I dont get all the love for Manning over Brady.... Brady besides this year hasnt had any wrs for the most part and Manning has been pretty stacked. I like Manning a lot better but I definitely think the better qb is Brady
I dont get all the love for Manning over Brady.... Brady besides this year hasnt had any wrs for the most part and Manning has been pretty stacked. I like Manning a lot better but I definitely think the better qb is Brady
I think that its not fair to give guys extra credit for rings. Defense wins championships, not qbs. I think the rules of the game are that when you have the ball, the object of the game is to move your team down the field and gain positive yardage and score points.
We shouldn't get sidetracked by achievements that are team related because how good the team that any QB ends up playing for is completely random, we don't want to reward a guy for getting lucky and getting on the right team.
Rewarding a QB for winning championships is like saying a guy who inherited 5 million from his parents is better in some way than a guy who never had anything handed to him and worked his fingers to the bone for 2 million.
Also, if a qb has tons of yards passing and tons of tds he might have this because of the teammates he played for. You might want to say Favre is the best QB ever because you really need to factor in the teammates he played with. Favre never really had a great running back and never had a career littered with great receivers. Montana had Rice, who did Favre have?
I hate to admit it, but it is Brady. The guy's going to have the most super bowls when done, he already has the most TDs in a season, and 1 day he will have the most throwing yards in season as well. He has also proven to be a clutch player in the 4th quarter.
Trent Dilfer has 1 SB ring and Dan Marino has none. Under this logic, Dilfer is the better player.op:
Negative. Trent Dilfer's overall resume comes no where near that of Dan Marino. Neither does that of Doug Williams, Mark Rypien, Joe Theisman, nor any other flash in the pan QB that got a ring.
When judging the place in history of a single player in a team game, the success of the team is inextricably intertwined with that of the player, and vice versa. For example, Michael Jordan does not win 6 championships without the rest of the Chicago Bulls. The Chicago Bulls do not win 6 titles without Michael Jordan.
The one constant on those 4 Super Bowl teams for San Fran was Joe Montana.
But if rings are the only thing that matters, Dilfer is ahead of Marino in the most important category.
I never said that rings are the ONLY thing that matters. I do place a large emphasis on them.
If winning the title doesn't matter the most... then what does?
A QB can only do 'his job' and accumulate offensive yards gained and points scored. And, even then, its hard to evaluate because you have to evaluate the teammates and how good THEY are. If a QB plays his entire career with Jerry Rice and the other guy plays his career with Joe Blow, well, you have to use that as a factor.
There are a lot of factors, i just think that winning the SB is somewhat overrated if you are just trying to determine who is the best QB.
Agreed on Unitas. My vote went to Montana, I can't remember him ever playing a bad game.I went with Montana being a 49er fan and got to see all his great performances.
Johnny Unitas was never mentioned. He was tops in a totally different era of football.
Manning.
I think with 4 SB rings, Bradshaw should have at least made the list