in revenue over the next year also fell, from 54 percent in January to 42 percent in July. Another 18 percent of small businesses said the expect their revenues to decrease.

These results mirror a National Federation of Independant Businesses study released earlier this week that found small-business optimism falling for the fifth consecutive month. Asked to identify the single most important problem facing their business, owners cited poor sales (23 percent), taxes (20 percent), and government regulations (16 percent).
 
Re: Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call

Business 101: Keep your money in the bank until the American-hating Kenyan Marxist is gonzo.
 
Top