I think Archie may have been better than Griffey Sr.
Definitely an apples and oranges argument. I looked up records on both and still contend Archie is a bit on the overrated side. Granted, we can't compare passing numbers from the 1970s to today's numbers, due to rules changes. But Archie clearly had some issues. I know the Saints teams were bad, but doesn't some of that have to be owned by him? I believe a son of his turned a bad Colts team into a 13-3 team in his second season.
Archie Manning:
one season with 20 TD passes, 2 Pro Bowls
125/173 TD INT ratio
55% career passer
35-101-3 career W/L record as a starter (0-10 with Houston and Minnesota)
one stat that surprised me: he rushed for nearly 2200 yards and 18 TDs.
As for Griffey Sr, he was a pretty good player overshadowed by some monsters on the Big Red Machine.
3 All-Star games and was a starter on 2 World Series winners
.296 lifetime hitter with 152 home runs and 200 stolen bases
career WAR puts him at tied at 438th all time