I said since last year that i voted no way to allow these deals for this reason. Tuck will try to say shit here about it but he knows the deal. This is a fucked up deal that should be reversed. I said the only way to have offseason deals is if we were able to vote on it, this should be vetoed its absurd. If i had offered Mo Albert for 5 keepers that would have stood? come onI'm looking for the posts where we all agreed not to do stuff like this - give me some time as I'm sure Tuck was one of the biggest ones against 4-1 type deals.
Where did we say 3 for 1 is good when the 1 is not much better then your one?okay me and Mo will be swapping back Cruz for Weaver
so its a 3-1 just like people agree'd was okay
end of discussion
Where did we say 3 for 1 is good when the 1 is not much better then your one?
come on 2 for 1 is not fair? explain to me why a 3rd piece has to be added? its bullshit and i called this a year ago
huh during season trade what you want, no one would do a crazy deal like this during. Just explain why a 3rd has to be added, its absolute bullshiteveryone has agree'd to 3-1, so now that thats what the deal is, people gonna bitch about that?
i forget who traded halladay last year for like 74 players and that was fine..
I offered:
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=2 width="100%"><TBODY><TR class=bgFan height=17 vAlign=top align=right><TD align=left>ACES are Queens
?Braun, Ryan J. LF MIL
?Santana, Ervin SP ANA
</TD><TD align=left>Breaksman
?Hamilton, Josh CF TEX
?Sabathia, CC SP NYY</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
He wanted Billz instead of Ervin. Or Ervin with Z and he threw back Aardsma.
I passed. Probably nutty to pass.
My first offer was CC/Gardner for Braun/Bills. He countered with Braun/Ervin for CC/Hambo. I wanted Bills in the deal instead of Ervin.
huh during season trade what you want, no one would do a crazy deal like this during. Just explain why a 3rd has to be added, its absolute bullshit
:LMAO:LMAO:LMAOsorry sir, no refunds avaliable at this time, thank you for the donation
Trade has to be reversed - end of story. If you will do a 3-1 that's fine, as we did agree to that whether Gamer wants to admit it or not. 3-1 is OK, but 4-1 keeper is too much. When doing off season trades, you can only trade keepers. I thought I brought this point up the other day messing around with TN.
Liriano, Tulo, Votto and Weaver were traded for Ubaldo and we made TTP reverse the trade - that's when we all decided 4-1 was not OK.
wtf is wrong with you
who the fuck said he is paid - I said i thought. If he is not chute has to pay
fuckin a are you fucking jumpy
Didleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeey
whoever said a 3 for 1 like this was good?so again then i am okay?
Liri
votto
utley
for
price
thats the final deal
Deal is good in my book then. :cheers Nice deal for you.its 3-1 now, so we are good, i traded back cruz for weaver
Yup, that's why it stands. We decided on 3-1 - just because Gamer doesn't like it doesn't mean we can change the rules.Gamer says a 2 or 3 for 1 is okay in that thread
so much for a league with integrityGamer says a 2 or 3 for 1 is okay in that thread
so much for a league with integrity
that was during season and that wasnt talking about guys who were absolute studs going in a 3 for 1
Like i said Votto himself is better then Price, but also having Liriano is at best a rapage in your favor. Now utley, come on its just plain stupidity
league votes dont matter though or i would have 3rd pick in the draft and i wouldnt have even made this trade
I agreed with you and no one else chimed in.RJT u dont recall i asked for league votes to determine pre draft trades? shit like this shouldnt fly. Absolutely no reason why Votto/Liri wasnt good enough for Price
I know that's what pushed it over the top for me - I mean the other 4 guys? Fine, but Leake too? I said no way. (joke, just so TTP knows)I think the deal Timely linked was vetoed because getting Leake was too much.
It's no different than what you were offering Viejo. Price has a lot more value than Liriano, IMO.I agreed with you and no one else chimed in.
That deal is awful imo. Liriano is every bit as good as Price, just a bigger risk. There's nothing I can do though.