Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Teddy my favourite character out of all these thieves.Such an awkward looking bloke.
Someone called him out on Twitter ages ago,he actually replied.." Not gonna lie,it's been a rough patch"
patch
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Similar response when someone asked Teddy a math related question one year at the Westgate seminar few years back..I believe how to calculate CLVwith M.L. MLB or something basic ..Teddy " Not gonna lie I don't know, its not something I include in my tracking" I knew right then he had no chance against -110 going forward.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Best part is he was down 50 units and fired 25 in action the next day. All in at the same time so no rolling units all simultaneous bets according to the time stamps.
Thats why I love to say its nice to bet in fantasy land.
But this is starting to look like when he was at the LVA board and hewas thinking baout going pro tout when he went on a bad run and started hammering 4 and 5 unit plays when he was down 50 or 60 units. I dont remember where he eventually ended up but -80 or so seems to ring a bell.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
ManUK:
* Is "patch" slang for "Two Decades"?
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
My favorite and I'm shocked no one noticed is how they grade games at Prescam. So Fezzik puts out a play and it shows up on the screen an hour after tip off as a 2 unit play on 3/12/17 on the Under 129.5 in the Yale / Princeton game. Once the game ended with 130 points scored and it's a loser they downgraded the play to a 1 unit play.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Come on. Did you really catch this?Originally Posted by texaswizzard
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Yep, I'm sure they will claim that the play was loaded wrong. I'm not buying it.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
This chicanery should surprise nobody. Also the biggest indicator that BLAP has ZERO real subscribers
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Fezzik | CBB Totaldime bet894 Princeton / 893 Yale UNDER 129.5 PinnacleResults: L, -$110
Analysis: With the OT, both Ivy games went OVER yesterday, but I like THIS Game UNDER as well.
Early Start time, and Champ Game.......on a neutral court.
If it goes up to 130 or more, 2 star it.......
So was the line on the play 130 or did they use the pinny closing total?
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
I didn't bet or follow the game all day long but do know the game actually closed 129. Who knows if they added the, "If it goes up to 130 or more, 2 star it..."?
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Here is March 14th Fezzik play. A Loser. See if anything changes on the site.
Fezzik | CBB Totaldouble-dime bet542 New Orleans / 541 Mount St. Mary's, Md UNDER131.5 SouthpointAnalysis: Solid Value playing UNDER in Dayton Tonight. First Four Tues/Wed Games have gone 3-1, 2-2, 3-1 to the UNDER the last 3 years, small sample.
I LOVE that the game is lined close to pk'm, and BOTH teams really would LOVE an NCAA win.
Mount in their Conf Finals game had a 132 game, but it was at 112 with 90 seconds left, an EPIC late foul fest added 20.
New Orl in THEIR conf Champ game had 120 only, but an OT got it to 133.
I expect BOTH teams to play THIS game like their Champ game.
UNDER!
Lean UNDER in the K ST/Wake Game Also.....
Pick Made: Mar 14 2017 7:10AM PST
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
A 8-4 ternd. Send it in Fez!
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Unreal
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Fez will certainly die on his big game under sword. He probably has 32 unders pending on Thursday and Friday, while bg appears to have popped 963 overs during the same time period
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Loved Bell's teaser yesterday re college hoops pod. College basketball experts Essler, Powers & Malinsky will be on & Steve Fezzik.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Essler actually sounded like a guy that bets his opinion. Didn't sound like a company guy.
Does anyone feel like the end is near for Fezzik. When he first came on it seemed like RJ would never say a bad word about him or ask him a confusing question. But over the last 3-4 months if seems like the complete opposite. RJ breaking his balls about games, his opinion on teams/games and asks off the wall questions that seem to put him on the spot about teams he might not have an opinion on.
Very strange make up of the radio show lately.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Thursday's darts
3* Virginia under 135
2* Florida st over 146, Nevada over 155.5
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Ignore his RESULTS for a second.
The question is, how does he GENERATE his plays? Did HE come up w/ those totals?
Or is he just tailing? Tailing and passing on to a 3rd party (HIS customers) is terrible! U don't think the line-value has deteriorated by the time it gets to a 3rd user?
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
One of the many issues with their godawful tracking system is that the touts can edit the writeup after the fact and the writeup shows no indication of having been edited. A truly transparent system would timestamp each edit. At the time of the release, Pinny and Bookmaker had 129.5, but I have no idea what edits Fenic might have made to the writeup between the plays release and gametime.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Some totals are his own i.e. "big games go under," some he buys from other touts, others he gets from buddies like CharlieJ. But yes, part of the issue with his steam chasing, either because he's chasing Dr Bob's steam, another bettor's steam, or random steam, is that the followers get the worse of the line. That Yale/Princeton total mentioned above is a fantastic example because it was 130.5 or 130 on either Pinny or CRIS (often at both) until about a half hour before he released, then 40 minutes before tip after the line dropped 1.5 points he releases under 129.5, and it landed 130.
Another recent example, he chased Dr Bob's steam on Texas A&M on March 4th. Pinny and CRIS had dropped to +7.5 and he claimed a +8 from William Hill that was gone less than 2 minutes later. The game landed +8, so Fenic gets credit for a push even though a lot of customers surely lost on the game.
And regarding:
What is even more ridiculous is that their system appears to allow the touts to input whatever line they want rather than pulling the line from an actual line history. On Saturday he gave out Wisconsin -4.5 -110 from "Pinnacle" when Pinny had moved to -4.5 -118 eight minutes earlier.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
One simple lesson: don't use a tout. Never pay for a tout.
Why pay for a tout...when u can hit 68% tailing ZHodges?
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
68% ???
Child's play. Joe wiz has been hitting at 81% for decades now.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
This is quite the euphemism for "I release plays during the steam".I didn't move the market....the market moved them since we have some damn good bets, I expect them to win by more than 3 points, so still playable....
"David is aware of this thread and he's disappointed about the developments."
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
The dude is simply blindly fadeable when his opinion is involved
Keep selling dem picks fez, I beg of you!
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
What groovin said, CG.
That being said, look at this writeup, on his highest rated game possible:
722 Virginia / 721 N.C.-Wilmington UNDER 135.0 Pinnacle
Analysis: Write up to follow.
A Virginia game simply cannot be at 135! We FIRE here.....
The Odds Guys made the mistake of averaging a high scoring team with a low scoring team.
Virg Slows down EVERYONE. NC got 43 vs. them.
With Virg -7.5 in this game, THEY will dictate pace. NC Wil played two regular season games vs. College of Ch, a team like Virg, and both went WAY under......
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Stop it, ChuckyG.
You're killing me.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Ha,I was just thinking of the HOF thread,when Fez left a 0.40c tip for the waitress at the El Cortez,40 cents all in pennies..One of EOGs greatest threads without doubt,
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Disgusting. Link please?
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
This dude and his ego. They may make it to the fifteen mark of the 2h with the under so there's that
Thu, 03/16/17 - 7:30 PMFezzik | CBB Total
dime bet744 St. Mary's (Cal.) / 743 Va. Commonwealth UNDER 129.0 Westgate
Analysis: NO WAY St Marys can have a total at close to 130 here vs. VCU.
We fade this move on the Total, and come in on the UNDER.......
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Scoop, they could turn the shot-clock off L8 minutes.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
It's hard to figure out how this guy loses so much isn't it
Sun, 03/19/17 - 8:00 PMFezzik | CBB Total
double-dime bet726 Baylor / 725 Southern California UNDER 142.5 William Hill
Analysis: I am going to lay out WHY this one is a great bet. Obviously, the better team Baylor is a solid UNDER team, but the REAL reason we hit this one?
OVERS kicked ass TH-Fri going 23-8-1. Due to this the weekend totals have gone UP UP UP in most games.......
However, THIS total has gone down 1/2 point to 1 point.
I hear the naysayers "What are we doing?? This total isn't inflating!"
Yes, and LIKE THE WICH ST/KY total (and the MTST total) it isn't inflating because the oddsmakers opened all the totals this weekend high already, And THIS game ( like the other two mentioned) the UNDER is the clear cut right side.
We Cash with this ROCK SOLID SLOW ROLL here.........
Pick Made: Mar 19 2017 3:47PM PST
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Oh boy trouble in pregame land. Fezzik using a line that probably was around for a short period of time.
Last 5 Comments
(Post Comment)
Rocco519
Sun, Mar 19 2017
4:06 PMNever got Oregon game either
ReplyRocco519
Sun, Mar 19 2017
4:05 PMAnnual subscribers didn't get these late plays emailed to them..we never got Kansas under either or USC game wtf
ReplyFezzik
Sun, Mar 19 2017
3:49 PMThe MIch Lou total was PAINTD 142.5 to 143 at post. I Waited for the good number, AND WE GOT IT...... If you are unhappy with THAT game, something is wrong....
Replyjeff232323
Sun, Mar 19 2017
2:01 PMTried posted 10 mins before game time when line was 142 but post it at 143. Please!
ReplyMashup
Sun, Mar 19 2017
1:31 PMUp where ?
Reply
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
I wonder when he released the total. YES the closing number was 142.5....but did he release it 10 minutes before close?
722 Louisville / 721 Michigan UNDER 143.0 William HillResults: W, $200
Analysis: LOVE this game UNDER here.
9:10 am PST tip.
Opened 139, And THAT was the right number IMO......
Pick Made: Mar 19 2017 8:51AM PST
Looks like he released a play 19 minutes before the game went off the board.
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Keep the updates comin!
Re: Fezzik: It's hard to say which is more inept
Post 521, can someone translate what he's saying? He's speaking in Arabic.
Also...notice how he leaves himself a convenient out on each play? If it loses..."Hey, we were on the right side."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks