'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Watching America

[SIZE=+1]'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood[/SIZE]

Given events in Lebanon, and Syria's well-established support for Hezbullah, what does Damascus have to say about America's project for a New Middle East? According to this op-ed article from Syria's State-controlled Thawra Al-Wada, official pronouncements from Washington and a recent article on the subject, indicate that, 'the region will be plunged into bloody and violent conflict, the opening scene of which is the Israeli aggression against Lebanon.'

By Dr. Tawfiq Simaq

Translated By Jonathan Levine

August 8, 2006
Saudi Arabia - Thawra Al-Wada - Original Article (Arabic)


Before and After maps of American plans for a New Middle East.


[CLICK FOR LARGER VERSIONS] (above and below)




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​

In July, the American Armed Forces Journal published an article entitled, Blood Borders , wherein the author, Ralph Peter (a pseudonym perhaps) writes of a vision for a New Middle East based on hitherto unknown maps.
These maps may have been officially prepared and then leaked to the media, or they may have originated at American research centers. But subsequent statements by the American Secretary of State [Condoleezza Rice] since the Israeli aggression against Lebanon about the "birth pangs of a New Middle East" gives this forecast added importance, if not the outright endorsement of the highest levels of the American administration.
This new vision for the Middle East is based on a geographical re-division of the region based on nationality and sect, and the writer views the justifications for such a division as follows:
The borders of the current Middle East cause much of the ethnic and sectarian strife within or between states, and that this has resulted in the taking of unconscionable measures against ethnic and religious minorities, and instability across the entire region.
Therefore, it is suggested that the various sects and ethnicities that find themselves unable to coexist have separate states established for them (for example, one for the Shi'a in Iraq and another for the Kurds). But in view of the fact that adjusting borders usually requires the agreement of the affected peoples, this may now be impossible. Therefore, such a border correction may have to be carried out by other means, even if that requires the shedding of blood to realize the purpose.
Meaning that the article brings the good news that the borders of the New Middle East are to be drawn with the blood of its people (meaning our blood). This compelled the author to choose the strange title of Blood Borders for his article.
Under the plan for remapping the borders of the Middle East, some countries will lose land and others will expand by annexing lands at the expense of those which are to shrink, with a scenario that appears something like the following [See Click-on maps above]:
1) Iraq: To be divided into three states (Shi'ite, Sunni, and Kurd).
-- a) The Kurdish State: Includes Iraqi Kurdistan, which comprises Kirkuk and part of Mosul, as well as parts of Turkey, Iran, Syria, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.
-- b) The Shi'ite Arab state: Made up of southern Iraq and the eastern portion of Saudi Arabia, as well as southwestern parts of Iran (Ahvaz Province), meaning that it comprises nearly a complete semi-circle around the east and west Arab Gulf.
[Editor's Note: It's interesting that this author refers to the Arab Gulf, rather than Persian Gulf, as Syria's supposedly close ally Iran would prefer it be called].
-- c) The Sunni Arab state: Built on the remainder of Iraqi territory, with a portion of Syria.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2) Syria: Would lose a portion of its northern territory to set up a Kurdish state, and parts of Iraqi lands would be added to that.
3) Iran: Would lose parts of its land to the Arab Shi'ite state, as previously noted, as well as portions to the Kurdish state and to a united Azerbaijan. Likewise, parts of Iran's southeast would be taken to set up the new state of Free Baluchistan, with the remainder going to a Shi'ite Persian state.
4) Afghanistan: Will lose portions of its southwest to the new Baluch state.
5) The new Baluch state, or ?Free Baluchistan:? Will be founded on part of southeastern Iran and part of southwestern Afghanistan in the area called Baluchistan, which is inhabited by Baluchs, most of whom are Sunni Muslims.
6) Saudi Arabia: Would be divided into two countries, one of them a religious state (or, as the article calls it ?an Islamic Sacred State?), which will include the Holy places of Mecca and Medina, in a political arrangement along the lines of the Vatican [the article calls it a Muslim Super-Vatican], and the other state, which would include the remainder of the territory of the current Kingdom.
7) Yemen: Would include parts of southern Saudi Arabia.
8) Jordan: Would become Greater Jordan, which would comprise the parts of Palestinian land occupied [by Israel] in 1967 and portions of northern Saudi Arabia, which would once and for all become a homeland for Palestinians, for those both in the Diaspora and under occupation.
9) The borders of the rest of Arab Asia would be left unchanged. As for the Arab countries of North Africa, they were not addressed in the article, and perhaps that is because they were considered outside the geographic bounds of the New Middle East.
After examining the available maps and the public statements of American officials, a number of objectives can be discerned, the most prominent of which are:
The fragmentation and weakening of the Arab region, making it easier for the United States of America to dominate its markets and its petroleum, (60% of world's proven oil reserves and 31% of its natural gas); and it would consolidate Israeli hegemony over its small and weak neighbors, which would force some of them to appeal to the Hebrew state for protection.
The incorporation of Israel into the region such that it would transform itself from an ostracized religiously-based state into one of a number of countries founded on the same principle, making its continued existence in its present environment possible - or rather, even in harmony with the natural order of things.
The draining away of strength from political Islam - or as its supporters would call it, Islamic awakening. In this way, sectarian conflicts would remain between countries in the region, rather than being directed at or fought against the United States on its own land, or against American interest in other countries.


Bush's sign reads 'The New Middle East'. [Ad Dustour, Jordan]. (above)


Ahmedinejad and Assad. [The Jerusalem Times, Israel]. (below)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At first glance, the project described above appears as if it were taken from one of the legends of the east or lifted from the tales of A Thousand and One Nights . But since the folly and adventurism of this American administration are fully recognized; and given what we know about the fundamentalist neoconservatives in the White House, who are infamous for their fanaticism and radicalism, we have little choice but to examine this plan and pay very serious attention.
If the American administration reformulates the frontiers of the Middle East in accordance with this or some similar project, we must expect that the region will be plunged into bloody and violent conflict, the opening scene of which is the Israeli aggression against Lebanon. The following scenes will witness a weakening of resistance forces in the region including in the forces of Hezbullah in Lebanon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Palestine, and the strength of [Washington's] regional opponents, primarily in Syria and Iran.
So that the core question that remains is this: who will write the final scene in the struggle that lies before us?
Without a doubt, the victors will write it, and the victors will be determined by which people are in possession of the skills and experience to undergo trials and suffering. They who experience the greatest testing will be capable of paying the price for victory, satisfied with the costs and the burdens.

[SIZE=+1]VIDEO FROM 1967: EMOTIONAL U.N. DEBATE ON SIX-DAY WAR

AS ISRAEL EXECUTES 'DISASTEROUS DEFEAT' OF ARAB FORCES [/SIZE]


NEWSREEL: Six-Day Middle East war debated in U.N. in New York, Syrian delegate blames Israel; Footage from battlefield, June 14, 1967, 00:05:00 "Israeli generals announce that their victory wipes out all previous agreements and borders ... The drive into Syria stops just short of Damascus."

 

frankjohnson

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Why don't the 500 million arabs quit whining about the five million israeli's and start toppling their own fat cat leaders instead of carrying their propoganda for them. Arab leaders treat their race horses better than their own people. Blame it on the Jews, it's such an imaginative excuse.
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Military-Industrial Complex Kingpins Call For Genocide To Kick-Start World War Three


Military-Industrial Complex Kingpins Call For Genocide To Kick-Start World War Three

Bogus hyped threats used to justify holocaust style genocide, redrawing of borders in middle east​
The military-industrial complex is gearing up to ethnically cleanse the entire middle east in a genocidal purge that will be a curtain raiser for world war three as preparations for a nuclear air strike on Iran remain on stand-by absent only the monolithic staged terror attack or false-flag provocation that will justify them.​
Armed Forces Journal, a mouthpiece for the military-industrial complex, recently carried a strategy plan for completely redrawing the borders of the Middle East written by retired Major Ralph Peters.
Peters lambastes the Neo-Cons for not having stamped enough influence (or chaos) on the middle east and calls for the use of genocide in realizing the Neo-Fascist's dream of a completely reinvented Middle East run by the same cabal currently responsible for untold war crimes In Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon.
"Oh, and one other dirty little secret from 5,000 years of history," writes Peters, "Ethnic cleansing works."
His twisted justification is that major crises around the globe are converging and that a massive economic crash is set to occur in 2008. Two of those converging disasters are listed as global warming and peak oil - which as we have exhaustively documented are monumental con jobs manufactured out of thin air to justify increased control over the personal lives of Westerners, feudalism, and expansion of empire.
An economic collapse doesn't worry the families that own the Federal Reserve and America because they will be the only ones to benefit from it.
The ten major shareholders of the Federal Reserve are as follows.
Rothschild: London and Berlin; Lazard Bros: Paris; Israel Seiff: Italy; Kuhn- Loeb Company: Germany; Warburg: Hamburg and Amsterdam; Lehman Bros; New York; Goldman and Sachs: New York; Rockefeller: New York.
Financial collapses are routinely preceded by insiders who are aware of the imminent downfall moving their assets and then buying them back for pennies on the dollar in the aftermath. So the graven necessity in which mass genocide is sold to us is inherently flawed and the justification for its implementation is a gargantuan deception.
Peters goes on to illustrate how our lives will be mired in a never ending cycle of war, terror and fear as he lays out the manifesto for world war three.
"There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing."

How the Middle East will look after it is ethnically cleansed by the "liberating" Neo-Fascist assault. Click to enlarge.
The endless drumbeat of propaganda tells us that it is Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who advocates genocide, yet scratch beneath the surface and the real protagonists of a vampiric holocaust to ethnically cleanse the middle east of Arabs are the US and Israeli Neo-Fascist crime syndicates that have hijacked our governments.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"TerrorStorm sets a new standard in documentary filmmaking. Alex Jones knocks it out of the park yet again." -Dylan Avery, Director, "Loose Change" - Click here to get the DVD or click here to watch online now!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
The megalomaniacs that control Israel wish to live in a world largely devoid of Muslims or Persians and they have embarked on a hundred year plus mission of ethnic cleansing to wipe them from the globe. The blitzkrieg of Lebanon is part of this process.
Race-specific bio-weapons have already been developed for this purpose.
From Wired News,
"Israel is reportedly developing a biological weapon that would harm Arabs while leaving Jews unaffected, according to a report in London's Sunday Times."
"The report, citing Israeli military and western intelligence sources, says that scientists are trying to identify distinctive genes carried by Arabs to create a genetically modified bacterium or virus."
"The "ethno-bomb" program is based at Israel's Nes Tziyona research facility. Scientists are trying to use viruses and bacteria to alter DNA inside living cells and attack only those cells bearing Arabic genes."
Imagine if plans were unearthed detailing a program on behalf of Kim Jong-il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to create an ethno-bomb to wipe out Jews or caucasians. How would Israel and the United States react?
Only Israel is allowed to be nuclear-armed, violate dozens of UN treaties, use chemical weapons on civilians, and construct horrific policies of ethnic cleansing.
Israel have made a pact to carry out this agenda in league with the Neo-Cons, and above them the Globalists, whose desire is also world population reduction and complete full spectrum domination and control over all countries and near-Earth space itself.
All these facets are openly discussed by the elite in their own public documents.
"...advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."​
Who wrote these words in their own strategy document? The Nazis? The regime of Pol Pot?​
No, it was Paul Wolfowitz, William Kristol and the rest of the Neo-Fascist collaborators that formed the Project For a New American Century - the ideological framework of the Bush administration.​
When we witness future atrocities that inflict death, misery and suffering on large numbers of the population will we recall who bragged about metering out such terror in the first place?​
As manufactured terror alerts, magnified turmoil in the Middle East, and dire proclamations that doomsday is approaching all converge at the end of the summer of 2006, the twist in the story is likely to be a massive staged terror attack that will smother any remaining voices of dissent and once again leave America transfixed in an orgy of militarism, paranoia and fear.​
The Israeli bombardment of Lebanon is the next escalation of a conflict that is being orchestrated according to a set roadmap that leads directly to World War Three.​
Israel, the United States and Great Britain have been caught red-handed on numerous occasions staging terror attacks and false flag provocations in the Middle East for over 50 years.

The next big provocation is intended to prod Iran into launching what will be presented by the world's media as a pre-emptive action, unjustified by any US or Israeli intervention and used as war propaganda to mandate nuclear air strikes to oust Ahmadinejad's regime.
Some see Ahmadinejad himself as just a cameo player in a rigged game. Greg Palast has suggested he could be reading off a script and has been in the pocket of the Neo-Fascists all along. Ahmadinejad and Bush are very close cousins in the context that they both believe their own ego and divine right to rule alone is enough to save them from the judgment of history. Contrast Ahmadinejad's behavior with that of Hugo Chavez - Chavez is completely obsessed with the fact that the US are trying to instigate regime change in Venezuela and he's shouting it from the rooftops in the media every week. Though the scheduled air strike of Iran is even more inevitable, Ahmadinejad remains seemingly unperturbed.
Others compare the actual context and meaning of Ahmadinejad's speeches with the bellicose hubris of warmongers who call him the new Hitler and say he wants to eradicate Israel.
Ahmadinejad never militarily threatened to "wipe Israel off the map," this is firstly a gross mistranslation and it is also taken completely out of context. Ahmadinejad called for the future end of the political system of Zionism, not to ethnically cleanse an entire country. In addition, earlier this week Ahmadinejad said on record that Iran "was no threat to Israel or any nation," but you won't hear Fox news repeating that particular quote every 5 minutes, because it doesn't correlate with the "Mad Mahmoud" image that the Neo-Fascists are trying to construct to justify their next act of bloodletting.
If there is some kind of staged attack in the US then as always we will look at who has the capability and the motive to pull it off - especially in light of the fact that Dick Cheney's USSTRATCOM contingency plan calls for attacking Iran in the immediate aftermath of a 'second 9/11' - no matter who is behind it - which of course is going to be the cabal Dick Cheney fronts for itself and the same pack of murderers that are actively seeking to initiate global ethic cleansing and genocide to bring about world war three.
 

frankjohnson

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

You are a foul ass liar. Just keep blaming the Jews. It's so creative. Fuck your ass!
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

You are a foul ass liar. Just keep blaming the Jews. It's so creative. Fuck your ass!


Frank you are not a really friendly Jew in this forum are ya :+textinb3:+textinb3

Just joking man.....Relax, nice to see ya here .....:)
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Here is a thought.....



What if Pakistan knows about this map. Pakistan ISI and the Talibans are working hand in hand to see US defeat in Afghanistan..............:rolleyes:
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

It seems that Iran is the winner in this map........:rolleyes: Well not really........ Everyone lose something.......
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Frank, that's a really nice map you guys put up for middle east...........


Nice going Frank......... You will be killing not 6 million but 6 billion with it..........



Is this make you proud frank.......
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

I think Frankie might actually be a skin head ....


:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:dancefool
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Frank, I don't blame Jews for the map that put up for middle east but rather then the Israeli government itself........


I know alot of Jews wouldn't even know about this........
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Frank, do you really support the new map that they put up for middle east.............
 

world traveler

EOG Addicted
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

you know the colonial powers have alot to do with modern day problems in the middle east and africa. The arbitrary drawing boarders along geographical lines can be directly linked to internal fighting of many of these countries. In pricipal redrawing boarders based on ethnic and sectarian factors rather than simply what ooks best on the map as was done befroe is ot a bad idea. I stress that before any boarder redrawing can commense it must have the consent of those that it will directly affect and that is the only way i ould agree to it. If some foriegn governing body like the us or the un were to deside who gets hat, well thats no different than what was done before and i would not agree with that. These people hate eachother and want to kill eachother anyway so why not let them each have their own land and be done with it.
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

World Traveller......... Every country, every city has differences.........


This doesn't mean we have to divide the country.............


Look at United States....... There are different racists, cultures etc.....


New Yorkers don't like Texas and Texas doesn't like New Yorkers so does this mean they have to be a different country........
 

world traveler

EOG Addicted
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

poor example.
#1 neither new yorkers nor texans esisted on that land before europeans settled it, it was american indian land and luckly they dont feel its ness. to blow themselves up in markets to try to get it back.
#2 if you read my post i state the problems started BECAUSE the boarders were redrawn to BEGIN with, therefore returning boarders to origional way might not be a good thing IF and ONLY IF the citizens agree to it.
Jesus Christ, i mean OHHH alllah you sure like to argue about everything.
 

jay28

EOG Dedicated
Re: 'New Middle East' Borders to Be Drawn in Arab Blood

Jesus Christ, i mean OHHH alllah you sure like to argue about everything.


You just compared Jesus Christ to Allah :nono
By doing this you are breaking your first commandment.........


You mean Oh God OHHHH Allah :)
 
Last edited:
Top