Raycabino
- Thread starter Heisenberg
- Start date
Complete rejection by SCOTUS. I told you nothing for the Supreme Court to decide. Texas has no standing, has no legal claim to tell other states how to run their elections. Now it's time to hold the seditious 17 accountable for their frivolous lawsuit. I simply amaze myself.
Now FW will claim Cuomo should be charged with manslaughter because Trump should be. Typical Fair Warning with his baseless uninformed claims. But we know FW well. In his closed mind it's always both sides.
Now FW will claim Cuomo should be charged with manslaughter because Trump should be. Typical Fair Warning with his baseless uninformed claims. But we know FW well. In his closed mind it's always both sides.
Not exactly. But the two you're referring to are Clarence Thomas and Sam Aleto. As pro Trump and as conservative as they come.
Can you imagine if Trump didn't fellow the recommendations of the Heritage Foundation when he picked Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett? Along with Thomas and Aleto we could have seen Judge Jeannie, Rudy the clown, and Joe DiGenova. Never thought I said it but in this case thank god for the heritage foundation.
Can you imagine if Trump didn't fellow the recommendations of the Heritage Foundation when he picked Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett? Along with Thomas and Aleto we could have seen Judge Jeannie, Rudy the clown, and Joe DiGenova. Never thought I said it but in this case thank god for the heritage foundation.
And done.
“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”
Let's see you spin that quote babe.
“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.”
Let's see you spin that quote babe.
Trump is 0-60. Will Bookmaker be paying extra to Biden winners for patiently waiting. Your rules aren't clear. It does say political bets for offices won't be paid until winner is sword in. 😂 😂. I bet Biden to win in Arizona, Ga, Wi, Mi, N. C. , Florida, Iowa, Tx. Eventhough no one has been sworn in, my losing bets in Florida, N C. , Iowa, and Tx have been graded as losses? My winning bets in Ariz, Ga, Wi, and Mi are still pending? Obviously we are witnessing some major inconsistent grading? Are you going to remain silent or can you explain why Trump state wins have been graded months before he would have been sworn in and Biden state wins are still pending?
Why? As long as they keep this nonsense of electoral college it has to remain a state by state process. Besides I live in a state that respects our lives and wants to make it easy for us to vote so none of this utter bullshit of standing in a long line on a work day to vote. You want to vote? You either mail in or drop off your ballot in a secure box anytime up until 7pm on election day, but no excuses, they don't take ballots a week later because the post office sat on them. Then I gotta hear these idiots in other states say that's fraudulent or corrupt? Fuck that, my state better not have to stoop down to the bullshit in other states that are nothing more than thinly veiled racism trying to make elections as biased as they can be.