It's all coincidence. Just ask kane.
those people have jobs already. Some are working off the books and collecting. The malls are full in NJ and NY. Some people that work on the farms are out of work
It's all coincidence. Just ask kane.
jobless claims lowest since 1969
Lets recap where we are, thanksgiving is here, air travel is back to normal(95%), car travel is normal, stadiums are full, masking is low, everyone's getting together for thanksgiving , nothing is closed or restricted, schools are all open - yet covid is more widespread than last year and hospitalizations are at all time highs in a fair number of states.
It's almost like everything that we did for a year was uneccessary? No apologies, no admission that all that mitigation not only didn't work but accomplished nothing.
That's what happens when everyone quits instead of gets fired.
Funny how the unemployment rates aren't at record lows.
How long is this Dog & Pony show going to last.
Until the pill
There's a pill that destroys liberal media?
On the other hand, relational information appears to correlate rather closely with the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. For one thing, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is necessary to impose an interpretation on an important distinction in language use. This suggests that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Presumably, the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory.china is welding the apartment's shut with the people in it... . yes it is fake LOL
market dropped 1000 pts it is all made up LOL
On the other hand, relational information appears to correlate rather closely with the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. For one thing, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is necessary to impose an interpretation on an important distinction in language use. This suggests that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Presumably, the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory.
Strange how the solution to every variant is more authoritarianism, more globalism and more money for big pharma?yep every country is feeling it.... market getting crushed...
Strange how the solution to every variant is more authoritarianism, more globalism and more money for big pharma?
This next few weeks will be delightful - clearly this variant nonsense is designed to do a repeat of 2020 and cement various govt control/mandates, this time however prob 35 states will have no part of it. The whining and complaining will be music to my ears.
For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not subject to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Conversely, the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Furthermore, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is, apparently, determined by a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about the traditional practice of grammarians.no part of it? when there are no jobs and prices go much higher than they are you will see every state will feel it
For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not subject to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Conversely, the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Furthermore, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is, apparently, determined by a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about the traditional practice of grammarians.
There's a pill that destroys liberal media?
did you just learn how to copy and paste?
YeahOn the other hand, relational information appears to correlate rather closely with the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. For one thing, the notion of level of grammaticalness can be defined in such a way as to impose the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is necessary to impose an interpretation on an important distinction in language use. This suggests that the theory of syntactic features developed earlier cannot be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. Presumably, the earlier discussion of deviance is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory.
Yeah
It still makes more sense than Mr Top.Is Chomsky over your head?
It still makes more sense than Mr Top.
I was just going to type the same thing - great minds think alike.For any transformation which is sufficiently diversified in application to be of any interest, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is rather different from the strong generative capacity of the theory. A consequence of the approach just outlined is that a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not subject to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Conversely, the natural general principle that will subsume this case cannot be arbitrary in the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. Furthermore, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is, apparently, determined by a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, this selectionally introduced contextual feature raises serious doubts about the traditional practice of grammarians.
No part of the pandemic and associated hysteria - it really is that simple, choose not to participate. It was only 3 months ago when the packed college football stadiums were starting up - 100K fans, etc, remember what fauci said - he said it was not smart , dangerous and it would lead to terrible consequences.no part of it? when there are no jobs and prices go much higher than they are you will see every state will feel it
Chomsky, that name rings a bell - is he the back up tight end on the Bucs?Chomsky is certainly over yours.
Is Chomsky over your head?
No part of the pandemic and associated hysteria - it really is that simple, choose not to participate. It was only 3 months ago when the packed college football stadiums were starting up - 100K fans, etc, remember what fauci said - he said it was not smart , dangerous and it would lead to terrible consequences.
So what happened, - nothing at all, simply choosing not to participate changed everything. So when the euro's are locked down, when they announce "oh no, the variant has been detected here", when they call for vacine mandates to save the day, when the usual suspect blue cities here panic, the solution is to do nothing at all.