- Thread starter KingRevolver
- Start date

J

I think you guys are dead wrong on HT.

He goes to extremes to talk about how great he is and how he wins, etc,etc.

If he really was such a winner, why not just PROVE it and shut everyone up? It would be different if he wasn't so critical of the new age math types that actually prove they win (WVU, IT types). HT just spouts off BS with nothing to back it up.

The guy is all talk, imo. I'm sure at some point in the 80s he was a winning gambler but not anymore.

Than again, WTF do I know?

:+clueless

Why is that?

He goes to extremes to talk about how great he is and how he wins, etc,etc.

If he really was such a winner, why not just PROVE it and shut everyone up? It would be different if he wasn't so critical of the new age math types that actually prove they win (WVU, IT types). HT just spouts off BS with nothing to back it up.

The guy is all talk, imo. I'm sure at some point in the 80s he was a winning gambler but not anymore.

Than again, WTF do I know?

:+clueless

He goes to extremes to talk about how great he is and how he wins, etc,etc.

If he really was such a winner, why not just PROVE it and shut everyone up? It would be different if he wasn't so critical of the new age math types that actually prove they win (WVU, IT types). HT just spouts off BS with nothing to back it up.

The guy is all talk, imo. I'm sure at some point in the 80s he was a winning gambler but not anymore.

Than again, WTF do I know?

:+clueless

J

How is WVU proving that he wins? He just hides the losing accounts. He doesn't win at sports betting. He knows how to bonus whore and has won in some contests.

He goes to extremes to talk about how great he is and how he wins, etc,etc.

If he really was such a winner, why not just PROVE it and shut everyone up? It would be different if he wasn't so critical of the new age math types that actually prove they win (WVU, IT types). HT just spouts off BS with nothing to back it up.

The guy is all talk, imo. I'm sure at some point in the 80s he was a winning gambler but not anymore.

Than again, WTF do I know?

:+clueless

Dude you take this way too serious OR you are just looking to stir problems.

Everyone has a high opinion of themselves and that is a good thing.

I'm sorry if I bothered you with my attitude, but that's just me having fun.

All this is ... Is people talking about sports betting and trying to get better communicating with others that MIGHT be sharp. If you don't think so don't read what they post.

It's not rocket science ......

op:

Yeah because Pinny gives so many bonuses :shoot:

They got you there, IT. LOL

How is it at all guaranteed he is winning into Pinny on these scalps? I know his agent/size account there because we have the same one and the limits aren't high enough to just keep doubling up on huge favorites if WVU is depth charging his entire account + bonus on huge dogs.

They got you there, IT. LOL

How is it at all guaranteed he is winning into Pinny on these scalps? I know his agent/size account there because we have the same one and the limits aren't high enough to just keep doubling up on huge favorites if WVU is depth charging his entire account + bonus on huge dogs.

Stick to ghosting Kinger.

How is it at all guaranteed he is winning into Pinny on these scalps? I know his agent/size account there because we have the same one and the limits aren't high enough to just keep doubling up on huge favorites if WVU is depth charging his entire account + bonus on huge dogs.

How is it at all guaranteed he is winning into Pinny on these scalps? I know his agent/size account there because we have the same one and the limits aren't high enough to just keep doubling up on huge favorites if WVU is depth charging his entire account + bonus on huge dogs.

How is it at all guaranteed he is winning into Pinny on these scalps? I know his agent/size account there because we have the same one and the limits aren't high enough to just keep doubling up on huge favorites if WVU is depth charging his entire account + bonus on huge dogs.

It's not rocket science

Not hard to lose to the bonus book and win at pinnacle.

I know you would never accept that, but it really doesn't matter any ways.

:lol

For a smart guy, sometime you make me wonder. Of course WV is taking bonuses at other books. He then betting big dogs there while taking the favorites at pinny hoping to lose at the other books so he can reload and get another bonus. It really isnt too hard to figure out

It's not that hard to do

And if you're middling, you are more likely to end up with the balance at the shit book over Pinny. Sounds like a cop out. I doubt HT has his own Pinny acct anyway.

How is it at all guaranteed he is winning into Pinny on these scalps? I know his agent/size account there because we have the same one and the limits aren't high enough to just keep doubling up on huge favorites if WVU is depth charging his entire account + bonus on huge dogs.

:+clueless

this isn't fair.

A free roll at a dime isn't fair???? It's a fucking free roll. Would it be fair if he was paid 100 if he lost and a dime if he won?

I'm sorry I've heard some stupid shit, but a free roll that's not fair is a fucking first to me.

A free roll at a dime isn't fair???? It's a fucking free roll. Would it be fair if he was paid 100 if he lost and a dime if he won?

I'm sorry I've heard some stupid shit, but a free roll that's not fair is a fucking first to me.