Fictionman
EOG Addicted
never can tell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from U.S. presidential election, 1948)
Jump to: navigation, search
<!-- start content --><table class="infobox vevent" style="font-size: 90%; width: 22em;"><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: center;" colspan="5">? 1944 1952 ?</td></tr><tr><td style="background: rgb(204, 204, 255) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; font-size: 140%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; text-align: center;" colspan="5">United States presidential election, 1948
</td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: center;" colspan="5">November 2, 1948</td></tr><tr><th align="left" width="10%"></th><th align="left" width="10%"></th><th align="middle" width="20%"></th><th align="middle" width="20%"></th><th align="middle" width="20%"></th></tr><tr><td colspan="2"></td><td style="border-bottom: 6px solid rgb(51, 51, 255);" align="middle"></td><td style="border-bottom: 6px solid rgb(255, 51, 51);" align="middle"></td><td style="border-bottom: 6px solid rgb(255, 127, 0);" align="middle"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" align="left">Nominee</td><td align="middle">Harry S. Truman</td><td align="middle">Thomas E. Dewey</td><td align="middle">Strom Thurmond</td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: left;" colspan="2">Party</td><td align="middle">Democratic</td><td align="middle">Republican</td><td align="middle">Dixiecrat</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Home state</td><td align="middle">Missouri</td><td align="middle">New York</td><td align="middle">South Carolina</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Running mate</td><td align="middle">Alben W. Barkley</td><td align="middle">Earl Warren</td><td align="middle">Fielding L. Wright</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Electoral vote</td><td align="middle">303</td><td align="middle">189</td><td align="middle">39</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">States carried</td><td align="middle">28</td><td align="middle">16</td><td align="middle">4</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Popular vote</td><td align="middle">24,179,347</td><td align="middle">21,991,292</td><td align="middle">1,175,930</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Percentage</td><td align="middle">49.6%</td><td align="middle">45.1%</td><td align="middle">2.4%</td></tr><tr><td style="" align="middle"></td><td style="" align="middle"></td><td style="" align="middle"></td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: center;" colspan="5">
<small>Presidential election results map. Red denotes states won by Dewey/Warren, Blue denotes those won by Truman/Barkley, Orange denotes those won by Thurmond/Wright. Numbers indicate the number of electoral votes allotted to each state.</small>
</td></tr><tr><td colspan="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>
The United States presidential election of 1948 is considered by most historians as the greatest election upset in American history. Virtually every prediction (with or without public opinion polls) indicated that incumbent President Harry S. Truman would be defeated by Republican Thomas E. Dewey. Truman won, overcoming a three-way split in his own party. Truman's surprise victory was the fifth consecutive win for the Democratic Party in a presidential election. Truman's election confirmed the Democratic Party's status as the nation's majority party, a status they would retain until the conservative realignment in 1968.
It's funny that some people are clueless enough to think that polling from 1948 is in any way comparable to what we have today. People betting Obama at -700 or -800 or -900 are getting free money.
Will say this. In Florida, the rural counties are not waiting at all to vote. The large counties though are predicted to have 5-6 hour wait times and have had 3 hour wait times in early voting. McCain WILL pull the "upset" in Florida, but not in the election.
The early voting has the same lines in some of the liberal Democratic areas also. The turnout might just be high across the board and I don't think this is indicative of a weakness in Florida for Obama.
I thought Einstein was dead-but I will be damned,here he is posting in a forum.Surprised you can even spell clueless.
I see that now - I misread the first time. I do think that the long lines show that a lot of Florida voters are passionate about Obama (or at least they hate Bush and McCain's future continuation of Bush policies) and that they will come out and support him. I don't see McCain winning Florida at all.?
What I am saying is that I think in Democratic counties lines are going to be longer (and thus more people will be discouraged and not vote) than in rural Republican counties.
?
What I am saying is that I think in Democratic counties lines are going to be longer (and thus more people will be discouraged and not vote) than in rural Republican counties.
It's all in the perception. Because polls say it one way means diddly. Last year Kerry had an even bigger lead on the day before--and the fool bit the dust like he deserved.