Re: Rank the top 4 Coaches left in the field of 16
Funny not 1 mention of Calhoun or Boeheim. Now don't get me wrong I am not arguing for them, but Calhoun has won over 800 games, and Jimmy is on 799. Both have become dominant recruiters bringing in elite talent each year. Boeheim has 1 National Title, and 2 other final game appearances. You can argue that he got there with less than elite talent as well. He is also widely known as the best teacher of the zone defense. Just thought these guys would get a little more play
Calhoun has been mentioned by a few people already. Boeheim was mentioned by one guy, but for me personally he wouldn't crack my top 10. He doesn't improve the players for the most part. Donte Green had incredible talent and Boeheim did nothing with it. He pretty much just let Donte do what he wanted last year, and what he wanted was to be a selfish player that take terrible shots more often than not. How that team did not even make the NCAA Tournament last year is absolutely horrible. Boeheim may have done the worst coaching job of anyone in the nation last season.
This season almost unraveled for them too. Looked great at the beginning. They got nice matchups against teams in a transition year (Kansas and Memphis) at the right time and you would think that would build confidence winning those games, especially the way they beat Kansas. They struggled for a bit after that though and was actually at a risk to miss the tournament before the hot end to the year. He gets a lot of raw talent, and guys that have tons of potential. They are guys that need to be molded into stars though, and Boeheim more often than not drops the ball doing that. Melo he didn't need to do anything with, he was already a star. I always say recruiting is the biggest part of coaching so I give him tons of credit for getting Melo and getting talented guys like Greene, Flynn, Harris and Devendorf. He just doens't really make them any better.
Just imagine what this would of been capable of if 1) Donte Greene progressed and stayed. He might of stayed if he saw a team that could win the title or was able to improve his stock. I think all an extra year would have done for him is hurt his stock though because Boeheim did nothing to stop him from making poor decisions, 2) He was able to get the guys to play better defense. The 2-3 looks very good at times, but not consistently. Now they are starting to play top teams all it takes is one bad performance on the defensive side and you're gone. They won't be able to switch to man either as I really don't think they'd be able to handle it. As soon as a team starts abusing the zone they are done in my opinion because Boeheim either hasn't spent the time getting them to play great defense, or his guys just don't get it. And 3) If he could only get Devendorf to play at his capabilities consistently. He at times looks absolutely awful, but when he's on he's fantastic. A great coach will get his guys playing as good as they can be pretty consistently. There will of coarse be bad games, but it shouldn't be going from night and day one game to the next. Devendorf can be a great college player, but he needs guidence on how to be a smarter player. That's Boeheim's job.
Boeheim gets talented guys though pretty often, so I will give him props for that.