for the cubbies.
MadCapper Head <in> Moderation Sep 25, 2008 #2 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? watching game. hes not throwing hard. surprised mets arent hitting.
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? watching game. hes not throwing hard. surprised mets arent hitting.
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #3 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? uh oh. much movement? cubs and under going down.
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? uh oh. much movement? cubs and under going down.
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #4 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? Strike looking (85/fastball). Click to expand... not what you're used to seeing
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? Strike looking (85/fastball). Click to expand... not what you're used to seeing
MadCapper Head <in> Moderation Sep 25, 2008 #5 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? im telling you 82-89 tonight. splitter been missing too. mets just blow.
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? im telling you 82-89 tonight. splitter been missing too. mets just blow.
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #7 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? god damn, now this retarded fuck is going to walk the bases loaded.
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? god damn, now this retarded fuck is going to walk the bases loaded.
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #8 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? fuck this fucking bullshit, mets get 1 hit this inning and get 2 runs. in the first they get 0 hits and get a run. muther fuck baseball
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? fuck this fucking bullshit, mets get 1 hit this inning and get 2 runs. in the first they get 0 hits and get a run. muther fuck baseball
MadCapper Head <in> Moderation Sep 25, 2008 #9 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? 3-3fuk
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #10 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? 3-3 aint it? 2nd night in a row the mets have more runs than hits. nothing like being terrible but lucky. fucking retarded bitch harden falls behind 3-1 and walks everyone
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? 3-3 aint it? 2nd night in a row the mets have more runs than hits. nothing like being terrible but lucky. fucking retarded bitch harden falls behind 3-1 and walks everyone
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #11 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? another walk. why dont you make them hit the fucking ball you assdick
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? another walk. why dont you make them hit the fucking ball you assdick
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #12 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? omg, he throws to 1st 50 times and now is in another 3-2 count. just get the batter out you asshole
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? omg, he throws to 1st 50 times and now is in another 3-2 count. just get the batter out you asshole
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #13 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? the fucking bitch with another walk
ballwonder EOG Master Sep 25, 2008 #14 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? U got the cubs mo.....
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #15 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? cubs and under. i will lose both because this fuck walks everyone. speaking of which, another walk. mets get no hits but have men on all day
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? cubs and under. i will lose both because this fuck walks everyone. speaking of which, another walk. mets get no hits but have men on all day
mofome Banned Sep 25, 2008 #16 Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? mets have 3 runs and none of those people got on with a hit. error walk walk thats it. fuck that
Re: Harden with no Ks through 3: good sign or bad sign? mets have 3 runs and none of those people got on with a hit. error walk walk thats it. fuck that
