under .500 vs above .500

Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Munson15

This system you bet the team with the worst record if they both have losing records or winning records. This is been kicking ass like you would not believe the last 5 days. I do not play the game if one team has a .500 record. Might be something to watch.
 
munson15

munson15

I want winners...
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Cannon said:
Munson15

This system you bet the team with the worst record if they both have losing records or winning records. This is been kicking ass like you would not believe the last 5 days. I do not play the game if one team has a .500 record. Might be something to watch.
Click to expand...
I like it, and I agree that the stronger subset would be the under .500 faves to beat the over .500 dogs. Thanks for posting it.
 
munson15

munson15

I want winners...
Re: under .500 vs above .500

jimmycrackcorn said:
An example game would be..

SMU +28 OVER 51.0
Tex A&M -28 UNDER 51.O

The line has to be 33% or greater than the total. 1 unit wager(parlay) on the favorite and the over, and 1 unit wager(parlay) on the dog and the under. 65% win rate for years!

JCC
Click to expand...

Jimmy, I'm confused.:+clueless You are saying to play the dog/under parlay, but the example shows the fave with the under. Please clarify. :cheers
 
cjv_11

cjv_11

EOG Veteran
Re: under .500 vs above .500

cannon, whats your system for the preseason? just curious, right around the corner and the lines are out.
 
jimmycrackcorn

jimmycrackcorn

EOG Senior Member
Re: under .500 vs above .500

The plays would be:

1. Parlay of the fav and the over
2. parlay of the dog and the under

1 unit each parlay. should hit appx. 65% of the time.

Yes, you lose one of the parlays, but make dollars with a win of one

Jimmy
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

My preseason system that smokes formthe first two games. Bet the home team if the opening line is -2 1/2 or less (the home team can alos be a pick or a home dog. If the home team opens at -3 or more bet the dog. If they are playing on a neutral site bet the favorite. I will bet tonight and buy to the opening line if it has moved against me.
 
munson15

munson15

I want winners...
Re: under .500 vs above .500

jimmycrackcorn said:
The plays would be:

1. Parlay of the fav and the over
2. parlay of the dog and the under

1 unit each parlay. should hit appx. 65% of the time.

Yes, you lose one of the parlays, but make dollars with a win of one

Jimmy
Click to expand...
Thanks Jimmy!:cheers
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Record after first week of system

31-33 +3.89 games after commission at Matchbook. I figure the 2% commission on winning bets unlike another guy on here when he figures his units. This system should net 15-20 games a month the rest of the season.

My opinion plays are really doing well to bad I am not betting them for more than $50 or counting them in my record.

Tuesday Plays
Balt
Tex
CWS
TB
KC
Oak
Flor
Hou
SF

The stronger plays should be (Oak and Flor)

My opinion plays
Sea
Pitt
Mil
SD
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500



Wednesdays Plays

TB
OAK
BALT
CWS
KC
TEX
FLOR
HOU
SF

Strongest play Flor

Opinions
Sea
Cinn
Pitt
Mil
SD
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Thanks Mic.


The two early games
TB
Oak

looking good as dogs so far. Hope I smoke Wednesday
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Wednesday's record (Thanks for the choke San Fran)

5-4 +2.09 net games after commission

Record after 9 days
40-42

+7.01 net games
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500




Thursday plays

Tex
Balt
CWS
Oak
Flor
Hou
SF


Opinions
Pitt
Mil
Phil
SD
Cinn
 
L

Larry B.

EOG Member
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Systems like this are pretty much hit or miss. One year you'll kill em, and the next year you'll get killed. That's a fact! If you want to win on a consistent basis over the long haul, you have better find a way to come up with a number (or a price for baseball) to compare with a number (the bookmaker's line). And when that number is off by a certain amount, it's a play. If you can not do that, you're better off getting a part time job somewhere, because you are not going to win ... Plain and simple.
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Thursday Results

3-4

+ .80 net games after commission at Matchbook

Record after 10 days

43-46 +7.81 net games after commissions at Matchbook
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Friday

CWS
KC
TEX
OAK
SF

Man those look ugly.

Opinions
Cubs
Pitt
Hou
TB
Wash
Minn
Colo
Phil
Sea
Lad
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Thusday results

2-3 -.74 games

results after 11 days

45-49 + 7.07 games
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500




Saturdays games

same as Friday

CWS
KC
Tex
Oak
SF


Opinions
Cubs
Pitt
Hou
TB
Wash
Minn
Colo
Phil
Sea
Lad
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500



Will update record after Sunday

went 2-3 on Saturday on dogs.


Same games for Sunday
CWS
Tex
Oak
SF
KC
:cheers
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

1-4 Sunday

The under .500 vs above .500 today were

St. Louis
TB
Hou


Been busy with work and promise to update tonight.
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Record after Monday (14 days of betting)

50-57 +5.60 net games at Matchbook with the 2% taken out for winning bets. This system should win 15 net games a month. These are not units but net games. So if you bet them for 3-5 units that would be 45-75 + units per month. I know this works.
 
Cannon

Cannon

Banned
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Tuesday Results

4-5 - .65 net games

Record after 15 days of posting

54-62 + 4.95 net games after Matchbook commission
 
munson15

munson15

I want winners...
Re: under .500 vs above .500

Cannon, you're a genius! I've played the under .500 faves and gone 6-3 since you started this thread, the Reds last night being the latest winner. Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top