JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

lied in print, indeed, that may very well be..!

..but that's open to interpretation..

But, mofo, I will give you some unsolicited (and probably unappreciated) advice about this mess: you made a big mistake towing the company line. The reason is there are 100 readers for every poster and by taking the shrink's side in this dispute, you have converted some number of neutral readers to your enemies. Now you have your previous enemies and you just made a bunch of new ones (lurkers turned enemies). Your own will, as strong and good as it may be, WILL be overcome by hundreds of wills, because you made enemies of them..
 

Enfuego

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

en fuego,

why do you hate eog so much?

you were so pro eog just a few months back.
I don't hate anyone MadCapper, the world has too much hate already. I just DISLIKE the owner and MoBo. I've never even met them but dislike them and I'm not the only one. If it was just me then so be it but there's a line.

You, on the other hand, seem to be a good dude. This thread serves as the perfect example of why nobody should ever trust this site or its management.
 

TonyMar

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

I wish some book would 'reach out' to me on the 5k Lenny, aka Joey got from me.:doh1
i really think it will happen...

this is not good for offshore gambling...

players are too far away...

to reach the 'book'...

to handle it themselves,...

if this happened on a 'local' level...

fuck the forums...

a player could handle it 'emsleves...

without a problem...

this is just so unfortunate...

that even a horseshit sportsbook like oddsmaker would flush their football 'take' down the drain like this.
 

Enfuego

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

lied in print, indeed, that may very well be..!

..but that's open to interpretation..

But, mofo, I will give you some unsolicited (and probably unappreciated) advice about this mess: you made a big mistake towing the company line. The reason is there are 100 readers for every poster and by taking the shrink's side in this dispute, you have converted some number of neutral readers to your enemies. Now you have your previous enemies and you just made a bunch of new ones (lurkers turned enemies). Your own will, as strong and good as it may be, WILL be overcome by hundreds of wills, because you made enemies of them..
And this is very well said. He's got a very thick head and this probably never crossed his mind. Very stubborn.
 

TonyMar

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

lied in print, indeed, that may very well be..!

..but that's open to interpretation..

But, mofo, I will give you some unsolicited (and probably unappreciated) advice about this mess: you made a big mistake towing the company line. The reason is there are 100 readers for every poster and by taking the shrink's side in this dispute, you have converted some number of neutral readers to your enemies. Now you have your previous enemies and you just made a bunch of new ones (lurkers turned enemies). Your own will, as strong and good as it may be, WILL be overcome by hundreds of wills, because you made enemies of them..
oddsmaker sent 'james mcdermott' two stipulations...

so...

they lied when they decided to steal from him like this...

the rest of this post...

intesting take.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

lied in print, indeed, that may very well be..!

..but that's open to interpretation..

But, mofo, I will give you some unsolicited (and probably unappreciated) advice about this mess: you made a big mistake towing the company line. The reason is there are 100 readers for every poster and by taking the shrink's side in this dispute, you have converted some number of neutral readers to your enemies. Now you have your previous enemies and you just made a bunch of new ones (lurkers turned enemies). Your own will, as strong and good as it may be, WILL be overcome by hundreds of wills, because you made enemies of them..
There is nothing I care less about. I am not in need of advice, I am not trying to please anyone with bullshit, I did not feed anyone any company line. You're ill-fit to advise me here, I am not whomever you seem to think. I could care less if someone likes me or does not like me. I believe in honesty and if feathers are ruffled, so be it. I care about people, I show that, I dont just talk like most people. My lone concern is honesty and people, and our advertisers, being treated with the respect they deserve. I couldn't possibly care less about whether a 'lurker' likes me. People are people, some will like you and some will not. If someone doesn't like me because I don't think lying is acceptable, I'll get over it.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

And this is very well said. He's got a very thick head and this probably never crossed his mind. Very stubborn.
I know the situation better than you, as always, and you've always had some strange agenda. Go back to ogd and make some more threats, or go cry about how a book didn't honor your wager against an obviously bad line. If anyone was ever not in a position to judge, its you. You're so close minded that its ridiculous and you're yet another who has tried to scam a book. Fine fellow.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Mo will be fired for this when he did it to look good in uncle shremp's eyes.

Just kidding. Mo should not have even responded here at all. No need. He is not here to negotiate with books he's here to be the action the life the drama when there is no drama.
 

Enfuego

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

I know the situation better than you, as always, and you've always had some strange agenda. Go back to ogd and make some more threats, or go cry about how a book didn't honor your wager against an obviously bad line. If anyone was ever not in a position to judge, its you. You're so close minded that its ridiculous and you're yet another who has tried to scam a book. Fine fellow.
Funny quote from 2007:

I can't defend their marketing tactics except to say I don't condone them. However, I have urged Oddsmaker to review some of their generous perks, so this situation doesn't keep repeating itself...

As far as your D- rating, I highly doubt that you came up with this grade yourself, and I suspect you are plagiarizing someone else's rating system that is far from perfect...

I don't believe this sports book has STIFFED ANYONE since EOG has taken them on as a sponsor, and certainly none of our posters ...

As long as Oddsmaker continues to pay out gamblers, why on earth would we kick them off of our site due to someone else's bias?
Are payments sometimes made too slowly?

Yes...

On the positive side, ODDSMAKER is extremely GENEROUS when it comes to handing out bonuses and perks to gain and sustain customers..

Here are a few FACTS that gamblers can count on:

1-I have met the main man behind this operation on more than one occasion and I trust that he will always do the RIGHT thing.
2-I also know that ODDSMAKER has more money behind them than MOST online sports books.
3- Any gambler can easily obtain INSURANCE on their accounts for up to 5 thousand dollars by simply sending us proof of their initial deposit, their account # and weekly balances...

THE SHRINK
 

TonyMar

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

everyone...

here is the honesty...

ODDSMAKER SENT JIMMY AN EMAIL....

SOLICITING HIS ACTION...

HERE ARE THE TWO FUCKIN' STIP's FOR THE NICKEL FREE PLAY...

BTW...HI SHIRLEY!:+waving-5

*Bonus has a 5 times rollover requirement, can’t be played in the Poker Room, and cannot be withdrawn for 30 days.
*THIS OFFER IS NOT VALID FOR ANYONE WHO ALREADY HAS AN ACTIVE ACCOUNT WITH ODDSMAKER.COM

 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Mo, I can tell you are a "many men wish death upon me, lord, I don't cry no more, don't look the sky no more" type of guy..

good luck, you're gonna need it!
 

TonyMar

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Funny quote from 2007:

I can't defend their marketing tactics except to say I don't condone them. However, I have urged Oddsmaker to review some of their generous perks, so this situation doesn't keep repeating itself...

As far as your D- rating, I highly doubt that you came up with this grade yourself, and I suspect you are plagiarizing someone else's rating system that is far from perfect...

I don't believe this sports book has STIFFED ANYONE since EOG has taken them on as a sponsor, and certainly none of our posters ...

As long as Oddsmaker continues to pay out gamblers, why on earth would we kick them off of our site due to someone else's bias?
Are payments sometimes made too slowly?

Yes...

On the positive side, ODDSMAKER is extremely GENEROUS when it comes to handing out bonuses and perks to gain and sustain customers..

Here are a few FACTS that gamblers can count on:

1-I have met the main man behind this operation on more than one occasion and I trust that he will always do the RIGHT thing.
2-I also know that ODDSMAKER has more money behind them than MOST online sports books.
3- Any gambler can easily obtain INSURANCE on their accounts for up to 5 thousand dollars by simply sending us proof of their initial deposit, their account # and weekly balances...

THE SHRINK
ouch...

:hockey1
 

Enfuego

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

I know the situation better than you, as always, and you've always had some strange agenda. Go back to ogd and make some more threats, or go cry about how a book didn't honor your wager against an obviously bad line. If anyone was ever not in a position to judge, its you. You're so close minded that its ridiculous and you're yet another who has tried to scam a book. Fine fellow.
And you helped resolve this issue how? Road coat tails of Ken and General and then took the pubes out of your mouth long enough to tow the company line? Great job you did on this one.

First you get conned by 5 Star of all people to give him money from a contest that shouldn't have gone to him and then you totally screw this one all to hell.

Close minded is the definition of this thread and what this site has done to a player JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE ALL TAKING THEIR ADVERTISING DOLLARS. You should be ashamed of this and you guys actually make Mike at BFC look like a choir boy now.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Maybe it could have been checked if JimmyMac made off with bonuses from other sportsbooks. To establish a pattern of bonus abuse or at least show that he was bonusing other books. I remember Sportsbook.com used to keep an archive of transactions to list your deposits, bonuses and payouts.
"Oddsmaker accepted and booked the action, Oddsmaker needs to pay the player.

worst case scenario is player forfeits bonus, and may or may not receive a future business modification or refusal.

even during instances when multiple IP's are used in an effort to scam the bonus structure and circumvent limits the player is usually entitled to his balance minus the bonuse(s) because the action at the time was accepted and booked."

these offshores would not be pulling this shit in the US.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Mo, I can tell you are a "many men wish death upon me, lord, I don't cry no more, don't look the sky no more" type of guy..

good luck, you're gonna need it!

You, clearly, can not tell anything at all.

Gl to you.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

And you helped resolve this issue how? Road coat tails of Ken and General and then took the pubes out of your mouth long enough to tow the company line? Great job you did on this one.

First you get conned by 5 Star of all people to give him money from a contest that shouldn't have gone to him and then you totally screw this one all to hell.

Close minded is the definition of this thread and what this site has done to a player JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE ALL TAKING THEIR ADVERTISING DOLLARS. You should be ashamed of this and you guys actually make Mike at BFC look like a choir boy now.
Did what? You called me scared that skinsraj may not pay you had you won. I told you he was fine. You paid him. We moved on. Ken? What are you even talking about? You have never known, have you.

I didn't get conned by anyone, 5 star won a contest. You're easily confused. You're a simple guy.

Oddsmaker has been wrong before, we got that player paid. Here they are not.

If its possible for you to have a decent day, living as who you are, then by all means have a good one.

:cheers
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Always trying to sound more important than he really is.

Shrink is the one that is guilty of acting like he could make a difference...

He even posted the verdict thread a day early for traffic and hoping Oddsmaker would sleep on it and make him look good by paying.
 

Enfuego

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Did what? You called me scared that skinsraj may not pay you had you won. I told you he was fine. You paid him. We moved on. Ken? What are you even talking about? You have never known, have you.

I didn't get conned by anyone, 5 star won a contest. You're easily confused. You're a simple guy.

Oddsmaker has been wrong before, we got that player paid. Here they are not.

If its possible for you to have a decent day, living as who you are, then by all means have a good one.

:cheers
Something you need to never forget is I am not afraid of anything. I've been on convoys in Afghanistan JoJo, have you done that? The conversation had nothing to do with him paying me it had to do with me paying him but I guess I'm confused.

5 won the contest and you paid who? He talked you into paying him didn't he?

Now you have this shameful thread and even have Ballwonder on the Legalsports payroll shilling for him. Ballwonder went 10-1 but no plays were posted anywhere were they? You can adjust the plays after the ending can't you? You guys are so deceitful to the posters here and most of them know it now.
 

Enfuego

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

I am the head mod of eog, I don't act like anything different. Your envy is something I enjoy. Your obsession is something I laugh at. Now, run along.
I envy a guy without a house, education, driver's license, car or a W-2? BWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

Something you need to never forget is I am not afraid of anything. I've been on convoys in Afghanistan JoJo, have you done that? The conversation had nothing to do with him paying me it had to do with me paying him but I guess I'm confused.

5 won the contest and you paid who? He talked you into paying him didn't he?

Now you have this shameful thread and even have Ballwonder on the Legalsports payroll shilling for him. Ballwonder went 10-1 but no plays were posted anywhere were they? You can adjust the plays after the ending can't you? You guys are so deceitful to the posters here and most of them know it now.
No, you are afraid of things. I have heard you. You don't impress anyone. You're a crybaby, you're a 'know it all', you're a tough guy...and so on. You're the online dream!

As for legalsports, you need to get your head checked. That was the most incoherent bit of rambling I have seen in some time.

Enjoy your online persona, but please do so somewhere else.
 

munson15

I want winners...
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

"Oddsmaker accepted and booked the action, Oddsmaker needs to pay the player.

worst case scenario is player forfeits bonus, and may or may not receive a future business modification or refusal.

even during instances when multiple IP's are used in an effort to scam the bonus structure and circumvent limits the player is usually entitled to his balance minus the bonuse(s) because the action at the time was accepted and booked."

these offshores would not be pulling this shit in the US.
A free $500 is pretty outrageous, I've seen many bonus offers, and that may be the most liberal ever. They offered me $100 I think, a while back. Only problem with U.S. online books is that the taxes and regulations imposed would make -110 with your local seem like Christmas morning.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

I envy a guy without a house, education, driver's license, car or a W-2? BWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

Enfuego, I am so much brighter than you are that its silly. You're nothing but another online tough guy. Stop making this about your obsession with me. Time for you to go. You're a waste of time.
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

You don't know anything. I have talked with oddsmaker myself. Ask questions. You don't have the answers.
They lied to you just like Shrink lied to me about getting paid for the contest. I got told that over and over again that I was getting something and fell for it. I guarantee you got fed a lot better bullshit because it was for $8400 instead of peanuts.

You have no RELEVANT or TRUE information that we don't have.
 

Flamingo kid

Everybody's hands go UP!
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

The bottom line in all of this is that the player didn't get paid.

period. End of story.

Everything else is just conversation.
 

TonyMar

EOG Dedicated
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

open an online account with oddsmaker...

then ask to speak with 'tonya stewart'...

see what happens...

:pop:
 
Re: JIMMYMAC VS. ODDSMAKER DISPUTE: THE VERDICT

They lied to you just like Shrink lied to me about getting paid for the contest. I got told that over and over again that I was getting something and fell for it. I guarantee you got fed a lot better bullshit because it was for $8400 instead of peanuts.

You have no RELEVANT or TRUE information that we don't have.

You have information that someone else has posted, I have first hand information. I don't know what your trying to prove, but im sorry that you've made this something that it is not. You don't have anything on me, this isn't about you and me, just relax there buddy. This isn't about the contest or you and me.

:+clueless
 
Top