Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Money Grows on Trees


BY JACK HUNTER






ALSO IN JACK HUNTER



In the spring of 1984, I was 10 years old and had one burning desire ? to get my hands on the new Twisted Sister album Stay Hungry. "We're Not Gonna Take It" was the greatest song I had ever heard. Well, at least since Quiet Riot's "Cum on Feel the Noize" the year before and Def Leppard's "Rock of Ages" before that.




But with only a $5-a-week allowance, I would have to wait two weeks before being able to afford the $7.99 cassette. When I begged my parents for the extra money early, I was told that "money doesn't grow on trees." But Mom and Dad were wrong.
If President Barack Obama and the Democrats are to be believed, the age-old economic lesson my parents tried to instill in me has been utterly rebuked. Money not only grows on trees, but the trees are blooming. How else can you explain Washington's decision to print more money to solve America's current lack-of-money woes?
With the national Democratic Party, a majority of state Republicans, and more than a few constituents bashing him for resisting the Democrats' $787 billion dollar stimulus, Gov. Mark Sanford still insists on pointing out that you can't fix the economy by "spending a bunch of money we don't have."
Said Sanford last week, "What you're doing is buying into the notion that if we just print some more money that we don't have and send it to different states, we'll create jobs ... If that's the case, why isn't Zimbabwe a rich place?"
In Zimbabwe, attempts to stimulate the economy by printing money ? including a $100 trillion bill ? have saddled the already poor African nation with debt and further financial meltdown.
Conservatives are in a tough spot right now, precisely because in these tough economic times, few people want to hear that "money doesn't grow on trees." Sanford, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, market observer Peter Schiff, and others predicted the current calamity, but they were ignored then and they are being ignored now, in favor of "experts" who never saw the crisis coming and now seek to solve it with more of the same.
Any reasonable adult knows that money does not grow on trees. Sanford, Paul, Schiff, and company are looking to cut the branches while Obama and his friends want to water the roots and further drown the dollar.


In these crucial times, we cannot afford more business-as-usual "leadership." Or as Thomas E. Woods writes, "We are at a watershed point in our country's history. Historians may look back on it as a turning point comparable in scope to the New Deal, the Progressive Era, or even the Civil War ... The problem with the stimulus is much more fundamental ? namely, the blockhead economics on which it is based. What we need, in short, is full-throttle opposition."
Woods is correct. "Full-throttle opposition" is exactly what this moment requires, but the kind of leaders that can do that will have to possess balls of steel, a particularly difficult challenge in the hostile economic and political environment of today.
Continues Woods, "[Grown-ups] understand that wealth is created through saving, investment, and entrepreneurial skill; that wealth has to be produced before it can be consumed; and that lending is impossible in the absence of prior saving."
He adds, "Today, we grown-ups have to explain these basic principles to the deranged children ? as they run around with their fingers in their ears, and screaming 'I can't hear you!' ? who run our government, write our opinion columns, and fill American airwaves with stupid and destructive economic advice."
One need not be an economist to understand basic economics, and Woods' common sense reflects the same elementary principles everyday people apply to their everyday lives ? you cannot endlessly spend what you don't have; credit isn't unlimited; money does not grow on trees.
As a kid, I used to fantasize about Monopoly money being real and mine for the taking. As an adult, I find that this fantasy is now a necessary prerequisite for political office.
If money does grow on trees, as Obama and his party now suggest, there's no reason for us all not to buy million dollar homes, sports cars, and dine out every night. All we have to do is print more money! Such thinking is precisely what has led to our current crisis, and it's foolish to believe more of the same is going to get us out of it.
Catch Southern Avenger commentaries every Tuesday and Friday at 7:50 a.m. on the "Morning Buzz with Richard Todd" on 1250 AM WTMA.

 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

Tell this asshole to STFU

Bush destroyed our economy so your "concern" is touching to say the least
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

$1 trillion deficits seen for next 10 years


NEWS FLASH!! THIS JUST IN FROM BIZARRO WORLD:
"Despite new estimates that say President Barack Obama's budget would generate unsustainable large deficits averaging almost $1 trillion a year, the White House insisted Friday that the flood of red ink won't swamp its costly agenda."
I can't even figure out which part of the above paragraph is scarier--the fact that the gunvernment is going to add almost $1 TRILLION a year to the deficit, or the fact that Obamanable isn't even worried about that.
Well, at least one person in the United States will be happy about this latest news--Paul Krugman.


Obama's socialist vision for America

 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

Bruce:

how did we got to an 11 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT?

Interesting how they is never talked about ....
 

LobWedgePhil

EOG Addicted
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

Someone please take away his checkbook. 4 times larger deficit then Doc's best friend.

WASHINGTON -- Congressional budget forecasters said President Barack Obama's spending blueprint would produce significantly deeper long-run deficits than the White House has projected, complicating the task of enacting his ambitious domestic agenda.

"This will make it more challenging for Congress as we craft a budget resolution," said North Dakota Democratic Sen. Kent Conrad. The Senate Budget Committee chairman will be one of the key players steering the White House spending blueprint through Capitol Hill starting next week. "The reality is, we are going to have to make adjustments to the president's budget if we want to keep the deficit on a downward trajectory," Mr. Conrad added.


President Obama Addresses Wasteful Spending
1:05
President Obama met with members of the National Conference of State Legislature at the White House speaking adamantly about how his $787 billion dollar bailout must be used wisely and that wasteful spending will be avoided. Video courtesy of Fox News.
Last week, Mr. Conrad warned that he is "very concerned" about the budget's long-run implications, saying the level of debt it envisioned "threatens the economic security of this country -- I believe it in my bones."

The Congressional Budget Office on Friday said that, if the Obama budget unveiled last month were approved, the federal government would run deficits averaging nearly $1 trillion a year over the next decade. The cumulative deficit from 2010-19 would be $9.3 trillion, according to the report -- $2.3 trillion more than the administration forecast last month.

One main reason for the difference in budget estimates is a difference in economic forecasts, with congressional views of long-term growth less optimistic than those of the White House -- in part because of the long-term effects of so much government borrowing. The White House said its projection is more in line with those of private-sector economists. Congressional forecasters also use different accounting rules that tend to be more conservative.


The CBO analysis showed deficits would run around 4% of U.S. gross domestic product for much of the next decade, even after the economy recovers. Administration officials have testified that such high deficit levels wouldn't be sustainable over the long run. Their own budget blueprint predicted deficits would run at around 3% of GDP after the recession has run its course.

The new estimate offers more fodder to the president's Republican critics, who have consistently attacked him in the early days of his administration for heavy spending. "If there was ever any doubt that the administration's budget spends too much, taxes too much and borrows too much, it's gone," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said.

Mr. Conrad, the Senate budget chairman, said the long-run deficits reflect deeper problems for the U.S. that aren't of Mr. Obama's making, but must be addressed in coming years. Those include the aging of the baby boomers and the growing cost of federal entitlements such as Social Security and Medicare, as well as the porousness of an obsolete tax system.

More

WSJ.com/Budget: News, analysis, more
The CBO analysis -- which Congress relies on in making budgeting decisions -- could make it tougher for Mr. Obama to advance some of his spending initiatives and tax cuts, and perhaps even imperil his health-care overhaul.

The new forecast also is likely to boost pressure for tax increases and stricter tax enforcement, as well as spending cuts. Lawmakers say some proposals have been raised already in talks between congressional budget writers and administration officials, such as expiration dates on some tax cuts and fresh spending cuts.

Mr. Obama has promised to halve the $1.3 trillion annual deficit he inherited by the end of his first term, but the CBO projection suggests he has further trimming to do to hit that goal. Mr. Obama on Friday told a group of state lawmakers that his aides are "having to go through the books line by line...so that we cut our deficit in half."

The president sought to underscore the administration's fiscal rectitude, noting that an electrical-renovation project for the White House East Wing didn't get funds from the recently enacted $787 billion stimulus bill because of the high standards the administration set for spending the money.

But, he said, "What we will not cut are investments that will lead to real growth and real prosperity over the long term." Those include his health care overhaul as well as clean-energy and education initiatives.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123755932558295685.html#articleTabs=article
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

Over 8 trillion of our debt from who?

The 2 Bush boys and "St Ronnie"

The Republicans offering "advice" on this area is like me giving advice to
Tiger on how to win a Major
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

They are projecting into 10 years without regards to savings that the reforms in health care and energy would bring

NICE TRY TO SCARE THE SHEEP HERDERS
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Plain Sailing ? the Keynesian Way[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]

[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]by Chris Clancy[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]by Chris Clancy[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Recently by Chris Clancy: Hate Crimes and Free Speech ? The Silence Is Deafening[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]
[/FONT]
<!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
<NOSCRIPT></NOSCRIPT>
<!--/* End OpenX Javascript Tag v2.4.4 */-->[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Do you remember the old joke about a guy who jumps off a fifty-storey building?[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]As he passes each floor he thinks to himself, "Well ? so far so good."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]I don?t believe it?s any exaggeration to say that the US economy, and therefore the world economy, is in a very similar position. The nonsense being talked about a "recovery" and the general level of ignorance, both in and out of government, is mind-boggling. [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Stimulus packages, bailouts, the "Cash for Clunkers" fiasco, proposals for socializing health care, cap-and-trade madness etc. etc. etc. What the hell is going on?[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The current administration inherited a disaster; but with President Obama a real opportunity was missed. Given the man and his background, he could have held many disparate groups together. Had he chosen small government, non-interventionist, free market advocates as advisors I believe there was a good chance that the majority of American people would have stuck with him ? that they would have put up with the tough medicine which would have brought about real "change" rather than just more of the same. [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]But that?s all water under the bridge now.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Frank Shostak begins this article with a quote from Obama:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]"I know how to ask good questions of my doctor. But ultimately, he's the guy with the medical degree. So, if he tells me, you know what, you've got such-and-such and you need to take such-and-such, I don't go around arguing with him or go online to see if I can find a better opinion than his."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This makes perfect sense providing your doctor knows what he?s talking about. Unfortunately, whatever Obama?s talents, he is not a businessman and certainly not an economist ? of any stripe. He has put his faith in a bunch of economic quacks and the result is, and will remain, a moribund economy for years to come.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Frank Shostak goes on in his article to leave the economic policies of the present administration in shreds ? he does so in a very patient and erudite fashion. It?s clear, it?s logical and it?s a must-read for anyone who wants to get a no-nonsense explanation of just why "Obamanomics" won?t work. [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]But it?s not as if we haven?t been here before. We even know the cause ? fiat money![/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]"[The current crisis is] payback for a decade of reckless monetary policy ? The recession is not the problem, the recession is the cure. It's not fun, just like heroin withdrawal is not fun ... but it's necessary." ~ Peter Schiff.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The problem is that no-one in government has either the guts or understanding, or both, to do what is needed. The last time anyone had the courage was during the Regan administration. Fed Chairman Paul Volcker stopped pushing counterfeit money into the system and let interest rates soar. In spite of incredible public hostility Ronald Regan stood by him. Of course, the healing process was painful but recovery followed and the USA, as usual, dragged the rest of the world back with it. Nothing has changed here. Recovery in the USA is still required before the global economy can recover.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]But "real" recovery in the USA is no-where in sight.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The fact is we are no longer in a boom-bust cycle. We are in a Depression. And there?s worse to come. The next shock is imminent. Adjustable rate mortgages on commercial property are due to begin re-setting upwards:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]"By some estimates, two out of every three will no longer meet the original loan conditions and won't be able to refinance ? [a]nd with prices for commercial properties expected to plunge ? [t]he falling prices in commercial real estate will lead to additional bank losses at a time when banks are sapped by home mortgage defaults and soaring credit card defaults."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Worse still:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]"This could lead to future additional taxpayer assistance for the banks."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]I wouldn?t bet against it. As regards any semblance of sane economic policies, the current administration is, like the previous one, intellectually bankrupt. They will carry on blindly trying to dig themselves out of the same ever-growing hole. [/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Amongst currently elected politicians there are very few voices of reason. Ron Paul is of course the most notable. Peter Schiff is thinking about throwing his hat into the ring and running for the US Senate.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]I?d vote for him. Why? Because first, he is a highly successful businessman, second, he has been spot-on with many of his predictions about the economy and, third, his understanding of Austrian economics is fundamental. On all three counts that puts him miles ahead of the vast majority of career politicians.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Visit his archives. If you haven?t read any of his articles you?ll be pleasantly surprised. No formulae, graphs, tables or charts ? just plain speech and common sense (e.g. "Cash for Clunkers"). No-one needs a degree in economics to understand what he?s saying ? in fact, it may well be an advantage not to have one![/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]He focuses on the repercussions of economic policies not their initial impact. Down the line their effect is almost invariably adverse. In a word, like Ron Paul, he?s "honest" about what the future holds if we continue on our present course:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]"Unlike most politicians, he does not traffic in unbridled optimism ? if painful and drastic changes aren't made soon, he foresees an economic depression lasting at least a decade. The future ? will be marked by rampant inflation ? food shortages and rolling blackouts, unless government sharply shrinks and the free market is allowed to flourish."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Until this happens, we continue the inevitable plunge into economic catastrophe.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]However, ask one of Obama?s Keynesian advisers how we?re doing and the reply would probably be:[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]"Well ? so far so good."[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]September 3, 2009[/FONT]​
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Chris Clancy [send him mail] is Associate Professor of Financial Accounting at Zhongnan University of Economics and Law in Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Copyright ? 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given[/FONT]​
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

What the hell happened to the Democratic party?

Recession? Deficits? The President says CUT TAXES!
The President was JFK ? A Democrat who understood what tax cuts can do for the economy.
<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/aEdXrfIMdiU&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&border=1 width=445 height=364 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></EMBED>
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

Economic theory can be pretty dry, but set it to a beat with a coupla gangsta economists in a hotel lobby and suddenly, it?s the most interesting thing you?ve heard all day.


<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/d0nERTFo-Sk&hl=en_US&fs=1& width=480 height=295 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

Friday, April 9, 2010

Recovery? There's No Recovery! The U.S. Is Completely Screwed!



<EMBED src=http://d.yimg.com/m/up/ypp/finance/player.swf width=576 height=324 type=application/x-shockwave-flash flashvars="repeat=1&vid=19046327&" allowFullScreen="true"></EMBED>

Retail analyst Howard Davidowitz of Davidowitz & Co. has always been one of our viewers' favorite guests. Howard's flamboyant bearishness won hearts and minds all through the financial crisis, and we--and you--never get tired of hearing from him.
But Howard has been bearish for a year now--all through one of the most amazing bull runs in history. Against all odds, the U.S. economy appears to be gathering steam by the day, charging out of the worst recession since the Great Depression and heading toward a strong recovery.
So what does Howard think about that? Has he changed his tune? Was he completely wrong?
NO WAY!!!
In Howard's view, nothing has changed. Howard thinks the U.S. is still careening down the road toward a hell of fiscal instability, over-indebtedness, ballooning budget deficits and interest payments, and declining living standards.
The U.S. is broke, Howard says. The current "sucker's rally" will end up like all the sucker's rallies that have tormented Japan for the past two decades. It will be a false dawn that will momentarily distract everyone from the enormous fiscal challenges we face ... and then reality will take hold again.
We won't be able to get out of our pickle without tremendous pain, Howard says. The American people are figuring that out. And the American people won't stand for the status quo anymore.
More Here..
 

brucefan

EOG Dedicated
Re: Obama and the Democrats deny an age-old economic lesson

NIA Inflationary Depression Update
Why it's possible to have massive inflation with rising unemployment




<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/uRQfvaTbaxo&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3 width=640 height=390 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always">




</EMBED>
 
Top