Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

    Originally posted by Joe Contrarian View Post
    Correction, Sheriff Joe attended the hearing, not trial.
    Another LIE!!Keep going for your record.

    Comment


    • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

      Originally posted by tank View Post
      Say's the guy who post smileys of guys sucking cock at an alarming pace!Yeah sure homo....keep posting the guy's sucking each other off thinking we won't notice your gay tendencies.
      You stop posting your boyfriend's cock in my thread and I'll stop pointing out the obvious. :thumbsup

      Comment


      • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

        Originally posted by Joe Contrarian View Post
        You stop posting your boyfriend's cock in my thread and I'll stop pointing out the obvious. :thumbsup
        What part do you not understand??I will continue to post Doc's FACTS and could care less if you want to show everyone how much you love cock.Me and Doc both have wives so we could care less!!It did make my day though after you finally admitted how much of a threat Doc is too you in case no one noticed yet since you have tried to discredit him but cannot do it.He uses facts which is like garlic to a vampire when dealing with birfers.You cannot stand the fact that he makes you look stupid and post's the truth while all you have is opinions and smears.
        Post all the cock smileys you want...homo.It only shows your desperation all that much more.

        Comment


        • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

          Originally posted by Joe Contrarian View Post
          Correction, Sheriff Joe attended the hearing, not trial.
          PROVE this LIE you fraud!!He was not there today liar!

          Comment


          • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

            Originally posted by tank View Post
            What part do you not understand??I will continue to post Doc's FACTS and could care less if you want to show everyone how much you love cock.
            Since you can't think for yourself and post your own independent thoughts, I will continue to prove to our readers how much you love sucking DR CON's (a proven fraud) cock. Don't like it? Bring your own arguments to the table. Stop soiling my thread with his delusional garbage that has no bearing on the eventual outcome -- the Kenyan being tossed out of office.

            Memo to our resident dufus: OPINION is not 'fact'.

            FACTS are evidence, witnesses, documents, testimony etc -- ya know, stuff I post here daily and shit you have never EVER posted.

            Stop your smears and witch hunts on every witness that comes forward. I couldn't care less about DR CON's OPINIONS.

            You know what they say about OPINIONS and assholes, don't you?

            Psst, someone's OPINION on any given SC case is not 'fact'...well, maybe in dirty underwear blogger world it is, but not in my thread.

            Don't like it?

            Obey bitch, or it's only going to get worse.

            Comment


            • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

              Originally posted by Joe Contrarian View Post
              Since you can't think for yourself and post your own independent thoughts, I will continue to prove to our readers how much you love sucking DR CON's (a proven fraud) cock. Don't like it? Bring your own arguments to the table. Stop soiling my thread with his garbage fantasies that have no bearing on the eventual outcome -- the Kenyan being tossed out of office.

              Memo to our resident dufus: OPINION is not 'fact'.

              FACTS are evidence, witnesses, documents, testimony etc -- ya know, stuff I post here daily and shit you have never EVER posted.

              Stop yours smears and witchhunts on every witness that comes forward.

              You know what they say about OPINIONS and assholes, don't you?

              So someone's OPINION on any given SC case is not 'fact'...well, maybe in dirty underwear blogger world it is, but not in my thread.

              Don't like it?

              Obey bitch, or it's only going to get worse.
              I have brought my OWN facts many times.Since you have no facts and cannot debunk those facts you will continue to look like the dumbass you are.You do not know shit about anything and I am getting tired of educating your dumbass.If you have so many facts then why are you 0-96 in court cases???That is all anyone needs to know , but your dumbass keeps ignoring reality .Everyone can easily see who has the facts and uses state laws and who has nothing but opinions that get laughed out of court.It isn't me dummy.So Doc kicks your ass ...so what.. you are use to it.
              Show us your facts that have proven something in those 96 court cases you lost?

              Comment


              • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                Kapi’olani confirms

                by Dr. Conspiracy on APRIL 27, 2011 in BIRTH LOCATION, DEBUNKING, MEDIA
                How many times have you read on the Internet that all the hospitals in Hawaii had been called, and NONE of them would confirm that Barack Obama was born there? I’ve never seen a single name of someone who made such a call, until now: Peter Boyles, of radio station KHOW in Denver. Here’s the transcript:
                RING…
                HOSPITAL: Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children. Can I help you.
                BOYLES: Hi, it’s Peter Boyles, a radio guy in Denver, Colorado, and you’re with us. I want to bring my family and go to where President Obama was born. Is this the right hospital?
                HOSPITAL: That’s correct.
                BOYLES: OK, so there’s, he was born here in Kapi’olani?
                HOSPITAL: Yes
                Well, I’m glad we have that cleared up. Here’s the audio of the call from KHOW.

                Comment


                • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                  Be sure to click on all those law icons.Joe seems to think they are not real.
                  They are just the facts and the laws is all.
                  Obama was an Indonesian Citizen

                  by Dr. Conspiracy on DECEMBER 22, 2008 in CITIZENSHIP, DEBUNKING
                  Facts: Barack Obama lived in Indonesia for 4 years from age 6-10 with his mother and his stepfather Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian national. Barack Obama visited Pakistan in 1981.
                  Theory: Obama was adopted by his stepfather and naturalized as an Indonesian citizen and obtained an Indonesian passport. Because Pakistan was off limits to Americans in 1980, Obama must have used an Indonesian passport.
                  Analysis: There is no legal documentation yet presented that Barack Obama was naturalized in Indonesia, nor that he held an Indonesian passport. His adoption and naturalization is inferred from a school registration form that lists his name as Soetoro and his citizenship (translation verified) as “Indonesian”.
                  Obama school registration form
                  The story of the travel ban for US Citizens to Pakistan seems to be an urban legend. There is a contemporary article in the New York Times of an American reporter traveling from India to Pakistan in mid 1981.
                  Good rail service also connects Lahore with other major Pakistani centers. It is possible to cross from India to Pakistan by train from Amritsar and Delhi, but border procedures can be long and complicated. A road crossing at Wagah is also open for a few daylight hours. Check schedules, and allow several extra hours for border formalities.
                  Tourists can obtain a free, 30-day visa (necessary for Americans) at border crossings and airports…
                  Because Pakistan is an Islamic nation, most tourist attractions and all mosques are closed to visitors on Fridays. The Pakistan Tourism Development Corporation (with an office in the Faletti’s Hotel complex and information publications available at major hotels) maintains up-to-date lists on museum opening hours, as well as on city tours.
                  It doesn’t sound at all scary or hostile to Americans.
                  As has been widely published, Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship. Because US Law prevents a US child from renouncing his citizenship (and his parents could not do it for him), Barack Obama could not have become an Indonesian citizen, since this would have created an illegal dual citizenship. This prohibition is stated specifically in Indonesian law. Indonesian Naturalization Law.
                  Conclusion: It impossible that Barack Obama became an Indonesian citizen as a child, the school record notwithstanding.
                  If Indonesia had granted Barack Obama Indonesian citizenship, in error, under United States law he would have been a dual citizen. The Supreme Court said that becoming a dual citizen does not remove the natural born status of a US Citizen.
                  Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
                  And the mere fact that the plaintiff [Elg] may have acquired Swedish citizenship by virtue of the operation of Swedish law on the resumption of that citizenship by her parents does not compel the conclusion that she has lost her own citizenship acquired under our law….
                  The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants [page 350] ….. declared Miss Elg “to be a natural born citizen of the United States,”
                  Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)

                  Comment


                  • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                    Originally posted by Joe Contrarian View Post
                    Don't like it?

                    Obey bitch, or it's only going to get worse.
                    Bring it!!I haven't even started yet and already have mopped the floor with your dumbass.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                      Again click on all those laws like the Indonesian laws that are there.Joe will still say they are not facts but he is a mindless birfer.Proof is there for everyone to see.

                      Hollister v. Indonesian Citizenship Law

                      by Dr. Conspiracy on FEBRUARY 9, 2009 in CITIZENSHIP, DEBUNKING, EVIDENCE, LAWSUITS, PHILIP BERG
                      Philip Berg
                      Some lawsuits filed with the intent of proving Barack Obama ineligible to be president make arguments that Barack Obama’s 4 years in Indonesia somehow erased his American citizenship.
                      In Philip Berg’s case, Hollister v Soetoro, we see some Indonesian laws cited. These are not as easy to find as a corresponding US law would be, but your diligent Obama Conspiracy Theorist has come up with them.
                      A number of claims are made in the suit for which no documentation is offered, for example the statement “All Indonesian students were required to carry government Identity cards.” Without a source, it’s not possible to verify the statement. We can’t deal with those here.
                      Here’s the first Indonesian law reference from Hollister:
                      27 Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s, and any time a child was registered for a public school, their name and citizenship status was verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education). The school record, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, indicates that Soetoro’s name is “Barry Soetoro;” his nationality is “Indonesia;” and his religion as “Islam”. There was no way for Soetoro to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen, as Indonesia was under tight rule and was a Police State. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Law No. 62 of 1958. These facts indicate that Soetoro is an Indonesian citizen, and therefore he is not eligible to be President of the United States.
                      Looking at the paragraph we see these Indonesian law claims:
                      1. Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their public schools in the late 1960’s or 1970’s
                      2. any time a child was registered for a public school, their name and citizenship status was verified through the Indonesian Government
                      3. There was no way for Soetoro to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen
                      No argument is provided for the truth of these claims save the Indonesian Constitution Chapter 13 and Indonesian Law No. 62 cited. Law No. 62 has nothing to do with education or identity cards, so we we’ll save that law for later. The Constitution Chapter 13 does talk about education. It says:
                      Chapter XIII. Education
                      Article 31
                      1. Every citizen has the right to education.
                      2. The government shall establish and conduct a national educational system which shall be regulated by law.
                      Article 32
                      The government shall advance the national culture.
                      Indonesian Constitution of 1945
                      Frankly I am at a loss as to how “There was no way for Soetoro to have attended school in Jakarta, Indonesia legally unless he was an Indonesian citizen” can be inferred from this article of the Indonesian Constitution. Further there is nothing about verifying identity.
                      Having struck out finding any valid application of the cited Indonesian laws to Berg’s claims, we move on to the next section.
                      28. Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Soetoro, an Indonesian State citizen. Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie).
                      Better luck this time because Law No. 62 does deal with citizenship. The entire law 62 is too long to paste here, but a copy in English is on the UNHCR web site for your review.
                      The facts are that Barack Obama’s mother married an Indonesian national (Lolo Soetoro) and that they all moved to Indonesia when Barack Obama was 6 years old.
                      First, Berg’s argument is predicated upon “a male acknowledges a child as his son” which doesn’t seem to apply. It was never said the Lolo Soetoro fathered Barack Obama. This law if it exists (it is not part of Law No. 62) it would reasonably be analogous to an “affidavit of paternity” such as we have the the United States. I don’t see this language as applicable to an adoption (if indeed there ever was one). Law No. 62 lists who is an Indonesian Citizen. Most are not relevant. This one is of interest:
                      (1)A foreign child of less than 5 years age who is adopted by a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if such an adoption is declared legal by the Pengadilan Negeri [state court] at the residence of the person adopting the child.
                      However, Obama was over 5 years old when he went to Indonesia so it does not apply. Law No. 62 says nothing about a child 5 years or older acquiring citizenship.
                      The rather complicated Article 3 is of interest. It says that a child cannot acquire Indonesian citizenship if it would create dual citizenship unless the child is able to renounce said citizenship (which an American child is unable to do).
                      (1)A child outside a marriage of a mother who is a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia or a child out of a legal marriage, but who has in a case of divorce been assigned to the care of its mother, a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia, who follows the nationality of the father, a foreigner, may present a petition to the Minister of Justice in order to acquire the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if, after, having acquired the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, it possesses no other nationality or states at the same time to have released another nationality according to the procedure stipulated by the legal provisions of the country of originand/or according to the procedure stipulated by the agreement on the settlement of the bi-nationality between the Republic of Indonesia and the country in question.
                      Of course there is no “legal provision” of the United States whereby a minor could release his US Citizenship. This is similar to 5h which also restricts citizenship to those for which it would create dual citizenship.
                      h.have no nationality, or have lost his nationality if the petitioner acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia or states at the time to have released another nationality according to the legal provisions of the country of origin or according to the legal provisions of the Agreement on the settlement of the bi-nationality between the Republic of Indonesia and the country concerned.
                      Article 7 deals with the options for Indonesian citizenship for Obama’s mother (probably not relevant but included for reference).
                      Article 7.
                      (1)A foreign woman married to a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia, acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if and when she makes a statement as to that effect within 1 year after contracting said marriage, except in case when she acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia she possesses still another nationality, in which case the statement may not be made.
                      (2)With the exception as mentioned in para 1 the foreign woman who marries a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia also acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia one year after the marriage has been contracted, if within that one year her husband does not make a statement as to release his citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia.
                      Said statement may only be made and only results in the loss of the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia if by such a loss the husband does not become stateless.
                      (3)If one of the statements mentioned in para 1 and 2 have been made, the alternative statement may not be made.
                      (4)The statements mentioned above shall be made to the Pengadilan Negeri or the Representation of the Republic of Indonesia at the residence of the person making such a statement.
                      Again, the principle of no dual citizenship prevents the acquisition of Indonesian citizenship:
                      Article 9.
                      (1)The citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia acquired by a husband is automatically valid for his wife, except if, after the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia has been acquired, the wife possesses still another nationality.
                      (2)The loss of the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia by a husband affects automatically his wife, except if the wife will become stateless.
                      Next item from the lawsuit:
                      29. Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once an Indonesian citizen adopts a child, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents, and the adopted child is given the same status as a natural child and the child takes the name of his step-father, in this case, Soetoro. See Indonesian Constitution, Article 2.
                      Following is Article 2 of the Indonesian Constitution:
                      Article 2
                      1. The Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat shall consist of the members of the Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat augmented by the delegates from the regional territories and groups as provided for by statutory regulations.
                      2. The Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat shall meet at least once in every five years in the capital of the state.
                      3. All decisions of the Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat shall be taken by a majority vote.
                      Doesn’t make any sense to me either. I’m beginning to think Berg is doesn’t know the difference between the Indonesian Constitution and Law No. 62 from 1958. Article 2 of Law No. 62 is quoted above and only applies to children under 5 years of age.
                      Next from Hollister:
                      30. The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual) citizenship. Indonesian regulations recognized neither apatride nor bipatride (stateless or dual) citizenship. Since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship; neither did the United States (since the United States only permitted dual citizenship when ‘both’ countries agree); and since Soetoro was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, the United States would not step in or interfere with the laws of Indonesia. Hague Convention of 1930.
                      In this Berg starts correctly: Indonesian law is designed to prevent dual citizenship; however, it does so with the full acknowledgment of the laws of other nations. What Berg fails to take into consideration is the provisions of Indonesian law already in place (cited preceding) that deal with dual citizenship, and prohibiting acquisition of Indonesian citizenship in that case when dual citizenship would otherwise be created. Therefore, US Law which does not allow a minor to renounce their citizenship, in no way interferes with Indonesian law, and there’s no reason to invoke the Hague Convention.
                      The way the Hague Convention is interpreted by Berg seems to be “any time US law conflicts with that of another country, we lose” and that’s just plain silly.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                        Originally posted by tank View Post
                        . Here’s the audio of the call from KHOW.
                        I wonder if Joe will claim this is not real too??

                        Comment


                        • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                          We all know you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, tank.

                          So let me illustrate the difference between FACT and OPINION, k?

                          This is FACT:



                          This is OPINION:

                          byDr. ConspiracyonJANUARY 26, 2012inBALLOT CHALLENGES, LOUNGE
                          Do you understand the difference, bitch?

                          I'm fine if you want to post any FACTS that contradict the ongoing progress birthers are making. Or perhaps you're interested in having a civil conservation and are willing to drop the incessant ridiculing tone.

                          If not, shut the fuck up and leave my thread. Your combative style and Alinsky smear tactics are no longer welcome here, bitch.

                          Oh, and btw DR CON, of course Jablonski will be thrown under the bus -- like everyone else in the fraud's circle.

                          Idiot.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                            Soetoro was a Foreign Student!

                            by Dr. Conspiracy on APRIL 1, 2009 in CITIZENSHIP, DEBUNKING, LAWSUITS, OBAMA EDUCATION CONSPIRACIES, ORLY TAITZ
                            So precisely why is Orly, Kreep et al. trying to get hold of President Obama’s records at Occidental College and what possible bearing could anything they find there on Obama’s citizenship?
                            Stay with me because this gets pretty weird. They say that President Obama attended Occidental College as a foreign student under the name Barry Soetoro. Given that his high school year book said “Obama” and he had been a resident of Hawaii since age 10, why in the world would they think he applied as a foreign student? (Having put a child through college in California, I know that they charge non-residents a small fortune.) Nonetheless they say it because there is evidence he did! Here is the evidence from the official records of the California Legislature!
                            Thanks to Curious Blue over at Politijab for the images:



                            OK, granted there is a tiny problem: the name. It’s not Barry Soetoro but Moestabjab Soetoro and he was in high school, not college. But it’s still confirmation.
                            There is one other small problem, can you spot in the image below?
                            Yup, it’s that pesky 1963. Mr. Soetoro was a visiting foreign student when little Barack was only 2 years old. But it’s still confirmation. Soetoro was a foreign student. They must think people are soooooo stupid.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                              Originally posted by tank View Post
                              Soetoro was a Foreign Student!

                              by Dr. Conspiracy

                              Comment


                              • Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

                                Originally posted by Joe Contrarian View Post
                                We all know you're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, tank.

                                So let me illustrate the difference between FACT and OPINION, k?

                                This is FACT:



                                This is OPINION:



                                Do you understand the difference?

                                I'm fine if you want to post any FACTS that you believe contradict the ongoing progress birthers are making. Or, perhaps you're interested in having a civil conservation and are willing to drop the incessant ridiculing tone.

                                If not, shut the fuck up and leave my thread. Your combative style and Alinsky smear tactics are no longer welcome here.

                                Oh, and btw DR CON, of course Jablonski will be thrown under the bus -- like everyone else in the fraud's circle.

                                Idiot.
                                Again for the 3rd time.....Doc is not saying any of that is a FACT!!!!Doc did say that letter was a fact so what in Hell does that have to do with what you just posted?Not comparable at all and just plain stupid!Okay so you are sensitive tonight so I will not call you the usual names.You going to be alright?
                                What you are forgetting about Jablonski is that he is just taking orders and doing what he is told.He is working for the Democrat party more then Obama and that is his main topic right now.This hearing is nothing to him concerning Obama because at the end of the day the Democratic party will still be in control of the delegates and they will sue to get Obama on the ballot and win.A precedent was set in 2008 and every single legislator from Georgia signed off on it because he fulfilled all requirements and the COLB was legal and tender then just like it will be now!They do not care about a primary ballot when no one is running against him anyway.
                                Now the question is do the GOP politicians in Georgia get behind this or ignore it and run for the hills ?If they get behind it they will look stupid in the long run because whether you like it or not Obama will be on the ballot in November.You keep getting your hopes up for nothing.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X