Sportsrmylife
EOG Master
Just found this on youtube.
Because fixes mess with the integrity of the game, where you getting limited doesn’t. Books don’t have to take anyone’s action.how come the Athletic does a story about the fixes (which is old news) and not about people getting limited, delayed or not allowed to play in the sports book?
Because fixes mess with the integrity of the gam, where you getting limited doesn’t. Books don’t have to take anyone’s action.
They know the 1-2% that beat them could crush them if the action isn’t limited. A college kid throwing a game or shaving points questions the sport.but what are they in business for ? at what point do they get rid of someone , a player wins 10k ? 5k ? 3k? 1k ? There is risk in the business. Limiting people to under $10 dollars is silly on straight plays in pro leagues. Perhaps get better people to run it.
not sure what the books were scared of. they can't see mattress matt as smart money.Voodoo and Anthony Curtis had a segment on VSin where they tried to get down a large sum for Mattress Mack's hedge on the Astros to win the WS.
Southpoint (Chris A and Jimmy V) agreed to $200k. The rest of Nevada just waffled. LOL
They may not always want balanced action.If the roll of a sportsbook is to "balance action" and they are lopsided why wouldn't they use the big players to help even things out.
Guy comes in and wants $2000 on a cbb total. sportsbook says "$500 for right now". later in the day they get heavy on the other side why wouldn't it be good business to call this guy and say "hey you still want over/under, you can have up to $3000"?
why isn't that a constant relationship?