Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

<header class="story-header" style="margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 7px; padding-bottom: 24px; padding-left: 12px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 15px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dotted; border-bottom-color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Tiimes, 'New Times Roman', serif; line-height: 19px; "><hgroup style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; ">CITE OBAMA WITH CONTEMPT, LAWYERS URGE
.”</hgroup></header>

Contempt of what?????:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]Judge soundly rejects Ga. birther claims[/h]5:25 pm February 3, 2012, by Jay
Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi has rendered his judgment, breaking birther hearts all over the country: Barack Obama will remain on the 2012 primary and general election ballot in Georgia.

The judge’s written opinion
all but drips with scorn for the absurd case presented to him by Orly Taitz and her colleagues:
“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations…. None of the testifying witnesses offered persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the plaintiffs, the court concludes the plaintiffs’ claims are not persuasive.”
In other words, the birthers finally got a judge to listen to their “evidence,” and even with no opposing counsel in the courtroom, the judge concluded that their case was total and complete bunk.
Cue the caterwauling ….
UPDATE: The estimable Brosephus, down in comments, found video of the judge rendering his decision. I think it’s worthy of a promotion:
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/M5QGkOGZubQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>
– Jay Bookman
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

How bad is it when Obama's lawyer does not show up and still win's???:lol:lol
I am sure Joe will be on screaming ''just wait until Sheriff Joe's report comes out'':LMAO
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=3]Attorney Mark Hatfield Responds To Judge Malihi's Ruling In The Georgia Ballot Challenge[/h]
OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/attorney-mark-hatfield-responds-to.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2012-02-03T16:16:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">4:16 PM</abbr>
Georgia Judge Rules Against Plaintiffs:
Attorney Mark Hatfield "taking it up on appeal"
Article II Super PAC Email

Greetings,

As you know we were expecting word out of Georgia today and we got it. Late this afternoon Judge Malihi issued his ruling against all four Plaintiffs.

We caught up with Swensson/Powell's counsel, Mark Hatfield, late this afternoon to get his initial take on the ruling. Here is what he stated ?obviously we are disappointed w/the decision, but there are a couple of items in the ruling that we are looking at. First, the Judge never made any ruling on who has the burden of proof even though he indicated in chambers prior to the hearing that making the determination of the burden of proof laid with Defendant Obama." He went onto state "the Judge has a record of placing the burden on the candidate, but didn't do so in this case." Another point Hatfield made was the ?Indiana Court of Appeals ruling in Arkeny elevates the Indiana case above the Constitution" while also noting the Judge ignored the Minor court in Minor v Happersett, a ruling that clearly defined natural born Citizen, established precedent. When asked about next steps Hatfield stated "we are going full bore and taking it up on appeal?. :houra

Click this link to read Judge Malihi's ruling - [url]http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html[/URL]

We will be following this in detail and will keep you abreast of activities as they unfold.

Remember, this isn't a race instead we are running a marathon.

Sincerely,
Helen Tansey
Director
Article II Super PAC
director@Art2SuperPAC
804.840.1449

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

xxxxx
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

. When asked about next steps Hatfield stated "we are going full bore and taking it up on appeal”. :houra


Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.

:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
Besides Joe is anyone dumb enough to send any money now??
:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

How is the challenge in Illinois going???:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=2]Birthers lose two more state ballot challenges[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-02T23:09:42-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 2, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES
Challenges from two birthers in Illinois were overruled by the State Board of Elections today. I’ve written about the challenges by Freeman and Jackson, and how they were very similar to the arguments put forward in Georgia by Weldon, Swensson and Powell. Obama’s representative in Illinois filed a copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate and that carried the day.
The state ballot challenge score: Obama 4, Birthers 0.

:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
They got him now Joe!!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=2]Malihi: Obama eligible[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-03T18:28:21-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 3, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES
In an anxiously awaited decision, Georgia administrative law judge Michael Malihi handed down a 10-page decision ruling Barack Obama eligible to be on the Georgia Democratic Primary Ballot.
Regarding the witnesses presented by Orly Taitz, Judge Malihi found a definite lack of substance, writing:
The Court finds testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs’ allegations.
The judge criticized Orly Taitz for failing to establish that her witnesses were indeed qualified to give expert testimony. In Georgia, Malihi wrote, “the unqualified testimony of the witness [is] not competent evidence.” He said: “neither witness was properly qualified or tendered as an expert in birth records, forged documents or document manipulation.”
Judge Malihi then went on to address the claims of plaintiffs Swensson and Powell that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen because his father was not a US Citizen.
In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.
Bless his heart.
More information at the Atlanta Journal Constitution.
Read the decision:

:3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=2]It’s time for birthers to throw Orly under the bus[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-03T20:03:08-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 3, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES, ORLY TAITZ
Farrar didn’t have a chance
I’ve read Judge Michael Malihi’s decision in the case ofFarrar v. Obama and it is clear to me that David Farrar didn’t have a chance. Farrar’s claim, presented by his attorney Orly Taitz (pictured right), was that Barack Obama has a forged birth certificate, a fraudulent social-security number and a false name. That’s a pretty substantial claim and ought to require some serious evidence. Orly Taitz called witnesses, but since her legal skills are abysmal, she didn’t bother with details like establishing the qualifications of her witnesses, or validating their methodology. Judge Malihi pointed this out multiple times in his ruling, saying: “neither witness was properly qualified or tendered as an expert in birth records, forged documents or document manipulation.” Apparently just using Adobe Illustrator in your work doesn’t make you an expert (re: Felicito Papa).
Just as Obama’s attorney Jablonsky forfeited his chance to refute birther claims because of his failure to appear, so Orly Taitz forfeited any chance of proving her claims because of her failure to establish the credentials of her witnesses and their methodology. She might as well have stayed in California for all the good she did.
I sat in the courtroom on the 26th and I yearned to be able to object to what I saw: unqualified witnesses and a total lack of rigor in the Plaintiff’s case. That needn’t have concerned me because administrative law judges in Georgia apply the rules of evidence themselves when they review testimony, and Malihi saw what I saw, nothing of substance. He wrote:
The Court finds testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs’ allegations.
Orly’s case was so bad that she lost when the defendant didn’t even show up.
I want to add just one thing before the birthers throw Orly Taitz under the bus as a scapegoat for losing the one case decided on the merits where they actually got to present witnesses in favor of the birther version of Obama’s origins. That is, not only did David Farrar not have a chance, Orly Taitz didn’t have a chance either because she could not have established the qualifications her witnesses if she had tried, nor any of the birther fraud witnesses that dance around the Internet, because they are not qualified. The whole birther movement is just a bunch of amateurs and cranks, Orly Taitz queen among them.

:3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

, nor any of the birther fraud witnesses that dance around the Internet,

HINT, HINT, HINT!!WINK,WINK,WINK.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

The cost of having your attorney NOT appear, $0.
The cost of having the opposing party enter all of your documents for you, $0.
The cost of having the opposing party present testimony, $0.

The cost of the look on their face?s when they realize they just shot themselves in their foot,
PRICELESS!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]VA – Tisdale v Obama – Natural born means born on soil[/h]The lower court observed… Another court ruling on the merits, or lack thereof…
“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens”.

 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

VA – Tisdale v Obama – Natural born means born on soil

The lower court observed… Another court ruling on the merits, or lack thereof…
“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens”.

:LMAO:LMAOToday is the birfers 9-11!!Yet another loss!!What a shock I tell ya.:houra
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

The government, in its Supreme Court brief, acknowledged that if Wong Kim Ark was a citizen he was eligible to be President. The Supreme Court upheld the District Court ruling without exception.
-- The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions (1999)

:3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]Georgia on my mind[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-03T22:00:32-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 3, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES
It’s been an interesting couple of weeks – first the anticipation of the “hearing of the century” in Atlanta, the battle of the titans Orly Taitz and Barack Obama. Then there was the chance to meet some of my fellow anti-birthers who are without exception, exceptional. The hearing itself was draining as I listened with just a tiny bit of anxiety as nonsense was entered into the record without challenge, Obama and his attorney having chosen not to show up. Then there was the wait to see the court would say, as birthers commented here while visions of inevitable victory danced in their heads.
It was around 5 PM today that I checked Google News to search for “Malihi” and saw the headline at the Atlanta Journal Constitution, Judge: Obama eligible to be Georgia Candidate. I raced to get something up on the blog and then took time to actually read the ruling from Judge Malihi.
What struck me was the wholly unremarkable nature of the ruling: it was all so anti-climactic. In fact, it is just like all those other unremarkable court decisions I’ve read, going back to the 18th century. They all make perfect sense (well, except Dred Scott).
What the judge in Atlanta said was that he uses the same rules of evidence as other courts. Expert testimony has to come from experts, and the qualifications of experts must be established – and they weren’t. The judge said that a methodology must be validated, and Susan Daniels didn’t show why her searches of error-filled public databases constituted a valid methodology. I’ve said over and over again that nothing the birthers think is “evidence” would be admissible in court. Today I’m proven right.
Today’s ruling reminds me of a joke from my youth (and I apologize in advance to those who take offense at animal cruelty). The story goes that a man was unable to get his mule to turn in the direction he wanted. A passerby said that you just had to know how to talk to a mule. The fellow took a two-by-four and hit the mule upside the head and yelled “gee” and the mule turned. The mule’s owner said, “I thought you said you could just talk to the mule” and the reply was, “yes, but first you have to get their attention.”
Birthers aren’t very good at paying attention, and in particular to the Indiana Court’s ruling in Ankeny v Daniels. Birthers have simply blown off this case: some say the Court got it wrong, some say it was dicta. I said that Ankeny shows how any court will look at claims that US Presidents must have citizen parents – they will take one look atUS v Wong and say “not so.” I was right as Judge Malihi found the Court’s argument in Ankeny persuasive. Birthers get their hopes up so high when there’s no justification whatever for their optimism. I hope (and it’s a small hope) that this new ruling from Georgia will be the two-by-four upside the mulish heads of the birthers. They’ve lost 100 court cases and they should stop making excuses and read the handwriting on the wall: “YOU ARE WRONG.”
So I challenge birthers, and in particular Dean Haskins, to stop and think a minute. The Indiana Court of Appeals says that you’re wrong about what defines a “natural born citizen.” The hearing officer and counsel for the Illinois State Board of Elections just said that you’re wrong. Judge Malihi in Atlanta said today that you’re wrong. No court has ever agreed with you. Did it ever occur to you that the Congress unanimously certified the 2008 election without objection because you’re wrong? Why don’t you change the name of The Birther Summit to Oops!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")



Step back Joe!!It is not worth it Joe!!Come on man you have other things in life to look foreword too.:scooter
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")


Come on Joe find a hobby or something.Don't do it Joe!!:btj:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")



Trust me Joe it will get better!!
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Back in December, the 9th Circuit Appellate Ct affirmed the District Court throwing out the birther claims.

Yesterday, they had their petition for rehearing denied.

Plaintiffs-Appellants contend that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States. United States District Court Judge David O. Carter dismissed Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims, as well as their claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, for lack of standing. We affirm the dismissal for lack of standing, albeit on somewhat different reasoning than that of the District Court.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2011/12/22/0956827.pdf


:3dapplaudir:
:3dapplaudir:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Attorney Hatfield's Response to GA Secretary of State about Judge Malihi's Erroneous Decision

OBAMARELEASE YOURRECORDS ON <a class="timestamp-link" href="http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/02/attorney-hatfields-response-to-ga.html" rel="bookmark" title="permanent link" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(88, 140, 184); outline-style: none; outline-width: initial; outline-color: initial; "><abbr class="published" title="2012-02-07T05:14:00-08:00" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; ">5:14 AM
</abbr>



Attorney Mark Hatfield's Response to Georgia Secretary of State
Brian Kemp About Judge Malihi's Erroneous Decision
Article II Super PAC Email


Greetings,

Kevin Powell and Carl Swensson's counsel, Mark Hatfield, early this morning sent his response to judicial errors of fact and law to Georgia's Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, in response to Judge Michael Malihi's decision in the Georgia ballot challenge.

Click this link to read Attorney Hatfield's response - http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Below is the ending portion of Attorney Hatfield's 6-page rebuttal letter to the Georgia Secretary of State. Read the whole letter!

"Please note that the foregoing cited errors, omissions, and flaws in Judge Malihi's "Decision" are not intended to be exhaustive, and Plaintiffs specifically reserve the right to raise other claims of error hereafter.

Mr. Secretary, as you deliberate on your final determination of Defendant Obama's qualifications to seek and hold office, I am requesting, on behalf of my clients, that you consider the posture of these matters. Defendant Obama has initiated the submission of his name as a candidate to be listed on the Georgia Democratic Presidential Ballot. Likewise, in accordance with their rights under Georgia law, my clients have raised a challenge to the Defendant's qualifications as a "natural born Citizen" pursuant to Article II of the United States Constitution. The Defendant and his lawyer tried, unsuccessfully, to have my clients' challenges dismissed. The Defendant was then legally served with a Notice to Produce, requiring him to appear at trial and to bring certain documents and items of evidence with him. The Defendant did not object. When the time for trial was imminent, the Defendant's lawyer wrote a letter to you in which he boldly criticized and attacked the judge and in which he stated that he and his client were refusing to come to court. The day of trial, after you warned him that his failure to appear would be at his own peril, the Defendant and his lawyer nevertheless failed to appear for court and failed to comply with the Plaintiffs' valid Notice to Produce. The Defendant thus not only presented no evidence of his own, but he failed to produce significant pieces of evidence to which Plaintiffs were legally entitled. Inexplicably, Judge Malihi, after verbally acknowledging Plaintiffs' entitlement to a "default judgment," then entered an order fully favorable to the recalcitrant Defendant, and to top it off, the judge refused to even acknowledge Plaintiffs' attempts to have Defendant held accountable for his purposefully contemptuous behavior in ignoring Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce.

Doesn't this result sound unreasonable? Doesn't this result appear on its face unfair? Doesn't this result in fact suggest that the Defendant is above the law?

Mr. Secretary, I am respectfully requesting on behalf of my clients that you render a decision in this matter that treats Defendant Obama no different than any other candidate seeking access to the Georgia ballot who fails and refuses to present evidence of his or her qualifications for holding office and who disregards the authority of our judiciary. I request that my clients' challenges to Defendant Obama's qualifications be sustained and upheld.

Finally, in view of the rapidly approaching Presidential Preference Primary in Georgia on March 6, 2012, I respectfully request that you enter a decision in these matters on an expedited basis."

READ THE FULL LETTER DEBUNKING THE DECISION BY JUDGE MALIHI HERE. IT ALSO DEBUNKS CLAIMS MADE BY OTHERS.

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

Please visit www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure donation to help cover legal costs associated with this GA ballot challenge.

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

"The day of trial, after you warned him that his failure to appear would be at his own peril, the Defendant and his lawyer nevertheless failed to appear for court and failed to comply with the Plaintiffs' valid Notice to Produce. The Defendant thus not only presented no evidence of his own, but he failed to produce significant pieces of evidence to which Plaintiffs were legally entitled."


:pOP:
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Dr. Conspiracy BALLOT CHALLENGES, LOUNGE

I would have preferred that Obama’s attorney had showed up this morning in Atlanta to make a vigorous defense and say all those things I was itching to say. I would have liked to have seen the COLB up close and personal. It didn’t happen.

"make a vigorous defense and say all those things I was itching to say"
"seen the COLB up close and personal"

::LMAO::

That's right, Mister Ignorant Far Left Commie Nut Job, it didn't happen.

It will never happen.

Four years after the "crime of the century", the American people have yet to see a shred of evidence that the Kenyan fraud is who he claims he is.

I don't give a flying fuck how many Kool-Aid drinkers voted for him, the UNDENIABLE FACT is HE'S NOT ELIGIBLE!

 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Tuesday, February 7, 2012
. The Defendant was then legally served with a Notice to Produce, requiring him to appear at trial
:LMAOThey still don't get it!!Sheriff Joe's attorney already explained it to you idiots.Why are you dumb enough to try and say it is valid for Obama but not for Sheriff Joe?:houra
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

" UNDENIABLE FACT is HE'S NOT ELIGIBLE!
0-99 in court cases and yet we still have retards saying this!I would say prove it but facts do not exist in birfer world.''Just wait until Sheriff Joe's report comes out''!!:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]Brian Kemp rejects birthers, declares Barack Obama will remain on ballot[/h]12:57 pm February 7, 2012, by jgalloway
Secretary of State Brian Kemp has put to bed – finally, we hope — the birther challenge to Democratic incumbent Barack Obama’s place on the March 6 presidential primary ballot. From the just-issued press release:
Secretary Kemp stated, “After careful consideration of Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi’s initial decision and all record evidence based on the criteria set forth in this process, I find that the Respondent, President Barack Obama, meets the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements. President Barack Obama’s name shall remain on the Democratic Party’s 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot.”
It feels odd to congratulate Kemp for doing the sane and obvious thing, but there you go.

:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=2]Kemp affirms Obama for Georgia Primary[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-07T15:11:05-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 7, 2012</abbr> in BALLOT CHALLENGES
Yawn. There was simply no chance that Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp would fail to affirm the ruling of Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi that Barack Obama was qualified to appear on the Georgia Democratic Preference Primary ballot on Tuesday, March 6.
In a press release issued today, the Secretary is quoted:
After careful consideration of Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi’s initial decision and all record evidence based on the criteria set forth in this process, I find that the Respondent, President Barack Obama, meets the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements. President Barack Obama’s name shall remain on the Democratic Party’s 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot.
In a move designed to prevent injury and premature death among Georgia’s birther population, the Secretary refrained from using the obviously implied phrase: “natural born citizen.”

:3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir::3dapplaudir:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

[h=1]Out of the frying pan and into the Apuzzo[/h]by Dr. Conspiracy on <abbr class="date time published" title="2012-02-07T02:10:35-0500" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; border-image: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; border-bottom-style: dashed; border-bottom-color: rgb(153, 153, 153); cursor: help; ">FEBRUARY 7, 2012</abbr> in BIRTHERS, DEAN HASKINS, LEO DONOFRIO, MARIO APUZZO, ORLY TAITZ
If we’ve learned anything over the past month, it is that there are varying degrees of crazy and that not all birthers are created equal.
Early in the birther movement we saw the Great Schism between the Eastern Orthodox birthers, lead by the patriarch Philip Berg (those of Eastern faith believe Barack Obama was born in Kenya, but that if he had been born in the United States, then he was born a natural born citizen) and the Catholic birthers, known for their veneration of the Blessed Orly Taitz (BOT), who believe Obama was not a natural born citizen wherever he was born because his father was British. Pope Leo Donofrio is the spiritual father of this group and Mario Apuzzo heads the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The official split between the two groups was the Taitz v. Liberi lawsuit in which each side excommunicated the other and damned them to hell.
Corruption within the Catholic birther movement has led some to question the infallibility of its leadership. These so-called Protestant Birthers are led by the reformer Dean Haskins. Haskins broke with the Catholic birthers through his heterodox refusal to venerate the BOT. Haskins has used a historical-critical methodology to show why the veneration of Taitz is against the long-term interests of the faith.
While I can describe these denominational categories and perhaps some will find them useful, the birther sheep in the flock may not clearly discern the divisions, and may remain in a state of internal self contradiction.
This brings me to the instance of David Farrar. The BOT is, after all, his attorney, a most sacred institutional attachment. Nevertheless, it appears that Farrar was appalled at the letter Taitz wrote (ostensibly on his behalf) to the Georgia Secretary of State, a letter making a scurrilous attack against a Georgia Judge.

I think Farrar is on the verge of a crisis of faith. On the one hand, he must separate himself from what he considers the outrageous actions of the BOT, but on the other hand his faith in the movement is tied to his faith in her. This contradiction expressed itself in a letter from Farrar to Secretary Kemp (the full text of the Farrar letter is at the bottom of this article):
Dear Sec. Kemp,
Please allow me an opportunity to disassociate myself from any and all criminal allegations made by my attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz, against Judge Malihi in her EMERGENCY APPEAL motion now before you. They were not only unauthorized, but unsupported.
In looking back over Judge Malihi’s recommendation, it seems apparent he may have erroneously combined the testimony and evidence submitted from all threes cases into one to arrive at his recommendation, when such is not the case. We do have a separation order signed by Judge Malihi just for that reason. We have different case numbers and we are three separate and distinct cases. This is the reason many leading jurists around the country are confused at just how the judge arrived at his recommendation given the evidence and testimony submitted, most notably, Mario Apuzzo, Esq. …
Birther's brain on Apuzzo
As best I can tell, Farrar is not ready to throw the BOT under the BUS, BUT he is looking elsewhere for spiritual inspiration, to Inquisitor Mario. That would be a mistake because. Apuzzo hasn’t won any more birther lawsuits than Taitz has, nor will he in the future. He’s no more a “leading jurist” than I’m a real doctor.
I wish Mr. Farrar the best, and for an abirther such as myself, that would mean full freedom from the birther cults of all denominations. Perhaps some study of Haskins will be the first step, followed by a deeper study of the ancient scriptures, such as Lynch v. Clarke – NY 1844. Fr. Sandford got it right.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

If Georgia Sec. of State knocks Obama off the ballot it will destroy down ballot Democrats

BY COACH COLLINS, ON JANUARY 31ST, 2012

:LMAODon't worry ''coach''!!Not going to happen but please keep feeding the birfers!:LMAO​
 
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Dr. Conspiracy BALLOT CHALLENGES, LOUNGE

"I would have preferred that Obama’s attorney had showed up this morning in Atlanta to make a vigorous defense and say all those things I was itching to say. I would have liked to have seen the COLB up close and personal. It didn’t happen."


"make a vigorous defense and say all those things I was itching to say"

::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO::

"seen the COLB up close and personal"


::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO::::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO:: ::LMAO::::LMAO::::LMAO::

The next time a state trooper pulls you over and asks for ID, pull out your laptop and show him a .pdf birth certificate posted on some website. If that doesn't work, show him the newspaper announcements when you were born. I'm sure the trooper will accept this as valid ID. Oh, and for all the Obots reading this, do the same in your local welfare office, that's more than enough 'proof' to keep the food stamps and checks rolling in forever.

WOW! Just WOW! :doh1

And to think there are entire websites defending this illegal irrational nonsense pretending they are "debunking birthers".

:shoot:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")


The next time a state trooper pulls you over and asks for ID, pull out your laptop and show him a .pdf birth certificate posted on some website. If that doesn't work, show him the newspaper announcements when you were born.
:shoot:
Are you retarded???That is the dumbest strawman idiotic stupid shit I have ever seen.Coming from you that say's alot.:shoot:
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

And to think there are entire websites defending this illegal irrational nonsense pretending they are "debunking birthers".

:shoot:
0-99 and 6 losses in state challenges and this fucking retard say's this??:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAO:LMAOYou are the Gift!!!:LMAO
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Secretary of State Kemp Issues Final Decision on Challenge to President Barack Obama’s Eligibility and Qualifications
Atlanta – Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp today issued his final decision on challenges contending that President Barack Obama does not meet the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements for his name to be listed on the 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot.Secretary Kemp stated, “After careful consideration of Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi’s initial decision and all record evidence based on the criteria set forth in this process, I find that the Respondent, President Barack Obama, meets the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements. President Barack Obama’s name shall remain on the Democratic Party’s 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot.”Brian Kemp has been Secretary of State since January, 2010. Among the office’s wide-ranging responsibilities, the Secretary of State is charged with conducting efficient and secure elections, the registration of corporations, and the regulation of securities and professional license holders. The office also oversees the Georgia Archives.
 

tank

EOG Dedicated
Re: Jerome Corsi's New Book Proves Obama's Ineligible! ("This is going to make Watergate look like a political sideshow by comparison.")

Secretary of State Kemp Issues Final Decision on Challenge to President Barack Obama’s Eligibility and Qualifications
Atlanta – Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp today issued his final decision on challenges contending that President Barack Obama does not meet the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements for his name to be listed on the 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot.Secretary Kemp stated, “After careful consideration of Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi’s initial decision and all record evidence based on the criteria set forth in this process, I find that the Respondent, President Barack Obama, meets the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements. President Barack Obama’s name shall remain on the Democratic Party’s 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot.”Brian Kemp has been Secretary of State since January, 2010. Among the office’s wide-ranging responsibilities, the Secretary of State is charged with conducting efficient and secure elections, the registration of corporations, and the regulation of securities and professional license holders. The office also oversees the Georgia Archives.

:mutley Come on Joe and humor us with some good old fashioned birfer stupidity.He is in on it too correct??:LMAO:LMAO:LMAOYou have to have some idiotic strawman stupid shit for this latest blow.:LMAO
 
Top