horse racing is a lot more difficult to win nowadays then it was 20 years ago.
I disagree (well with sports can't speak for horse racing). There were way more mistakes made but the books 20 years ago than there are today such as taking tons of correlated parlays (soccer unders to draw, puckline tot total, runline to total)awful team totals etc. There are still holes out there but the cherries are limited compared to years ago.People say the same type of shiz with sportsbetting.
It really isn't any harder (I am sure it was hard 20 years ago).
Maybe whatever worked 20 years ago doesn't work today.... That doesn't mean it is "harder"
There is a difficulty to winning. Some guys are doing the right type of work to overcome that difficulty. Some guys are not.
I'm just tired of these blanket statements of "oh... It was so much easier 20 years ago" as there is no truth to said statement.
People say the same type of shiz with sportsbetting.
It really isn't any harder (I am sure it was hard 20 years ago).
Maybe whatever worked 20 years ago doesn't work today.... That doesn't mean it is "harder"
There is a difficulty to winning. Some guys are doing the right type of work to overcome that difficulty. Some guys are not.
I'm just tired of these blanket statements of "oh... It was so much easier 20 years ago" as there is no truth to said statement.
It’s a completely different animal now . There’s software, easy access to replays and bloodlines. So much more information now that helps the public. Field sizes are less and trainers are not giving their horses a race as much as before , they are working them out like it’s a race.
I disagree (well with sports can't speak for horse racing). There were way more mistakes made but the books 20 years ago than there are today such as taking tons of correlated parlays (soccer unders to draw, puckline tot total, runline to total)awful team totals etc. There are still holes out there but the cherries are limited compared to years ago.
What exactly makes it more difficult? All you are saying is that it is different than it was 20 years ago. No one would disagree with that.
Well all this is probably true. Most people probably did not know about this stuff 20 years ago and those that knew were probably working hard to discover these things. If books were just getting killed and going out of because of these particular bets i imagine they would have changed their odds. What more than likely happened is very few people knew, thus the books were winning at close to the same percentage they are now.
The only difference in my head is the free bonus money. That is definitely a difference now compared to 14ish years ago. It was easier to win with bonus money, that i will agree with.
Remember all those books with 100% bonuses? In those days you could easy turn a $100 to $1000 with basic bonus busting .
Plus the damn books wouldn’t limit what you did with the bonus like they do now .
I disagree (well with sports can't speak for horse racing). There were way more mistakes made but the books 20 years ago than there are today such as taking tons of correlated parlays (soccer unders to draw, puckline tot total, runline to total)awful team totals etc. There are still holes out there but the cherries are limited compared to years ago.