JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Those darn Unions continue to outsmart those dumb corporate boards of directors along with state and local elected officials nationwide!

heh
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Wall Street bad! Corporations evil...Too much greed...unions are for the little guy...blah blah blah

:whine:

In a healthy, prosperous economy, privately owned businesses benefit the sovereign individual and vice-versa through millions of voluntarily exchanges of goods and services between two parties: buyer and seller. It's called democratic capitalism, Mr. Crybaby Union Hack.

On the other hand, unions benefit nobody...except members inside their little "club"...certainly not the buyer nor seller, or any member of society. Quite the opposite. By their own disruptive barbaric nature, unions systematically destroy the cities and communities they claim to love, by driving up prices, stifling innovation and technology and smothering everyone with red tape, until entire industries collapse or get fed up and leave. Unions are a pollutant to the natural economy. Organized Big Labor is nothing but a cabal of professional extortionists lead by bunch of lazy, envious losers drunk with power.

Envious, you say? :bwah:

I've dealt with these scumbags.

Unions are economic terrorists...think of them as Marxist Jihadis. No, they don't fly loaded airplanes into buildings and kill people, at least not yet. But they do steal people's livelihood, with a goal of crushing entire economies demonstrating abject carelessness to the impact their selfish greed and corruption have on those less fortunate -- particularly the poor.

Tank: "I'm a libertarian"

More like...

LINO (LIBERTARIAN IN NAME ONLY) 2938u4ji23

 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

In a healthy, prosperous economy, privately owned businesses benefit the sovereign individual and vice-versa through millions of voluntarily exchanges of goods and services between two parties: buyer and seller. It's called democratic capitalism, Mr. Crybaby Union Hack.
Yet the taxpayer pays for the corporations subsidies and this is suppose to be okay according to the Fascist.
If this sounds so good to you take your Fascist talking points to China where slave labor does not know any different.Americans [ not you CANADIAN Fascist ] still like to have a choice and decide whether they want a union or not.

On the other hand, unions benefit nobody...except members inside their little "club"...certainly not the buyer nor seller, or any member of society.
Do you realize how stupid you sound here?Nope!!Go to China and see how well that is working over there with slave labor and how prosperous that country is.

Quite the opposite. By their own disruptive barbaric nature, unions systematically destroy the cities and communities they claim to love, by driving up prices,
And your excuse for most of the cities in China is what????Again you are showing how stupid you are!!
What prices are being driven up??This should be good and explain again how a car built at a non union plant costs the same as one built at a union plant.You never have an excuse for this stupid!!But continue with the envy ...it has made my day once again loser.

stifling innovation and technology and smothering everyone with red tape, until entire industries collapse or get fed up and leave.
:LMAOEXAMPLES PLEASE...this should be real good!!

Unions are a pollutant to the natural economy. Organized Big Labor is nothing but a cabal of professional extortionists lead by bunch of lazy, envious losers drunk with power.
Yet the most productive in the world!!Please try again since you are batting 0!!:LMAO

Envious, you say?
Of course not!!Just because it is obvious to everyone with a brain doesn't make it so right envious loser??Who else would start 3 threads a week on a internet gambling site crying about unions if they was not jealous or envious right??:LMAO:LMAO

I've dealt with these scumbags.
A stupid pussy like you would not be alive so nice fantasy there Mr, Envious!

Unions are economic terrorists...think of them as Marxist Jihadis. No, they don't fly loaded airplanes into buildings and kill people, at least not yet. But they do steal people's livelihood, with a goal of crushing entire economies demonstrating abject carelessness to the impact their selfish greed and corruption have on those less fortunate -- particularly the poor.

Keep showing your stupidity there Mr. Envious!Are you dumb enough to believe that companies agree to these contracts when they cannot afford them?Are you even dumber to think that unions ask for things the company cannot afford??You are so stupid I honestly think that you think unions try to bankrupt a company so they are out of a job!!What kind of Canadian Fascist thinks this way??

Tank: "I'm a libertarian"

More like...

Joe; I am a Canadian Fascist that proves how stupid I am on a daily basis!!
Tank; thanks for the laughs and please work on that jealousy and envy problem!!

[g]
I just do not understand how all those millionaires in the NBA, NFL and MLB do not do away with their union??After listening to the Canadian Fascist they should have destroyed the leagues a long time ago and bankrupted every city and team along the way!!:LMAO
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

[SIZE=+1]:finger007-1Merry Christmas from all government employee unions! [/SIZE]:finger007-1

*********************************************************
Pensions Push Taxes Higher


Cities Tap Homeowners for Revenue as Workers' Retirement, Health Costs Rise

By JEANNETTE NEUMANN

Cities across the nation are raising property taxes, largely citing rising pension and health-care costs for their employees and retirees.

In Pennsylvania, the township of Upper Moreland is bumping up property taxes for residents by 13.6% in 2011. Next door the city of Philadelphia this year increased the tax 9.9%. In New York, Saratoga Springs will collect 4.4% more in property taxes in 2011; Troy will increase taxes by 1.9%.


<cite>Scott Lewis for The Wall Street Journal</cite> John Crawford is director of finance in Upper Moreland, Pa., which is raising taxes 13.6%.

Property-tax increases aren't unusual, in part because the taxes are among the main sources of local revenue. But officials say more and larger increases are taking hold. "This year we have seen a dramatic increase in our cities and towns having to increase property taxes" for pensions and other expenses, said Jack Garner, executive director of the Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities.

Local officials and government workers say a confluence of factors is driving the increases, including the need to make up for staggering investment losses from the financial crisis and rising costs as more workers retire. In addition, benefit increases promised in flush times are coming due as revenue flounders, and some cities have skipped payments to their pension funds over the years.

In Illinois, towns have been raising property taxes to keep up with pension and health-care costs for several years, but the scale and scope of the increases this year are unprecedented 2938u4ji23, said Joe McCoy, a lobbyist with the Illinois Municipal League.

Representatives of government workers, including for unions, don't deny that pension costs are rising. But they blame local officials for failing to fund pensions adequately in better times.


"The main driver is the irresponsibility of local public officials who for years and years have not been funding their pensions," said Henry Bayer, executive director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 union, which represents 72,000 employees in Illinois.

Many local officials say they have been trying to right their pension funds without raising taxes. They have borrowed money from reserves, trimmed services and cut back on staff.

Some cities have also pushed unions to reopen contracts in an attempt to pare benefits or raise workers' contributions for pensions and health care. They have faced stiff resistance from some unions that argue it's unfair to penalize workers for a financial crisis that isn't their fault. Others have agreed to some cutbacks.

State aid to many local governments and other revenue remain below precrisis levels. Nearly half of states reduced aid to local governments in 2010, and 20 states have proposed additional cuts in 2011, according to a December report by the Congressional Budget Office.

"Unless governments really want to squeeze essential services?there are likely to be a lot more property tax increases" across the country, said Don Boyd, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York.

Tax increases and budget cuts are raising pressure on state politicians to tame growing pension costs, and the topic has become a significant issue in elections.

Many states have already increased the retirement age and required years of service for new hires, bumped up the amount new workers pay toward their benefits and reduced annual cost-of-living increases. This month, for example, Illinois lawmakers approved legislation requiring newly hired police and firefighters to retire at age 55 instead of 50 to receive full benefits, among other changes. The governor is reviewing the bill.

The tax increases are coming to light now because many local governments plan their budgets at the end of the previous year.

In Upper Moreland, a township of about 26,000 near Philadelphia, the Board of Commissioners voted this month to raise its 2011 property tax for residents by 13.6%, the first such rise in five years. That means a $67 annual tax bump on a $135,000 home, the average value there.

Pension and health-care costs are likely to make up more than a fifth of the town's $17.8 million operating budget for next year, said finance director John Crawford, a Republican.

In 2005, Upper Moreland contributed around $100,000 to its pensions. This year, it contributed $681,000. In 2011, it will pay an estimated $1.1 million. Healthy investment returns used to cover a large portion of the town's contribution to its pension funds. Now, lower returns?coupled with higher costs as more workers retire?mean Upper Moreland is paying more.

In addition to those figures, the state of Pennsylvania annually contributes $250,000 to Upper Moreland's pensions, Mr. Crawford said. Local Pennsylvania governments only receive pension aid from the state if they make the payments to their pensions recommended by actuaries.
Upper Moreland's payments on current workers' health care were $2 million in 2010 and are estimated to reach $2.63 million in 2011, Mr. Crawford said.

"If it hadn't been for the escalating costs," in pension and health-care benefits, he said, "the board may have succeeded in going through another year without a tax increase."

Many of the same issues are hitting Philadelphia, which earlier this year increased its property tax by 9.9%, the first bump since the early 1990s. That's a $270 annual payment increase for residents living in homes valued at $100,000, said Rob Dubow, city finance director.

Philadelphia's pension fund is 45% funded?meaning its assets represent 45% of its long-term liabilities?and the city's payments are projected to increase to $600 million in 2015, up from $230 million in 2004. Actuaries recommend pension systems be 80% funded.

Rolling Meadows, a Chicago suburb, is raising its property taxes next year by 9.8%, on top of a 16% jump in 2010, due to increased police and fire pension costs, said Mayor Ken Nelson. Those increases are the largest in nearly 20 years, he said. The local police and fire pension funds are around 45% funded.

Chris Lee, a firefighter paramedic and president of the city's pension fund, says the pensions must be paid because they are "promises the city made to us."

Rolling Meadows has paid less than it should into its pension fund by relying on higher assumed rates of returns than those recommended by the Illinois Department of Insurance, Mr. Lee said. Lower annual contributions mean the fund has trouble staying abreast of ballooning costs, leading in part to the underfunding, Mr. Lee said. The city recently changed to the Department of Insurance's recommended annual contributions, Mr. Nelson said.

The 70,000-person village of Palatine, near Chicago, recently voted to raise property taxes 3.99%, the most in at least five years. That's an average increase of $40 per home. "But for the pensions, [the property tax] would not have gone up at all," said Village Manager Reid Ottesen.

The increase comes after cost-cutting steps in the past two years, including a hiring freeze and not replacing three firefighters and several police officers who retired, said Mr. Ottesen. "There is nothing left to cut if you still want to deliver the services that make you the community you are."

Write to Jeannette Neumann at Jeannette.Neumann@wsj.com
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

After Years of Lobbying for Job Killing Policies Unions Favorability Ratings Remain Low

By Christopher Prandoni

The latest installation of Gallup?s long running polling data regarding Americans preferences towards labor unions reveals that Americans approval of unions remains near an all-time low?52 percent of Americans approve of labor unions, 48 percent disapprove. Peaking in the 1950s, union popularity amongst Americans has steadily declined over the past half century with labor?s approval ratings dropping off a cliff in recent years.

Gallup?s graph helps illustrate this point:



Gallup?s polling data illustrates Americans disenchantment with organized labor and its job killing, protectionist policies.:houraWith unemployment hovering around 10 percent and workers taking pay cuts and furloughs just to keep their jobs, Americans are making sacrifices. These same Americans grow resentful when they look at organized labor who has been coddled by the current Administration, often at the expense of the rest of the nation.

Armand Thieblot highlights a number of union handouts dolled out since President Obama took office:

?(The) rescinding of four Bush anti-union executive orders and issuing two pro-union ones; the Lilly Ledbetter law; the 35 percent tariff on tires imported from China; the scrapping of the Mexican-truck experiment; the buy-American provisions in the $787 billion bailout package; the dropped plans for free-trade agreements with Panama, Colombia, and South Korea; the preferential treatment of unions in the GM and Chrysler bailout deals; the changes in voting rules under the Railway Labor Act elections favoring unions; the rescinding of the more vigorous reporting requirement under LMRDA implemented in 2004; the muzzling of employer free speech during union elections and contract negotiations; the appointment of dozens of vocal union activists to putatively neutral jobs, commissions, and boards; and the fact that Andy Stern (SEIU), Richard Trumka (AFL-CIO) and John Sweeney (AFL-CIO) have been among the most frequently entertained guests at the White House.?

All of these policies negatively affect non-union members by raising prices for goods, increasing government spending, and unnecessarily increasing competition in workers in other industries. The high-wage doctrine implemented by unions reduces the number of workers that can be employed in a unionized shop.

An overly simplistic example:

A unionized coal mine is forced to pay the union wage of $25 per hour. The non-union coal company pays its workers $20 per hour. For every four workers the unionized coal mine hires the non-unionized mine can hire five workers, reducing overall unemployment. 2938u4ji23

This puts additional pressure on the rest of the non-union labor market as now more people are competing for jobs, thus, driving up the unemployment rate and depressing wages for every non-union member, a vast majority of the workforce. 2938u4ji23

Americans are feeling this pressure more than ever and have begun to rebel against these policies and the Democratic majority which enables them.
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

JOB KILLERS -- UNIONS


<object height="385" width="640">


<embed id="kwiclick-temp-0" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9Fyh3eRKde4?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="385" width="640"></object>
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

[SIZE=+1]:finger007-1Merry Christmas from all government employee unions! [/SIZE]:finger007-1
Freerepublic!!:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
Cities Tap Homeowners for Revenue as Workers' Retirement, Health Costs Rise
]

Cities across the nation are raising property taxes, largely citing rising pension and health-care costs for their employees and retirees.

Those cops and firemen should just die damnit!!

In Pennsylvania, the township of Upper Moreland is bumping up property taxes for residents by 13.6% in 2011. Next door the city of Philadelphia this year increased the tax 9.9%. In New York, Saratoga Springs will collect 4.4% more in property taxes in 2011; Troy will increase taxes by 1.9%.

Not to mention falling home prices too damnit!!:LMAO:LMAO


<cite>Scott Lewis for The Wall Street Journal</cite> John Crawford is director of finance in Upper Moreland, Pa., which is raising taxes 13.6%.

Property-tax increases aren't unusual, in part because the taxes are among the main sources of local revenue. But officials say more and larger increases are taking hold. "This year we have seen a dramatic increase in our cities and towns having to increase property taxes" for pensions and other expenses, said Jack Garner, executive director of the Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities.
If only those damn cops would die right??

Local officials and government workers say a confluence of factors is driving the increases, including the need to make up for staggering investment losses from the financial crisis and rising costs as more workers retire. In addition, benefit increases promised in flush times are coming due as revenue flounders, and some cities have skipped payments to their pension funds over the years.

LALALALALA And the truth finally comes out!!!Joe did you read this??Wall Street better get it's act together right??:LMAOAnd they skipped payments to the funds????????????????No way!!!!!They are innocent damnit!!

In Illinois, towns have been raising property taxes to keep up with pension and health-care costs for several years, but the scale and scope of the increases this year are unprecedented 2938u4ji23, said Joe McCoy, a lobbyist with the Illinois Municipal League.
Joe McCoy, a lobbyist with the Illinois Municipal League.
A lobbyist with the Municipal League!!!!!!!:LMAO:LMAOHey I wonder where he want;s the money to go???????????????:LMAO

Representatives of government workers, including for unions, don't deny that pension costs are rising. But they blame local officials for failing to fund pensions adequately in better times.

For starters they need to stay on script here!!It is all the unions fault and do not ever stray from the script again!!Also do not mention that they skipped putting money in the funds again or off to Canada you go!!I know a Fascist up there that will set you straight!!
[

"The main driver is the irresponsibility of local public officials who for years and years have not been funding their pensions," said Henry Bayer, executive director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 union, which represents 72,000 employees in Illinois.

I cannot believe Joe even posted this!!Are you feeling ''fair and balanced today''?:houra

Many local officials say they have been trying to right their pension funds without raising taxes. They have borrowed money from reserves, trimmed services and cut back on staff.

Some cities have also pushed unions to reopen contracts in an attempt to pare benefits or raise workers' contributions for pensions and health care. They have faced stiff resistance from some unions that argue it's unfair to penalize workers for a financial crisis that isn't their fault. Others have agreed to some cutbacks.

We all have to sacrifice for Wall Streets greed and irresponsibility!!Get use to it.

State aid to many local governments and other revenue remain below precrisis levels. Nearly half of states reduced aid to local governments in 2010, and 20 states have proposed additional cuts in 2011, according to a December report by the Congressional Budget Office.

"Unless governments really want to squeeze essential services…there are likely to be a lot more property tax increases" across the country, said Don Boyd, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York.

Tax increases and budget cuts are raising pressure on state politicians to tame growing pension costs, and the topic has become a significant issue in elections.

Mostly from bi polar Fascist Canadian that starts 3 threads a week about it though but yeah.....

Many states have already increased the retirement age and required years of service for new hires, bumped up the amount new workers pay toward their benefits and reduced annual cost-of-living increases. This month, for example, Illinois lawmakers approved legislation requiring newly hired police and firefighters to retire at age 55 instead of 50 to receive full benefits, among other changes. The governor is reviewing the bill.
No No!!That is too simple.We have a major crisis here according to the Canadian Fascist!!We will be broke by 2018 according to Joe!!:houra

The tax increases are coming to light now because many local governments plan their budgets at the end of the previous year.

In Upper Moreland, a township of about 26,000 near Philadelphia, the Board of Commissioners voted this month to raise its 2011 property tax for residents by 13.6%, the first such rise in five years. That means a $67 annual tax bump on a $135,000 home, the average value there.
$67 dollars????No way man that will bankrupt people to pay for managements short fall and not putting money in there for years!!:LMAO

Pension and health-care costs are likely to make up more than a fifth of the town's $17.8 million operating budget for next year, said finance director John Crawford, a Republican.

In 2005, Upper Moreland contributed around $100,000 to its pensions. This year, it contributed $681,000. In 2011, it will pay an estimated $1.1 million. Healthy investment returns used to cover a large portion of the town's contribution to its pension funds. Now, lower returns—coupled with higher costs as more workers retire—mean Upper Moreland is paying more.
That damn common sense again!!What on earth are we going to do here?

In addition to those figures, the state of Pennsylvania annually contributes $250,000 to Upper Moreland's pensions, Mr. Crawford said. Local Pennsylvania governments only receive pension aid from the state if they make the payments to their pensions recommended by actuaries.
Upper Moreland's payments on current workers' health care were $2 million in 2010 and are estimated to reach $2.63 million in 2011, Mr. Crawford said.

"If it hadn't been for the escalating costs," in pension and health-care benefits, he said, "the board may have succeeded in going through another year without a tax increase."

Many of the same issues are hitting Philadelphia, which earlier this year increased its property tax by 9.9%, the first bump since the early 1990s. That's a $270 annual payment increase for residents living in homes valued at $100,000, said Rob Dubow, city finance director.
This is fair.No mention of what the corporations are going to kick in to help but that does not matter!!They should not contribute at all right Joe??

Philadelphia's pension fund is 45% funded—meaning its assets represent 45% of its long-term liabilities—and the city's payments are projected to increase to $600 million in 2015, up from $230 million in 2004. Actuaries recommend pension systems be 80% funded.

Rolling Meadows, a Chicago suburb, is raising its property taxes next year by 9.8%, on top of a 16% jump in 2010, due to increased police and fire pension costs, said Mayor Ken Nelson. Those increases are the largest in nearly 20 years, he said. The local police and fire pension funds are around 45% funded.
Anyone who puts their live on the line everyday should be willing to do it until they are 80 years old and then just die right Fascist Joe?

Chris Lee, a firefighter paramedic and president of the city's pension fund, says the pensions must be paid because they are "promises the city made to us."
See above for the Fascist reply that Joe would approve of!!Joe might add that they should do it for minimum wage too right Joe?The bi polar mind is easy to read.

Rolling Meadows has paid less than it should into its pension fund by relying on higher assumed rates of returns than those recommended by the Illinois Department of Insurance, Mr. Lee said. Lower annual contributions mean the fund has trouble staying abreast of ballooning costs, leading in part to the underfunding, Mr. Lee said. The city recently changed to the Department of Insurance's recommended annual contributions, Mr. Nelson said.
Wait!!They paid in less and waited for Wall Street to lead them to the promise land??What are these ballooning cost's and why are those people not working for minimum wage?Joe you need to use your best Fascist talk here and convince these people that working for minimum wage is good for the cause right?:LMAO

The 70,000-person village of Palatine, near Chicago, recently voted to raise property taxes 3.99%, the most in at least five years. That's an average increase of $40 per home. "But for the pensions, [the property tax] would not have gone up at all," said Village Manager Reid Ottesen.
$40 dollars??Does this go for the cause or not??

The increase comes after cost-cutting steps in the past two years, including a hiring freeze and not replacing three firefighters and several police officers who retired, said Mr. Ottesen. "There is nothing left to cut if you still want to deliver the services that make you the community you are."

Write to Jeannette Neumann at Jeannette.Neumann@wsj.com
x
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

[SIZE=+1]:finger007-1Merry Christmas from all government employee unions! [/SIZE]:finger007-1
Freerepublic!!:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
Cities Tap Homeowners for Revenue as Workers' Retirement, Health Costs Rise
]

Cities across the nation are raising property taxes, largely citing rising pension and health-care costs for their employees and retirees.

Those cops and firemen should just die damnit!!

In Pennsylvania, the township of Upper Moreland is bumping up property taxes for residents by 13.6% in 2011. Next door the city of Philadelphia this year increased the tax 9.9%. In New York, Saratoga Springs will collect 4.4% more in property taxes in 2011; Troy will increase taxes by 1.9%.

Not to mention falling home prices too damnit!!:LMAO:LMAO


<cite>Scott Lewis for The Wall Street Journal</cite> John Crawford is director of finance in Upper Moreland, Pa., which is raising taxes 13.6%.

Property-tax increases aren't unusual, in part because the taxes are among the main sources of local revenue. But officials say more and larger increases are taking hold. "This year we have seen a dramatic increase in our cities and towns having to increase property taxes" for pensions and other expenses, said Jack Garner, executive director of the Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities.
If only those damn cops would die right??

Local officials and government workers say a confluence of factors is driving the increases, including the need to make up for staggering investment losses from the financial crisis and rising costs as more workers retire. In addition, benefit increases promised in flush times are coming due as revenue flounders, and some cities have skipped payments to their pension funds over the years.

LALALALALA And the truth finally comes out!!!Joe did you read this??Wall Street better get it's act together right??:LMAOAnd they skipped payments to the funds????????????????No way!!!!!They are innocent damnit!!

In Illinois, towns have been raising property taxes to keep up with pension and health-care costs for several years, but the scale and scope of the increases this year are unprecedented 2938u4ji23, said Joe McCoy, a lobbyist with the Illinois Municipal League.
Joe McCoy, a lobbyist with the Illinois Municipal League.
A lobbyist with the Municipal League!!!!!!!:LMAO:LMAOHey I wonder where he want;s the money to go???????????????:LMAO

Representatives of government workers, including for unions, don't deny that pension costs are rising. But they blame local officials for failing to fund pensions adequately in better times.

For starters they need to stay on script here!!It is all the unions fault and do not ever stray from the script again!!Also do not mention that they skipped putting money in the funds again or off to Canada you go!!I know a Fascist up there that will set you straight!!
[

"The main driver is the irresponsibility of local public officials who for years and years have not been funding their pensions," said Henry Bayer, executive director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31 union, which represents 72,000 employees in Illinois.

I cannot believe Joe even posted this!!Are you feeling ''fair and balanced today''?:houra

Many local officials say they have been trying to right their pension funds without raising taxes. They have borrowed money from reserves, trimmed services and cut back on staff.

Some cities have also pushed unions to reopen contracts in an attempt to pare benefits or raise workers' contributions for pensions and health care. They have faced stiff resistance from some unions that argue it's unfair to penalize workers for a financial crisis that isn't their fault. Others have agreed to some cutbacks.

We all have to sacrifice for Wall Streets greed and irresponsibility!!Get use to it.

State aid to many local governments and other revenue remain below precrisis levels. Nearly half of states reduced aid to local governments in 2010, and 20 states have proposed additional cuts in 2011, according to a December report by the Congressional Budget Office.

"Unless governments really want to squeeze essential services?there are likely to be a lot more property tax increases" across the country, said Don Boyd, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government at the State University of New York.

Tax increases and budget cuts are raising pressure on state politicians to tame growing pension costs, and the topic has become a significant issue in elections.

Mostly from bi polar Fascist Canadian that starts 3 threads a week about it though but yeah.....

Many states have already increased the retirement age and required years of service for new hires, bumped up the amount new workers pay toward their benefits and reduced annual cost-of-living increases. This month, for example, Illinois lawmakers approved legislation requiring newly hired police and firefighters to retire at age 55 instead of 50 to receive full benefits, among other changes. The governor is reviewing the bill.
No No!!That is too simple.We have a major crisis here according to the Canadian Fascist!!We will be broke by 2018 according to Joe!!:houra

The tax increases are coming to light now because many local governments plan their budgets at the end of the previous year.

In Upper Moreland, a township of about 26,000 near Philadelphia, the Board of Commissioners voted this month to raise its 2011 property tax for residents by 13.6%, the first such rise in five years. That means a $67 annual tax bump on a $135,000 home, the average value there.
$67 dollars????No way man that will bankrupt people to pay for managements short fall and not putting money in there for years!!:LMAO

Pension and health-care costs are likely to make up more than a fifth of the town's $17.8 million operating budget for next year, said finance director John Crawford, a Republican.

In 2005, Upper Moreland contributed around $100,000 to its pensions. This year, it contributed $681,000. In 2011, it will pay an estimated $1.1 million. Healthy investment returns used to cover a large portion of the town's contribution to its pension funds. Now, lower returns?coupled with higher costs as more workers retire?mean Upper Moreland is paying more.
That damn common sense again!!What on earth are we going to do here?

In addition to those figures, the state of Pennsylvania annually contributes $250,000 to Upper Moreland's pensions, Mr. Crawford said. Local Pennsylvania governments only receive pension aid from the state if they make the payments to their pensions recommended by actuaries.
Upper Moreland's payments on current workers' health care were $2 million in 2010 and are estimated to reach $2.63 million in 2011, Mr. Crawford said.

"If it hadn't been for the escalating costs," in pension and health-care benefits, he said, "the board may have succeeded in going through another year without a tax increase."

Many of the same issues are hitting Philadelphia, which earlier this year increased its property tax by 9.9%, the first bump since the early 1990s. That's a $270 annual payment increase for residents living in homes valued at $100,000, said Rob Dubow, city finance director.
This is fair.No mention of what the corporations are going to kick in to help but that does not matter!!They should not contribute at all right Joe??

Philadelphia's pension fund is 45% funded?meaning its assets represent 45% of its long-term liabilities?and the city's payments are projected to increase to $600 million in 2015, up from $230 million in 2004. Actuaries recommend pension systems be 80% funded.

Rolling Meadows, a Chicago suburb, is raising its property taxes next year by 9.8%, on top of a 16% jump in 2010, due to increased police and fire pension costs, said Mayor Ken Nelson. Those increases are the largest in nearly 20 years, he said. The local police and fire pension funds are around 45% funded.
Anyone who puts their live on the line everyday should be willing to do it until they are 80 years old and then just die right Fascist Joe?

Chris Lee, a firefighter paramedic and president of the city's pension fund, says the pensions must be paid because they are "promises the city made to us."
See above for the Fascist reply that Joe would approve of!!Joe might add that they should do it for minimum wage too right Joe?The bi polar mind is easy to read.

Rolling Meadows has paid less than it should into its pension fund by relying on higher assumed rates of returns than those recommended by the Illinois Department of Insurance, Mr. Lee said. Lower annual contributions mean the fund has trouble staying abreast of ballooning costs, leading in part to the underfunding, Mr. Lee said. The city recently changed to the Department of Insurance's recommended annual contributions, Mr. Nelson said.
Wait!!They paid in less and waited for Wall Street to lead them to the promise land??What are these ballooning cost's and why are those people not working for minimum wage?Joe you need to use your best Fascist talk here and convince these people that working for minimum wage is good for the cause right?:LMAO

The 70,000-person village of Palatine, near Chicago, recently voted to raise property taxes 3.99%, the most in at least five years. That's an average increase of $40 per home. "But for the pensions, [the property tax] would not have gone up at all," said Village Manager Reid Ottesen.
$40 dollars??Does this go for the cause or not??

The increase comes after cost-cutting steps in the past two years, including a hiring freeze and not replacing three firefighters and several police officers who retired, said Mr. Ottesen. "There is nothing left to cut if you still want to deliver the services that make you the community you are."

Write to Jeannette Neumann at Jeannette.Neumann@wsj.com
x
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

After Years of Lobbying for Job Killing Policies Unions Favorability Ratings Remain Low

By Christopher Prandoni

The latest installation of Gallup’s long running polling data regarding Americans preferences towards labor unions reveals that Americans approval of unions remains near an all-time low—52 percent of Americans approve of labor unions, 48 percent disapprove. Peaking in the 1950s, union popularity amongst Americans has steadily declined over the past half century with labor’s approval ratings dropping off a cliff in recent years.

Gallup’s graph helps illustrate this point:



[g]

52% ??Not bad considering the corporate medias push to eliminate it!!Of course we even have the Canadian Fascist trying too.Shout out to our favorite Fascist...take a bow Joe!!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off


An overly simplistic example:

A unionized coal mine is forced to pay the union wage of $25 per hour. The non-union coal company pays its workers $20 per hour. For every four workers the unionized coal mine hires the non-unionized mine can hire five workers, reducing overall unemployment. 2938u4ji23

This puts additional pressure on the rest of the non-union labor market as now more people are competing for jobs, thus, driving up the unemployment rate and depressing wages for every non-union member, a vast majority of the workforce. 2938u4ji23

Americans are feeling this pressure more than ever and have begun to rebel against these policies and the Democratic majority which enables them.

Knowing you are to much of a pussy to ever work in a coal mine explains your stupidity.
Fatalities Higher at Non-Union Mines—Like Massey’s Upper Big Branch


http://www.inthesetimes.com/working..._non-union_mineslike_masseys_upper_big_branch

Anatomy of a non-union coal mine

http://zunguzungu.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/anatomy-of-a-non-union-coal-mine/

Union-busting associated with Massey's coal mine disaster

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/290311

I love how the cowards that would never step foot in a coal mine have the nerve to try and dictate what their wages and safety should be!!Only a Fascist piece of shit would stoop this low scumbag!!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off


An overly simplistic example:

A unionized coal mine is forced to pay the union wage of $25 per hour. The non-union coal company pays its workers $20 per hour. For every four workers the unionized coal mine hires the non-unionized mine can hire five workers, reducing overall unemployment. 2938u4ji23

This puts additional pressure on the rest of the non-union labor market as now more people are competing for jobs, thus, driving up the unemployment rate and depressing wages for every non-union member, a vast majority of the workforce. 2938u4ji23

Americans are feeling this pressure more than ever and have begun to rebel against these policies and the Democratic majority which enables them.

Knowing you are to much of a pussy to ever work in a coal mine explains your stupidity.
Fatalities Higher at Non-Union Mines?Like Massey?s Upper Big Branch


http://www.inthesetimes.com/working..._non-union_mineslike_masseys_upper_big_branch

Anatomy of a non-union coal mine

http://zunguzungu.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/anatomy-of-a-non-union-coal-mine/

Union-busting associated with Massey's coal mine disaster

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/290311

I love how the cowards that would never step foot in a coal mine have the nerve to try and dictate what their wages and safety should be!!Only a Fascist piece of shit would stoop this low scumbag!!
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Public workers facing outrage as budget crises grow

'Mantra is that the problem is the unions, the unions, the unions,' teacher says

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40874710/ns/business-the_new_york_times#

Yep, the shit is starting to hit the fan and people are beginning to catch on. :thumbsup

Once economies all over the world begin to collapse because of these criminal thugs, every union mobster will have to go into hiding. :btj:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Come on man you can start a 7th thread about anti union crap, nobody will notice how jealous and envious you are!!:LMAO:houra
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Government workers make too much money:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KMSFVPJv7oM?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KMSFVPJv7oM?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

Government workers make too much money:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KMSFVPJv7oM?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KMSFVPJv7oM?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
I feel cheated!!!Come on man this could have been thread number 11 this month.Come on Joe monkey do some more tricks for us.Fetch boy fetch and get back to spamming.This is comedy Gold here.
 

Vance

EOG Senior Member
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

in my pocket bitches
 
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

http://www.realclearmarkets.com/art...he_union_leader_behind_the_curtain_98818.html

January 5, 2011

Ignore the Union Leader Behind the Curtain


By Josh Barro

As discontent with public employee compensation grows, the latest fashion from the Left is to claim that public workers are being scapegoated. Yesterday, Gawker even ran a piece called "The Plan to Blame Unions for Everything," arguing that the real causes of states' fiscal woes are failures to properly fund pension plans and a financial collapse caused by greedy bankers. Without problems caused by other people, there would be no crisis in employee compensation-so don't blame the unions.

The problem with this account is that it is false. While many states were in fact reckless in their pension funding practices - New Jersey and Rod Blagojevich's Illinois being the poster children - even states that followed the pension management rulebook are facing a cost explosion, and must re-evaluate their employee compensation practices to cope with budget gaps.

Take my home state of New York. We came into the recession with some of the best-funded pension plans in the country: we made our required pension contributions every year and were over 100 percent funded, if you follow the overly-rosy accounting practices that public pensions are allowed to use. Pension management practices were by most accounts appropriate, notwithstanding a pay-to-play scandal in one of the state's pension systems.

Yet, pension contribution rates are skyrocketing and will continue to do so. By 2015, pension payments by school districts will more than quadruple from their levels in 2010, requiring a property tax increase of 18 percent just to pay for higher pension costs. Contributions for other workers will rise nearly as sharply. In fact, New York's practice of funding its pensions relatively well exacerbated market effects on required contributions: if your pension fund holds few assets, it's not very exposed to stock market downturns.

The fundamental reason for the pension mess is that nearly three decades of bull markets made pensions look cheaper than they really were, and led lawmakers to hand out pensions that were unaffordable except when bolstered by lucky investment returns. That holiday from market reality is over. In closing budget gaps, states must now ask questions like "are pension benefits too generous?"

The answer varies from state to state and from city to city. But in many places, the answer is a clear "yes." If you feel like raising your blood pressure, go check out the Empire Center for New York State Policy's pension calculator to see what kind of pension you would be entitled to if you worked in New York government.

Union leaders like to point out that government pension benefits are not so kingly on average: the average government retiree in New York draws a pension of about $27,000. But that figure includes part-timers (yes, you can get a pension for part-time work) and people who spent only part of their careers in government.

Full-career employees, especially those in higher-paid roles like police, firefighters, teachers and administrators, do quite well. It is not atypical for a full-career teacher working in a suburban district downstate to retire at 59 with a pension of nearly $80,000 per year, adjusted annually for cost of living.

That pension is not subject to state and local taxes and, unlike many private-sector pensions, does not include an offset for Social Security benefits. Buying an equivalent annuity would cost you more than $1.5 million. Upstate, where salaries are lower, the figure might be closer to $1.2 million. The formula is simple: work 37 years as a teacher in New York, and retire in your 50s as a millionaire.

New York can't afford to go on like this. While we ought to honor the promises we have already made, it's time to reduce the benefits that workers (both new and existing) can accrue in the future. Other states like California and New Jersey have similarly padded employee compensation and worse fiscal situations, making cuts even more necessary.

I do think the unions are right about one thing here: we shouldn't blame the unions for this mess. Public employee unions have done exactly what they are supposed to do: they have advocated vociferously and effectively for their members' interests in negotiations against management. The trouble is that, when the employer is the government, all the rest of us are management.

Yesterday, in announcing a wage freeze, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo called his policy necessary and said "This is not political theory. These are numbers." Fundamentally, paying government workers more means that taxpayers-everybody else-must keep less of their own money.

When liberal commentators call criticism of public employee wages a scapegoating ploy, they are trying to reintroduce a left-right dynamic and a team defense of public employee benefits. But voters are realizing that the money simply is not there anymore-and whether the unions like it or not, they will be applying more scrutiny to public workers' pay.

Josh Barro is the Walter B. Wriston Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: JOHN STOSSEL: Unions Working With Politicians to Rip YOU Off

<input id="vmessage_imod_checkbox_1167" class="inlinemod" name="vmessagelist[1167]" value="0" title="" tabindex="1" type="checkbox"> <label for="vmessage_1167"> Joe Contrarian - 01-02-11 - permalink </label>
I gave you plenty of warnings months ago not to copy the "Manny" style of posting and stick to the issues.

You didn't listen.

Welcome to H-E-L-L, crybaby union hack.
 
Top