dirty
EOG Master
March 13, 2006
CBS SportsLine.com wire reports
INDIANAPOLIS -- Craig Littlepage took aim at critics of the NCAA selection committee Monday, even firing back at CBS.
One day after the committee was harshly criticized for its 65-team field, its chairman defended the panel's work saying he wanted a better working relationship with the NCAA's $6 billion broadcast partner.
Then, when pressed on comments made by CBS analyst Billy Packer, Littlepage mixed honesty with diplomacy.
"I think Billy made the comment that he hadn't seen the Missouri Valley Conference play, but he felt comfortable enough to talk about their lower level of performance not only this year but over time," Littlepage said. "It seems to be counterintuitive, if you will, that he'd make a comment like that."
A message for Packer was left with CBS.
Littlepage, the athletic director at the University of Virginia, praised the 10-member committee for its dedication, thorough evaluations and ability to work under a challenging deadline.
Some scrutiny, he acknowledged, was expected.
But the scope of the criticism during Sunday's selection show telecast and on other networks clearly irritated Littlepage.
The controversy from Sunday's brackets seemed as wide-ranging as the tournament itself -- Packer and CBS aside -- and former committee member Jim Delany called the criticism unprecedented.
"It seemed to me to be at a higher pitch than before," said Delany, the Big Ten commissioner.
Among the issues were:
And Littlepage said the reason teams from the traditional power conferences fare better in the tournament is that they typically get higher seeds.
"He may have an opinion about that or the two of them may have an opinion about that, and they are certainly free to have those opinions and express those opinions," Littlepage said of Packer and his CBS broadcast partner, Jim Nantz. "But to look at this in terms of the partnership, you would hope there would be a little better understanding of what it is that we do and an accurate reflection of the facts as they know them to be. Facts, instead of opinions, would be helpful."
But there were times Monday that Littlepage almost seemed to plead for empathy.
"I think you can imagine the pressure in that room and the tension that builds up leading to Sunday," he said. "We're working on the field up until about 30 to 45 minutes before it goes on the air."
Since the pairings were released, there have also been questions about whether mid-major programs were disproportionately represented on the committee. Littlepage denied that.
He said six of the 10 committee members work at Division I-A schools, primarily from the Bowl Championship Series conferences, while only four work at schools with Division I-AA football programs.
Another issue was how the championships being played Sunday afternoon complicate the selection process.
"For instance, if South Carolina wins the SEC championship, that takes a spot away and changes what we've already done," Littlepage said.
Delany said the Big Ten prefers playing late Sunday afternoon because it gives the game more national coverage. If that means those two teams are penalized, Delany is willing to accept such a decision.
"We choose to play at that time so whatever the consequences are, we bear them," Delany said.
Littlepage remained confident, though, that by Tuesday night's opening round game between Monmouth and Hampton all the controversy would fade.
But before next year, Littlepage hopes to find a way to avoid a repeat of Sunday night's blistering attacks -- particularly on CBS' selection show.
"I think what we have to have are more conversations about the partnership and how we need to work better together a little bit," he said. "Or at least to have better information and accurate information out there."
CBS SportsLine.com wire reports
INDIANAPOLIS -- Craig Littlepage took aim at critics of the NCAA selection committee Monday, even firing back at CBS.
One day after the committee was harshly criticized for its 65-team field, its chairman defended the panel's work saying he wanted a better working relationship with the NCAA's $6 billion broadcast partner.
Then, when pressed on comments made by CBS analyst Billy Packer, Littlepage mixed honesty with diplomacy.
"I think Billy made the comment that he hadn't seen the Missouri Valley Conference play, but he felt comfortable enough to talk about their lower level of performance not only this year but over time," Littlepage said. "It seems to be counterintuitive, if you will, that he'd make a comment like that."
A message for Packer was left with CBS.
Littlepage, the athletic director at the University of Virginia, praised the 10-member committee for its dedication, thorough evaluations and ability to work under a challenging deadline.
Some scrutiny, he acknowledged, was expected.
But the scope of the criticism during Sunday's selection show telecast and on other networks clearly irritated Littlepage.
The controversy from Sunday's brackets seemed as wide-ranging as the tournament itself -- Packer and CBS aside -- and former committee member Jim Delany called the criticism unprecedented.
"It seemed to me to be at a higher pitch than before," said Delany, the Big Ten commissioner.
Among the issues were:
- Cincinnati's omission despite a strong strength of schedule ranking and a relatively high RPI.
- The at-large selections of Air Force and Utah State, two teams with lower RPIs than schools such as Michigan and Missouri State -- which were left out of the field.
- Seedings that gave Tennessee a No. 2 seed, higher than either Southeastern Conference regular-season champion LSU or tournament champ Florida, and had No. 14 George Washington dealt an eight seed in the Atlanta Regional despite having the best record in the field at 26-2.
And Littlepage said the reason teams from the traditional power conferences fare better in the tournament is that they typically get higher seeds.
"He may have an opinion about that or the two of them may have an opinion about that, and they are certainly free to have those opinions and express those opinions," Littlepage said of Packer and his CBS broadcast partner, Jim Nantz. "But to look at this in terms of the partnership, you would hope there would be a little better understanding of what it is that we do and an accurate reflection of the facts as they know them to be. Facts, instead of opinions, would be helpful."
But there were times Monday that Littlepage almost seemed to plead for empathy.
"I think you can imagine the pressure in that room and the tension that builds up leading to Sunday," he said. "We're working on the field up until about 30 to 45 minutes before it goes on the air."
Since the pairings were released, there have also been questions about whether mid-major programs were disproportionately represented on the committee. Littlepage denied that.
He said six of the 10 committee members work at Division I-A schools, primarily from the Bowl Championship Series conferences, while only four work at schools with Division I-AA football programs.
Another issue was how the championships being played Sunday afternoon complicate the selection process.
"For instance, if South Carolina wins the SEC championship, that takes a spot away and changes what we've already done," Littlepage said.
Delany said the Big Ten prefers playing late Sunday afternoon because it gives the game more national coverage. If that means those two teams are penalized, Delany is willing to accept such a decision.
"We choose to play at that time so whatever the consequences are, we bear them," Delany said.
Littlepage remained confident, though, that by Tuesday night's opening round game between Monmouth and Hampton all the controversy would fade.
But before next year, Littlepage hopes to find a way to avoid a repeat of Sunday night's blistering attacks -- particularly on CBS' selection show.
"I think what we have to have are more conversations about the partnership and how we need to work better together a little bit," he said. "Or at least to have better information and accurate information out there."
