before the second round the Spurs would not have been this big a fav
before the second round the Spurs would not have been this big a fav
haters gonna hate
I agree - albeit small - but for different reasons, most notably getting more data to project the rotations. Point differential is much more significant than W-L record.
Good to see you on it. I banged it pretty good (for me). Brooks sucks as you alluded to but even without that it's still a good play. Not starting Harden (or playing him 35+ minutes), shooting 3s in last shot situations with the game tied, and not fouling when up 3 at the end of the game should be grounds for firing Brooks with cause. And that was just this weekend...
I like Tim's "fair price" on San Antonio (-250) over Oklahoma City better than his evaluation of the Boston-Philadelphia series (Celtics -130).
I think it is interesting that "Thunder killer" DeJuan Blair(11th man) has played in only 6 of 8 playoff games and is averaging 8.2 minutes per game. Ginobili missed all 3 regular season games. The Thunder coaches are still trying to figure out the best solution to guarding Bonner(14-20 3pts).
Tim, can I get a prediction on the series line for Boston-Miami?
haters gonna hate
I think the line last year was -180 or so. Boston is a year older and as I posted in another thread, player production drops off precipitously in the mid-30s.
(the % represents change from previous season)
23 to 24: +2%
24 to 25: no change
25 to 26: -2%
26 to 27: -4%
27 to 28: -6%
28 to 29: -9%
29 to 30: -11%
30 to 31: -17%
31 to 32: -22%
32 to 33: -35%
33 to 34: -57%
34 to 35: -146%
Just look at Shaq who at age 32 was one of the top handful of players in the league and at age 34 was statistically just a shade above an average center in the NBA.
This combined with Lebron's dominance this season (on display the last two games with the best two performances of the playoffs in the two most important games for Miami) formulated my estimate.
Is bosh going to be back by then?
Dodged a bullet with Miami, that was my good sweat for the playoffs. Market bidding up San Antonio.
Congrats on the Miami play, they looked dead midway through game 4 to me.![]()
---may the odds be ever in your favor.
Shame on Indiana for inciting Miami with Stephenson's choke sign, West's rough play and Granger's mouth.
All signs of a team not quite ready to win, John. NBA history is littered with teams who needed to learn some painful lessons before climbing O'Brien summit. Even Jordan's 6-time champion Chicago clubs needed some seasoning and tenderizing before going on their tremendous run in the 90's.
---may the odds be ever in your favor.
Lacking guys that can break down the defense well enough. Better regular season team as they are deep and play hard, but in playoffs everyone plays hard and depth not as big a factor with coaches having more urgency.
RF is spot on, depth and bench outside the 6th man are irrelevant in the playoffs.
JK, I still have to laugh at the notion that any of that contributed to the outcome of the series. I'm confident that Miami had sufficient motivation before all of that. And wasn't the choke sign in Game 2 anyway?
thanks for the plays Tim.
you model games too?
I can promise you the separation in the chances of winning is much stronger than that. Talent wise no. Fear wise yes. Philly will be too scared. Boston won't be. That is half the battle when playing a great team like the heat. Neither can probably win, barring injury, but Boston with the much better chance. Philly has no way to score when Miami buckles down.
5dimes has those numbers up already. As expected the Heat are a much bigger fav against Philly than Boston.
philly is something like 1-10 last two years vs Miami. philly has no shot against the heat and they would know it
but I agree they shouldnt get there
Bookmarks