True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
More truth in 2:44 than you'll get in hours of Fox News/Rush Limbaugh style viewing/listening.

True Lies by Taalam Acey:

<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/jUTuxA0kO8s&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>

 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.


Beyond the vote of the people lies the New World Order.
The NWO[or call it what you like]is run through a network of non-elected groups,industries,fronts,etc.[see examples below] which influence how the world is governed.
Here's a primer on the shadow elite operation:
<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/6JATcBFbvcI&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>

The Bilderberg Group
Trilateral Commission
New World Order
World Government
North American Union
Military Industrial Complex
Federal Reserve fraud
Globalism
War with Iran
U.S. Economic Depression
Martial Law
Fascism
Big Brother Society
Police State
Cashless Society
Scientific Dictatorships
are all on our doorstep and most people don't even realize it.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

24 Paved the Way

If Barack Obama becomes the first ever African-American President of the United States, we may have one man to thank: actor Dennis Haysbert. At least according to Dennis Haysbert. In a media teleconference the actor credited his role as President David Palmer on the hit show 24 as an influential force in preparing the American people for the possibility of a black Commander in Chief. At first, the idea seems ludicrous: an actor priming the country for one of the most historical elections in history? But then I started to think about it?

Back in 2001, as we were reeling in the wake of September 11th, 24 hit the airwaves, and the world was introduced to the fictitious Senator David Palmer. The embattled politician faced a tumultuous path to the White House fraught with assassination attempts, terrorist cells, bomb scares, bomb blasts, more assassination attempts, filial rape charges, and one crazy, crazy wife. And yet he handled every situation with grace and aplomb. He rarely raised his voice and he always measured each situation carefully, often choosing the moral high ground over convenient solutions. There was something so strong, so unwavering, about Palmer that it was hard not to quietly wish he was our President in real life.

From and continued at:
http://dippolitics.dipdive.com/blog/611

Who's who?:


 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

Ironically or intentionally a New World Order reference was inserted into an episode of Heroes.Just a coincidence like the preview of an Obama presidency in the storyline of the Murdoch/Fox networks 24 series, or a form of mass brainwashing from NBC/General Electric TV.
Heroes talks of New World Order

<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/eCMt4O8qCnk&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.



The "24" series and future Presidents,"Heroes", New World Order, it's not farfetched to think TV watching can influence how the mass viewing audience perceives their world.
Besides advertising what other information can be shaped and passed along to be uncritcally absorbed by American couch potatos.

Excerpts below from:
http://www.naturalnews.com/024530.html
Television May Be Doing Your Thinking

Saturday, October 18, 2008 by: Lynn Berry

NaturalNews) The world's biggest leisure activity is watching television. Not walking or reading, not playing games with our children, not engaging with others in outdoor activities. Most of us like to think that television has absolutely no effect on how we think or what we do. We believe that it is a way to relax. Many of us may be surprised to know that television is a controlling medium, relaxing us enough to switch off our analytical brain (the left side of the brain) so that we uncritically, or unlogically, process the information beaming from the television. This means we are less able to make decisions or judgments about what we hear on television.

Our brains undergo a similar process under hypnosis. The similarity between hypnosis and the effects of watching television is unveiled in Dr Aric Sigman's book called Remotely Controlled. Sigman describes hypnosis as "an altered state of consciousness"; a form of sleepwalking where our mind is influenced by another (the hypnotist or practitioner).

Under hypnosis we become more open to the suggestions of the practitioner and this happens as we are asked to refrain from being critical and relaxed. As we do this, the frontal lobe in our brain alters becoming less connected with the brain so that we switch off. Hypnosis effectively causes a change in the brain so that we use the right side of our brain. What we switch off is the left side used for critical thinking.

While hypnosis may be considered an extreme or unusual solution to certain conditions, it only takes 30 seconds for us to be in a similar state when we switch on the television. Such were the findings from Professor Herbert Krugman in a study conducted in 1971. His conclusion was that we do not think about the information transmitted via television. In other words the way television communicates is a form of brainwashing.

Left in this state for some time can mean that we become less inventive in problem-solving and less able to concentrate.

The frontal lobe also alters in the brain when watching television. The frontal lobe is an important part of the brain as it is a management type system ensuring that our self-control, moral judgment and attention is planned, organised and sequenced. The concern is that the frontal lobe may be damaged by watching television and this may happen in childhood because the frontal lobe is in a continual stage of development until around 20 years of age.

It is not the information itself that causes the problem, but rather the medium. Somehow we are electrically wired to the television enabling information to be absorbed ? any information. The medium induces within us a passive state for communication. If we are unconsciously absorbing information, then what is this information doing to the way we think and act? Of course, the medium is a perfect match for advertisers.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

The effort by the few to command and control the many is an always ongoing process,it's a long game;in the 1976 film Network some of the mechanism was briefly exposed to interested movie-goers,as the You Tube clip details.

Text below from:
http://newworldorderinfo.com/
This New World Order has been a long time in the making, its pieces fitting into place from divergent realms and different players.

It is not some prophetically speculative or futuristic fairy tale, but a real world reality.

Gears and levers of history have been moved and adjusted, and a large-scale game of Monopoly has been played, with real currency and real assets shifting hands - a game with very real winners and losers.

If average Americans understood their true agenda, there would be an uprising of revolutionary proportions. Therefore, secrecy of their true agenda is critical.

A large part of its economic agenda was exposed in the 1976 movie, ?Network?.

</PARAM>
</PARAM><EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/3BVqIjKyJh0&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED></OBJECT>



Network re-run:
?The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back. It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity. It is ecological balance. You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations; there are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems; one vast, interwoven, interacting, multivaried, multinational dominion of dollars.?

?It is the international system of currency which determines the vitality of life on this planet. THAT is the natural order of things today.?

?There is no America; there is no democracy. There is only IBM, and ITT, and AT&T, and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today.?

?The world is a business, Mr. Beale; it has been since man crawled out of the slime. Our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there?s no war or famine, oppression or brutality - one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock - all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.?
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

What's going on here?
First off the comments by Colin Powell and Joe Biden plant the assumption via the mainstream media that Barack Obama will be Preident in the "early days of his term",so thereby a subliminal message has been sent to Americans .
If something were to happen what could the crisis possibly be?Where Iran,Pakistan,no,no,we'll connect the dots in the next post[keep an eye out for the answer].

Colin Powell Warns Of Coming Crisis ?We Don?t Even Know About Right Now?

Echoes Biden comments that Obama will be tested in early days of his term
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Tuesday, Oct 21, 2008

Colin Powell has made bizarre comments that echo the recent declaration by Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden that there will be an ?international crisis? early into Barack Obama?s presidency that will test the new president by forcing him to make unpopular decisions.

Speaking on meet the press two days ago, Powell officially endorsed Obama and also made the following statement:


?The problems will always be there and there?s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don?t even know about right now.
So I think what the President has to start to do is to start using the power of the oval office and the power of his personality to convince the American people and convince the world that America is solid, that America is going to move forward, we are going to fix our economic problems, we?re going to meet out overseas obligations.?
Watch Powell make the comment at 2.35 into the following video:
<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/_LDBOPcHpeo&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>
Is Colin Powell referring to a theoretical crisis that could occur at any time? If so why does he choose a specific date, within the first two days after the inauguration? Also why does he refer to general problems that the new president will have to deal with in a separate context? We are already in an economic crisis, everyone knows that, so what new crisis is Powell talking about?

Whatever you read into Powell?s comments, they sound somewhat bizarre, particularly as they come on the back of Joe Biden?s ?guarantee? of a ?generated crisis? to ?test the mettle? of the new leader within six months of the new presidential term:​
<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/dOwb9l0DtRA&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>

What does Biden mean by ?generated crisis?? It is an undeniably strange term to use.

His reference to John F. Kennedy indicates that Biden may have been referring some kind of geopolitical crisis in the vain of the Cuban missile crisis of April 1961. The confrontation between the United States, the Soviet Union, and Cuba at the height of the Cold War came within the first four months of JFK?s presidency.

Obama?s running mate made the comments at a fundraising event in Seattle two days ago, on the same day Powell also spoke of a coming crisis.

We shouldn?t be surprised at Powell?s comments however, given that the former Secretary of State seemingly has a knack for predicting events before they take place.

Previous to the beginning of the Iraq war in February 2003, an audio tape containing a voice described as that of Osama Bin Laden was touted as proof positive of Al Qaeda links with Saddam Hussein.

Hours before the tape was discovered and aired by TV channel Al Jazeera, Powell announced in the US Senate that a ?Bin Laden tape is coming proving Iraq?s links with Al-Qaeda.?

This led some to raise the question how does Colin Powell know what Al Jazeera are going to broadcast before they do?

In an amazing and timely coincidence, the tape came barely a week after Powell?s attempts to link Al Qaeda and Saddam in his botched presentation of lies and exaggerations before the UN Security Council.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

Answer:

At the same time Biden/Powell expect a "crisis"early in an Obama administration,it "emerges" there are more than 20 billion barrels of oil in Cuba.

Are elements in the Raul Castro communist Cuban regime prepared to work with the next admisitration,and manufacture a pretext to allow the US to effect regime change?

While an attack on Iran was expected by the Bush admistration,and Obama speaks about gong into Pakistan,isn't it more logiclal to work over a country only 90 miles form the US?
Let's see what happens...

Below from:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/18/cuban-oil

20bn barrel oil discovery puts Cuba in the big league

? Self-reliance beckons for communist state
? Estimate means reserves are on a par with US


<LI class=byline>Rory Carroll, Latin America correspondent <LI class=publication>The Guardian, <LI class=date>Saturday October 18 2008

A worker walks at an oil rig in Havana, Cuba. Photograph: Enrique De La Osa/Reuters​

Friends and foes have called Cuba many things - a progressive beacon, a quixotic underdog, an oppressive tyranny - but no one has called it lucky, until now .

Mother nature, it emerged this week, appears to have blessed the island with enough oil reserves to vault it into the ranks of energy powers. The government announced there may be more than 20bn barrels of recoverable oil in offshore fields in Cuba's share of the Gulf of Mexico, more than twice the previous estimate.

If confirmed, it puts Cuba's reserves on par with those of the US and into the world's top 20. Drilling is expected to start next year by Cuba's state oil company Cubapetroleo, or Cupet.

"It would change their whole equation. The government would have more money and no longer be dependent on foreign oil," said Kirby Jones, founder of the Washington-based US-Cuba Trade Association. "It could join the club of oil exporting nations."

Havana based its dramatically higher estimate mainly on comparisons with oil output from similar geological structures off the coasts of Mexico and the US. Cuba's undersea geology was "very similar" to Mexico's giant Cantarell oil field in the Bay of Campeche, said Tenreyro.

A consortium of companies led by Spain's Repsol had tested wells and were expected to begin drilling the first production well in mid-2009, and possibly several more later in the year, he said.

Cuba currently produces about 60,000 barrels of oil daily, covering almost half of its needs, and imports the rest from Venezuela in return for Cuban doctors and sports instructors. Even that barter system puts a strain on an impoverished economy in which Cubans earn an average monthly salary of $20.

Subsidised grocery staples, health care and education help make ends meet but an old joke - that the three biggest failings of the revolution are breakfast, lunch and dinner - still does the rounds. Last month hardships were compounded by tropical storms that shredded crops and devastated coastal towns.

"This news about the oil reserves could not have come at a better time for the regime," said Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado, a Cuba energy specialist at the University of Nebraska.

However there is little prospect of Cuba becoming a communist version of Kuwait. Its oil is more than a mile deep under the ocean and difficult and expensive to extract. The four-decade-old US economic embargo prevents several of Cuba's potential oil partners - notably Brazil, Norway and Spain - from using valuable first-generation technology.

"You're looking at three to five years minimum before any meaningful returns," said Benjamin-Alvarado.
Even so, Cuba is a master at stretching resources. President Raul Castro, who took over from brother Fidel, has promised to deliver improvements to daily life to shore up the legitimacy of the revolution as it approaches its 50th anniversary.

Cuba's unexpected arrival into the big oil league could increase pressure on the next administration to loosen the embargo to let US oil companies participate in the bonanza and reduce US dependency on the middle east, said Jones. "Up until now the embargo did not really impact on us in a substantive, strategic way. Oil is different. It's something we need and want."
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

Hugo Chavez visited Cuba twice in September,and in the story below it's mentioned Venezuela sends nearly 100,000 barrels a day of oil to Cuba.

Then in October 2008 Cuba suddenly finds 20 billion barrels of oil,or do they,and will they need "help"to extract it?
Curious how the story was published with the headline "New world order"[for real].


Excerpt below with actual headline,"New world order' + 'Cuba",from:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=15&entry_id=30874

New world order notes: Cuba, Venezuela's Ch?vez, the U.S. banking crisis
Ch?vez had stopped by Cuba on September 21,2008 at the beginning of his just-completed overseas tour. "Days later, in Moscow, he told the Cuban government news agency Prensa Latina that Fidel [Castro, Cuba's ailing, former leader] was 'stronger and more impetuous than a Hurricane Ike,'" a reference "to the storm that killed seven people and damaged hundreds of thousands of homes in Cuba [earlier] this month." (Associated Press)


This past Saturday night,[9/29/2008] on his way back to Venezuela from Europe, Ch?vez again stopped in Havana (for just a few hours), where he met with Castro and the sequestered, veteran rebel's younger brother, Ra?l Castro, who became Cuba's president earlier this year. The Cuban publication Juventud Rebelde described the meeting of the three current and former leaders as a "fruitful exchange." (Cited by Prensa Latina)


Miraflores Palace/Handout, via Reuters
On September 21, on his way to China and Europe, Ch?vez met in Havana with Cuban President Ra?l Castro (left)

AP reports: "Ch?vez is a close friend and ally of the older Castro, and oil-rich Venezuela sends nearly 100,000 barrels of crude a day to Cuba at favorable prices, helping to keep the island's communist economy afloat. Holed up in an undisclosed location, Fidel Castro is suffering from an unknown illness but continues to sign essays that appear several times a week in state-controlled newspapers. He has not been seen in photographs or video images since June" of this year.
Posted By: Edward M. Gomez (Email) | September 29 2008
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

Excerpts below from:
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10687

Psychological Control: States of Mental Disempowerment
Part II: Deconstructing the Power of the Global Elite

by Dr. Judith H. Young
Global Research, October 25, 2008

As stated in a famous quote from Henry David Thoreau, the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation, marked by a state of resignation which is confirmed desperation. This phenomenon, which is so antithetical to the joyful natural instincts of newborns, has not come about by accident, but rather through the careful crafting of a cold-blooded global oligarchy. An oligarchy whose insidiousness calls to mind an ancient story in which a perfect murder is committed by Brak the ice man, who kills a woman with an icicle dagger: both he and his weapon melt away in the next day's sun, leaving nothing behind as a basis for prosecuting the crime.

For in addition to brute force and the power to hurt, the global elite uses another form of power that is as stealth like and chilling as Brak's perfect crime: sophisticated techniques for psychological control stemming in large part from the ability to mold the perceptions and behavior of the populace through mental and emotional manipulation of the very reality it experiences.

Although it would take volumes to do justice to deconstructing the crimes against the human spirit perpetrated by the globalists, I will here attempt to expose several of their common themes: normalizing the abnormal, learned helplessness, and the disorientation of the betwixt and between syndrome. In my view, if we explore the ways these states of mind disempower us, they will be stripped of their disabling mystique and reveal the very ways they can be neutralized.

This truth is stated well by Jungian Analyst and wise woman Clarissa Pinkola Est?s in discussing the core agenda of terrorists,...

"How strongly that poisonous net holds when one is unaware of what it is made of, and how easily it falls apart when one consciously begins to contradict its malicious urgings."

Normalizing the Abnormal
Dr. Est?s observes that the disorder of normalizing the abnormal is rampant across cultures. When there are formidable punishments for breaking silence, for pointing out wrongs, for demanding change, we cut away our rightful rage and become used to not being able to intervene in shocking events. Despair, fatigue and resignation follow.

Normalization of the abnormal has been achieved in large part through the power elite's control of the news media and entertainment. This dominance has permitted not only deciding the "information" the public is allowed to receive, but also the molding of public opinion and behavior. One example is sponsorship of the TV show 24, carefully designed to desensitize the viewers to the use of torture. Another is the use of TV commercials showing stars cheerfully endorsing invasive personal identification technology, as part of a carefully designed program for grooming us to accept Big Brother surveillance and control, including the eventual implantation of microchips under our skin.
The power elite goes to any lengths to keep the public misled, distracted, fearful, and ultimately imprisoned in a matrix of disinformation, rampant consumerism and the lowest common denominators of human nature, including raw violence and mindless sexuality.

As Huxley observed in 1962, the controlling oligarchy has long been at work developing scientific methods of control to "induce people to love their servitude" - to make them "enjoy a state of affairs which by any decent standard they ought not to enjoy."

This dystopic scenario was echoed by Bertrand Russell, who predicted that as a result of the gradual and ruthless use of technological advances, "a revolt of the plebs would be as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton."
I would contend that the disorder of normalizing the abnormal consists in large measure of reshaping our very construct of human nature in terms of its basest parameters, especially in the areas of acquisitiveness, violence, and sexuality. Massive effort has gone into studying and modifying human behavior to serve the global elite's greed for money and power. The modern consumer is not reflective of genuine human nature, but rather a phenomenon created in great part by the psychoanalytic studies, experiments and recommendations of the brilliant capitalist asset Edward Bernays. The widespread aberration of a dumbed down populace, unaware and largely uncaring regarding its destiny, has taken years of careful elitist effort to orchestrate.
Learned Helplessness
The phenomenon of normalizing the abnormal was given experimental validation in the 1970s through controlled studies with groups of dogs. The experiments revealed a great deal about the innate flight or fight reactions to danger and indicated that self-protective instincts can be overriden by inducing "learned helplessness."

In one experiment the bottoms of cages were wired to produce a shock on one side only, resulting in the expected avoidance behaviors; then the entire floors of the cages were wired to give random shocks, resulting in confusion, then panic, and then just lying down in resignation, taking the shocks as they came and no longer trying to avoid or outsmart them. Next the cage doors were opened, but the dogs did not move to escape as expected, leading to the hypothesis that they had adapted to or "normalized" their pain and were consequently exhibiting symptoms similar to chronic clinical depression.
Learned helplessness manifests in everyday situations or environments in which people perceive, rightly or wrongly, that they have no control over what happens to them, e.g., war, famine, or detention. When the instincts for self-determination are injured, as observed by Dr. Est?s, humans will 'normalize' assault after assault, acts of injustice and destruction toward themselves, their offspring, their loved ones, their land, and even their moral and spiritual values.

The electroshock of the dogs in the learned helplessness experiments has, as Naomi Klein documents, been copied on a societal level by the financial oligarchy. The capitalist elite shocks a nation with an event like 9/11, and in the ensuing stage of confusion and panic rushes in with salvation in the form of protective father figures who provide a narrative that offers a perspective on the shocking events that allows the profoundly disoriented victims to make sense of the trauma.Hence the extraordinary power of the mind control matrix known as the War on Terror.

But what is learned can be unlearned; what has been forgotten can be relearned. Especially in the case of our inherent instincts of preservation, we can engage in forensic analysis with a view to restoring the natural skills that give us power:
"[The] normalizing of the shocking and abusive is refused by repairing injured instinct....To re-learn the deep...instincts, it is vital to see how they were decommissioned to begin with....[We compose] a map of the woods in which we live, and where the predators live, and what their modus operandi is....[Then] if our wild nature has been injured by something, we refuse to lie down to die. We refuse to normalize this harm. We call up our instincts and do what we have to do."
The Betwixt and Between Syndrome
The relentless march toward tyranny in the United States and other nations with a heritage of freedom, underscored by the blatant criminality of the recent bailout package implemented against the political will and interest of the populace, seems to portend a terrifying future for humanity. It leaves us in a no man's land between the familiarity of our previous reality and the uncharted dangers lying ahead.

This loss of bearings should be seen as a form of psychological control by the globalists over the populace for two reasons. First, it is a situation they have engineered, and engineered in such a way as to serve their self-interest. Second, our fear of a destiny they have designed for us keeps us from exercising our full potential of actively opposing its unfolding. At a time of the implementation of what can only be perceived as their endgame, we find ourselves floundering and cut off from our inner fire.

Humans have an instinctive fear of the unknown, which is exacerbated if trends indicate an unknown that is negative rather than positive. In the present case the unknown seems to be characterized by the probability of enormous global destabilization, with massive suffering in store for the populace. Although the world as we have known it is far from acceptable, the horizon appears quite possibly unbearable--hence the phrase "looking into the abyss" used recently by a number of analysts.

This makes the betwixt and between predicament more difficult to navigate than it would be in less extreme situations, such as adolescence as a normal and predictable transition from childhood to maturity. Another exacerbation is the endless onslaught of crises that the oligarchy orchestrates in order to keep us in a state of continual disorientation, seemingly unable to process one trauma before the next one hits.

Once we dissect the betwixt and between predicament, a predicament that all of us have experienced and navigated in our personal lives but may well not have recognized and named as such, our fear will lose its hold and we can reclaim our power.

The betwixt and between predicament occurs whenever we are forced to revise our previous sense of self and reality, and are required to remain in a zone of unfamiliarity, disorientation and loss of control until a new set of truths emerges and is integrated. All of us have faced this predicament again and again in our lives, e.g., during the teen years, after a major loss, and in our daily lives when our personal growth process entails the death of old aspects of the self and the birth of new ones. Even transitions that one welcomes gladly, such as marriage, a better job, or moving, are in fact highly stressful because of their magnitude.

...It is less painful to accept the need for change than to stay in denial.

The good news goes further: Turner and others in fact see potential gifts in the betwixt and between ambiguity that is so emotionally difficult. The inability to classify oneself, while one is in the stage of uncertainty and not-knowing, is also freedom to explore new ways of constructing reality and identity. The stage of ambiguity can become one of enormous creativity and fertility as we move to a new reality that we ourselves construct.It is vital to keep this awareness as we face and oppose the unfolding of the financial elite's endgame of cementing its global control through the current economic crises and so-called solutions it has itself engineered. As an advancing power nears its goal of full spectrum dominance, its crimes break the surface for all to witness, as evidenced by the audacity of the corporatocracy in forcing the passage of the bailout package and in its brazenly self-serving implementation.

Our Republic was not always ignorant and apathetic in the face of such criminality. In reaction to an offer in 1905 of a $100,000 donation by John D. Rockefeller for the missionary work of the U.S. Congregationalist Church, its most eminent leader asked, "Is this clean money? Can any man, can any institution, knowing its origins, touch it without being defiled?"
No longer can the oligarchs use the insidiousness of the iceman Brak to further their agenda. And longer do we need to allow them to disempower us through technocratic techniques of psychological control. The efficacy of these techniques has stemmed in great measure from our internalization of oppression, a process we can work to reverse once we understand it.

The technocrats would have us believe we are helpless to join battle. We are not.
Patrick Henry, 'Give me Liberty or give me death.'


 

ShamsWoof10

EOG Enthusiast
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I don't agree with everything in this thread but I agree with most things and I am very impressed with some of the information reguarding media programming...
:smokesmal
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I don't agree with everything in this thread but I agree with most things and I am very impressed with some of the information reguarding media programming...
:smokesmal

The thread unravels further in the same vein.
America the Illiterate

Posted on Nov 10, 2008

<TABLE style="BORDER-RIGHT: #555555 0px solid; BORDER-TOP: #555555 0px solid; FLOAT: right; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; BORDER-LEFT: #555555 0px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #555555 0px solid" width=300><TBODY><TR><TD style="FONT-SIZE: x-small" align=right jQuery1226399669918="693"> </TD></TR><TR><TD style="FONT-SIZE: x-small" align=right jQuery1226399669918="694">AP photo / Tina Fineberg</TD></TR><TR><TD style="FONT-SIZE: x-small" jQuery1226399669918="695"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
By Chris Hedges
We live in two Americas. One America, now the minority, functions in a print-based, literate world. It can cope with complexity and has the intellectual tools to separate illusion from truth. The other America, which constitutes the majority, exists in a non-reality-based belief system. This America, dependent on skillfully manipulated images for information, has severed itself from the literate, print-based culture. It cannot differentiate between lies and truth. It is informed by simplistic, childish narratives and clich?s. It is thrown into confusion by ambiguity, nuance and self-reflection. This divide, more than race, class or gender, more than rural or urban, believer or nonbeliever, red state or blue state, has split the country into radically distinct, unbridgeable and antagonistic entities.

There are over 42 million American adults, 20 percent of whom hold high school diplomas, who cannot read, as well as the 50 million who read at a fourth- or fifth-grade level. Nearly a third of the nation?s population is illiterate or barely literate. And their numbers are growing by an estimated 2 million a year. But even those who are supposedly literate retreat in huge numbers into this image-based existence. A third of high school graduates, along with 42 percent of college graduates, never read a book after they finish school. Eighty percent of the families in the United States last year did not buy a book.

The illiterate rarely vote, and when they do vote they do so without the ability to make decisions based on textual information. American political campaigns, which have learned to speak in the comforting epistemology of images, eschew real ideas and policy for cheap slogans and reassuring personal narratives. Political propaganda now masquerades as ideology. Political campaigns have become an experience. They do not require cognitive or self-critical skills. They are designed to ignite pseudo-religious feelings of euphoria, empowerment and collective salvation. Campaigns that succeed are carefully constructed psychological instruments that manipulate fickle public moods, emotions and impulses, many of which are subliminal. They create a public ecstasy that annuls individuality and fosters a state of mindlessness. They thrust us into an eternal present. They cater to a nation that now lives in a state of permanent amnesia. It is style and story, not content or history or reality, which inform our politics and our lives. We prefer happy illusions. And it works because so much of the American electorate, including those who should know better, blindly cast ballots for slogans, smiles, the cheerful family tableaux, narratives and the perceived sincerity and the attractiveness of candidates. We confuse how we feel with knowledge.

The illiterate and semi-literate, once the campaigns are over, remain powerless. They still cannot protect their children from dysfunctional public schools. They still cannot understand predatory loan deals, the intricacies of mortgage papers, credit card agreements and equity lines of credit that drive them into foreclosures and bankruptcies. They still struggle with the most basic chores of daily life from reading instructions on medicine bottles to filling out bank forms, car loan documents and unemployment benefit and insurance papers. They watch helplessly and without comprehension as hundreds of thousands of jobs are shed. They are hostages to brands. Brands come with images and slogans. Images and slogans are all they understand. Many eat at fast food restaurants not only because it is cheap but because they can order from pictures rather than menus. And those who serve them, also semi-literate or illiterate, punch in orders on cash registers whose keys are marked with symbols and pictures. This is our brave new world.

Political leaders in our post-literate society no longer need to be competent, sincere or honest. They only need to appear to have these qualities. Most of all they need a story, a narrative. The reality of the narrative is irrelevant. It can be completely at odds with the facts. The consistency and emotional appeal of the story are paramount. The most essential skill in political theater and the consumer culture is artifice. Those who are best at artifice succeed. Those who have not mastered the art of artifice fail. In an age of images and entertainment, in an age of instant emotional gratification, we do not seek or want honesty. We ask to be indulged and entertained by clich?s, stereotypes and mythic narratives that tell us we can be whomever we want to be, that we live in the greatest country on Earth, that we are endowed with superior moral and physical qualities and that our glorious future is preordained, either because of our attributes as Americans or because we are blessed by God or both.

The ability to magnify these simple and childish lies, to repeat them and have surrogates repeat them in endless loops of news cycles, gives these lies the aura of an uncontested truth. We are repeatedly fed words or phrases like yes we can, maverick, change, pro-life, hope or war on terror. It feels good not to think. All we have to do is visualize what we want, believe in ourselves and summon those hidden inner resources, whether divine or national, that make the world conform to our desires. Reality is never an impediment to our advancement.
Page 1 from:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20081110_america_the_illiterate/
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.



"Say bud, can you tell me where the illiterate club is?"

Chris Hedges' Columns
America the Illiterate

By Chris Hedges
(Page 2)from:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/20081110_america_the_illiterate/

The Princeton Review analyzed the transcripts of the Gore-Bush debates, the Clinton-Bush-Perot debates of 1992, the Kennedy-Nixon debates of 1960 and the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858. It reviewed these transcripts using a standard vocabulary test that indicates the minimum educational standard needed for a reader to grasp the text.

During the 2000 debates, George W. Bush spoke at a sixth-grade level (6.7) and Al Gore at a seventh-grade level (7.6). In the 1992 debates, Bill Clinton spoke at a seventh-grade level (7.6), while George H.W. Bush spoke at a sixth-grade level (6.8), as did H. Ross Perot (6.3). In the debates between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, the candidates spoke in language used by 10th-graders. In the debates of Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas the scores were respectively 11.2 and 12.0. In short, today?s political rhetoric is designed to be comprehensible to a 10-year-old child or an adult with a sixth-grade reading level. It is fitted to this level of comprehension because most Americans speak, think and are entertained at this level. This is why serious film and theater and other serious artistic expression, as well as newspapers and books, are being pushed to the margins of American society. Voltaire was the most famous man of the 18th century. Today the most famous ?person? is Mickey Mouse.

In our post-literate world, because ideas are inaccessible, there is a need for constant stimulus. News, political debate, theater, art and books are judged not on the power of their ideas but on their ability to entertain. Cultural products that force us to examine ourselves and our society are condemned as elitist and impenetrable. Hannah Arendt warned that the marketization of culture leads to its degradation, that this marketization creates a new celebrity class of intellectuals who, although well read and informed themselves, see their role in society as persuading the masses that ?Hamlet? can be as entertaining as ?The Lion King? and perhaps as educational. ?Culture,? she wrote, ?is being destroyed in order to yield entertainment.?

?There are many great authors of the past who have survived centuries of oblivion and neglect,? Arendt wrote, ?but it is still an open question whether they will be able to survive an entertaining version of what they have to say.?

The change from a print-based to an image-based society has transformed our nation. Huge segments of our population, especially those who live in the embrace of the Christian right and the consumer culture, are completely unmoored from reality. They lack the capacity to search for truth and cope rationally with our mounting social and economic ills. They seek clarity, entertainment and order. They are willing to use force to impose this clarity on others, especially those who do not speak as they speak and think as they think. All the traditional tools of democracies, including dispassionate scientific and historical truth, facts, news and rational debate, are useless instruments in a world that lacks the capacity to use them.

As we descend into a devastating economic crisis, one that Barack Obama cannot halt, there will be tens of millions of Americans who will be ruthlessly thrust aside. As their houses are foreclosed, as their jobs are lost, as they are forced to declare bankruptcy and watch their communities collapse, they will retreat even further into irrational fantasy. They will be led toward glittering and self-destructive illusions by our modern Pied Pipers?our corporate advertisers, our charlatan preachers, our television news celebrities, our self-help gurus, our entertainment industry and our political demagogues?who will offer increasingly absurd forms of escapism.

The core values of our open society, the ability to think for oneself, to draw independent conclusions, to express dissent when judgment and common sense indicate something is wrong, to be self-critical, to challenge authority, to understand historical facts, to separate truth from lies, to advocate for change and to acknowledge that there are other views, different ways of being, that are morally and socially acceptable, are dying. Obama used hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign funds to appeal to and manipulate this illiteracy and irrationalism to his advantage, but these forces will prove to be his most deadly nemesis once they collide with the awful reality that
awaits us.
 

ZZ CREAM

EOG Master
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I try to read 2 or 3 books a week....................when I tell people this..............they look at me as some form of alien.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I try to read 2 or 3 books a week....................when I tell people this..............they look at me as some form of alien.
ZZ;
Guess you don't watch too much television to read at that rate,unlike many who just passively absorb what's beamed into their house by the networks.People who get most of their information from reading books,newspapers,and other material are becoming exceptions.This is a dangerous trend as TV,You Tube,movies, etc. are viewed uncritically and can subtly control how people think.

Following's a comparison of reading and television,plus a method from the "Pioneer of Speed Reading" Evelyn Wood to improve reading speed and comprehension.

Reading is a multi-dimensional cognitive process of decoding symbols for the purpose of deriving meaning (reading comprehension) and/or constructing meaning. Written information is received by the retina, processed by the primary visual cortex, and interpreted in Wernicke's area.

Reading is a means of language acquisition, of communication, and of sharing information and ideas.

Readers use a variety of reading strategies to assist with decoding (to translate symbols into sounds or visual representations of language), and comprehension. Readers may use morpheme, semantics, syntax and context cues to identify the meaning of unknown words. Readers integrate the words they have read into their existing framework of knowledge or schema (schemata theory).

Other types of reading may not be text-based, such as music notation or pictograms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_(activity)

[From Post #5 in this thread]
television is a controlling medium, relaxing us enough to switch off our analytical brain (the left side of the brain) so that we uncritically, or unlogically, process the information beaming from the television.

It is not the information itself that causes the problem, but rather the medium. Somehow we are electrically wired to the television enabling information to be absorbed ? any information.


Evelyn Wood (January 8, 1909 ? August 26, 1995), sometimes known as "the Pioneer of Speed Reading," learned how to read quickly by watching fast readers. She coined the phrase, "speed reading" and developed a system that was taught in seminars.

Her method is to read every word by using a finger or pointer, such as a pen to move under each line of text at a steady pace. Her system is based on the idea that every person reads a word at the same rate, but a poor reader re-reads words. The pacing hand prevents re-reading, the brain does not need to interpret a jumble of words, with a resulting increase in comprehension, speed, and enjoyment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evelyn_Wood_(teacher)

 

ZZ CREAM

EOG Master
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I love newspapers too. I read our local paper and several days a week I get the out of town papers......The NY Times, Washington Post and usually a third. When I first started betting the NBA, mid-70's, I averaged about 8 or 9 out of town papers a day. All, at my local library. I knew more arcane local knowledge about alot of cities.......Denver, Dallas and Portland were my favorites.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

Researchers have found looking at ourselves in a mirror can alter our behavior,and a video can induce the same effect.
Does our "choice" of television programming do the same,and how about at times when something is shown on all the major channels simultaneously,like on 9/11,Presidential State of the Unions/ debates,or other major events,can this influence the common denominators who've tuned in?
Excerpts below from;
http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com/blog/articles/mirror-power.htm
Mon 6 Oct 2008
Reflecting on the Mirror

Posted by Roger Dooley



...the mirror has a rather magical effect on us.

For years, motivation experts have told their audiences to ?look in the mirror? as they formulated their goals or imagined the future they wanted. As it turns out, this advice wasn?t all motivational hokum. When we look in a mirror, our behavior is actually altered - at least for a short period of time.

Yes! 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive by Cialdini, Goldstein, and Martin, led me to mirror and related research peformed both by Cialdini and other teams.

The most venerable piece of mirror-behavior research is a 1970s study, Social Awareness and Transgression in Children: Two Field Studies, by Beaman et al. Like many experiments in social psychology, the setup was simple:

children making their Halloween rounds were told they could take one piece of candy from a large bowl of candy, and then left alone. About 34% helped themselves to more than one piece. When a mirror was placed behind the bowl so that the children could see themselves as they took the candy, only 9% disobeyed their instructions. The simple addition of the mirror cut the rate of bad behavior by almost three-fourths!

And it?s not just kids that respond to seeing themselves. Another experiment described in Yes! showed subjects either a live video of themselves (rather like looking in a mirror except for the image reversal part) or neutral geometric shapes. They were then given a small task which required them to exit the room with a used paper towel. Almost half of the subjects who saw the neutral images ?littered? by dropping the used towel in an empty stairwell, while only a quarter of those who saw themselves did so.

It seems that seeing one?s image causes one to think about one?s behavior and ultimately behave in a more socially desirable way. According to Cialdini, other actions can have a similar effect. Asking people their names can have a similar effect, and one experiment showed that a picture of eyes dramatically reduced ?theft? in a break area where employees were supposed to drop money in a jar when they were supposed to pay for coffee or tea.

Cialdini notes that mirrors could be an inexpensive way to cut shoplifting or employee theft in areas that can?t readily be monitored.
I think there could well be some interesting marketing applications for this ?self awareness? strategy. The most obvious are for non-profit marketers. Generally, they are seeking financial or time commitments for a cause that most people would consider socially beneficial. What better way to boost the success rate than letting potential donors see themselves?

 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

<CITE>Comment on the prior post,

Reflecting on the Mirror</CITE>
<CITE>http://www.neurosciencemarketing.com...rror-power.htm</CITE>
<CITE></CITE>
<CITE>Alan</CITE>Says:
<SMALL class=commentmetadata>October 7th, 2008 at 12:58 pm </SMALL>
<SMALL class=commentmetadata></SMALL>
<SMALL class=commentmetadata></SMALL>
Pseudo ?self-awareness? via a mirror is far surpassed by the real Self-awareness which sages have exhorted us to practice over millennia?

Turn away from any mirrors and simply become aware of yourself looking. If you find this difficult, try paying attention to the shapes and colors in your peripheral vision. Then you will have the impression of viewing your broad field of visual perception like a mirror ? just as symbolized in much art and literature. Here?s a detail from a 15th c. painting by Hans MEMLING[Diptych of Maarten Nieuwenhove 1487]:


<CENTER> </CENTER>http://www.wga.hu/index1.html

?with the implication that it is you, the viewer, looking in the symbolic mirror. And the complete work ]below]shows the practice of Self-awareness on the right, leading to the ?birth? of spiritual Presence on the left:



http://www.wga.hu/index1.html

It is this ?birth? of a new consciousness (effortless real Self-awareness) which provides a lasting improvement in our behavior. And rather than churches placing mirrors in their entryways, they should be explaining that this practice of Self-awareness is what is meant by ?Watching? in the New Testament.

and in Zen?
Manjusri Enters the Gate

One day as Manjusri stood outside the gate, the Buddha called to him, "Manjusri, Manjusri, why do you not enter?" Manjusri replied, "I do not see myself as outside. Why enter?"
http://www.chinapage.com/zen/koan1.html
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

The Matrix Trailer1999
<EMBED src=http://www.youtube.com/v/UM5yepZ21pI&hl=en&fs=1 width=425 height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true">
</EMBED>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM5yepZ21pI

Excerpts below from:
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4002.shtml
The problem of mass
By Michael Hasty
Online Journal Contributing Writer

Nov 13, 2008

The late great media critic Marshall McLuhan described the planetary media system as the extension of humanity?s collective nervous system into space, creating a ?one world? consciousness.

It is indisputable that 21st-century humans have a more global consciousness than our predecessors. The extension of media all over the world, with satellites providing instantaneous information through a variety of receiving devices, from televisions to cellphones, has united human consciousness in an unprecedented way. Mass culture has become a global phenomenon; billions of people ?know? Angelina Jolie.

... mass culture also brings many problems, from celebrity worship to corporate domination of national politics, which inhibit the healthy functioning of democracy. Many of these problems can be addressed by returning our national cultural emphasis to local participation in politics and the economy.

Of course, it is against the interests of the ruling power structure to decentralize either political or economic power. So naturally, this subject doesn?t get much discussion in the national media. Nor does it even get much discussion in the academic world of political science. I saw an analysis of an annual conference of political science professors a few years ago which showed that not a single paper submitted to the conference discussed corporate influence on American political life.

As McLuhan would have explained, they don?t see corporate involvement in democracy because it?s like the water in which fish swim: it?s everywhere. It hasn?t been possible to separate business from government since the very beginning of the American republic.
When the republic began, however, business was much more decentralized than it is today, and there was a healthy distrust of corporations. Thomas Jefferson wanted an anti-corporate 11th amendment in the Bill of Rights. Corporations were far more restricted in their lifespans, and in what activities they could engage. Some historians think that the American Revolution was principally waged against the monopoly power of the British East India Company.

It?s a different story today, when multinational corporations provide just about everything we buy, from food to entertainment. We?ve lost the economic independence that comes from local self-sufficiency, and as a result, we?ve lost our real political independence. When every jurisdiction is begging for jobs, because there?s no more real work, and most people spend their lives sitting in boxes, looking at changing light forms emitted from ever smaller boxes, a county commissioner is as likely to favor a global giant in his decisions as anyone else up the political food chain. We are all prisoners of a corporate economy.

With the corporate economy comes the corporate mass media, from which most Americans still get most of their information. (This is what I generally refer to as ?the Matrix,? from the film trilogy, which, whatever its flaws, presented a devastatingly accurate picture of how the virtual world in which most Americans live operates.)

The corporate media are as multinational as the other corporations which dominate the global economy, and because of their unique function, integral to the continuation of the current global economic structure, which primarily benefits the elites who control it. So mass culture, in the present context, will always reflect the long-term needs of the global power elite, whose corporations fund the advertising, which produces the media under this system. No advertising, no media. And anyone who doesn?t think advertisers affect media content is living in a fantasy.

The most harmful effect that corporate mass culture has on our political brains is to close off possibilities, and to separate us from our own local geography.
Late one night, many years ago, I stood at the base of the Citibank skyscraper in Manhattan. I couldn?t help but marvel at the engineering that produced it, as well as the amount of work involved, having spent much of my life building things. But I was struck, at the same time, by the fact that the building?s dimensions were so far beyond human scale, and that that physical fact also expressed the underlying reality of the corporate/human relationship. The mass scale of global institutions has grown beyond human control. It?s a major reason we all feel so helpless.

If we really want to return control of our economy and government to the American people, we?re going to have to find a way to bring our institutions, especially our media, back to human scale.

Michael Hasty lives on a farm in West Virginia, where he wrote a column for seven years for the Hampshire Review, the state?s oldest newspaper. In 2000, it was named best column by the West Virginia Press Association. His writing has appeared in the Charleston Gazette, Online Journal, Common Dreams, Buzzflash, Tikkun and many other websites. He publishes the blog, Radical Pantheist. He plays guitar and harmonica with the folk/gospel trio, the Time Travelers. Email:. radicalpantheist(at)gmail (dot) com.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.



November 17, 2008

Study: Unhappy people watch more TV

An extensive new research study has found that unhappy people watch more TV while those who consider themselves happy spend more time reading and socializing.

The University of Maryland analyzed 34 years of data collected from more than 45,000 participants and found that watching TV might make you feel good in the short term but is more likely to lead to overall unhappiness.

"The pattern for daily TV use is particularly dramatic, with 'not happy' people estimating over 30% more TV hours per day than 'very happy' people," the study says. "Television viewing is a pleasurable enough activity with no lasting benefit, and it pushes aside time spent in other activities -- ones that might be less immediately pleasurable, but that would provide long-term benefits in one?s condition. In other words, TV does cause people to be less happy."

The study, published in the December issue of Social Indicators Research, analyzed data from thousands of people who recorded their daily activities in diaries over the course of several decades. Researchers found that activities such as sex, reading and socializing correlated with the highest levels of overall happiness.
Watching TV, on the other hand, was the only activity that had a direct correlation with unhappiness.

"TV is not judgmental nor difficult, so people with few social skills or resources for other activities can engage in it," says the study. "Furthermore, chronic unhappiness can be socially and personally debilitating and can interfere with work and most social and personal activities, but even the unhappiest people can click a remote and be passively entertained by a TV. In other words, the causal order is reversed for people who watch television; unhappiness leads to television viewing."

Unhappily married couples also watch more TV: "(Happily married couples) engage in 30% more sex, and they attend religious services more and read newspapers on more days," reports the study. "While those not happy with their marriages watch more TV."

Yet there may be good news here for broadcasters. Commenting on the study, co-author John P. Robinson said the worsening economy could boost TV viewing.

"Through good and bad economic times, our diary studies, have consistently found that work is the major activity correlate of higher TV viewing hours," Robinson says. "As people have progressively more time on their hands, viewing hours increase."

Concludes the study: "These points have parallels with addiction; since addictive activities produce momentary pleasure but long-term misery and regret. People most vulnerable to addiction tend to be socially or personally disadvantaged, with TV becoming an opiate."
From:
http://www.thrfeed.com/2008/11/study-unhappy-p.html


 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.


Unfortunately it's easier to go along with the program of increased government control and surveillance in the name of security,then to raise a protest and stick out from the herd.
All the little decisions to agree to submit set precedent,and are considered tacit agreement of the new order expanding police state methods.
Below from:
http://civicsnews.blogspot.com/2008/11/chronicling-surveillance-control-grid.html

Chronicling the Surveillance Control Grid

The Airport: A Freedom-Free Zone

Scott Ritsema
CIVICS NEWS
November 21, 2008

The American surveillance society is one of the worst in the world. According to Privacy International and the Electronic Privacy Information Center,we are among the nine most ?endemic? surveillance societies. The U.S. is supposed to be the beacon of liberty, the example to all the world of what a society of liberty under law ought to look like. But we have become an embarrassment.

Several facets of the surveillance society exist: the police state at the air port, massive biometrics databases of innocents, implantable microchips, secret spy forces, and much more. This report covers just one piece of our massive surveillance society: airports.

Part I: AIRPORTS

You?ve just walked into an airport. Don?t make a joke about a bomb, or you?ll be arrested. Dump out your water before you go through the line. And if you haven?t properly put your personal items in the correct sized zip-lock bags, they will be confiscated.

Is that tooth paste you?re trying to smuggle by? Hand it over. And missy, don?t even think about trying to bring that lip gloss through?that could be a liquid bomb for all we know.

Ma?am, you can?t have that bottle of milk?but it?s for my baby, this is breast milk that I pumped for him?well, you?ll have to take a sip so that I know that it?s not a bomb?I have to drink my own breast milk?...yes, take a sip, Ma?am.

Face it: this is not a free country. The moment you walk into the airport, there are Behavioral Detection Officers examining your ?micro-expressions,? attempting to read your emotions for signs of terroristic motives. This practice began all the way back in 2002. It?s called ?SPOT?: Screening passengers by Observation Technique. Flying make you anxious? TSA make you mad? You?d better not show it, or you might miss your flight and have to pull your pants down for the TSA agents.

The airport police state is illegitimate on its face. It is immoral and unconstitutional. Our women endure sexual humiliation having to bare their breasts, and our men in wheel chairs have their pants taken off in public, and we simply let it go on as if it?s normal.

But if one is not convinced based on a moral calculation or an appeal to the Fourth Amendment, an argument based on pragmatism is necessary. And the verdict is in: airport ?security? does not make us any safer. TSA agents confiscate dangerous water bottles faithfully, while they allow bomb parts and other prohibited items to pass them without a hitch.

You know you?re not living in a free country when there is little to no reaction to the outrageous suggestion that cameras should watch airline passengers from the moment they sit down on the airplane to the moment they get up. That they would actually have the gall to suggest that all passengers should be fitted with shock bracelets should tell us how highly they think of us. We are mere dogs to them.

And does it get any worse than the famed x-ray screeners? You get to choose: endure a good government groping, or a quick peep show. I hate to post inappropriate material, but ask yourself, would you be comfortable having your body (or your sister?s or mother?s) exposed in this fashion?





Then, you really know you?re living in a high tech police state when NASA and the Pentagon say they?re going to read your mind and examine your physiology with bio-scanners in order to determine if you?re a terrorist or not. And getting agitated by the police state will only make you appear suspicious.

Not to mention, they?re watching what you read, where you travel, and even what size bed you sleep in while traveling.

In addition to the litany of creepy Big Brother facets of our so-called free society, much has been said about the no-fly lists and other databases of information about travelers, which are collected and kept without the travelers? knowledge or consent. AP reported,
Without notifying the public, federal agents for the past four years have assigned millions of international travelers, including Americans, computer-generated scores rating the risk they pose of being terrorists or criminals.

The travelers are not allowed to see or directly challenge these risk assessments, which the government intends to keep on file for 40 years.

The scores are assigned to people entering and leaving the United States after computers assess their travel records, including where they are from, how they paid for tickets, their motor vehicle records, past one-way travel, seating preference and what kind of meal they ordered.

The program's existence was quietly disclosed earlier in November when the government put an announcement detailing the Automated Targeting System, or ATS, for the first time in the Federal Register, a fine-print compendium of federal rules. Privacy and civil liberties lawyers, congressional aides and even law enforcement officers said they thought this system had been applied only to cargo.
The Washington Post reported on the ?TIDE? database of supposed terrorists that had quadrupled between 2003 and 2007, heading toward 500,000 names as of March 2007. The same article reminded readers that in 2004 and 2005, a full half of names that were triggered at airports were misidentifications. And that does not account for the innocent people who were identified properly, but were flagged for reasons other than criminal or terrorist activity?namely, those who were flagged intentionally (though illegitimately) for their political activism.

The famed ?do not fly? list, Raw Story reported, was edging toward a million names in 2008. One million terrorists on the U.S. Government?s no-fly list. Wow.

AP reported on the phenomenon of misidentifications that harass travelers:
Thousands of people have been mistakenly linked to names on terror watch lists when they crossed the border, boarded commercial airliners or were stopped for traffic violations, a government report said Friday.

More than 30,000 airline passengers have asked just one agency?the Transportation Security Administration?to have their names cleared from the lists, according to the Government Accountability Office report.

Hundreds of millions of people each year are screened against the lists by Customs and Border Protection, the State Department and state and local law enforcement agencies. The lists include names of people suspected of terrorism or of possibly having links to terrorist activity.

?Misidentifications can lead to delays, intensive questioning and searches, missed flights or denied entry at the border,? the report said. ?Whether appropriate relief is being afforded these individuals is still an open question.?
Last of all, don?t forget that you?re still being watched when you?re on the airplane. Air Marshals went public in 2006 exposing the insane requirement that they fill out ?Surveillance Detection Reports? (SDRs) even if they witnessed no suspicious activity. These whistleblowers told the press that they and other Air Marshals were given monthly quotas of SDRs to fill. How many regular people were placed on a watch list because of their normal airplane conduct? The DenverChannel.com reported:
You could be on a secret government database or watch list for simply taking a picture on an airplane. Some federal air marshals say they're reporting your actions to meet a quota, even though some top officials deny it.

The air marshals, whose identities are being concealed, told 7NEWS that they're required to submit at least one report a month. If they don't, there's no raise, no bonus, no awards and no special assignments.

"Innocent passengers are being entered into an international intelligence database as suspicious persons, acting in a suspicious manner on an aircraft ... and they did nothing wrong," said one federal air marshal.
If we endure all of this, what will we not endure? Will we go to FEMA camps, submit to forced inoculations, hand over our guns, give our children over to the state?

When we endure the most blatant oppression at the airport, and when we stand by as our masters loot the people for trillions of dollars in banker bailouts, one has to really wonder, what won?t we put up with?

And airport tyranny is only one facet of the surveillance society. And the surveillance society is only one facet of the emerging tyranny in America.

Before we can solve our problem, we must first come to terms with the fact that we have a problem. Admit it: we?ve been in denial about our so-called free society. Face it: we?re living in a police state.

---------------------------------------------------------​

[Scott Ritsema teaches AP U.S. History, U.S. Government, and Economics to high school students. He holds a M.A. in History-Political Science-Economics. He runs the news website, CIVICS NEWS, and is the author of the book, The Way, the Truth, and the Sword.]
 

iMaggot

EOG Member
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I wouldn't let any random stranger onto my yacht or even in my car unless they passed a security screening. If you don't feel comfortable with airport security practices, don't use airports. Drive! Or better yet, get a motorcycle, they're much more efficient! If you despirately Need be be across the country or world right away, get a private plane out of a small town airport. Parking is usually free and you can probably find a trainee pilot on craigslist.org that will take you anywhere just for the practice if you just pay for the gas/mainenance/rental/costs, which is around $100/hour as 150 miles per hour, do the math. Fill the small Cessna up with 3 friends, 2 dogs and some luggage and the $1000 or so you spend going from coast to coast adds up to under $250 per person. Comparable to a last minute airline ticket but without the hassle.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

I try to read 2 or 3 books a week....................when I tell people this..............they look at me as some form of alien.
ZZ;
Is it the practice of reading a physical paper book that's alien,and are people still reading books etc.as much just in a different way[eg.download e-books,or on-line]?
Or is reading being replaced by other media altogether,and in decline generally.
There's lots of trouble in the book publishing world.Without this traditional way of creating worthwhile well written/edited content,what new business model will arise to get the word out instead?


How to Be an Alien (Penguin Readers)
Penguin Books Ltd| ISBN 0140816755 |1998-02-26 | PDF | 48 pages | 1.69 MB
http://flmsdown.net/2007/07/21/page/2/

Major US publisher not buying new books

By Jane Stimmen
December 16,2008
Excerpts from:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/dec2008/book-d16.shtml


...recent news developments have been no less startling in the publishing world. According to a November 24[2008] report in the industry paper, Publishers Weekly, "Josef Blumenfeld, vice president of communications for HMH [Houghton Mifflin Harcourt], confirmed that the publisher has ?temporarily stopped acquiring manuscripts' across its trade and reference divisions."

In an effort to be reassuring, apparently, Blumenfeld added that this is "not a permanent change," although the article did not indicate when new manuscripts would again be considered. It is not clear as to whether manuscripts already approved and set for release would make it to bookshelves.

A number of literary agents consulted by Publishers Weekly said they had never heard of a major publisher instructing its editors to stop buying manuscripts. "I've been in the business a long time and at a couple of houses I worked at, when things were bad, we were asked to cut back," said agent Jonathon Lazear. "But I've never heard of anything so public."...The Boston Globe noted the freeze for an indefinite period was "a virtually unheard-of act by a major publisher."

Houghton Mifflin officials deny that the company is for sale, but speculation is rife. Education Media and Publishing Group, which owns the publisher, carries some $7 billion in debt.
In early December[2008] Houghton's publisher of the company's adult trade division resigned, reportedly in protest against the freeze on acquiring new books. Days later, the company announced that it was "streamlining" its educational business and eliminating jobs in both its education and general divisions.

HarperCollins and Pearson, parent company of Penguin, have reported a freeze on wages and the possibility of layoffs.

The various announcements come on the heels of a leaked internal memo in which Random House, which is owned by the international media conglomerate Bertelsmann, proclaimed that it would freeze all pensions at their current level and would not offer pensions to people hired after January 1, 2009.
There have since been reports of a major restructuring of the publishing houses under Random's umbrella, with the number being reduced from five to three.

...San Francisco-based Chronicle Books announced that it will be cutting back almost 5 percent of its staff due to the outlook for 2009. Macmillan has announced a pay freeze for staff earning $50,000 and over, and the establishment of a pool to provide for modest increases for those earning less. Simon & Schuster announced the elimination of 35 jobs, and Thomas Nelson slashed 54 positions.

Over the last two decades, many publishing houses have been absorbed by non-publishing entities, and the emphasis has been on making fast (and large) profits for the shareholders, rather than on building a solid literary or cultural institution. In the last few years, even the largest of houses have been taken over, merged with or outright bought by enormous entities whose bottom line is not cultural enrichment. These new organizations show a lack of willingness to take chances on new literature, and a quick abandonment of any projects that do not garner immediate attention. As we see in the case of HMH, in tough economic times even the supposed raison d'?tre of a publisher?to find and publish new material?is sacrificed to cut costs.

Concurrently, the retail aspects of the book business underwent several major changes?from the rise of the "big box" bookstores and the resulting explosion of retail shelf space at a time when readership had been declining to the advent of the Internet as a shopping venue. Both had an adverse effect on the more traditional independent bookstores, with many going under, partly due to the publishers' refusal of deep discounts that the larger chains were offered.

The current economic situation is also felt by the large chains. Borders has been teetering on the brink of bankruptcy for months, and its third-quarter reports show overall sales down 10 percent . Should the company fail, the return of product would be more than most publishers could fiscally bear, and approximately 30,000 workers would be rendered unemployed. The ripple effect would also very likely take down distributing companies, who would be forced to reduce staff as well.

While certain independent stores are able to scrape by on the strength of the demand for used books, the resource is not infinite; it does take the publishing of new books to eventually supply that market. Were the publishers to fail, even the stores that exclusively sell used books would see their stock dwindle. In recent years, the number of failed independent bookstores has increased, succumbing to the economic pressures of meeting increased rents and decreased sales.

The book business has not until recently been viewed as a means to get rich. Very often, writers and sellers of the books have scraped by, their love for words and ideas taking precedence over profit. The same can be said of many publishers and presses, some of which have maintained that integrity and a number of which are still producing vibrant, unusual and original works. Rather than banking on the Next Big Thing, or, as is more common now, The Next Blockbuster Sequel, they have built their reputations on presenting well-written, enduring works with an eye to artistic merit.
 

scrimmage

What you contemplate you imitate
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.



The "24" series and future Presidents,"Heroes", New World Order, it's not farfetched to think TV watching can influence how the mass viewing audience perceives their world.
Besides advertising what other information can be shaped and passed along to be uncritcally absorbed by American couch potatos.

Excerpts below from:
http://www.naturalnews.com/024530.html
Television May Be Doing Your Thinking

Saturday, October 18, 2008 by: Lynn Berry

NaturalNews) The world's biggest leisure activity is watching television. Not walking or reading, not playing games with our children, not engaging with others in outdoor activities. Most of us like to think that television has absolutely no effect on how we think or what we do. We believe that it is a way to relax. Many of us may be surprised to know that television is a controlling medium, relaxing us enough to switch off our analytical brain (the left side of the brain) so that we uncritically, or unlogically, process the information beaming from the television. This means we are less able to make decisions or judgments about what we hear on television.

Our brains undergo a similar process under hypnosis. The similarity between hypnosis and the effects of watching television is unveiled in Dr Aric Sigman's book called Remotely Controlled. Sigman describes hypnosis as "an altered state of consciousness"; a form of sleepwalking where our mind is influenced by another (the hypnotist or practitioner).

Under hypnosis we become more open to the suggestions of the practitioner and this happens as we are asked to refrain from being critical and relaxed. As we do this, the frontal lobe in our brain alters becoming less connected with the brain so that we switch off. Hypnosis effectively causes a change in the brain so that we use the right side of our brain. What we switch off is the left side used for critical thinking.

While hypnosis may be considered an extreme or unusual solution to certain conditions, it only takes 30 seconds for us to be in a similar state when we switch on the television. Such were the findings from Professor Herbert Krugman in a study conducted in 1971. His conclusion was that we do not think about the information transmitted via television. In other words the way television communicates is a form of brainwashing.

Left in this state for some time can mean that we become less inventive in problem-solving and less able to concentrate.

The frontal lobe also alters in the brain when watching television. The frontal lobe is an important part of the brain as it is a management type system ensuring that our self-control, moral judgment and attention is planned, organised and sequenced. The concern is that the frontal lobe may be damaged by watching television and this may happen in childhood because the frontal lobe is in a continual stage of development until around 20 years of age.

It is not the information itself that causes the problem, but rather the medium. Somehow we are electrically wired to the television enabling information to be absorbed ? any information. The medium induces within us a passive state for communication. If we are unconsciously absorbing information, then what is this information doing to the way we think and act? Of course, the medium is a perfect match for advertisers.

FaculTV


Justus (Reginald Butler, rnb), is a visual artist and writer. He has worked as an animator, color artist and designer within the New York animation industry. Credits include work for Sesame Workshop, MTVU, Nickelodeon, Curious Pictures, and color supervision on Fox?s Ninja Turtles Fast Forward. He is simply passionate about creating and pitching ideas! Justus is his prized online comic. It has been published in The Brooklyn Free Press, The Minneapolis Liberator, Free Comics NYC, Blow Magazine, Blackcommentator.com, and The Hook.
FaculTV from:
http://www.blackcommentator.com/310/310_cartoon_facultv_justus.html
 

Doc Mercer

EOG Master
Re: True Lies,The New World Order in minutes.

Scrimmage:

Has Munchkin Man given ya his "always short commentary" feedback yet?
 
Top