Fezzik GOY Part II

lol at 47.5 last night. A brief eyeball during the week, available for a half hour on the 13th, immediately to 46.5.

I'm surprised he didn't release the opener of 50.5, but that could never happen without some info from the screen.
 
If Steve wins the circa millions can we call him the stu Unger of sports betting contests?

The increase in sales of his nfl package will make rj and Steve millions.

I guess that's why RJ is so excited for this free marketing since his supercontest gold entry is dog shit
 
If Steve wins the circa millions can we call him the stu Unger of sports betting contests?

The increase in sales of his nfl package will make rj and Steve millions.

I guess that's why RJ is so excited for this free marketing since his supercontest gold entry is dog shit


More credence that Fezzik is the ultimate contest player. Paid picks? Yikes!

Would you back Jamie Gold in a ring game?
 
Interesting on Wong teasers, you never see him pump up a medium size dog like GB today. Always +7.5 or +8 with
a small dog. The point is, as a tout, he's so scared to stray far from a favorite. I remember on Fezzik's Place him
and Dreamer debating his -17 on a side (CFB) versus the current number +21.5. Fezzik arguing -17 was the much
better number.

His service is 100% designed for squares unfortunatly most squares only have one or two outs, that's not ideal finding his
props and/or numbers.
 
11/24/23 Friday (7/22/23 8:32am) Akron RSW OVER 3.5 -140 [2-10] CFB 2 L -2.8
11/24/23 Friday (11/24/23 7:17am) Michigan St +22.5 [0-42] CFB 2 L -2.2
11/24/23 Friday (11/24/23 7:17am) Oregon St +14 [7-31] CFB 2 L -2.2
11/24/23 Friday (11/24/23 7:17am) Tulane ML -165 [29-16] CFB 2 W 2

YTD +54.05u

50% increase
10k roll now at 15k

Minus his fees
 
You know it's not your year when your lean on a micro total (CFB) wins but 1Q under loses. (-160).


PS. NFL turkey teaser loser not yet graded.
 
Fezzik missed a easy unit on Philly/KC prop.

'Yes' a Swift would be at the game was a easy winner at -10000. 😅
 
Fezzik has been only able to win ML (-160) to (-500) college and NFL plays of late. I was calling Fezzik Vegas Dave Jr. Maybe I should change his name to Vegas Dave Sr. Lol
 
Vegas Dave is not up big on EVERY SINGLE Vegas Sports Book APP. EVERY ONE.

Anyone who disputes this can bet me AND CHOOSE any of the places and we can bet the annual will show a profit.
 
It's interesting. A B2B NFL champ is adverse to NFL sides unless he can pick off a rogue number in July for a September game.

However he trusts his CFB sides, which are brutal.
 
Last edited:
Fezzik's teasers are identical to Krackman's. I can't figure out if Fezzik originates (lol) or Krack.

Krack seems to be enamored with Fezzik and his advantage ability when he talks on Fox radio, so
I have to assume he copies Fezzik.
 
Fezzik's teasers are identical to Krackman's. I can't figure out if Fezzik originates (lol) or Krack.

Krack seems to be enamored with Fezzik and his advantage ability when he talks on Fox radio, so
I have to assume he copies Fezzik.
they both copy wong, mindless
 
they both copy wong, mindless

Wong teasers are named after Stanford Wong, a pseudonym for John Ferguson who actually went to Oregon State. "Wong" specialized in blackjack counting systems ("Professional Blackjack") and later dice setting ("Wong on Dice"). He wrote the book "Sharp Sports Betting".

Kind of funny that the chapter on teasers was essentially written by Fezzik who collaborated with Wong on the SSB forum for several years. So Fezzik is copying himself. LOL
 
Wong teasers are named after Stanford Wong, a pseudonym for John Ferguson who actually went to Oregon State. "Wong" specialized in blackjack counting systems ("Professional Blackjack") and later dice setting ("Wong on Dice"). He wrote the book "Sharp Sports Betting".

Kind of funny that the chapter on teasers was essentially written by Fezzik who collaborated with Wong on the SSB forum for several years. So Fezzik is copying himself. LOL
every tourist in town betting the nfl were already doing wongs long before steve arrived.
 
every tourist in town betting the nfl were already doing wongs long before steve arrived.

I don't know about every tourist, but in 1993 I met a friend who did nothing but NFL and selected college 6 pt teasers, usually just taking favorites thru 3 and 7, down to 2.5 points or less. He had been doing it for around 8 to 10 years. I asked him why and he just said it the only way he found that he could win consistently.

I looked into it and lo and behold, it was quite the winning dataset. Of course, I also found that NFL dogs were a winning subset if teased back thru 3 and 7 to 7.5 or more.
 
Wong teasers are named after Stanford Wong, a pseudonym for John Ferguson who actually went to Oregon State. "Wong" specialized in blackjack counting systems ("Professional Blackjack") and later dice setting ("Wong on Dice"). He wrote the book "Sharp Sports Betting".

Kind of funny that the chapter on teasers was essentially written by Fezzik who collaborated with Wong on the SSB forum for several years. So Fezzik is copying himself. LOL
A year before Wong's book, Don Peszynski's (Donnie P) book "Win More Lose Less- Maximizing Profits on NFL Wagering" addressed Basic Strategy Teasers, but he was never credited in the fashion Wong has been through the years. I know he collaborated with Yao' book "Weighing the Odds in Sports Betting", not sure if he worked with Wong.
 
A year before Wong's book, Don Peszynski's (Donnie P) book "Win More Lose Less- Maximizing Profits on NFL Wagering" addressed Basic Strategy Teasers, but he was never credited in the fashion Wong has been through the years. I know he collaborated with Yao' book "Weighing the Odds in Sports Betting", not sure if he worked with Wong.
90% of the bettors in casino were using them before someone name and claim it and write a book, its no invention
 
A rather bad day for Fezzik in the Circa Million contest. The entry currently in 2nd place is 0-2, the other four are 0-2, 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2.
 
A rather bad day for Fezzik in the Circa Million contest. The entry currently in 2nd place is 0-2, the other four are 0-2, 0-4, 0-3, and 0-2.

A little better luck as most of the Circa leaders also had poor results. Fezzic-2 is 2-2 with the Jags -8.5 pending, the others went 2-2, 1-4, 0-4, 1-4.

An oddity that my one entry matched 4 of 5 of Fezzic-2's picks.
 
A nice thing about this contest is that the $6.5M prize is spread out across the top 100 or so entries so even if you don't get the top spot should still be a nice payday. And of course once you get close to the end, assuming still top 10, definitely opportunities to hedge. I believe they also have a consolation prize for last place.
 
Back
Top