jimmythegreek
The opening odds start here
Don't you know that on PAT or two point conversions the clock doesn't move? Athletes...smh
They set up to go for 2 didn't they,?They didn't want the kick blocked and ran back for 2
True but if you go up 3, then commit a penalty on the ensuing kickoff, ah nevermind!!If they made it, would not have mattered by only being up 2
They didn't want the kick blocked and ran back for 2
The Niners were not kicking a fg at that point anymore.
So ATL didnt wanna take the chance on it returned for 2.
Correct move
Winky, that's not entirely true. I understand the concept, but if they truly had intentions going for 2 and thought they could run the clock out, that's why I initially reacted, and you never know what ensuing kickoffs would bring with deficits one possession or less. I mean those chances still exist if the kick is blocked or there's a fumble because I thought for sure they set up going for 2, bit playing it mathematically you're up a fg and still s point even if you don't. Nothing to lose either way with a team that can only play spoiler at best.100% agree. ONLY realistic way the Falcons lose is going for 2 and having it returned. Brilliant strategy, When Fullerton had a football team I asked the Coach, Gene Murphy, what he would do in this exact situation and he said he would take a knee or take the snap and throw it into the 20th row.
Jimmy: If Falcons got for 2 and have it returned and lose the game you would have ripped the Falcons to pieces saying how stupid it was. Can't have it both ways.
Winky, that's not entirely true. I understand the concept, but if they truly had intentions going for 2 and thought they could run the clock out, that's why I initially reacted, and you never know what ensuing kickoffs would bring with deficits one possession or less. I mean those chances still exist if the kick is blocked or there's a fumble because I thought for sure they set up going for 2, bit playing it mathematically you're up a fg and still s point even if you don't.
The game should end immediately when the losing lateralling team loses control of the ball. It seems like the defense scores more often than the offense in these desperation, end of game scenarios.
The rugby plays are aesthetically unappealing.
Why? What happens if the receiving team gets the ball back on the play and now has a chance to score?
I did not get to see the final play, but apparently it was a kickoff return. Was it a squib kick? When was the last time anyone saw the receiving team on a kickoff return score on lateralling? The Music City Miracle comes to mind, but that was around 20 years ago. Yet we see kickoff returns for touchdowns every season. Niners would've been better off just trying for a long runback without the nonsense. Another rule I'd like to see is a yardage limit to how far a team can retreat for lateralling for an offensive play, or after receiving a kickoff. A 10 yard limit should suffice.
STUPID rule. Why? Why limit a team as to how far they can go back? And if they go back 11 yards but score a TD you want it wiped out? If your team (Root for or Bet on) scored a TD that won the game (ATS and/or SU) but it was wiped out because they went back 11 yards not 10 you'd be one of the very first people here to bitch about it
The game should end immediately when the losing lateralling team loses control of the ball. It seems like the defense scores more often than the offense in these desperation, end of game scenarios.
The game should end immediately when the losing lateralling team loses control of the ball. It seems like the defense scores more often than the offense in these desperation, end of game scenarios.
When rules are in place, teams adjust. How often have you seen a team score who retreated more than ten yards? For me the answer is ZERO. Never seen it.
If teams in the league don't like the 10 yards, make it 15. There should be absolutely no reason to go higher than that.
I watched a replay of the Music City Miracle. Kickoff was caught by an upback,, one handoff then one lateral, about 2 yards (backwards) tops, to Kevin Dyson, who took it the distance.
And WTF are you to tell me how I'd react? I would react the same way. The outcome win/loss is already decided. No need to toss on bonus points to due nonsense at the end which did not have an impact on the straight up win/loss.