Re: pioneer: New thread. Your disputes with me!
Yes, I have no other issues with you....YET...LOL. But like a woman I reserve the right to change my mind. Here is my last post in the other thread...
Re: GRAVE CONCERNS ABOUT SKYBOOK
<HR style="COLOR: #2b295e" SIZE=1>Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=3 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by
The General
FTR, I hate this game. BUT...
YES, I AM 100% OK WITH MY POSTINGS TODAY AND DO NOT FEEL I VIOLATED ANY PRIVACY THAT I WOULD WORRY OVER MYSELF.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
For the record, you should hate this game because I have you caught between a rock and a hard place. OK, so now you have finally answered the question as a YES. And the question was again...
"So are you actually saying that it is all right to publicly display the gist of your private internet conversations with TTinCO as long as you don't directly quote him?"
But then how do you square that answer with your signature which says....
"I consider all email correspondence private unless it is agreed by both parties to publicly display the exchange of communication."...?
It is actually much worse for you to paraphrase TTinCO rather than to directly quote him; at least if you quoted him, or cut and pasted his conversation, nothing could be misconstrued from your paraphrasing him or taking his words out of context. But either way, you are still publicly displaying his communication with you without his agreement and by your own words, that is wrong. How can you feel 100% OK with this, when it is not even consistent with your own words?
And your response was, OK, I did.
You did what? My last question to you can not be answered with "I did"!