I think time and score should matter to both players and referees.
Winky disagrees.
Nothing worse than a make-up call.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Judgement calls in the NBA are tough.
The athletes are so big and fast.
So easy when you're calling the game from the couch.
Of course, consistency is the key.
I believe players want the refs to set the tone early and then disappear late.
Nobody, including the officials, wants a controversial whistle to decide a game.
Not good for the sport, in general.
I believe NHL officials put their whistles away late in the third period and overtime, only calling infractions that are obvious to all.
I endorse that general philosophy.
Thanks for sharing, Wink.
Nothing worse than a make-up call.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
The one thing I thought on Dragic's questionable foul was that despite being straight up, it didn't look like Middleton had the chance to come down on his own two feet without landing on Dragic's feet. He was literally standing below him. I was actually watching without sound so couldn't hear their assessment, but it was what I felt constituted the foul.
Giannis' was tough as I agree it didn't obstruct the actual shot, but by definition was a foul too.
With Giannis, I also question his brain capacity alot of the time. He is prone to picking up dumb fouls and true to form - why even put yourself in that spot? Especially as the second help defender? Just dumb on his part.
That said, Bucks are so outclassed thus far and didn't deserve to even have that shot.
Boston/Miami looking like a potentially great, grinding, low scoring series.
Maybe a better question is do the refs make that last call if the game is in Milwaukee with fans in the stands? Can you imagine the conditions they would be dealing with as those refs walk off the court?
The Dragic foul was a joke, all he did was stand straight up with his arms over his head, he didn't move his feet at all, he didn't even jump, all he did was stand there with his arms over his head, he never moved from that spot, just a terrible call. The Giannis call was a bad way to end a game, but technically the call was correct, you can't put your hand on a shooter while he's still in the air, that's exactly what happened, granted it didn't appear as though the contact disrupted Jimmy's shot since he was on his way down, but the bottom line is you can't put your hand on a shooter while he's still in the air, Giannis clearly put his hand on Jimmy's waist. Legler also agree with me, he said the Dragic call was bad and the Giannis call, while unfortunate, was the correct call
The Dragic call was one you see way too often in the NBA with stars. Harden loves to do that shit, jump into a defender that is standing still and yet he gets that call way too often. CP3 used to do that a lot too. Countless times they call that and show the replay and all you can say is what exactly was the defender supposed to do there? I mean literally the ref is going to call that no matter what the defender does, about all he could do in the eyes of the ref is stand about 5 feet back and give the guy an uncontested shot.
Surly ref'n in the nba is a tough gig, but with millions upon millions of money in advertising & marketing riding on calls, you better know that these ref's absolutely know what will make their bosses richer.
Really old news here. Everything in our society right now says that if you can't get caught with proof of cheating for more, and more, and more, and more money, especially white collar stuff, that company will do it...and are doing it.
Sometimes it just doesn't work out like the refs and owners want it to work out, cause they can't afford to be too obvious. But sometimes it's soo obvious.
Being inconsistent makes it way,way easier to manipulate the outcome.
Watching a nba game is like: foul {not called}, foul {not called}, hard foul {not called}, foul {not called}, star going to the hoop barely touched, called. Or variations.
WHEN refs call a foul is extremely important in BB. Foul while shooting is like a huge way for a team to get ahead, so refs wait till someone is shooting sometimes.
Refs are very artful in making the finale box score look a certain way. Football too big time.
If you have integrity and want the play on the court to determine the outcome, you will be consistent with your playcalling.
NBA does have integrity...Their Jedi~mind tricks only work on the weak~minded.
Bet accordingly.
How about players shooting a shot and kick out their leg. They get it hit. FOUL! On the defender. Thankfully the NBA is doing a somewhat better job of looking out for that.
I will mention what might be my #1 gripe about HS kids. So Player from Team A takes a shot. Player from Team B is guarding him. As A lets go of the ball B taps him on the stomach. We have all seen it before. NOT IN MY BOOK! I call a foul on B. I will frequently call an "Intentional Foul" meaning 2 FT and the ball back. Team B couch will go nuts but I tell them his player did not make a play on the ball and did it on purpose. Coach B is not happy. Not that I care
Reggie Miller made a career out of doing just that, used to drive me crazy, thankfully the league eventually started calling it an offensive foul