Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

tank

EOG Dedicated
Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin - Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei - POLITICO.com


There is rising expectation among GOP elites that Palin will probably run for president in 2012 and could win the Republican nomination, a prospect many of them regard as a disaster in waiting.
Many of these establishment figures argue in not-for-attribution comments that Palin?s nomination would ensure President Barack Obama?s reelection, as the deficiencies that marked her 2008 debut as a vice presidential nominee ? an intensely polarizing political style and often halting and superficial answers when pressed on policy ? have shown little sign of abating in the past two years


Read more: Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin - Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei - POLITICO.com
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

Democrats' Last Hope: Sarah Palin


Can [COLOR=#366388 ! important][COLOR=#366388 ! important]Sarah [COLOR=#366388 ! important]Palin[ save House Democrats? Many of the party's endangered incumbents are spending their final days campaigning as much against the former Alaska governor as against their Republican rivals.
No one in American politics engenders stronger feelings than Palin, the [URL="http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_exclusive/20101031/pl_yblog_exclusive/democrats-last-hope-sarah-palin#"][COLOR=#366388 ! important][COLOR=#366388 ! important]2008 [COLOR=#366388 ! important]Republican [/COLOR][COLOR=#366388 ! important]vice [/COLOR][COLOR=#366388 ! important]presidential [/COLOR][COLOR=#366388 ! important]nominee[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]
. Republicans love her, but Democrats and independents view her unfavorably with equal intensity.
The numbers bear out those sentiments. The latest Bloomberg survey, conducted by Des Moines-based Selzer & Co., shows just 38 percent of Americans view her favorably, while 54 percent see her unfavorably. A [COLOR=#366388 ! important][COLOR=#366388 ! important]Gallup [COLOR=#366388 ! important]poll[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR] conducted October 14 to 17 shows almost twice as many voters say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate for whom Palin campaigns as those who say they would be more likely to vote for that candidate, a nearly identical figure to Pres. Obama's. And 56 percent of Americans told Langer Research Associates, in a poll for ABC News and Yahoo!, they view Palin as more interested in division than cooperation; only 34 percent chose cooperation.
[

:houra:houra
So now instead of trying to paint everyone with Bush they are running against Palin?:LMAO
 
Re: Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

There is rising expectation among GOP elites....

The "GOP elites", aka progressives, are going to be purged from the Republican party in the next 2-3 election cycles.

Just ask Mike Castle, Charlie Crist, Arlen Specter and other tea party roadkill. :thumbsup
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

The "GOP elites", aka progressives, are going to be purged from the Republican party in the next 2-3 election cycles.

Just ask Mike Castle, Charlie Crist, Arlen Specter and other tea party roadkill. :thumbsup
I honestly do hope it shakes up the Establishment.Steele has to go and the only reason we are gaining ground is because of Obama.I would love to see Hillary run against Obama and start a war amongst Democrats.
 
Re: Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

TOGETHER

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xr3sj8q5lfY?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xr3sj8q5lfY?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
 
Re: Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin to Bernanke: ‘Cease and Desist’

November 7, 2010 4:55 P.M.
By Robert Costa

As President Obama prepares for the G20 summit in South Korea this week, Sarah Palin is challenging the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, which will likely be a key issue at the talks. On Monday, in a keynote address at a trade-association convention in Phoenix, Palin will urge Fed chairman Ben Bernanke to “cease and desist” his “pump priming.” The United States, she says, “shouldn’t be playing around with inflation.”

Here are snippets from Palin’s prepared remarks obtained by National Review Online:

I’m deeply concerned about the Federal Reserve’s plans to buy up anywhere from $600 billion to as much as $1 trillion of government securities. The technical term for it is “quantitative easing.” It means our government is pumping money into the banking system by buying up treasury bonds. And where, you may ask, are we getting the money to pay for all this? We’re printing it out of thin air.

The Fed hopes doing this may buy us a little temporary economic growth by supplying banks with extra cash which they could then lend out to businesses. But it’s far from certain this will even work. After all, the problem isn’t that banks don’t have enough cash on hand – it’s that they don’t want to lend it out, because they don’t trust the current economic climate.

And if it doesn’t work, what do we do then? Print even more money? What’s the end game here? Where will all this money printing on an unprecedented scale take us? Do we have any guarantees that QE2 won’t be followed by QE3, 4, and 5, until eventually – inevitably – no one will want to buy our debt anymore? What happens if the Fed becomes not just the buyer of last resort, but the buyer of only resort.

All this pump priming will come at a serious price. And I mean that literally: everyone who ever goes out shopping for groceries knows that prices have risen significantly over the past year or so. Pump priming would push them even higher. And it’s not just groceries. Oil recently hit a six month high, at more than $87 a barrel. The weak dollar – a direct result of the Fed’s decision to dump more dollars onto the market – is pushing oil prices upwards. That’s like an extra tax on earnings. And the worst part of it: because the Obama White House refuses to open up our offshore and onshore oil reserves for exploration, most of that money will go directly to foreign regimes who don’t have America’s best interests at heart.

We shouldn’t be playing around with inflation. It’s not for nothing Reagan called it “as violent as a mugger, as frightening as an armed robber, and as deadly as a hit man.” The Fed’s pump priming addiction has got our small businesses running scared, and our allies worried. The German finance minister called the Fed’s proposals “clueless.” When Germany, a country that knows a thing or two about the dangers of inflation, warns us to think again, maybe it’s time for Chairman Bernanke to cease and desist. We don’t want temporary, artificial economic growth bought at the expense of permanently higher inflation which will erode the value of our incomes and our savings. We want a stable dollar combined with real economic reform. It’s the only way we can get our economy back on the right track.
 
Top