Society must choose: The Sodomites or Judeo-Christian Tradition

[Joe Contrarian]

And of course -- Manny's favorite -- step by step guides on how to abduct, molest and discard young boys.

Oops, you forgot that one, Saul...though I'm sure it was just an 'oversight'.

Sooo....NAMBLA still protected by the First Amendment, ?

Suing E-Harmony (coercing an independent business to cater to the perverted sodomite lifestyle)....you support that as well?

Yes/no?

C'mon pervert....say what you mean and mean what you say -- STAND UP FOR YOUR BELIEFS!

You've given THOUSANDS of $$$ to this vile, sick anti-American group that is out to destroy America.

What distracting carnival sideshow do you plan on pulling out of your NAMBLA baseball cap this time?

Now folks, I want you to witness something very beautiful here (and why I am so missed over at the Rx):

Just watch these leftist perverts squirm.

[4625]

Can we get a roll call of suspects to support the "I am so missed over at the Rx?" This should be mildly amusing. . .

[MannyLovitto]

Don't know how it works up there in Canada, Mark. But here in the USA if some guys want to wax eloquent with their written fantasies of buggering young boys, it's not against the law.

We actually find it useful to let them speak freely because then it's easier to keep an eye on them in case they ever try and carry out their plans, which if physically enacted would be criminal.

We also permit racists and female haters to talk about how they would love to drop nukes on certain populations or how they would love to shut up those women who have the nerve to want to vote and such crazy stuff.

Basically, the First Amendment of our Constitution down here in the USA rocks pretty fucking steady.

[MannyLovitto]

Originally Posted by 4625

Can we get a roll call of suspects to support the "I am so missed over at the Rx?" This should be mildly amusing. . .

"Barman" (me) raises his hand.

But I'm one of just a few who misses having Mark post his Hot Political Opinions at the RxForum.

I spend a couple hours a day on site as paid Mod while handicapping and wagering on sports events and the PoliticoPub is a nice break for a few minutes at a time in between sporting events.

Mark is a wacky dude and we all know he's just playing a cyber role pretending to be American. But that kind of cartoon character can add some pep to what is often a boring sub-forum.

[MannyLovitto]

BTW, it is a fact that over the past 15 years I've personally donated several thousand dollars to the American Civil Liberties Union, with most of it going to the Texas or Florida chapters.

Like minded Americans are invited to chip in with what they can when they can

http://action.aclu.org/site/PageServ...J_donationhome

[Joe Contrarian]

Okay, so we're on the record:

1) Even though the courts came to their senses, "Manny" supports NAMBLA 100%. Specifically, a website that posts step-by-step instructions on how to abduct, molest and discard innocent boys.

(I guess you don't want the authorities to shut down kiddie porn trafficking which destroys children's lives anymore than you want the authorities to shut down drug trafficking which destroys children's lives. Give the man a gay US flag -- at least he's consistent.)

2) "Manny" supports coercing anyone and everyone to accept his perverted worldview. Specifically, he believes websites like E-Harmony (who's owner does NOT consider the sodomites to be legitimate romantic relationships) should accommodate everything and everyone -- no matter vile, sinful and morally backward.

3) "Manny" thinks the Boy Scouts of America (an organization that for generations has developed boys into men)are...well...."bad"..."intolerant", "bigoted", "old fashioned" and whatever the fuck other adjectives the sodomites and their sodomite-enablers can think of.

Folks, I want you to understand what's happening here -- why YOUR liberties are threatened by a RADICAL, albeit small, minority.

Between this forum and the Rx, there is no BIGGER MARXIST RADICAL than "Manny"

Trust me, you do not want to come home from work one day and find out your child was suspended from school because he uttered "non-inclusive" hate speech like "husband and wife" in class.

Yet sadly, this is exactly where we are headed with these Orwellian perverts.

Freedom is under attack -- because the radical America-hating left destroys freedom and American values.

How?

By indoctrinating our youth with their radical backward worldviews while coercing the rest of us to BOW DOWN to their sick, perverted values until their utopian day arrives.

It doesn't have to be that way - not now, not ever.

Not if you stand up and fight this tyranny.

As your God-given moral conscience and "common sense" portion of your mind is your witness....have faith you are doing the right thing and defeat this insanity.

Evil is powerless, if the good are unafraid.

[MannyLovitto]

heh....Yeah, that First Amendment to The United States Constitution is really radical

Perhaps one day Mark, if your application for citizenship is ever accepted, you can live under the auspices of this God-given document.

[MannyLovitto]

And little surprise that I have no freakin' idea what E-Harmony has to do with Mark's fixation on NAMBLA.

I can only surmise that perhaps he's been absolutely shut down by more than one female EHarmony member with who he tried to arrange a hookup. But that's just a guess.

[MannyLovitto]

Dig it....Mark and Steve working together to almost single-handedly keep the EOG Politics Forum up and running.

If not for me, Mark would be posting all alone to himself in the middle of the night.

Back later after I do some more capping on the Monday MLB card

[Joe Contrarian]

Originally Posted by MannyLovitto

heh....Yeah, that First Amendment to The United States Constitution is really radical

There is nothing -- NOTHING -- First Amendment-like by concocting "civil rights", forcing E-Harmony to cater to the sodomites (ACLU stood back and was silent, while the militant sodomites marched on) and declaring all out WAR against the Boy Scouts of America, in the name of a vile, perverted agenda.

Repeat: There is NOTHING in the First Amendment that justifies this barbarism -- NOTHING.

You lose, -- again.

[Joe Contrarian]

Originally Posted by MannyLovitto

And little surprise that I have no freakin' idea what E-Harmony has to do with Mark's fixation on NAMBLA.

I can only surmise that perhaps he's been absolutely shut down by more than one female EHarmony member with who he tried to arrange a hookup. But that's just a guess.

As you impotent nose-pickers jockey for a piece of my reflected light by hurling these petty insults at me.



Of course "Manny" wants me back -- I'm great for business.

Problem is, I won't allow my posts to be cut/edited/deleted/manipulated for his perverted Marxist agenda or because some left wing drone gets "offended" by my popular, brilliant prose.

Not gonna happen.

So until Wilheim and "Manny" bite the dust, people can only read my copy here.

(Actually, that's not entirely accurate. You can read my commentary on many websites, forums and blogs across the net. I just can't tell you under what name).

[MannyLovitto]

Originally Posted by Joe Contrarian

There is nothing -- NOTHING -- First Amendment-like by concocting "civil rights", forcing E-Harmony to cater to the sodomites (ACLU stood back and was silent, while the militant sodomites marched on) and declaring all out WAR against the Boy Scouts of America, in the name of a vile, perverted agenda.

Repeat: There is NOTHING in the First Amendment that justifies this barbarism -- NOTHING.

I have no idea what you're talking about regarding Eharmony.

So any "victory" is as imaginary as most of your cyber fantasies.

[MannyLovitto]

Ahhhh....Took me about 30 seconds to find that EHarmony voluntarily agreed in a court settlement to no longer discriminate against gay Americans wishing to use their service.

Not a First Amendment matter whatsoever.

Good for EHarmony. Their sensible response saves the owners of their business a lot of money.

God Bless America and the civil judicial system which assures resolution of civil disputes without the need for violence.

[4625]

Originally Posted by Joe Contrarian

(. . .I just can't tell you under what name).

Oh! . . .Snap!

[Doc Mercer]

vile, perverted agenda

YA MEAN LIKE?

REPUBLICAN LARRY CRAIG?

REPUBLICAN MARK FOLEY?

REPUBLICAN BUSH 43 W/BULLDOG GANNON?

REPUBLICAN TED HAGGARD AND HIS METH DEALER?

And Many Other "Good Catholic" Republicans who have been busted
in sexual acts that mostly include UNDERAGE CHILDREN ....

[Road Dawg]

One has to wonder why Homosexuals SCARE Mark L. so much. I thought Canada was pretty tolerant of them.

[festeringZit]

A 2004 article by Michael Proust regarding homosexuality and promiscuity states the following:

“

A new study by a group of University of Chicago researchers reveals a high level of promiscuity and unhealthy behavior among that city's homosexual male population. According to the researchers, 42.9 percent of homosexual men in Chicago's Shoreland area have had more than 60 sexual partners, while an additional 18.4 percent have had between 31 and 60 partners. All total, 61.3 percent of the area's homosexual men have had more than 30 partners, and 87.8 percent have had more than 15, the research found. As a result, 55.1 percent of homosexual males in Shoreland -- known as Chicago's "gay center" -- have at least one sexually transmitted disease, researchers said. The three-year study on the sexual habits of Chicago's citizens will appear in the upcoming book, "The Sexual Organization of The City" (University of Chicago Press), due out this spring.[75]

”

In September of 2006, the Agape Press reported the following regarding homosexuality and promiscuity:

“

A survey by The Advocate, a homosexual magazine, revealed that promiscuity is a reality among homosexuals. The poll found that 20 percent of homosexuals said they had had 51-300 different sex partners in their lifetime, with an additional 8 percent having had more than 300. Unprotected homosexual sex is also a concern among health professionals. A survey in Ireland by the Gay Men's Health Project found that almost half of homosexuals said they were having unprotected sex.... The fact that many homosexuals appear to live their lives in sexual overdrive does not seem to concern leaders in the movement. In an editorial from the same issue (August 15) in which the survey results were published, The Advocate said: "[Homosexuals] have been proud leaders in the sexual revolution that started in the 1960s, and we have rejected attempts by conservatives to demonize that part of who we are."[76]

”

In November of 2007 the news organization One News Now reported the following regarding Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth remarks about the spead of AIDS via male homosexual promiscuity and a conference on AIDS featuring Pastor Rick Warren and Senator Hillary Clinton:

“

Pro-family activist Peter LaBarbera says he shares Pastor Warren's desire to fight the spread of HIV/AIDS but wonders what solutions a politician who is an ardent supporter of the homosexual agenda has to offer in combating the disease. "He says that he's a co-belligerent with people who he disagrees with on other issues," notes LaBarbera, "[so] I guess the question would be: does he disagree strongly with Hillary Clinton's approach to homosexuality and even the AIDS crisis?" Although he admits he is skeptical of what solutions a defender of the homosexual lifestyle like Clinton has to offer churches for fighting the HIV/AIDS crisis, the activist is calling on Warren and Clinton to use the upcoming summit to tackle the problem of homosexual promiscuity, which often results in HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. "We have homosexual bath houses operating in major cities across this nation," LaBarbera notes. "These are places where men go for anonymous sexual liaisons with other men. They're bringing the HIV virus back to innocent women, because some of these men do not identify as 'gay' and they're even married. So what about that aspect of the AIDS crisis?"[77]

”

Another study involving male homosexuality examined the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexual men and was published in the Journal of Sex Research in 1997.^[78] This study of male homosexuality found that 2.7 percent of these men claimed to have had sex with one partner only. ^[79]
The David P. McWhirter, M.D., and Andrew M. Mattison, M.S.W., Ph.D. study reported in their 1984 work The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop stated that in regards to relationships involving male homosexuality that "all couples with a relationship lasting more than 5 years have incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in their relationships."^[80]

[festeringZit]

Studies report that homosexual couples have significantly higher incidences of violent behavior. For example, a recent study by the Canadian government states that "violence was twice as common among homosexual couples compared with heterosexual couples".^[82] According the American College of Pediatricians who cite several studies, "Violence among homosexual partners is two to three times more common than among married heterosexual couples."^[83] In addition, the American College of Pediatricians states the following: "Homosexual partnerships are significantly more prone to dissolution than heterosexual marriages with the average homosexual relationship lasting only two to three years."^[84]

In June of 2004, the journal Nursing Clinics of North America reported the following regarding homosexuality and domestic violence:

“

Domestic abuse is under-reported in the gay community... Male-on-male same-sex domestic violence also has been reported in couples where one or both persons are HIV-positive. Intimate partner abuse and violence include humilation, threatening to disclose HIV status, withholding HIV therapy, and harming family members or pets.[85]

”

In 2000, the pro-homosexual agenda newspaper the New York Times in an article entitled Silence Ending About Abuse in Gay Relationships cites some information which may indicate that domestic abuse may be under-reported in relation to couples who engage in homosexuality.^[86] The New York Times article states the following:

“

But the issue of gay domestic abuse has been shrouded by silence until recently... For years, gay people have tried to keep quiet about the problem, said Dave Shannon, coordinator of the violence recovery program at Fenway Community Health, a gay and lesbian clinic in Boston. Mr. Shannon said: People feel, 'Why should we air our dirty laundry? People feel so negatively about us already, the last thing we should do is contribute to negative stereotypes of us.' [87]

”

The Journal of the Family Research Institute using data from the U.S. Justice Department's Bureau of Justice Statistics and the Center for Disease Control concluded that "married men who are not separated are at least 25 times less apt to be domestically attacked than a homosexual male in an 'on-going relationship.' Even if we include all married and separated husbands, the risk of domestic violence in a male-male homosexual relationship is still at least 18 times greater." ^[88] A study published in The Journal of Family Violence reported in respect to homosexuality and domestic violence that among its participants "Emotional abuse was reported by 83%" of its participants.^[89] The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Domestic Abuse Fact Sheet states that "11% of women in homosexual relationships and 23% of men in homosexual relationships report being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by an intimate partner".^[90]
A study that compared domestic violence between lesbian couples and married women is even more pronounced in respect to the above statistics that suggest that homosexual couples are more violent than heterosexual couples.

[MannyLovitto]

ZIT, welcome back to the EOG backroom low budget politicopub

Your presence bumps us up to about seven people posting....Bet you never thought you could make such a big contribution, eh?

[festeringZit]

A review of the history of homosexuality and AIDS, indicates the original spread of AIDS is generally attributed to the aforementioned promiscuity of homosexual men. Originally the syndrome was called the "gay disease" because the overwhelming majority of patients were homosexual men.^[113]
In June of 2004, the journal Nursing Clinics of North America reported that homosexual men and men who have sex with men "are nine times more likely to become infected with HIV than their heterosexual counterparts".^[114] Of newly diagnosed HIV infections in the United States during the year 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated that about 63% were among men who were infected through sexual contact with other men.^[115] As of 1998, fifty-four percent of all AIDS cases in the United States were homosexual men, and the CDC stated that nearly ninety percent of these men acquired HIV through sexual activity with other men.^[116]
In relation to HIV infections in the developed world, in 2007 the German medical journal Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz published an article entitled Prevention strategies to control the HIV epidemic. Successes, problems, and perspectives. The abstract for that German medical journal stated the following: "...for several years now, in the western developed countries sexual risk behaviour, newly diagnosed HIV infections, and the incidence of various other sexually transmitted infections seem to re-increase, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM)."^[117] In 2007, the medical journal Sexually Transmitted Diseases reported the following: "In Western Europe, HIV prevalence among community surveys of MSM [men who have sex with men] conducted between 2000 and 2004 ranged from 5% to 18%.^[118]
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 1994 to 1997 the proportion of homosexual men stating they had anal sex increased from 57.6 percent to 61.2 percent.^[119] Although homosexual men may practice various sexual practices which may put them at risk, studies report that anal sex may be an important risk factor for the relay of many diseases.^{[120][121][122][123][124]} For example in 2004, Jeffrey D. Klausner, Robert Kohn, and Charlotte Kent reported in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases the following: "Proctitis, or inflammation of the rectum, is a condition that is not uncommon among men who have sex with men (MSM), and, in HIV-negative men, greatly increases the risk of acquiring HIV infection. With the recent increases in bacterial sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among MSM in the United States and Europe, there has been a concomitant increase in the number of cases of clinical proctitis."^[125] On March 15, 2004 Medscape published an article by John G. Bartlett, M.D. entitled New Look at "Gay Bowel Syndrome" in which they commented on the aforementioned 2004 journal article Etiology of clinical proctitis among men who have sex with men published by JD Klausner and C. Kent in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. The article in Medscape stated the following:

“

There were multiple studies of the newly recognized "gay bowel syndrome" in the late 1970s and early 1980s. However, subsequent attention and study has been sparse, in part attributed to reduced frequency thought to reflect changing practices by gay men in response to the HIV epidemic. This study clearly indicates that it is still an issue, since the cases were studied in 2001-2002. Also, the etiology is about the same as previously, although HSV is newly recognized as an important component. This finding not only affects management but also has HIV prevention implications. The authors note that two thirds of the participants were HIV negative and that proctitis increases the risk of HIV by up to 9-fold.[126]

”

Johns Hopkins HIV Guide website has a duplicate of the aforementioned article by John G. Bartlett, M.D. at Medscape which was entitled New Look at "Gay Bowel Syndrome".^[127]
In 2004, the prominent medical website, WebMD, stated the following: "Men who have sex with men and women are a "significant bridge for HIV to women," the CDC's new data suggest."^[128]

[festeringZit]

Homosexuality and MRSA


In 2008, the Annals of Internal Medicine reported that infection with multidrug-resistant USA300 MRSA is common among men who have sex with men, and multidrug-resistant MRSA infection might be sexually transmitted in this population.


In regards to homosexuality and MRSA, on January 15, 2008 the newspaper San Francisco Chronicle had a news article entitled San Francisco gay community an epicenter for new strain of virulent staph.^[129] The San Francisco Chronicle news article stated the following in regards to homosexuality and MRSA:

“

A new variety of staph bacteria, highly resistant to antibiotics and possibly transmitted by sexual contact, is spreading among gay men in San Francisco, Boston, New York and Los Angeles, researchers reported Monday.[130]

”

On February 19, 2008 the Annals of Internal Medicine published a study regarding antiobiotic resistant staph infection in relation to men who have sex with men and the abstract for the article states the following in relation to homosexuality and MRSA:

“

Infection with multidrug-resistant USA300 MRSA is common among men who have sex with men, and multidrug-resistant MRSA infection might be sexually transmitted in this population.[131]

”

The February 19, 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine stated the following regarding homosexuality and MRSA:

“

Data from this study suggest that multidrug-resistant USA300 has spread rapidly among men who have sex with men in San Francisco and Boston, and that having male–male sex seems to be a risk factor for multidrug-resistant USA300 infection independent of HIV infection.... As in the SFGH HIV clinic population, having male–male sex was a risk factor for multidrug-resistant USA300 infection among patients in the Fenway Community Health sample. All patients in this sample who had multidrug-resistant USA300 infection were men who had sex with men, and none of the more than 3000 men seen at this health center annually who did not have male–male sex had multidrug-resistant USA300 infection, suggesting the exclusive spread of the multidrug-resistant USA300 clone among men who have sex with men.... In summary, we show that multidrug-resistant USA300 has emerged as an important source of disease among men who have sex with men in 2 geographically distinct communities. The high proportion of infection involving the buttocks, genitals, and perineum suggests that community-associated MRSA may be transmitted in the setting of sexual contact among men who have sex with men. The link among USA300, multidrug-resistant USA300, and unsafe sexual risk behaviors should be evaluated further in prospective studies.[132]

”

The Mayo Clinic states the following regarding antibiotic resistant staph:

“

MRSA infection is caused by Staphylococcus aureus bacteria — often called "staph." MRSA stands for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. It's a strain of staph that's resistant to the broad-spectrum antibiotics commonly used to treat it. MRSA can be fatal. Most MRSA infections occur in hospitals or other health care settings, such as nursing homes and dialysis centers. It's known as health care-associated MRSA, or HA-MRSA. Older adults and people with weakened immune systems are at most risk of HA-MRSA. More recently, another type of MRSA has occurred among otherwise healthy people in the wider community. This form, community-associated MRSA, or CA-MRSA, is responsible for serious skin and soft tissue infections and for a serious form of pneumonia.[133]

”

In the January 15, 2008 newspaper San Francisco Chronicle entitled San Francisco gay community an epicenter for new strain of virulent staph, Binh An Diep, a researcher at San Francisco General Hospital and lead author of the aforementioned medical journal article in the February 2008 Annals of Internal Medicine stated the following regarding MRSA:

“

"We are nowhere near the peak," Diep said. "The peak will occur when it spreads into the general population." Diep said there is reason to believe that the more drug-resistant strain will make that leap because it is just a slight variant of USA300, which became one of the most common strains of MRSA in the United States only a few years after it was first detected.[134]

”

In the previously cited January 15, 2008 newspaper article in the San Francisco Chronicle regarding MRSA the medical reseacher Binh An Diep stated regarding the MRSA and the city of San Francisco: "We probably had it here first, and now it is spreading elsewhere." The January 2008 San Francisco Chronicle article also stated regarding San Francisco and MRSA: "The risk of contracting this difficult-to-treat bug is 13 times greater for gay men than for the rest of the city's population, researchers found."^[135]
American conservative commentators and conservative news organizations have published a number of articles on the internet in relation to the homosexuality and MRSA issue.^{[136][137] [138][139] [140] [141] [142]}

[festeringZit]

Originally Posted by MannyLovitto

ZIT, welcome back to the EOG backroom low budget politicopub

Your presence bumps us up to about seven people posting....Bet you never thought you could make such a big contribution, eh?

I had to take a break, because Doc Mercer wasn't letting anyone
post between his empty threads.

I see you and Joe still having fun in the sandbox.

What more could there be to life other than arguing about gay sex
in a gambling political forum?

[MannyLovitto]

Hey ZIT, your pasted articles would pack a lot more punch if you were to write up a quick macro program that would substitute "sodomite" everywhere that the word "gay" appears.

[MannyLovitto]

MERCER's back posting, but from the looks of the Index page, he's on a Pitch Count

[festeringZit]

Originally Posted by MannyLovitto

Hey ZIT, your pasted articles would pack a lot more punch if you were to write up a quick macro program that would substitute "sodomite" everywhere that the word "gay" appears.

Hmm.. great idea - you think sodomite packs more punch than
faggot, or no?

[tank]

Originally Posted by festeringZit

Hmm.. great idea - you think sodomite packs more punch than
faggot, or no?

Sodomite sounds too biblical.Stick with calling them fags.

[MannyLovitto]

Respectfully disagree.

There's nothing more ominous than a word that is not only derisive but also carries that spectre that God is going to turn your pecker into a pillar of salt

[MannyLovitto]

I'm a little discouraged that Mark has yet to make clear if women who give blow jobs are included among those whose acts of sodomy will bring down the Republic as we know it.

[tank]

Originally Posted by MannyLovitto

I'm a little discouraged that Mark has yet to make clear if women who give blow jobs are included among those whose acts of sodomy will bring down the Republic as we know it.

He is too busy researching what a blow job is but we will learn so enough if he approves.

[festeringZit]

Originally Posted by MannyLovitto

Respectfully disagree.

There's nothing more ominous than a word that is not only derisive but also carries that spectre that God is going to turn your pecker into a pillar of salt

You must have been listening to Rev. Phelps...

[Doc Mercer]

Nothing worse than a President who claims God told him to illegally invade a Muslim country and slaughter hundreds of thousands of innocent folks ....


The GOP yapping about Religion and Morals is laughable

[Joe Contrarian]

Originally Posted by festeringZit

You must have been listening to Rev. Phelps...

That would be an improvement over Deepak Chopra.

[MannyLovitto]

Yeah, that Chopra is a real radical.

Love thy neighbor as thyself.

Forgive your neighbor and yourself unconditionally

Help people empower themselves


Guys like him need to be set straight and he needs to spend more time denoucing homos

[MannyLovitto]

But hey...Let's get back On Topic, Mark.

Are those women who give blow jobs to their male partners sodomites we need to be watching out for too?

And the fellas who like to uh.....well..you know......Go Down Yonder on their female partners.....Are they sodomites that will destroy the Republic as well?

It's important for us all to know the Proper Pecking Order.

[Joe Contrarian]

Obviously there are different gradations of evil and different gradations of sin.

The more pertinent question is: how does oral sex (or any sexual act in private, for that matter) impact society?

Are heterosexuals marching in the streets half naked demanding their "blow job rights" grossing out and terrorizing the rest of us?

Uhhh, nooooo...

These things are kept private -- as it should be.

I don't judge what goes on in someone's private bedroom. I don't care. It doesn't impact me. It doesn't impact society. What goes on in your private bedroom is between you, your partner and God. NOBODY else.

That's how it should be.

We aren't to judge private behavior.

It's public behavior we need to have standards for.

For example...

Urination and defecation are private acts -- completely natural. (Btw, don't you love that word? It's the most meaningless, ABUSED word in politics these days...it also happens to be UTTERLY MEANINGLESS!)

Everyone urinates and defecates multiple times a day.

But...BUT....

Should these private acts be thrust into the public square?

OF COURSE NOT!

Can you be arrested for it?

Uh, yeah.

Aha!

Therefore...

It's the sodomites (and their sodomite-enablers) that bring their vile demonic acts out in the open, and therefore into the public arena to be judged.

THEY START THESE POLITICAL AND CULTURAL WARS -- NOT CONSERVATIVES.

Conservatives don't want to "govern in your bedroom", as these left wing drones are always chanting.

IT'S THE OTHER WAY AROUND!

That's the irony.

Name one heterosexual group/fetish marching for their "rights"?

WHAT AN EMBARRASSMENT!

INTIMATE

: in·ti·mate ¹ (nt-mt)adj.1. Marked by close acquaintance, association, or familiarity.
2. Relating to or indicative of one's deepest nature: intimate prayers.
3. Essential; innermost: the intimate structure of matter.
4. Marked by informality and privacy: an intimate nightclub.
5. Very personal; private: an intimate letter.
6. Of or involved in a sexual relationship.

Do the sodomites and their sodomite-enablers understand the meaning of the word intimacy?

Memo to Sodomites:

Stop using society as your personal therapist ("coming out of the closet").

Nobody gives a flying fuck about your inner narcissistic inferiority complex you are vomiting all over civilized society.

Everyone knows your devious acts are unhealthy -- emotionally, physically and spiritually, as documented by FZ, myself and others.

Everyone knows your demonic acts are a mental disorder -- the official American Psychiatric Association position before the militant-sodomite agenda perverted the truth (the way they pervert everything else, including language, culture, politics and women's fashions, as I documented earlier).

Is the sodomite culture good for society?

No.

Look at the impact they've had on women.

Folks, let's get real here...

No amount of "social engineering", no amount of accommodation, no amount of indoctrination, no amount of "civil rights", no amount of public charades (parades) will ever mask this mental disorder.

Science will never discover the magic "gay gene" -- because it doesn't exist.

I've known gay people who spoke perfectly civilized language until their demonic feelings forced them underground (the "gay community") and now they act like complete F-A-G-S. They speak with a lisp and dress like a peacock -- probably carrying all sorts of dormant diseases and germs...something every study in this area confirms.

Why should society tolerate such vile public displays of filth?

Why should society change the rules and expose our children to this poison?

Answer: Society shouldn't tolerate it -- no more than we should tolerate people defecating in public.

It's disgusting.

"Stay out of my bedroom" they tell us..

NO SODOMITES -- YOU STAY IN THE BEDROOM!

STAY IN YOUR BEDROOM AND AWAY FROM OUR CHILDREN AND AWAY FROM THE CURRICULUM AND WE'll STOP JUDGING AND EXPOSING YOUR DEVIOUS BEHAVIOR!

I think that's a fair trade.

"Civil rights"...

What about pedophiles, polygamists and those who engage in incest and bestiality?

What about their "civil rights"?