Super Bowl field goals

jimmythegreek

jimmythegreek

The opening odds start here
I'm going to play this over 3.5 -125. Both teams I believe in between the big 3rd down plays will be feeling each other out. Even on successful drives and deep stops in opponents territory, the defenses will have success on 3rd and medium to long, and both these kickers have been money.

Feeling confident that this hits late 3rd or early 4th quarter. Hope those that follow hit it with me.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
Someone here posted a 4+ hour long prop video of supposed sharp bettors like Dink, several of whom liked this play, though at like +125 odds.
Minus -125 was a horrible number.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
BTW, Dink gave out two props, Over 5.5 sacks, and the Rams to have more third down conversions, both winners
Click to expand...

So what? BTW I had Rams ML, -1.5, +3, +4, +7.5 all winners, middled with Cinci +13 & +14.5, all winners as well.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
No proof? LMAO, everyone on that pod is a professional bettor, your boy sherwood wouldn't make the cut
Click to expand...

Yeah, no proof. And still no proof of anything you're claiming. Capish, or is English not your first language.

Why don't you compare Sherwood's long term winning record vs your boys' records & see if any of your boys make the cut by being up to the Sherwood standard of excellence & success.
 
kane

kane

EOG master
X-Files said:
Yeah, no proof. And still no proof of anything you're claiming. Capish, or is English not your first language.

Why don't you compare Sherwood's long term winning record vs your boys' records & see if any of your boys make the cut by being up to the Sherwood standard of excellence & success.
Click to expand...
Dude, if you don't think guys like Rob Pizzola, Rufus Peabody, and Ed feng are sharp bettors, then I don't know what to tell you
 
kane

kane

EOG master
Sherwood laid 4.5 with the Rams, and if this guy was as sharp as you think, he wouldn't have taken them at a bad number
 
J

Jammer

EOG Dedicated
X-Files said:
Yeah, no proof. And still no proof of anything you're claiming. Capish, or is English not your first language.

Why don't you compare Sherwood's long term winning record vs your boys' records & see if any of your boys make the cut by being up to the Sherwood standard of excellence & success.
Click to expand...

Keep sucking that Sherwood dick- at least you know your job on this site. Slurp, slurp.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
Sherwood laid 4.5 with the Rams, and if this guy was as sharp as you think, he wouldn't have taken them at a bad number
Click to expand...

What a ridiculous remark on multiple levels. Clearly you don't know the guy or what i think, even though you act like you do.

Also you can only make real bets with bookies that are available to you & where you have funds at the time you make the wager, unlike make believe air bets in a BB thread:

L.A. Rams vs Cincinnati

L.A. Rams -4½ -110 over Cincinnati

Pinnacle -4½ -111 BET365 -4 ½-110 SportInteraction -4½ -110 BetOnline -4½ -110
Click to expand...

Free NFL picks daily, National Football league analysis, NFL Best bets

Free NFL picks daily with in-depth analysis throughout the regular season, playoffs and Super Bowl
www.sportswagers.ca www.sportswagers.ca

NFL Season to Date: 64-59, +22.13 units

Free NFL picks daily, National Football league analysis, NFL Best bets

Free NFL picks daily with in-depth analysis throughout the regular season, playoffs and Super Bowl
www.sportswagers.ca www.sportswagers.ca
 
Last edited:
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
If Sherwood couldn't find a 4 anywhere, he's clearly not as sharp as you think, hell a lot of pros laid 3.5 before the move
Click to expand...

Big "if". And "if" unicorns existed...blah, blah, blah. But they don't. What he did do was post widely available lines from the books he typically uses on his site. That doesn't mean he doesn't have other outs where he gets better lines. And yet - still - winning big & hugely successful based on the posting of available lines at a mere handful of books that are used on the site. So he is obviously very - very - sharp. If you think he, as a bettor of at least 15 years, is ignorant of the value of getting the best number possible, then you are clueless.

OTOH you have continued to fail to provide any proof that your boys & girl/s on your video are sharp cappers. Being a "professional bettor" does not necessarily make one sharp. Plenty of pro bettors have failed, like many other business folks, at being a success. Some have even lost their wealth, family and health.
Furthermore being a successful "pro bettor", as i have been, does not necessarily equate to being a "sharp capper". So, in that context, being an alleged "pro bettor" doesn't mean much, if anything, & is not at all impressive.
 
Last edited:
kane

kane

EOG master
X-Files said:
OTOH you have continued to fail to provide any proof that your boys & girl/s on your video are sharp cappers.
Click to expand...
Google Rufus Peabody, Rob Pizzola, Joey Knish, Fabian Sommer, Ed Feng, Jeff Ma, and the rest of them, they don't need me to provide proof to you that they're all winning bettors, their long term track records will speak for themselves, these guys are all pros who have been winning sports bettors for many years, the fact that you don't think so says more about you than it does me. And sure, many pro bettors have failed, not these guys, that's why they are who they are
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
Google Rufus Peabody, Rob Pizzola, Joey Knish, Fabian Sommer, Ed Feng, Jeff Ma, and the rest of them, they don't need me to provide proof to you that they're all winning bettors, their long term track records will speak for themselves, these guys are all pros who have been winning sports bettors for many years, the fact that you don't think so says more about you than it does me. And sure, many pro bettors have failed, not these guys, that's why they are who they are
Click to expand...

False. Wrong. I have never stated any such thing.
 
J

Jammer

EOG Dedicated
Sherwood shit his diaper again last night and was up on twitter whining and complaining.

Let's see if he gets his usual case of dementia after a losing night, and "forgets" to post his results

No gimmicks, Integrity
 
kane

kane

EOG master
Jammer said:
Sherwood shit his diaper again last night
Click to expand...
Just for the hell of it I checked his plays, ironically he had two plays that I also had, he lost with Maine +9.5 and UMass +9.5, I got pushes on both of them, Maine +10 and Umass +12. Yeah, he's a sharp one, LMAO
 
kane

kane

EOG master
X-Files said:
If you think he, as a bettor of at least 15 years, is ignorant of the value of getting the best number possible, then you are clueless.
Click to expand...
Last night he lost two plays solely due to him not getting the best number, I did and pushed the games he lost #FakeSharp
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
Last night he lost two plays solely due to him not getting the best number, I did and pushed the games he lost #FakeSharp
Click to expand...

My posts #'s 24 & 26 above already addressed your nonsense.

Also you didn't say when & where you got your alleged numbers.

Lots of people get highly favorable lines from a local. Does that mean others who don't have access to such are not sharp?

BTW Sherwood uses Pinnacle, which USA bettors don't have access to, so gets a better number on a huge # of bets - on that basis alone - than the vast majority of USA bettors. What do you have to beat Pinnacle?

I suppose - you - are not seeing as good a line as i am getting on many bets. Does that mean you're not sharp. Time to move to Canada?

If your success ever measured up to Sherwood's long term winning success, then you might be considered to be in his class & very sharp. Are you a lousy capper? Where are your records?
 
Last edited:
kane

kane

EOG master
X-Files said:
Also you didn't say when & where you got your alleged numbers.
Click to expand...
Nothing alleged about them. My UMass +12 was placed at a PPH that mirrors BOL, the bet was made at 10:05 the night before, my Maine +10 was also placed at a PPH, don't know where they get their lines, but I made the play yesterday at 11:40 AM. I pride myself on always trying to get the best of it, of course I don't always succeed, but I spend an ungodly amount of time on the screen, and quite often I'll see one of my games moving, and because I'm on the screen a lot I'm able to get the number I want before any of my places move it.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
Nothing alleged about them. My UMass +12 was placed at a PPH that mirrors BOL, the bet was made at 10:05 the night before, my Maine +10 was also placed at a PPH, don't know where they get their lines, but I made the play yesterday at 11:40 AM. I pride myself on always trying to get the best of it, of course I don't always succeed, but I spend an ungodly amount of time on the screen, and quite often I'll see one of my games moving, and because I'm on the screen a lot I'm able to get the number I want before any of my places move it.
Click to expand...

I'm sure Sherwood doesn't spend his days fixated on a screen watching numbers. He's a capper & spends his time doing that, & very successfully, as his track record proves.

Though maybe you're not very sharp at what you do, as it seems Maine was available at +10.5 & +11's, for a winner, rather than you're mere push with +10.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
Yeah, the same push for me that was a loss for him, lol
Click to expand...

Actually we don't know what other books he uses or what number he bet it at, but only what was posted on his site based (1) on widely available numbers
at (2) four books he refers to on his site. In the past he has used & referred to other books which he may still use for his personal betting.

Of course he would be the first to tell newbies to sports betting to get the best number they can, as that is just the ABC's of it for beginners. Many times
he tells people to wait for later on a pick as he's expecting a better line will be available.
 
X-Files

X-Files

2
kane said:
Nothing alleged about them. My UMass +12 was placed at a PPH that mirrors BOL, the bet was made at 10:05 the night before,
Click to expand...

Yeah, if you understand the English language, that was your allegation.

Sherwood lists BOL in his arsenal of books, but didn't get +12. Evidently it wasn't available at the time he posted. Doesn't mean he isn't sharp.
Another time the line may have moved in his favour & he'd have gotten the W while you got a P or L. But then you wouldn't be on here
boasting about it, would you.

Neither does it mean that a bet at his posted number wasn't sharp.

Not everyone can watch a screen all day & some may feel they have better sharper things to do with their time, e.g. capping, that leads to
greater long term success than that of some screen watchers.

Bottom line: he's a proven long term publicly documented sharp winner. You're not.
 
kane

kane

EOG master
X-Files said:
That gets a big fat F compared to Sherwood's posted public records over the past some 15 years
Click to expand...
Okay, so I just went to his site and looked up his historical records, his records go back to 2004

NCAA Basketball 1,296-1,223 (51%)
NBA 962-1,066 (47%)
NCAA Football 818-782 (51%)
NFL 933-931 (50%)

Total 4,113-4,002 (51%)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top